Effect of changes in the centre of rotation after hip arthroplasty on knee joint function
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2024.574Keywords:
Osteoarthritis, Tibial plateau, Prosthesis, LoadAbstract
Introduction: A common complication after hip arthroplasty is pain and inflammation in other large joints, especially the knee joint. Displacement of the centre of rotation of the femoral head after endoprosthetics can change the redistribution of force vectors acting on the femur, change its tilt and pressure on the surface of the knee joint.
Objective: The investigation of the effect of displacement of the centre of rotation of the hip joint after arthroplasty on the knee joint.
Methods: Using SolidWorks software and the SimulationXpress tool, a 3D model of the lower limb was created that reproduced the interaction between the components of the musculoskeletal system.
Results: As a result, it was found that the displacement of the centre of rotation of the hip joint medially and laterally from the anatomical position leads to a significant increase in pressure on the corresponding tibial condyles. The increase in load is linear and increases from a minimum value of 1.77 N⋅m in anatomical position to 123.79 N⋅m with a medial displacement of up to 8 mm.
Conclusions: This study indicates the need for proper restoration of the centre of rotation of the hip joint after implantation and the possible consequences of changes in knee joint loads. The data may be useful for specialists working in the field of implantology and the development of hip prosthesis systems
References
1. Ferguson RJ, Palmer AJ, Taylor A, Porter ML, Malchau H, Glyn-Jones S. Hip replacement. Lancet. 2018;392(10158):1662-1671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31777-X
2. Zagra L. Advances in hip arthroplasty surgery: What is justified? EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(5):171-178. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.170008
3. Babii M. Telerehabilitation model in operated individuals with upper limb and chest trauma due to road traffic accidents. Bull Med Biol Res. 2023;5(4):8-16. https://doi.org/10.61751/bmbr/4.2023.08
4. Zazirnyi IM. Total hip arthroplasty during last 25 years. Trauma. 2020;21(5):32-41. https://doi.org/10.22141/1608-1706.5.21.2020.217088
5. Venher IK, Herasymiuk NI, Kostiv SYa, Loyko II, Khvalyboha DV. Nonspecific dysplasia of the connective tissue – a factor of venous thromboembolic complications in endoprosthetics of hip joints. Int J Med Med Res. 2020;6(1):35-42. https://doi.org/10.11603/ijmmr.2413-6077.2020.1.11047
6. Latka K, Kozlowska K, Waligora M, Kolodziej W, Olbrycht T, Chowaniec J, Hendryk S, Latka M, Latka D. Efficacy of discogel in treatment of degenerative disc disease: A prospective 1-year observation of 67 patients. Brain Sci. 2021;11(11):1434. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11111434
7. Bjarnason JA, Reikeras O. Changes of center of rotation and femoral offset in total hip arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(22):355.
8. Traina F, De Fine M, Biondi F, Tassinari E, Galvani A, Toni A. The influence of the centre of rotation on implant survival using a modular stem hip prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1513-1518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0710-0
9. Ugurbas MV. Dupuytren’s contracture treated with collagenase Clostridium histolyticum. International J Med Med Res. 2023;9(1):39-46.
10. Saleeva AD, Avrunin OG, Kabanenko IV, Zaitsev VM, Datsok OM, Boboshko RO, Dondoreva IS, Chugaev AYu, Baev PO, Korneev SV, Lytvynenko OM. Functional anatomy of the musculoskeletal system. Kharkiv: Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics; 2023.
11. Smahlii ZV. The effect of mechanical skin damage on manifestations of endotoxicosis and immune response under the influence of skeletal trauma complicated by acute blood loss and PRP-therapy effectiveness. Bull Med Biol Res. 2022;4(1):95-102. https://doi.org/10.11603/bmbr.2706-6290.2022.1.12977
12. Diniz KMA, Resende RA, Mascarenhas RO, Silva HJ, Filho RGT, Mendonça LM. Hip passive stiffness is associated with hip kinematics during a single-leg squat. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021;28:68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.06.008
13. Haiko HV, Haluzynskyi OA, Burburska SV. Using 3D modeling with the manufacture of plastic prototypes in traumatology and orthopedics (clinical examples). Trauma. 2019;20(1):89-97. https://doi.org/10.22141/1608-1706.1.20.2019.158676
14. Sylwander C, Larsson I, Haglund E, Bergman S, Andersson MLE. Pressure pain thresholds in individuals with knee pain: A cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021;22:516. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04408-0
15. Navruzov SN, Polatova DSh, Gafoor-Akhunov MA, Gabdikarimov KH. The value of marker proteins p53, bcl-2, Ki-67 in predicting the effectiveness of treatment for osteogenic sarcoma of tubular bones. Vopr Onkol. 2012;58(5):691–693.
