Dental comparison in postmortem identification of individuals. Systematic review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2024836

Keywords:

Dental Comparison, Ante Mortem Record, Autopsy, Postmortem Changes

Abstract

Introduction: the identification of postmortem persons using dental comparison is very useful in the case of finding bodies in an advanced state of decomposition for various reasons, and this is where dentistry plays a significant role, since it has the possibility of providing ante mortem data on the deceased for comparison and definitive identification.
Objective: the general objective was to know the possibilities and limitations of odontological comparison in the identification of postmortem persons.
Methods: a systematic review was carried out under a qualitative approach, with a descriptive scope on the relevant literature in the Scopus, PubMed and Google Scholar databases to be distributed from 2018 to 2023, following the guidelines of the Prisma method. There was a total of 210 articles, with a final selection of 20.
Results: in relation to the number of publications, Europe and Asia led in this category. The type of study that stands out is the case report of observational studies with comparative analysis, and the systematic review. As aspects addressed most frequently are, the role of the forensic odontologist, 3D scanning, microcomputed tomography, cone beam computed tomography and the importance of ante mortem and postmortem dental records in the identification of postmortem persons, by means of dental comparison. 
Conclusions:  the possibilities and limitations of odontological or dental comparison will depend directly on the full, safe and reliable accessibility of the ante mortem and postmortem information

References

1. Mesejo P, Martos R, Ibáñez Ó, Novo J, Ortega M. A Survey on Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Biomedical Image Analysis in Skeleton-Based Forensic Human Identification. Applied Sciences. 2020; 10(14):4703. DOI:10.3390/app10144703

2. Malik SD, Pillai JP, Malik U. Forensic genetics: Scope and application from forensic odontology perspective. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2022; 26:558‑63. DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_341_21

3. Cagna D, Donovan T, McKee J, Eichmiller F, Metz J, Albouy J, Marzola R, et al. Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021;126(3): 276-359. DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.014

4. Kochkonyan T, Domenyuk D, Shkarin V, Dmitrienko S, Domenyuk S. Variant anatomy of transitional occlusion dental arch at optimal occlusal relationships. Archiv Euromedica. 2022; 12(2): 128-133. DOI:10.35630/2199-885X/2022/12/2.32

5. Gamulin O, Škrabi´c M, Serec K, Par M , Bakovi´c M, Krajaˇci´c M, Dolanski S, et al. Possibility of Human Gender Recognition Using Raman Spectra of Teeth. Molecules. 2021; 26, 3983. DOI:10.3390/molecules26133983

6. Al-Rawee R, Hammadi S, Abdul-Ghani B. Role of Dental Evidences in Persons Forensic Identification in Nineveh Province. J Dental Sci Res Rep. 2023; 5(2): 1-10. https://www.onlinescientificresearch.com/articles/role-of-dental-evidences-in-persons-forensic-identification-in-nineveh-province.pdf

7. Baqai H, Zaidi S, Baig Q, Bashir M, Anwar M, Ansari A. Maintenance of dental records and awareness of forensic odontology among Pakistani dentists: a mixed-method study with implications for dental data repository. BMC Oral Health. 2023; 23(783):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03500-2

8. Baz A, Ahmed R, Khan S, Kumar S. Security Risk Assessment Framework for the Healthcare Industry 5.0. Sustainability. 2023; 15(23):16519. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316519

9. Fabbri M, Alfieri L, Mazdai L, Frisoni P, Gaudio R, Neri M. Application of Forensic DNA Phenotyping for Prediction of Eye, Hair and Skin Colour in Highly Decomposed Bodies. Healthcare. 2023;11: 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11050647

10. Guerrero-Félix E, Rodríguez-Guajardo N, Del Muro-Casas F, Varela-Parga M, Martínez-López G. Prevalencia de Odontología, como Ciencia Básica, en la Identificación Forense. Rev Mex Med Forense. 2019; 4(suppl 2):108-110.

11. Valenzuela-Garach A. La odontología en la identificación de sucesos con víctimas múltiples. Revista Española de Medicina Legal. 2023; 49(2023):47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reml.2022.11.005

12. Marrone M, Tarantino F, Stellacci A, Lonero S, Cazzato G, Vinci F, Dell´Erba A. Forensic Analysis and Identification Processes in Mass Disasters: Explosion of Gun Powder in the Fireworks Factory. Molecules. 2021; 27(1):244(1-10). DOI:10.3390/molecules27010244

13. Suárez M. Conocimientos sobre métodos odontológicos forenses más utilizados para el reconocimiento de cadáveres por el personal del Laboratorio Criminalística Guayaquil, Ecuador 2022. Pol. Con. 2023; 8(6):290-310. DOI: 10.23857/pc.v8i6

14. Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff J, Akl E, et al. Declaración Prisma 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Revista Española de Cardiología, 2021; 74(9):790-799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016

15. Cely-Salazar M. V., Quiñones-Urquijo A. Revisión sistemática de las características de evaluación curricular en programas académicos de pregrado a través del método PRISMA-NMA. Revista Electrónica Calidad En La Educación Superior. 2022; 13(2): 150–174. DOI:10.22458/caes.v13i2.4415

16. Peng W, Tan Q, Chen A, Zheng C. University ideological and political learning model based on statistical memory curve mathematical equation. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences. 2023: 8(1); 1117-1124. DOI:10.2478/amns.2022.2.0098

17. Wi˛eckowska B, Kubiak K.B, Jó´zwiak P, Moryson W, Stawi ´nska-Witoszy ´ nska, B. Cohen’s Kappa Coefficient as a Measure to Assess Classification Improvement following the Addition of a New Marker to a Regression Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022: 19(10213); 1-15. DOI:10.3390/ ijerph191610213

18. Forrest A. Forensic odontology in DVI: current practice and recent advances. Forensic Sciences Research. 2019; 4(4): 316-330. DOI:10.1080/20961790.2019.1678710.

