Case report: Resolution of pathologic fracture from metastatic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with compassionate therapy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2024830

Keywords:

Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Metastasis, Drug Therapy, Combination, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Chlorine Dioxide Solution

Abstract

Broad-spectrum anticancer treatments have limited cell selectivity. The sites of action of these treatments are targeted at blocking cell division and inducing apoptosis. This has a negative impact on the viability and proliferation of healthy cells, which can cause deterioration in the patient's quality of life. In this case report, an older patient with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, follicular pattern grade 2 with invasion to the L3 vertebra, concluded a combination chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP). However, the patient reported severe and prolonged adverse reactions that caused physical and emotional complaints, thus she refused to continue with the subsequent radiotherapy. Given the impact on quality of life and uncertain survival, by personal decision, the patient started compassionate therapy based on chlorine dioxide (ClO2). This low-cost anticancer agent causes apoptosis in cancer cells by destabilizing the oxidative balance through the release of reactive oxygen species. ClO2 treatment was administered orally and by enema at a concentration below the EPA-reported toxicity threshold, in order to not compromise healthy cells, given that they do not experience the high levels of oxidative stress of cancer cells. During ClO2 treatment, the patient reported no adverse reactions and an increase in bone density was observed in pathological terrain. Rigorous clinical studies are needed to analyze the temporal sequence of the increase in bone density

References

1. Shrestha A, Martin C, Burton M, Walters S, Collins K, Wyld L. Quality of life versus length of life considerations in cancer patients: A systematic literature review. Psychooncology. 2019;28:1367–80.

2. Yıldız SZ, Bilir C, Eskiler GG, Bilir F. The Anticancer Potential of Chlorine Dioxide in Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells. Cureus. 2022;

3. Kim Y, Kumar S, Cheon W, Eo H, Kwon H, Jeon Y, et al. Anticancer and Antiviral Activity of Chlorine Dioxide by Its Induction of the Reactive Oxygen Species. J Appl Biol Chem. 2016;59:31–6.

4. Ogata N. Denaturation of Protein by Chlorine Dioxide: Oxidative Modification of Tryptophan and Tyrosine Residues. Biochemistry. 2007;46:4898–911.

5. Ison A, Odeh IN, Margerum DW. Kinetics and Mechanisms of Chlorine Dioxide and Chlorite Oxidations of Cysteine and Glutathione. Inorg Chem. 2006;45:8768–75.

6. Láng O, Nagy KS, Láng J, Perczel-Kovách K, Herczegh A, Lohinai Z, et al. Comparative study of hyperpure chlorine dioxide with two other irrigants regarding the viability of periodontal ligament stem cells. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:2981–92.

7. Environmental Protection Agency. Toxicological Review of Chlorine Dioxide and Chlorite [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/iris.

8. Sapkota S, Shaikh H. Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559328/.

9. Liou GY, Storz P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic Res. 2010;44:479–96.

10. Gad SE, Sullivan DW. Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO). In: Encyclopedia of Toxicology. Elsevier; 2014. p. 166–8.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Aparicio-Alonso M, Torres-Solórzano V. Case report: Resolution of pathologic fracture from metastatic non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with compassionate therapy. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología [Internet]. 2024 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 4];4:830. Available from: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/828