Technological Innovation to Increase the Competitiveness of MSMEs: Implementation of the Integrated Industry Village 4.0 Platform

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20241220

Keywords:

Innovation, MSME, Integrated Industry, Village, Platform

Abstract

Villages have great potential to support economic development. Excellent products contribute to improving the village economy. MSMEs play an essential role in economic development in the village. However, MSME players have less knowledge and skills in running a business. The MSME actors do not utilize technology properly and find it challenging to use it. This study aims to develop an integrated industry village 4.0 platform and measure the capabilities of MSME actors. The research consists of preparatory, development, and assessment phases. This research involved 25 MSME actors in Srigonco and Bantur Villages, Malang Regency. The instrument consists of validation sheets, user satisfaction assessment questionnaires, pre-test and post-test questionnaires. Data analysis in this study is using qualitative and quantitative analysis techniques. This platform has features such as home page, business incubators, export cloud markets, and MSME Matching Fund. material, media, information, and IT platform validation tests obtained 85,2 %, 89,33 %, and 84,6 %, respectively—the feasibility with excellent categories. MSME actors in the village experienced an increase of 0,40 on the medium criteria. This research is the basis for recommendations for partner villages to make policies related to developing MSME actors. Technology use in several Malang Regency villages can be applied more widely

References

1 Ariansyah K, Sirait ERE, Nugroho BA, Suryanegara M. Drivers of and barriers to e-commerce adoption in Indonesia: Individuals’ perspectives and the implications. Telecomm Policy [Internet]. 2021;45(8):102219. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102219

2. Qin X, Li Y, Lu Z, Pan W. What makes better village economic development in traditional agricultural areas of China? Evidence from 338 villages. Habitat Int [Internet]. 2020;106(November):102286. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102286

3. Langgut D, Cheddadi R, Carrión JS, Cavanagh M, Colombaroli D, Eastwood WJ, et al. The origin and spread of olive cultivation in the Mediterranean Basin: The fossil pollen evidence. Holocene. 2019;29(5):902–22.

4. Wijijayanti T, Agustina Y, Winarno A, Istanti LN, Dharma BA. Rural tourism: A local economic development. Australas Accounting, Bus Financ J. 2020;14(1 Special Issue):5–13.

5. Brown JA. Territorial (In) Coherence: Labour and Special Economic Zones in Laos’s Border Manufacturing. Antipode. 2019;51(2):438–57.

6. Kumar A, Pramanik M, Chaudhary S, Negi MS. Land evaluation for sustainable development of Himalayan agriculture using RS-GIS in conjunction with analytic hierarchy process and frequency ratio. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci [Internet]. 2021;20(1):1–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2020.10.001

7. Purnomo S, Rahayu ES, Riani AL, Suminah S, Udin U. Empowerment model for sustainable tourism village in an emerging country. J Asian Financ Econ Bus. 2020;7(2):261–70.

8. Feinman GM, Fang H, Nicholas LM. Coastal Shandong, China: The longue durée. J Anthropol Archaeol. 2019;55(January).

9. Nuryanah S, Mahabbatussalma F, Satrio AA. Evaluation of Government Reform in Tax Administration: Evidence from Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Indonesia. Int J Public Adm [Internet]. 2023;46(5):313–25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1995746

10. Bhattacharya L, Chatterjee A, Chatterjee D. Critical Enablers that Mitigate Supply Chain Disruption: A Perspective from Indian MSMEs. Manag Labour Stud. 2023;48(1):42–63.

11. Aman J, Abbas J, Shi G, Ain NU, Gu L. Community Wellbeing Under China-Pakistan Economic Corridor: Role of Social, Economic, Cultural, and Educational Factors in Improving Residents’ Quality of Life. Front Psychol. 2022;12(March):1–16.