16. Polatova DSh, Islamov UF, Davletov RR, Savkin AV, Sharipov MM. Oncologic outcomes of pelvic bone sarcomas surgical. Int J Health Sci. 2021;5(3):252–259. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v5n3.1467
17. Bourne L, Hesketh A, Sharma A, Bucca G, Bush PG, Staines KA. The effects of physiological and injurious hydrostatic pressure on murine ex vivo articular and growth plate cartilage explants: An RNAseq study. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14(10):3389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1278596
18. Baghdadi YM, Larson AN, Sierra RJ. Restoration of the hip center during THA performed for protrusio acetabuli is associated with better implant survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(10):3251-3259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3072-x
19. Pulatova A, Mamedaliyeva N, Omarova G, Urazbayeva G, Veliyeva A. Pelvic floor muscle exercises plus biofeedback versus pelvic floor muscle exercises for patients with stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Electron J Gen Med. 2023;20(5):em520. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejgm/13411
20. Nieschk C, Abelmann-Brockmann J, Lisitano L, Fenwick A, Röttinger H, Ecker M, Mayr E, Röttinger T. Clinical effects of different center of rotation reconstructions in total hip arthroplasty after femoral neck fractures: A cohort study including a follow-up analysis on patient’s mobility and daily living ability. J Orthop Trauma. 2023;24(1):58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-023-00738-y
21. Lerner ZF, DeMers MS, Delp SL, Browning RC. How tibiofemoral alignment and contact locations affect predictions of medial and lateral tibiofemoral contact forces. J Biomech. 2015;48(4):644-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.049
22. Hrubar YuO, Hrubar MYu. Evaluation of early clinical and functional results after suturing of meniscal ruptures under arthroscopic control with “аll-inside” and “inside-out” techniques. Bull Med Biol Res. 2021;3(2):16-21. https://doi.org/10.11603/bmbr.2706-6290.2021.2.11726
23. Mendis MD, Wilson SJ, Hayes DA, Hides JA. Hip muscle atrophy in patients with acetabular labral joint pathology. Clin Anat. 2020;33(4):538-544. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23429
24. Zhang H, Zhou J, Liu Y, Guan J, Ding H, Wang Z, Dong O. Mid-term and long-term results of restoring rotation center in revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res, 2020;15:152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01670-1
25. Latka K, Kolodziej W, Domisiewicz K, Pawus D, Olbrycht T, Niedzwiecki M, Zaczynski A, Latka D. Outpatient spine procedures in Poland: Clinical outcomes, safety, complications, and technical insights into an ambulatory spine surgery center. Healthcare (Switzerland). 2023;11(22):2944. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11222944
26. Abolghasemian M, Samiezadeh S, Jafari D, Bougherara H, Gross AE, Ghazavi MT. Displacement of the hip center of rotation after arthroplasty of Crowe III and IV dysplasia: A radiological and biomechanical study. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(6):1031-1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.07.042
27. Rajpura A, Asle SG, Ait Si Selmi T, Board T. The accuracy of restoration of femoral head centre of rotation in the anteroposterior plane after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: A CT-based study. Bone Joint Res. 2022;11(3):180-188. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.113.BJR-2021-0378.R2
28. van Drongelen S, Wesseling M, Holder J, Meurer A, Stief F. Knee load distribution in hip osteoarthritis patients after total hip replacement. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:578030. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.578030
29. Shaprynskyi V, Nazarchuk O, Faustova M, Mitiuk B, Dmytriiev D, Dobrovanov O, Kralinsky K, Babina Y. Some aspects of infectious complications in patients with surgical diseases – Multicentr trials. Lek Obzor. 2020;69(7-8):257-260.
30. Benson RJ, Govindarajan M, Muir JM, Lamb IR, Sculco PK. Surgical approach and reaming depth influence the direction and magnitude of acetabular center of rotation changes during total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today. 2020;6(3):414-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2020.04.003
31. Messer-Hannemann P, Bätz J, Lampe F, Klein A, Püschel K, Campbell GM, Morlock M. The influence of cavity preparation and press-fit cup implantation on restoring the hip rotation center. Clin Biomech. 2019;63:185-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.03.006
32. Marsh M, Newman S. Trends and developments in hip and knee arthroplasty technology. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2021;8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668320952043
33. Siddiqui MF, Alam A, Kalmatov R, Mouna A, Villela R, Mitalipova A, Mrad YN, Rahat SAA, Magarde BK, Muhammad W, Sherbaevna SR, Tashmatova N, Islamovna UG, Abuassi MA, Parween Z. Leveraging healthcare system with nature-inspired computing techniques: An overview and future perspective. Stud Comput Intell. 2023;1066:19–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6379-7_2
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Oleksandr Zubkov, Victor Torchynskyi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
