Diploma in Accounting and Business Studies Students’ Perceptives on Online Teaching and Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2024.584Keywords:
Access, online learning, internet, mobile technologiesAbstract
Introduction: The advent and consequent entrenched use of new media technologies in higher education has prompted systems change in many universities across the world. At the University of Botswana, the Centre for Continuing Education (CCE) unveiled a plan to “break down physical lecture-rooms and campus walls” by delivering courses in the Diploma in Accounting and Business Studies (DABS) programme, including to satellite centers, solely through the virtual mode. Driven by the idea of Digital Divide and the hypothesis of lack of access and system challenges, the study investigated the viability of this change considering the inherent social and digital divides in Botswana, and the observation that New Media Technologies often place more emphasis on proliferation of information and communication technologies to the detriment of variables such as economic status, income, and social environment.
Objectives: The central question for this study was: Do all students in the DABS programme have “access” to the Internet, mobile technologies and other associated resources to impeccably take part in the online teaching and learning dispensation? Thus, the overarching objective of this study was to unearth whether or not learners enrolled in the DABS programme had access to Internet, mobile technologies and other associated resources to successfully take part in online teaching and learning.
Methods: This study used a focus group discussion method involving students’ representatives from all the centers to get their perspectives on online teaching and learning.
Results: The study has unveiled that not all DABS students embraced online teaching and learning.
Conclusions: It was, therefore, concluded that DABS students have to change their mindset and behaviours towards online-based learning and teaching. They need to adapt to the new norm of online learning
References
1. Bazar M, Mansor AM, Jamaluden KA, Alias BS. The effectiveness and challenges of online learning for secondary school students - A case study. 2021. doi: 10.2419/ajue.v17i3.14514
2. Signe L. Fixing the global digital divide and digital access gap. Brookings.edu. 2023. Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/fixing-the-global-digital-divide-and-digital-access-gap
3. Cheshmehzangi A, Zou T, Zhaohui Z. The digital divide impacts on mental health during COVID-19 pandemic. Brain Behav Immun. 2022;101:211-213.
4. Mkhize TR, Davids MN. Towards a digital resource mobilisation approach for digital inclusion during COVID-19 and beyond: A case of a township school in South Africa. Educ Res Soc Change. 2021;10(2):18-32. doi: 10.17159/2221-4070/2021/v10i2a2
5. De Clerq M, D’Haese M, Buysse J. Economic growth and broadband access: The European urban-rural digital divide. Telecommun Policy. 2023;47:102579.
6. Bennett R, Uink B, Cross S. Beyond the social: Cumulative implications of COVID-19 for First Nations University students in Australia. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2019;2(1):100083. doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100083
7. Jauhiainen JS, Eyvazlu D, Junnila J, Virnes A. Digital divides, the Internet and social media uses among Afghans in Iran. Technol Soc. 2022;70:102057. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102057
8. Grishchenko N. An inverted digital divide during Covid-19 pandemic? Evidence from a panel of EU countries. Telemat Inform. 2022;72:101856. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2022.101856
9. Iftikhar A, Ahmed N, Shah S. Analysing digital divide among university students of Pakistan. Turk Online J Distance Educ. 2022;24(2):261-271.
10. Ye L, Yang H. From digital divide to social inclusion: A tale of mobile platform empowerment in rural areas. Sustainability. 2019;12(6):2424. doi: 10.3390/su12062424
11. Adedoyin O, Soykan E. Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments. 2023;31(2):863-875. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180
12. Ndibalema P. Constraints of transition to online distance learning in higher education institutions during COVID-19 in developing countries: A systematic review. E Learn Digit Media. 2022;19(6):595-618. doi: 10.1177/20427530221107510
13. Al-Kahtani N. A survey assessing the health science students' perception towards online learning at a Saudi Higher Education Institution during COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon. 2022;8:1-9.
14. Almahasees Z, Mohsen K, Amin MO. Faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19. Front Educ. 2021;6:638470. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.638470
15. Chung E, Subramaniam G, Dass L. Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst Covid-19. Asian J Univ Educ (AJUE). 2020;16(2):46-58.