12. Richter S, Wunsch N. Money, power, glory: the linkages between EU conditionality and state capture in the Western Balkans. J Eur Public Policy [Internet]. 2020;27(1):41–62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1578815

13. Kilay AL, Simamora BH, Putra DP. The Influence of E-Payment and E-Commerce Services on Supply Chain Performance: Implications of Open Innovation and Solutions for the Digitalization of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in Indonesia. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex [Internet]. 2022;8(3):119. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030119

14. Daud I, Nurjannah D, Mohyi A, Ambarwati T, Cahyono Y, Haryoko ADE, et al. The effect of digital marketing, digital finance and digital payment on finance performance of indonesian smes. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2022;6(1):37–44.

15. Lim KYH, Zheng P, Chen CH. A state-of-the-art survey of Digital Twin: techniques, engineering product lifecycle management and business innovation perspectives. J Intell Manuf [Internet]. 2020;31(6):1313–37. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-019-01512-w

16. Galati F, Bigliardi B. Industry 4.0: Emerging themes and future research avenues using a text mining approach. Comput Ind [Internet]. 2019;109:100–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.018

17. Fosso Wamba S, Akter S. Understanding supply chain analytics capabilities and agility for data-rich environments. Int J Oper Prod Manag. 2019;39(6):887–912.

18. Friedrich J, Becker M, Kramer F, Wirth M, Schneider M. Incentive design and gamification for knowledge management. J Bus Res. 2020;106(February):341–52.

19. Guzmán VE, Muschard B, Gerolamo M, Kohl H, Rozenfeld H. Characteristics and Skills of Leadership in the Context of Industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf [Internet]. 2020;43:543–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.167

20. Camargo M, Báron D, Dumas M, González-Rojas O. Learning business process simulation models: A Hybrid process mining and deep learning approach. Inf Syst [Internet]. 2023;117:102248. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2023.102248

21. Octasylva ARP, Yuliati LN, Hartoyo H, Soehadi AW. Innovativeness as the Key to MSMEs’ Performances. Sustain. 2022;14(11).

22. Siddhartha T, Nambirajan T, Ganeshkumar C. Self-help group (SHG) production methods: insights from the union territory of Puducherry community. J Enterprising Communities. 2022;16(4):517–39.

23. Roztocki N, Soja P, Weistroffer HR. The role of information and communication technologies in socioeconomic development: towards a multi-dimensional framework*. Inf Technol Dev [Internet]. 2019;25(2):171–83. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1596654

24. Cunningham JA, Damij N, Modic D, Olan F. MSME technology adoption, entrepreneurial mindset and value creation: a configurational approach. J Technol Transf [Internet]. 2023;48(5):1574–98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10022-0

25. Türkeş MC, Oncioiu I, Aslam HD, Marin-Pantelescu A, Topor DI, Căpuşneanu S. Drivers and barriers in using industry 4.0: A perspective of SMEs in Romania. Processes. 2019;7(3):1–20.

26. Kumar B, Sharma A, Vatavwala S, Kumar P. Digital mediation in business-to-business marketing: A bibliometric analysis. Ind Mark Manag [Internet]. 2020;85(October):126–40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.10.002

27. Cassetta E, Monarca U, Dileo I, Di Berardino C, Pini M. The relationship between digital technologies and internationalisation. Evidence from Italian SMEs. Ind Innov. 2020;27(4):311–39.

28. Syafiq A, Fikawati S, Gemily SC. Household food security during the COVID-19 pandemic in urban and semi-urban areas in Indonesia. J Heal Popul Nutr [Internet]. 2022;41(1):1–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-022-00285-y

29. Matthyssens P. Reconceptualizing value innovation for Industry 4.0 and the Industrial Internet of Things. J Bus Ind Mark. 2019;34(6):1203–9.

30. Galindo-Martín MA, Méndez-Picazo MT, Castaño-Martínez MS. The role of innovation and institutions in entrepreneurship and economic growth in two groups of countries. Int J Entrep Behav Res. 2020;26(3):485–502.

31. Pang C, Wang Q, Li Y, Duan G. Integrative capability, business model innovation and performance: Contingent effect of business strategy. Eur J Innov Manag. 2019;22(3):541–61.