19. Heinrich A, Güttler F, Schenkl S, Wagner R, Teichgräber U. Automatic human identification based on dental X-ray radiographs using computer vision. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10(3801):1-13. DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-60817-6

20. Beschui L, Ardelean L, Tigmeanu C, Rusa L. Cranial and Odontological Methods for Sex Estimation—A Scoping Review. Medicina. 2022; 58(1273):1-28. DOI:10.3390/ medicina58091273

21. Nuzzolese E. VIRDENTOPSY: Virtual Dental Autopsy and Remote Forensic Odontology Evaluation. Dent. J. 2021; 9(102):1-7. DOI:10.3390/dj9090102

22. Smitha T, Sheethal H, Hema K, Franklin R. Forensic odontology as a humanitarian tool. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019;23:164. DOI:10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_249_18

23. Nuzzolese E, Torreggianti M. The need for a complete dental autopsy of unidentified edentulous human remains. Forensic Sciences Research. 2022; 7(2): 319-322. DOI:10.1080/20961790.2021.1962038

24. Vodanović M, Subašić M, Milošević D, Galić I, Brkić H. Artificial intelligence in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry. Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology. 2023; 41(2); 30-41. https://ojs.iofos.eu/index.php/Journal/article/view/1550/348

25. Jayakrishnan J, Reddy J, Kumar R. Role of forensic odontology and anthropology in the identification of human remains. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2021; 25: 543-547. DOI:10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_81_21

26. Nuzzolese E. Dental autopsy for the identification of missing persons. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2018;10:50-54. DOI:10.4103/jfo.jfds_33_17

27. Thurzo, A.; Janˇcoviˇcová, V.; Hain, M.; Thurzo, M.; Novák, B.; Kosnáˇcová, H.; Lehotská, V.; Varga, I.; Kováˇc, P.; Moravanský, N. Human Remains Identification Using Micro-CT, Chemometric and AI Methods in Forensic Experimental Reconstruction of Dental Patterns after Concentrated Sulphuric Acid Significant Impact. Molecules. 2022; 27: 4035. DOI:10.3390/molecules27134035

28. Puri P, Shukla S, Haque I. Developmental dental anomalies and their potential role in establishing identity in post-mortem cases: a review. Medico-Legal Journal. 2019; 87(1):13–18. DOI:10.1177/0025817218808714

29. Shah P, Velani PR, Lakade L, Dukle S. Teeth in forensics: A review. Indian J Dent Res 2019;30:291-9. DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_9_17.

30. Mishalov V, Goncharuk-Khomyn M, VoichenkoV, Brkic H, Kostenko S, Vyun V, Brekhlichuk P. Forensic dental identification in complicated fractured skull conditions: case report with adapted algorithm for image comparison. Forensic Odontostomatol. 2021;39(2): 45-57. PMID: 34419945

31. Johnson A, Jani1G, Pandey A, Patel N. Digital tooth reconstruction: An innovative approach in forensic odontology. Journal of Forensic Odonto-Stomatology. 2019; 37(3): 12-20. PMCID: PMC7442960

32. Bui R. Iozzino R, Richert R, Roy P, Boussel L, Tafrount C, Ducret M. Artificial Intelligence as a Decision-Making Tool in Forensic Dentistry: A Pilot Study with I3M. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2023; 20: 4620. DOI:10.3390/ijerph20054620

33. Giraudeaua N, Duflosc C, Moncayo C, Marinc G, Baccinod E, Martrilled L, Inquimbertb C. Teledentistry and forensic odontology: Cross-sectional observational comparative pilot study. Forensic Science International. 2021;326: 110932. DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110932

34. Prajapati G, Sarode SC, Sarode GS, Shelke P, Awan KH, Patil S. Role of forensic odontology in the identification of victims of major mass disasters across the world: A systematic review. 2018; PLoS ONE 13(6): e0199791. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199791

35. Putrino A, Bruti V, Marinelli E, Ciallella C, Barbato E, Galluccio G. Intraoral scanners in personal identification of corpses: usefulness and reliability of 3d technologies in modern forensic dentistry. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2020; 14(1): 55-266. DOI:10.2174/1874210602014010255

36. Picoli F, Mundim-Picoli M, Rodrigues L, Silva M, Franco A, Silva R. Dental Cingulum and Position of Fixed Orthodontic Appliance as Source of Morphological and Therapeutic Identifiers: An Unusual Case Report. J Forensic Dent Sci.2019; 11:51-55. DOI: 10.4103/jfo.jfds_28_19

37. Yazdanian M, Karami S, Tahmasebi E, Alkam M, Abbasi K, Rahbar M, Tabyaniyan H, et al. Dental Radiographic/Digital Radiography Technology along with Biological Agents in Human Identification. Hindawi Scanning. 2022; (2022): 1-30. DOI:10.1155/2022/526591

38. Del Carpio-Delgado, F, Bernedo-Moreira, D, Espiritu-Martinez, A, Aguilar-Cruzado, J, Joo-García, C, Mamani-Laura, M, Romero-Carazas, R. Telemedicine and eHealth Solutions in Clinical Practice. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology. 2023; 9(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4108/eetpht.9.4272

Downloads

Published

2024-04-26

Issue

Section

Systematic reviews or meta-analyses

How to Cite

1.
Escobar Chauca L, Villamar Diaz MJ, Aldana Cáceres A, Montes Hijar EP. Dental comparison in postmortem identification of individuals. Systematic review. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología [Internet]. 2024 Apr. 26 [cited 2025 Jun. 22];4:836. Available from: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/824