Resin inlays as an aesthetic alternative to conventional restorations in posterior teeth. Case study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2024.561

Keywords:

adhesion, cementation, contraction, incrustation, composite resin

Abstract

The systematized professional experience was developed from the analysis of a case treated based on resin inlays as an aesthetic alternative to conventional restorations in posterior teeth. The description of the design and care protocol prior to the attention of the ethics committee is of relevant importance. The objective was to expose the use of composite resin under indirect technique as an alternative to the structural involvement of posterior teeth in a patient treated at the postgraduate clinic of the San Gregorio University of Portoviejo, Manabí, Ecuador. Dies were used as a basis for making the inlays using the incremental technique. To obtain the model, the arch of the selected teeth was impressed with alginate, followed by casting in light silicone for the prepared portion of the tooth and in type III stone plaster for the rest. The cementation process in the oral cavity is carried out with dual resin cement. After analyzing the information collected, an encouraging conclusion is reached that supports the viability and predictability of composite resins indirectly in clinical settings. This, of course, provided that there is a deep knowledge of the advantages and limitations inherent to the various materials involved. Likewise, it is positioned as a reasonable alternative for cases of considerably affected teeth, which, in some instances, could have been considered for more extensive treatments, such as crowns, which involves the removal of remaining dental tissue that could possibly have been preserved

References

1. Andaluz ME. Estudio comparativo de restauraciones complejas utilizando resina y porcelana en segundos molares inferiores. Universidad de Guayaquil. 2014. https://repositorio.ug.edu.ec/bitstreams/7518447f-72cf-43e3-b4bc-5ed68110d946/download

2. Ortuño M. Materiales para aplicaciones médicas: Biomateriales metálicos. Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena. 2022. https://repositorio.upct.es/bitstreams/1f33fb39-7150-4f6d-a596-1dd339c1734e/download

3. Re D, Cerutti A, Mangani F, Putignano A. Restauraciones estéticas-adhesivas indirectas parciales en sectores posteriores. Amolca. 2009.

4. Cruz AC, Díaz A, Méndez JE. Uso de incrustaciones de resina compuesta tipo onlay en molares estructuralmente comprometidos. Revista Cubana de Estomatología. 2012;49(1):55–62. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/est/v49n1/est08112.pdf

5. Iglesia MA. Restauraciones de recubrimiento parcial indirectas adheridas en sectores posteriores: indicaciones actuales. Revista Internacional de Prótesis Estomatológica. 2022; 22(2): 20–38. https://clinicamaip.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2020-Iglesia-Puig-MA-Rev-Int-Protesis-Indicaciones-incrustaciones_compressed.pdf

6. Yaya A. Uso del cerómetro como alternativa en la reconstrucción de molares con incrustaciones tipo inlay. Universidad peruana los Andes. 2022. https://repositorio.upla.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12848/3804/TRABAJO%20DE%20SUFICIENCIA%20PROFESIONAL.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

7. Quisbert E, Quenta S, Valencia S. Incrustaciones Estéticas. Rev Actual Clínica. 2012; 22: 1156-1160. http://revistasbolivianas.umsa.bo/pdf/raci/v22/v22_a07.pdf

8. Orea DC. Influencia de Strectococcus Mutains sobre la resistencia a la comprensión diametral de resinas compuestas usadas en Odontología. Universidad Autónoma De Querétaro, Especialidad En Endodoncia. 2022. https://ri-ng.uaq.mx/bitstream/123456789/4389/1/RI007114.pdf

9. Gurrea J. Restauraciones parciales posteriores indirectas. Protocolo clínico. Rev Int Prótesis Estomatológica. 2021; 23(2): 8–24. https://www.sepes.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/lectura-recomendada-restauraciones-parciales-posteriores-indirectas-jon-gurrea-arroyo.pdf

10. Bertoldi A. Rehabilitación posendodóncica. Base racional y consideraciones estéticas. S.A.C.F. EMP, editor. 2012. Editorial médica panamericana. 2011.

11. Barbero J. Patología y Terapéutica Dental. Editorial Síntesis. Madrid, 2000.

12. Zarza A. Elevación de la caja proximal y calidad del sellado marginal en inlays. 2019. [s.n.].

13. Vicente A, Ortiz AJ, Parra PL, Calvo JL, Chiva F. Microleakage in class V composite and compomer restorations following exposure to a colutory prescribed for the treatment of xerostomy. Odontology. 2011;99(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-010-0149-9

14. Febres LA. Incrustación Inlays con cerómero. Reporte de un caso clínico. Universidad Peruana Los Andés. 2020. https://repositorio.upla.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12848/1837/TRABAJO%20DE%20SUFICIENCIA%20PROFESIONAL.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

15. Arias J, Becerra J, Herrera C, Ruíz B. Prevalencia de asimetrías mandibulares en radiografías panorámicas en pacientes de la clínica de adultos de la Universidad Antonio Nariño; Sede de Villavicencio. 2016. https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/bitstreams/9fd4fddb-5637-4000-b9d0-84a4873a3058/download

16. Nicoló S. Efecto del sellado dentinario inmediato en las fuerzas de adhesión de las restauraciones indirectas: una revisión sistemática. Presentado. [Valencia, España]: Universidad Valencia de España; 2022. https://titula.universidadeuropea.com/handle/20.500.12880/5744?locale-attribute=en

17. Aparecida F, Carelli J, Campos T, Pietrobon R, Rodrigues C, Bonilauri A. Recommendations for the prevention of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. A Syst Rev J Evid Based Dent Pr. 2018; 18(2): 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.11.002

18. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan T. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. 2005; 8(3):166-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60052-3

19. Magne P, So WS, Cascione D. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98(3): 166–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60052-3

20. De-Carvalho MA, Lazari-Carvalho PC, Polonial IF, De-Souza JB, Magne P. Significance of immediate dentin sealing and flowable resin coating reinforcement for unfilled/lightly filled adhesive systems. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33(1): 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12700

21. Díaz CA, López Y, Valdés H, Martínez M. (2021). Elementos de pertinencia para una especialización en operatoria dental y estética. Universidad San Gregorio de Portoviejo. Revista San Gregorio, (48), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.36097/rsan.v0i48.1851

Downloads

Published

2024-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Alvarado Pino LE, Garcia Loor JV. Resin inlays as an aesthetic alternative to conventional restorations in posterior teeth. Case study. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología [Internet]. 2024 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 4];4:.561. Available from: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/561