32. Garcia Martinez M, Zouaghi F, Garcia Marco T, Robinson C. What drives business failure? Exploring the role of internal and external knowledge capabilities during the global financial crisis. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2019;98(July):441–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.032

33. Rodrigues LF, Oliveira A, Rodrigues H. Main gamification concepts: A systematic mapping study. Heliyon [Internet]. 2019;5(7):e01993. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01993

34. Nguyen NTH, Barth JR. Community Banks vs. Non-Community Banks: Where is the Advantage in Local Small Business Funding? Atl Econ J. 2020;48(2):161–74.

35. Ugbala CP, Owolabi KA, Adesina AO, Ajayi TB. Public Library as a Source of Business Information for Small-Scale Business Enterprises in Nigeria. Public Libr Q [Internet]. 2021;40(5):454–67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2020.1794768

36. Tosida ET, Herdiyeni Y, Suprehatin S, Marimin. The potential for implementing a big data analytic-based smart village in Indonesia. 2020 Int Conf Comput Sci Its Appl Agric ICOSICA 2020. 2020;

37. Kurniasih N, Yusup PM, Kuswarno E. Strategy of rural entrepreneurship potential development in Pamarican village ciamis district Indonesia. Humanit Soc Sci Rev. 2019;7(4):291–6.

38. Agyemang M, Kusi-Sarpong S, Khan SA, Mani V, Rehman ST, Kusi-Sarpong H. Drivers and barriers to circular economy implementation: An explorative study in Pakistan’s automobile industry. Manag Decis. 2019;57(4):971–94.

39. Xu J, Ye M, Lu W, Bao Z, Webster C. A four-quadrant conceptual framework for analyzing extended producer responsibility in offshore prefabrication construction. J Clean Prod [Internet]. 2021;282(xxxx):124540. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124540

40. Koutitas G, Smith S, Lawrence G. Performance evaluation of AR/VR training technologies for EMS first responders. Virtual Real [Internet]. 2021;25(1):83–94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00436-8

41. Pande M, Bharathi SV. Theoretical foundations of design thinking – A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Think Ski Creat [Internet]. 2020;36(October 2019):100637. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100637

42. Deitte LA, Omary RA. The Power of Design Thinking in Medical Education. Acad Radiol. 2019;26(10):1417–20.

43. Systems MI. Retracted: Development of a Mobile Application for Interaction between Patients and Doctors in Rural Populations. Mob Inf Syst. 2023;2023:1–1.

44. Earle AG, Leyva-de la Hiz DI. The wicked problem of teaching about wicked problems: Design thinking and emerging technologies in sustainability education. Manag Learn. 2021;52(5):581–603.

45. Thompson L, Schonthal D. The Social Psychology of Design Thinking. Calif Manage Rev. 2020;62(2):84–99.

46. Foster MK. Design Thinking: A Creative Approach to Problem Solving. Manag Teach Rev. 2021;6(2):123–40.

47. Chopra G, Madan P, Jaisingh P, Bhaskar P. Effectiveness of e-learning portal from students’ perspective: A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interact Technol Smart Educ. 2019;16(2):94–116.

48. Liu B, Wang L, Liu M. Lifelong Federated Reinforcement Learning: A Learning Architecture for Navigation in Cloud Robotic Systems. IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2019;4(4):4555–62.

49. Gong JW, Liu HC, You XY, Yin L. An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for E-learning website evaluation and selection. Appl Soft Comput [Internet]. 2021;102:107118. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107118

50. Tan PJB. An empirical study of how the learning attitudes of college students toward English E-Tutoring websites affect site sustainability. Sustain. 2019;11(6).

51. Bashori M, van Hout R, Strik H, Cucchiarini C. Web-based language learning and speaking anxiety. Comput Assist Lang Learn [Internet]. 2022;35(5–6):1058–89. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1770293

52. Garg R, Kumar R, Garg S. MADM-Based parametric selection and ranking of E-learning websites using fuzzy COPRAS. IEEE Trans Educ. 2019;62(1):11–8.

53. Mahoney JW, Harris-Reeves B. The effects of collaborative testing on higher order thinking: Do the bright get brighter? Act Learn High Educ. 2019;20(1):25–37.

