Augmented reality's impact on STEM learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20241202Keywords:
Educational Technology, Problem Solving, Motivation, LearningAbstract
Introduction: Augmented Reality (AR) is an emerging technology with potential to enhance STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education. This study investigates the impact of implementing AR in STEM learning.
Objectives: to evaluate the effectiveness of AR in enhancing students' motivation, understanding, academic performance, and problem-solving abilities in STEM disciplines.
Method: a mixed methods approach with a quasi-experimental design was employed. The study involved 180 university students and 12 STEM instructors from various programs. Data collection methods included standardized tests, questionnaires, interviews, observations, and artifact analysis.
Results: the AR group showed significant improvements in academic performance, motivation, and attitudes toward STEM subjects compared to the control group. Qualitative data supported AR's potential to create more engaging and interactive learning experiences. Students reported better understanding of complex concepts and increased interest in STEM fields.
Conclusions: integrating AR in STEM education can enhance academic performance, motivation, attitudes, and comprehension of complex concepts. These findings support the importance of exploring and implementing AR technology in STEM educational settings to improve learning outcomes and foster student engagement
References
1. Becker K, Park K. Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students' learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education. 2011;12(5/6):23-37. https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1509
2. Zollman A. Learning for STEM Literacy: STEM Literacy for Learning. School Science and Mathematics. 2012;112(1):12-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2012.00101.x
3. Núñez M, Quintero R, Chan ME, Vigier JC, Hugerat M. Integrated science concept learning through experiencing continuous processes in virtual labs. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2008;17(6):587-603.
4. Potkonjak V, Gardner M, Callaghan V, Mattila P, Guetl C, Petrović VM, et al. Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education. 2016;95:309-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
5. Azuma RT. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments. 1997;6(4):355-85. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
6. Yuen S, Yaoyuneyong G, Johnson E. Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange. 2011;4(1):119-40. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0401.10
7. Ibáñez MB, Delgado-Kloos C. Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education. 2018;123:109-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
8. Chang YH, Wu HK, Hsu YS. Integrating augmented reality into multimedia book-based instruction: An exploratory study on students' learning performance and cognitive load. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2020;52(3):279-98.
9. Estapa A, Nadolny L. The effect of an augmented reality enhanced mathematics lesson on student achievement and motivation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research. 2015;16(3):40-8.
10. Radu I. Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 2014;18(6):1533-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0747-y
11. Delgado FJ, Coas XA, Arza CV, Del Rey AM. Using augmented reality in high line construction education. Universal Access in the Information Society. 2015;14(2):251-68.
12. Zhang J, Sung YT, Hou HT, Chang KE. The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education. 2014;73:178-88.
13. Ibáñez MB, Di Serio A, Villarán D, Delgado-Kloos C. Experiencias de realidad aumentada en la educación: Nuevas alternativas para la enseñanza. Madrid: Editorial Dykinson; 2014.
14. Singhal S, Bagga S, Goyal P, Saxena V. Augmented chemistry: Interactive education system. International Journal of Computer Applications. 2012;49(15):1-5.
15. Sommerauer P, Müller O. Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education. 2014;79:59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.013
16. Bower M, Howe C, McCredie N, Robinson A, Grover D. Augmented Reality in education – cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International. 2014;51(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2014.889400
17. Martín-Gutiérrez J, Fabiani P, Benesova W, Meneses MD, Mora CE. Augmented reality to promote collaborative and autonomous learning in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015;51:752-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.093
18. Yoon S, Elinich K, Wang J, Steinmeier C, Tucker S. Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 2017;12(1):1-22.
19. Akçayır M, Akçayır G, Pektaş HM, Ocak MA. Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students' laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;57:334-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.054
20. Bujak KR, Radu I, Catrambone R, MacIntyre B, Zheng R, Golubski G. A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education. 2013;68:536-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.017
21. Dunleavy M, Dede C, Mitchell R. Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2009;18(1):7-22.
22. Barreira J, Bessa M, Pereira LC, Adão T, Peres E, Magalhães L. MOW: Augmented reality game to learn words in different languages: Case study: Learning English names of animals in elementary school. In: 2012 7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). IEEE; 2012. p. 1-6.
23. Bujak KR, Radu I, Catrambone R, MacIntyre B, Zheng R, Golubski G. A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education. 2013;68:536-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.017
24. Yoon S, Elinich K, Wang J, Steinmeier C, Tucker S. Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 2017;12(1):1-22.
25. Ibáñez MB, Delgado-Kloos C. Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education. 2018;123:109-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
26. Singhal S, Bagga S, Goyal P, Saxena V. Augmented chemistry: Interactive education system. International Journal of Computer Applications. 2012;49(15):1-5.
27. Chang YH, Wu HK, Hsu YS. Integrating augmented reality into multimedia book-based instruction: An exploratory study on students' learning performance and cognitive load. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2020;52(3):279-98.
28. Hewitt J, Pedretti E, Bencze L, Vaillancourt BD, Yoon S. New practices of science education through augmented reality: Students exploring optics concepts through new media and immersive experience design. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2019;28(5):484-502.
29. Hsieh MC, Lin HCK. Virtual reality reactor auxiliary building system for education in radiation-applied programs. Computers & Education. 2017;109:73-90.
30. Martín-Gutiérrez J, Luís Saorín J, Contero M, Alcañiz M, Pérez-López DC, Ortega M. Design and validation of an augmented book for spatial abilities development in engineering students. Computers & Graphics. 2012;36(7):910-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2012.07.001
31. Webel S, Bockholt U, Engelke T, Gavish N, Olbrich M, Preusche C. An augmented reality training platform for assembly and maintenance skills. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 2013;61(4):398-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2012.09.013
32. Bujak KR, Radu I, Catrambone R, MacIntyre B, Zheng R, Golubski G. A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education. 2013;68:536-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.017
33. Estapa A, Nadolny L. The effect of an augmented reality enhanced mathematics lesson on student achievement and motivation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research. 2015;16(3):40-8.
34. Kaufmann H, Schmalstieg D. Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & Graphics. 2003;27(3):339-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8493(03)00028-1
35. Kerawalla L, Luckin R, Seljeflot S, Woolard A. "Making it real": Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality. 2006;10(3-4):163-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0036-4
36. Wu HK, Lee SWY, Chang HY, Liang JC. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education. 2013;62:41-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
37. Bacca J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R, Graf S, Kinshuk. Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society. 2014;17(4):133-49.
38. Cuendet S, Bonnard Q, Do-Lenh S, Dillenbourg P. Designing augmented reality for the classroom. Computers & Education. 2013;68:557-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.015
39. Wu HK, Lee SWY, Chang HY, Liang JC. Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education. 2013;62:41-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
40. Akçayır M, Akçayır G. Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review. 2017;20:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
41. Cheng KH, Tsai CC. Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2013;22(4):449-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9405-9
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Geovanny Francisco Ruiz Muñoz, David Arturo Yépez González, Norma Verónica Romero Amores, Ángela Francisca Cali Proaño (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