16. Stone C, O’Shea S. My children … think it’s cool that Mum is a uni student: Women with caring responsibilities studying online. Australas J Educ Technol. 2019;35(6):97-110.
17. Werang BR, Leba SMR. Factors affecting student engagement in online teaching and learning: A qualitative case study. Qual Rep. 2022;27(2):555-577. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5165
18. Bell A, Bartimote K, Dempsey N, Mercer-Mapstone L, Moran G, Tognolini J. Student and educator perspectives on equity and online work integrated learning. Australas J Educ Technol. 2022;38(6):185-200. doi: 10.14742/ajet.7524
19. Bekker T, Carrim N. Education lecturers’ perceptions of organising systematic online teaching and learning during COVID-19 pandemic conditions in 2020 at two selected universities in South Africa. J Educ. 2021;84:48-66. Available from: http://journals.ukzn.ac.za/index.php/joe
20. Hamad WB. Understanding the foremost challenges in the transition to online teaching and learning during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review. J Educ Technol Online Learn. 2022;5(2):393-410.
21. Dhurumraj T, Ramaila S, Raban F, Ashruf A. Broadening educational pathways to STEM education through online teaching and learning during Covid-19: Teachers’ perspectives. J Balt Sci Educ. 2020;19(6):1055-1067. doi: 10.33225/jbse/20.19.1055
22. Mazlan AF, Mohamad M, Reesha A, Kassim R, Othman Z, Kummi S. Challenges and strategies to enhance online remote teaching and learning by tertiary institution educators: A literature review. Creat Educ. 2021;12:718-726. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/journal/ce.2021.124050
23. Kara A, Anagün ŞS, Boyacı ŞD, Yaşar S. Investigating the link between teachers' perceptions of 21st century skills efficiency and students' perceptions of learning experience: Mediating role of teacher’s self-efficacy. J Pedagog Res. 2022;6(4):50-65. doi: 10.33902/JPR.202215268
24. Indira K. Blended learning approach to engineering education: Students' perceptions on learning experience and effectiveness. J Eng Educ Transform. 2022;35(3):160-170.
25. Han L, Wang Y, Li Y. Student perceptions of online interpreting teaching and learning via the Zoom platform. Electr J Engl Second Lang. 2022;26(1):1-19. doi: 10.55593/ej.26101int
26. Basch CE. Focus group interview: An underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Educ Q. 1987;14(4):411-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818701400404.
27. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2008.
28. Corbin J, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canon, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol. 1990;13(1):3-21.
29. Mohajan HK. Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. J Econ Dev Environ People. 2018;7(1):23-48.
30. Higginbottom G, Lauridsen EI. The roots and development of constructivist grounded theory. Nurse Res. 2014;21(5):8-13.
31. Mediani HS. An Introduction to Classical Grounded Theory. SOJ Nurs Health Care. 2017;3(3):1-5.
32. Konecki, K. T. (2018). Classic Grounded Theory-The Latest Version: Interpretation of Classic Grounded Theory as a Meta-Theory for Research. Symbolic Interaction, 41(4), 547-564.
33. Adnan M, Anwar K. Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students' perspectives. J Pedagog Soc Psychol. 2020;2(1):45-51. doi: 10.33902/JPSP.2020261309
34. Irfan F, Iman Hermawan Sastra K. Teachers elementary school in atas talian learning of Covid 19 pandemic conditions. Jakarta. J Igra. 2020.
35. Wildana W, Iffat M, Eva D, Zainur R. Student's responses on learning in the early COVID-19 pandemic. Malang, Indonesia. J Educ Teach Train. 2020;14:211-216.
36. Martin F, Ahlgrim-Delzell L, Budhrani K. Systematic Review of Two Decades (1995 to 2014) of Research on Synchronous Online Learning. Am J Distance Educ. 2017; 31(1):3-10.
37. Mhindu A. Students’ Experiences of E-learning During Covid-19 in a Selected State University in Zimbabwe. J., e-learn. res. [Internet]. 2023 Jun. 19 [cited 2024 Jul. 31];2(1):1-11. https://diamondopen.com/journals/index.php/jelr/article/view/294
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Lovie Seru, Susan Akinkurolere, Unity Nkateng (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
