Anthropomorphism and Allegorical Illustration: A Reading of Perumal Murugan’s Novel Poonachi or The Story of a Black Goat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2025996Keywords:
Anthropomorphism, allegory, discrimination, rural life, patriarchy etcAbstract
Introduction: Anthropomorphic representations generally suggests that certain human characteristics are universal and can be shared by all creatures. This paper attempts to study the anthropomorphic effect on human’s prosocial behaviour through a metaphorical representation of a black goat named Poonachi in Poonachi or the Story of a Black Goat (2017) by Perumal Murugan.
Method: The paper employs qualitative literary analysis and references theories of anthropomorphism, including the frameworks of Theory of mind and Guthrie’s Cognitive evolution to examine how Poonachi represents marginalized groups, especially women subjected to discrimination based on gender, caste, and colour. The analysis demonstrates that Murugan’s anthropomorphic approach humanises the goat Poonachi, eliciting empathy for marginalized individuals.
Discussion: This study examines the anthropomorphic influence on human prosocial behaviour, concentrating on the metaphorical depiction of Poonachi. It investigates how the ascription of human characteristics to animals cultivates empathy in readers and prompts contemplation about marginalized situations. Poonachi is examined as a symbol of a woman confronting the obstacles of a patriarchal and caste-restricted society. The narrative functions as a metaphor for the challenges faced by Dalit women, immersing readers in the socio-political dynamics of power and discrimination in rural India. Eventually, this story falls into the category of anthropomorphism where the goat reflects the existential reflection of a woman’s rural life and it exposes a lot about discrimination and troubled lives.
Results: The outcome indicate that anthropomorphism in Poonachi serves as a potent instrument for social commentary, promoting prosocial behaviour and stimulating critical thought on societal inequities, especially concerning caste and gender.
References
Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press; 1980.
Guthrie S. Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford University Press; 1993.
Morewedge CK, Preston J, Wegner DM. Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007;93:1-11.
Fife-Cook I, Franks B. Positive Welfare for Fishes: Rationale and Areas for Future Study. Fishes. 2019;4(2):31-14. doi: 10.3390/fishes4020031.
Darwin C. The expression of the emotions in man and animals. In: Darwin C, editor. The Portable Darwin. CiNii—National Institute of Informatics; 1872. p. 364-393.
Kumar A. How Perumal Murugan Was Resurrected through Writing. The New Yorker. 2019 Dec 12. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/12/12/how-perumal-murugan-was-resurrected-through-writing.
Murugan P. Poonachi: Or the story of a black goat. Translated by Raman NK. Westland Publications; 2018.
Kalyan N. (Trans). Poonachi or the Story of a Black Goat. New Delhi: Westland Publications; 2018.
Kadiyoti D, Dhingana S. Female Identity in Mahasweta Devi's "Sandhayani and the Five Women." [Internet]. Year. Available from: http://www.jsrr.org/down_303
Sehgal P. Controversial Novelist Returns With a Powerful Parable. The New York Times. 2019 Dec 11. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/11/books/review-story-of-goat-perumal-murugan.html.
Hayward T. Anthropocentrism: A misunderstood problem. Environmental Values. 1997;6(1):49-63.
Shapiro K, Copeland MW. Toward a Critical Theory of Animal Issues in Fiction. Society & Animals. 2005;13(4):343-346.
Barry P. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Viva Books; 2017.
Orwell G. Animal farm. Penguin Books; 1999.
Hinson J. Goat. London: Reaktion Books Ltd; 2015.
McKay R. Representation. In: Gruen L, editor. Critical Terms for Animal Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2018.
Harrison MA, Hall AE. Anthropomorphism, empathy, and perceived communicative ability vary with phylogenetic relatedness to humans. Journal of Social, Evolutionary & Cultural Psychology. 2010;4(1):34-48. doi: 10.1037/h0099303.
Haslam N, Bain P, Douge L, Lee M, Bastian B. More human than you: Attributing humanness to self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005;89:937-950.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aarthimeena S, Tamilarasan P (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.