Beyond Boundaries Uniting Internal Medicine and Surgery in Patient Care - A Narrative Synthesis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20241259Keywords:
Internal Medicine, Surgery, Interdisciplinary Communication, Patient Care PlanningAbstract
Introduction: the evolving landscape of healthcare necessitates the integration of internal medicine and surgery to address complex patient needs comprehensively. Traditional boundaries between these disciplines are increasingly blurred, prompting a holistic approach to patient care.
Objective: this narrative review aims to synthesize current literature on the integration of internal medicine and surgery, exploring collaborative models, integrated care pathways, technological advancements, and interdisciplinary initiatives to enhance patient outcomes.
Method: a comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar using keywords and MeSH terms related to internal medicine, surgery, interdisciplinary collaboration, and patient outcomes. Inclusion criteria included 30 articles discussing integrated care models and their impact on patient outcomes, published in English between 2009 and 2024. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, key findings, and outcomes.
Results: the review identified several collaborative frameworks, such as multidisciplinary teams and perioperative surgical homes, which improved diagnostic accuracy, treatment efficacy, and patient satisfaction. Integrated care pathways demonstrated effectiveness in managing chronic diseases and complex surgical cases. Technological advancements, including EHRs and telemedicine, facilitated seamless communication and data sharing. Challenges to integration included institutional silos, cultural differences, and time constraints, but these were mitigated through interdisciplinary training and policy incentives.
Conclusions: integrating internal medicine and surgery enhances patient care by leveraging the combined expertise of both fields. Overcoming barriers through technological innovations, education, and policy changes is crucial. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, patient engagement, and the role of personalized medicine in integrated care
References
1. Reyes Nieva H, Ruan E, Schiff GD. Professional-Patient Boundaries: a National Survey of Primary Care Physicians’ Attitudes and Practices. J GEN INTERN MED [Internet]. 2020 Feb 1 [cited 2024 May 12];35(2):457–64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05543-0
2. Shaw M, Pelecanos AM, Mudge AM. Evaluation of Internal Medicine Physician or Multidisciplinary Team Comanagement of Surgical Patients and Clinical Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open [Internet]. 2020 May 5 [cited 2024 May 12];3(5):e204088. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4088
3. Aggarwal A. The Evolving Relationship between Surgery and Medicine. AMA Journal of Ethics [Internet]. 2010 Feb 1 [cited 2024 May 17];12(2):119–23. Available from: https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/evolving-relationship-between-surgery-and-medicine/2010-02
4. Rosen MA, DiazGranados D, Dietz AS, Benishek LE, Thompson D, Pronovost PJ, et al. Teamwork in Healthcare: Key Discoveries Enabling Safer, High-Quality Care. Am Psychol [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Sep 8];73(4):433–50. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6361117/
5. Russell B, Fletcher N. Workforce issues: the blurring of boundaries in surgical care. Br J Nurs [Internet]. 2021 Apr 8 [cited 2024 May 21];30(7):426–426. Available from: https://www.magonlinelibrary.com/doi/abs/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.7.426
6. Kyaw L, Loh KY, Tan YQ, Wu FMW, Tiong HY, Wang Z. Personality differences between internal medicine and surgical residents in an Asian population. BMC Medical Education [Internet]. 2022 Aug 29 [cited 2024 May 11];22(1):650. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03689-w
7. Jørgensen L, Paludan-Müller AS, Laursen DRT, Savović J, Boutron I, Sterne JAC, et al. Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews. Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2016 May 10 [cited 2024 May 12];5(1):80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0259-8
8. Lo CKL, Mertz D, Loeb M. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale: comparing reviewers’ to authors’ assessments. BMC Medical Research Methodology [Internet]. 2014 Apr 1 [cited 2024 May 13];14(1):45. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-45
9. Purssell E. Can the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme check-lists be used alongside Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation to improve transparency and decision-making? J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2020 Apr [cited 2023 Apr 22];76(4):1082–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31944380/
10. Evans JM, Baker RG, Berta W, Jan B. The Evolution Of Integrated Health Care Strategies. In: Annual Review of Health Care Management: Revisiting The Evolution of Health Systems Organization [Internet]. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2014 [cited 2024 May 12]. p. 125–61. (Advances in Health Care Management; vol. 15). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-8231(2013)0000015011
11. Baxter S, Johnson M, Chambers D, Sutton A, Goyder E, Booth A. Understanding new models of integrated care in developed countries: a systematic review. Health Services and Delivery Research [Internet]. 2018 Aug 24 [cited 2024 May 10];6(29):1–132. Available from: https://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr/hsdr06290/
12. Mahdizadeh M, Heydari A, Moonaghi HK. Clinical Interdisciplinary Collaboration Models and Frameworks From Similarities to Differences: A Systematic Review. Global Journal of Health Science [Internet]. 2015 Apr 19 [cited 2024 May 12];7(6):p170. Available from: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/43259
