Assessment of the self-perception of the research role of medical students in universities in Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2024.611Keywords:
Self-perception, Medical students, Research, MethodologyAbstract
Introduction: The promotion of quality research at the university level implies the strengthening of the training of professionals who master the scientific method and knowledge, and this is especially necessary in a scenario where there are limited competencies and capacities to update and perfect procedures that improve the health of the population.
Objective: To assess the self-perception of the research role of medical students.
Method: A total of 105 university students exposed to learning topics about research methodology during their academic training from their first level to their pre-professional internships, at the universities of San Gregorio de Portoviejo, Guayaquil, and others, were investigated through a questionnaire conducted in GoogleForm, disseminated through teachers and group leaders.
Results: 80% of the respondents were female, 40.4% stated that their level of training is lower in relation to developed countries, 7.7% had committed fraud at some time, 7.7% could not imagine doing research work, while 46.2% indicated that 15.4% give medium importance to the training of doctors-researchers. 61.5% consider that they have an average ability to formulate research problems, and another 11.5% declare that it is low.
Conclusions: The strengthening of the teaching-learning process of research methodology issues should include, in its design, how to deal with negative manifestations associated with self-discrimination limiting to reach the category of researcher and the habit of plagiarism recognized as a lack of academic and professional ethics.
References
1. Hernández-Navarro MI, Panunzio AP, García-Pérez A, Fernández-Hernández CP, Sánchez-García AJ. Las competencias investigativas en los profesionales de la salud. Rev Inf Científica. 2022;101(4):1–11.
2. Olivares Olivares SL, López Cabrera MV. Medición de la autopercepción de la autodirección en estudiantes de medicina de pregrado. Investig en Educ Médica [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2024 Jul 26];4(14):75–80. Available from: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-investigacion-educacion-medica-343-pdf-S2007505715300053
3. Ministerio de Salud Pública E. Prioridades de investigación en salud ,2013-2017. 2017. p. 2013–38.
4. Salicrup LA, Cuervo LG, Jiménez RC, Salgado de Snyder N, Becerra-Posada F. Advancing health research through research governance. BMJ [Internet]. 2018 Jul 16 [cited 2019 Jun 18];362:k2484. Available from: http://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.k2484
5. Consejo de Aseguramiento de la Calidad de la Educación Superior C. Ley Orgánica de Educación Superior, LOES. 2012. 2018;1–58.
6. Bruque S. La producción científica en Ecuador en el contexto latinoamericano. Senescyt. 2013. p. 35.
7. Habineza H, Nsanzabaganwa C, Nyirimanzi N, Umuhoza C, Cartledge K, Conard C, et al. Perceived attitudes of the importance and barriers to research amongst Rwandan interns and pediatric residents – a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2019 Dec 3 [cited 2022 Mar 17];19(1):4. Available from: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-018-1425-6
8. Stockfelt M, Karlsson L, Finizia C. Research interest and activity among medical students in Gothenburg, Sweden, a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2016 Aug 26 [cited 2022 Mar 21];16(1):1–8. Available from: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-016-0749-3
9. García C, Espinosa JM, Valdés YD. La investigación científica en las universidades ecuatorianas.: Prioridad del sistema educativo vigente. Rev Cuba Educ Super [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Mar 21];36(2):113–25. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0257-43142017000200011
10. Stone C, Dogbey GY, Klenzak S, Van Fossen K, Tan B, Brannan GD. Contemporary global perspectives of medical students on research during undergraduate medical education: a systematic literature review. Vol. 23, Medical Education Online. Taylor and Francis Ltd.; 2018.
11. Núñez R. Enseñanza de la competencia investigativa: percepciones y evidencias de los estudiantes universitarios Teaching of research competence: perceptions and evidence of university students Contenido. 2019. 2019;40:41.
12. Etienne C, Abbasi K, Cuervo LG. Research for health in the Americas [Internet]. Vol. 362, BMJ (Online). 2018. p. 1–2. Available from: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/51080/v43eBMJ12019_spa.pdf?sequence=8
13. Hierro B. Formación científica en estudiantes de medicina : percepción sobre la integración de actividades de investigación durante la carrera Formación Científica en Estudiantes de Medicina [Internet]. 2024. Available from: http://trovare.hospitalitaliano.org.ar/
14. Pastor-Ramírez D, Arcos-Medina G de L, Lagunes-Domínguez A. Desarrollo de capacidades de investigación para estudiantes universitarios mediante el uso de estrategias instruccionales en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Apertura [Internet]. 2020;12(1):6–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v12n1.1842
15. Silva I, Espig H. La producción cinetífica en estudiantes de medicina de la Universidad Autónoma en Venezuela. 2014;12:39–50.
16. Richard, E. Rol de la investigación en la formación en Ciencias de la Salud. Revista Gregoriana de Ciencias de la Salud. 2024;1(1):6-9. https://doi.org/10.36097/rgcs.v1i1.3097
17. Borroto Cruz ER, Dueñas Espinoza FX, Reyna García AE. Identificación de necesidades de formación en competencias investigativas: herramienta para la implementación de planes de formación. Rev San Gregorio. 2018;1(24):34-43. Available from: http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/pdf/rsan/v1n24/2528-7907-rsan-1-24-00034.pdf
18. Borroto Cruz ER. Hacia una educación médica cada vez más científica. Rev Cubana Educ Med Super. 2015;29(2):208-210. Available from: https://ems.sld.cu/index.php/ems/article/view/745
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yumy Estela Fernández Vélez, Driannet Castillo Peña (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.