54. Lukeš M, Longo MC, Zouhar J. Do business incubators really enhance entrepreneurial growth? Evidence from a large sample of innovative Italian start-ups. Technovation. 2019;82–83(July):25–34.

55. Meister AD, Mauer R. Understanding refugee entrepreneurship incubation – an embeddedness perspective. Int J Entrep Behav Res. 2019;25(5):1065–92.

56. Nair S, Blomquist T. Failure prevention and management in business incubation: practices towards a scalable business model. Technol Anal Strateg Manag [Internet]. 2019;31(3):266–78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1495325

57. Sagath D, van Burg E, Cornelissen JP, Giannopapa C. Identifying design principles for business incubation in the European space sector. J Bus Ventur Insights [Internet]. 2019;11(January):e00115. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2019.e00115

58. Efthymiou L, Zarifis A. Modeling students’ voice for enhanced quality in online management education. Int J Manag Educ [Internet]. 2021;19(2):100464. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100464

59. Jiang M, Lam AHC, Chiu DKW, Ho KKW. Social media aids for business learning: A quantitative evaluation with the 5E instructional model. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;28(9):12269–91.

60. Mousa M. Winterizing the Egyptian spring: why might business schools fail to develop responsible leaders? Eur J Train Dev. 2023;47(5–6):599–614.

61. Lee S, Costello FJ, Lee KC. Hierarchical balanced scorecard-based organizational goals and the efficiency of controls processes. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2021;132(April):270–88. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.038

62. Rasheed RA, Kamsin A, Abdullah NA. Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Comput Educ [Internet]. 2020;144(September 2019):103701. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701

63. Zainuddin Z, Chu SKW, Shujahat M, Perera CJ. The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educ Res Rev. 2020;30(March).

64. Abad GR, Galleto PG. Alternative learning system program’s implementation landscape of a division in the Philippines. Cypriot J Educ Sci. 2020;15(5):1078–88.

65. Sholihin M, Sari RC, Yuniarti N, Ilyana S. A new way of teaching business ethics: The evaluation of virtual reality-based learning media. Int J Manag Educ [Internet]. 2020;18(3):100428. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100428

66. Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, Abdelwahed A, Al-Nusair L. Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: A national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):1–10.

67. Muthuprasad T, Aiswarya S, Aditya KS, Jha GK. Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic. Soc Sci Humanit Open [Internet]. 2021;3(1):100101. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100101

68. Waheed H, Hassan SU, Aljohani NR, Hardman J, Alelyani S, Nawaz R. Predicting academic performance of students from VLE big data using deep learning models. Comput Human Behav. 2020;104.

69. Almusharraf NM, Khahro SH. Students’ Satisfaction with Online Learning Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2020;15(21):246–67.

70. Ho MHW, Chung HFL, Kingshott R, Chiu CC. Customer engagement, consumption and firm performance in a multi-actor service eco-system: The moderating role of resource integration. J Bus Res [Internet]. 2020;121(April 2019):557–66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.008

71. Malik A, Pereira V, Budhwar P. HRM in the global information technology (IT) industry: Towards multivergent configurations in strategic business partnerships. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2021;31(3).

72. Gold S, Chowdhury IN, Huq FA, Heinemann K. Social business collaboration at the bottom of the pyramid: The case of orchestration. Bus Strateg Environ. 2020;29(1):262–75.

73. Heizmann H, Fox S. O Partner, Where Art Thou? A critical discursive analysis of HR managers’ struggle for legitimacy. Int J Hum Resour Manag [Internet]. 2019;30(13):2026–48. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1314974

74. Alkaher I, Gan D. The role of school partnerships in promoting education for sustainability and social capital. J Environ Educ [Internet]. 2020;51(6):416–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1711499

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Wulandari D, Prayitno PH, Basuki A, Prasetyo AR, Aulia F, Gunawan A, et al. Technological Innovation to Increase the Competitiveness of MSMEs: Implementation of the Integrated Industry Village 4.0 Platform. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología [Internet]. 2024 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Nov. 10];4:1220. Available from: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/676