13. Calancie L, Frerichs L, Davis MM, Sullivan E, White AM, Cilenti D, et al. Consolidated Framework for Collaboration Research derived from a systematic review of theories, models, frameworks and principles for cross-sector collaboration. PLOS ONE [Internet]. 2021 Jan 4 [cited 2024 May 16];16(1):e0244501. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0244501
14. Kash BA, Zhang Y, Cline KM, Menser T, Miller TR. The Perioperative Surgical Home (PSH): A Comprehensive Review of US and Non-US Studies Shows Predominantly Positive Quality and Cost Outcomes. The Milbank Quarterly [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2024 May 16];92(4):796–821. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-0009.12093
15. Allen D, Gillen E, Rixson L. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review. JBI Evidence Synthesis [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2024 May 21];7(3):80. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jbisrir/abstract/2009/07030/the_effectiveness_of_integrated_care_pathways_for.1.aspx
16. Feltz-Cornelis C van der, Attree E, Heightman M, Gabbay M, Allsopp G. Integrated care pathways: a new approach for integrated care systems. Br J Gen Pract [Internet]. 2023 Sep 1 [cited 2024 May 21];73(734):422–422. Available from: https://bjgp.org/content/73/734/422
17. Kobayashi ST, Diz MDPE, Campolina AG, De Soárez PC, Ribeiro UJ, Nahas SC, et al. Integrated care pathway for rectal cancer treatment: health care resource utilization, costs, and outcomes. JBI Evidence Implementation [Internet]. 2017 Jun [cited 2024 May 17];15(2):53. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijebh/abstract/2017/06000/integrated_care_pathway_for_rectal_cancer.3.aspx
18. Levine DM, Syrowatka A, Salmasian H, Shahian DM, Lipsitz S, Zebrowski JP, et al. The Safety of Outpatient Health Care. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2024 Jun 18 [cited 2024 May 21];177(6):738–48. Available from: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M23-2063
19. Quinn M, Forman J, Harrod M, Winter S, Fowler KE, Krein SL, et al. Electronic health records, communication, and data sharing: challenges and opportunities for improving the diagnostic process. Diagnosis [Internet]. 2019 Sep 1 [cited 2024 May 23];6(3):241–8. Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2018-0036/html
20. Asiri A, AlBishi S, AlMadani W, ElMetwally A, Househ M. The Use of Telemedicine in Surgical Care: a Systematic Review. Acta Inform Med [Internet]. 2018 Oct [cited 2024 May 21];26(3):201–6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6195401/
21. Auschra C. Barriers to the Integration of Care in Inter-Organisational Settings: A Literature Review. International Journal of Integrated Care [Internet]. 2018 Jan 16 [cited 2024 May 21];18(1). Available from: https://ijic.org/articles/10.5334/ijic.3068
22. Garas G, Ibrahim A, Ashrafian H, Ahmed K, Patel V, Okabayashi K, et al. Evidence-Based Surgery: Barriers, Solutions, and the Role of Evidence Synthesis. World Journal of Surgery [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2024 May 17];36(8):1. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1007/s00268-012-1597-x
23. Correa VC, Lugo-Agudelo LH, Aguirre-Acevedo DC, Contreras JAP, Borrero AMP, Patiño-Lugo DF, et al. Individual, health system, and contextual barriers and facilitators for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic metareview. Health Research Policy and Systems [Internet]. 2020 Jun 29 [cited 2024 May 27];18(1):74. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00588-8
24. Augestad KM, Han H, Paige J, Ponsky T, Schlachta CM, Dunkin B, et al. Educational implications for surgical telementoring: a current review with recommendations for future practice, policy, and research. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2017 Oct 1 [cited 2024 May 21];31(10):3836–46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5690-y
25. Byhoff E, Kangovi S, Berkowitz SA, DeCamp M, Dzeng E, Earnest M, et al. A Society of General Internal Medicine Position Statement on the Internists’ Role in Social Determinants of Health. J GEN INTERN MED [Internet]. 2020 Sep 1 [cited 2024 May 21];35(9):2721–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05934-8
26. Loftus TJ, Altieri MS, Balch JA, Abbott KL, Choi J, Marwaha JS, et al. Artificial Intelligence–enabled Decision Support in Surgery: State-of-the-art and Future Directions. Annals of Surgery [Internet]. 2023 Jul [cited 2024 May 20];278(1):51. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/abstract/2023/07000/artificial_intelligence_enabled_decision_support.9.aspx
27. Marzban S, Najafi M, Agolli A, Ashrafi E. Impact of Patient Engagement on Healthcare Quality: A Scoping Review. Journal of Patient Experience [Internet]. 2022 Jan 1 [cited 2024 May 25];9:23743735221125439. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735221125439
28. Baxter S, Johnson M, Chambers D, Sutton A, Goyder E, Booth A. The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence. BMC Health Services Research [Internet]. 2018 May 10 [cited 2024 May 27];18(1):350. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3161-3
29. Teper MH, Vedel I, Yang XQ, Margo-Dermer E, Hudon C. Understanding Barriers to and Facilitators of Case Management in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis. The Annals of Family Medicine [Internet]. 2020 Jul 1 [cited 2024 May 25];18(4):355–63. Available from: https://www.annfammed.org/content/18/4/355
30. Gopalan M, Edara R. Health Policies as Education Policies? A Review of Causal Evidence and Mechanisms. AERA Open [Internet]. 2023 Jan 1 [cited 2024 May 26];9:23328584231177616. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231177616
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Danny Manuel Vera Alay, Luis Ricardo Costales Vallejo, Valeria Lizbeth Bernal Cevallos, Viviana Nataly Jiménez Aleman, Gary Adolfo Medina Herrera, Daniel Ismael Astudillo Pinos, Luz María Delgado Medina , Maryuri Guicella Sarango Coronel (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
