Innovation in Digital Personalized Learning based on gamifications for learning in SMA during and post COVID-19 pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2022240Keywords:
Digital Personalized Learning, Gamification, Covid-19, PandemicAbstract
According to the UNICEF 2020 through the U-Report channel survey, it was stated that over 4 000 students were polled in 34 Indonesian provinces, with 87 percent of students acknowledging that they prefer to study at school. Furthermore, according to the Unesco-Unicef case study report, up to 66 percent of the 60 million students at various levels of education admitted to not feeling comfortable studying from home during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, the solutions offered cannot be implemented because, even if E-learning is used properly, it cannot solve the problem unless it is supported by the readiness of mature human resources. The purpose of this study is to reduce learning loss among high school students during online learning due to the pandemic. Therefore, with the development of gamification-based learning media innovations, an exciting and fun learning environment can be created while students gain a thorough understanding of the material. Furthermore, the existence of this learning media innovation can direct high school students who enjoy playing games to be delighted to receive learning materials that are designed to play. The goal of this research is to eventually serve as one of the steps towards a solution to raise students' academic achievement standards in the midst of a pandemic. This research is critical in order to overcome the pandemic's effects on education in Indonesia
References
1. Andriani W, Subandowo M, Karyono H, Gunawan W. Learning Loss in Online Learning in the Corona Pandemic Period. Semin. Nas. technol. Learning. 2021;1(1):1.
2. Cahyani A, Listiana ID, Larasati SPD. Learning Motivation of High School Students in Online Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic. IQ of Al-Quran Science J Educator Islam. 2020;3(1):57. https://doi.org/10.37542/iq.v3i01.57.
3. Pratiwi W D. Dynamics of Learning Loss: Teachers and Parents. Jurnal Edukasi Nonformal. 2021;2(1):147–153.
4. Nu'man AZ. Effectiveness of application of the edmodo e-learning model in learning islamic religious education on student learning outcomes (Case Study: SMK Muhammadiyah 1 Sukoharjo). DutaCom. 2014;7(1):1.
5. Nadziroh F. The Analisa Efektifitas Sistem Pembelajaran Berbasis E-Learning. Journal of Computer Science and Visual Communication Design 2017;2:1–14..
6. Sagita M, Nisa K. Utilization of e-learning for educators in the digital 4.0 era. J Sos Hum Sigli. 2019;2(2):2. https://doi.org/10.47647/jsh.v2i2.169.
7. Adi NNS, Oka DN, Wati NMS. Positive and Negative Impacts of Distance Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Imiah Educator And Learning. 2021;5(1):1. https://doi.org/0.23887/jipp.v5i1.32803.
8. Nafrin IA, Hudaidah H. The Development of Indonesian Education in the Time of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Educative J Ilmu Pendidik. 2021;3(2):2. http://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i2.324.
9. Fauziyaturrosyidah A. Gamification method as a solution to learning loss phenomenon in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Literature Review. COLLAGE Creat Learn Studs element Educ. 2021;4(5):5.
10. Wrigley C, Mosely G, Tomitsch M. Design Thinking Education: A Comparison of Massive Open Online Courses. She Ji J Des Econ Innov. 2018;4(3):275-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2018.06.002.
11. Edelman JA, Owoyele B, Santuber J, Talbot AV. Designing as Performance: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice in Design Thinking Education. In: Meinel C, Leifer L, eds. Design Thinking Research. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021:75-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62037-0_3.
12. Linton G, Klinton M. University entrepreneurship education: a design thinking approach to learning. J Innov Entrep. 2019;8(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-018-0098-z.
13. Marantz Cohen R, Mule L. Collaborative Pedagogy in a Design Thinking Education Course. InSight J Sch Teach. 2019 Aug;14:29-42. https://doi.org/10.46504/14201902ma.
14. Novak E, Mulvey BK. Enhancing design thinking in instructional technology students. J Comput Assist Learn. 2021 Feb;37(1):80-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12470.
15. Mosely G, Wright N, Wrigley C. Facilitating design thinking: A comparison of design expertise. Think Skiing Creat. 2018 Mar;27:177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.02.004.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Andi Basuki, Andreas Syah Pahlevi , Madziatul Churiyah , Ari Gunawan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
