The triple helix model linked to knowledge transfer and economic progress from universities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2023314Keywords:
Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Triple Helix Model, Decision Making, Knowledge TransferAbstract
The strategic actions that are being developed from the Ecuadorian universities, are heading towards the linking of innovative factors under an interrelated scheme known as Triple Helix, whose intention is framed in connecting entrepreneurship, using knowledge and society as a platform, generating a model sustainable development between university-state-business. The objective of this research is to show the relationship between university-company-state with entrepreneurial research through the triple helix functional model, with a view to innovative potentializing that serves as a boost to socioeconomic progress. The research approach is qualitative at a descriptive level, using a hermeneutical review focused on entrepreneurship studies, business and university alliances, government plans and the triple helix theory. The results indicate that scientific research based on the triple helix method should be strengthened, the main obstacles being lack of communication, business disinterest and distorted state policies. The Ecuadorian universities UEM, UTB and UEB must make concerted efforts so that the investigations are directed towards the true social needs of each area. The conclusions indicate that the links of the triple helix model lead to socioeconomic strengthening through the development of research and scientific projects, without neglecting technological advances
References
1. Navarro J. La economía del conocimiento. McGraw Hill; 2018.
2. Gómez M del CF, Crespo G de la CR. Una incursión al Modelo Triple Hélice, visto desde la Uni-versidad Metropolitana del Ecuador. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas 2020;3:204-11.
3. Bellés-Obrero C, Duchini E. Who benefits from general knowledge? Economics of Education Review 2021;85:102122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102122.
4. Montes DCR, Bonfante JSO. La relación entre la triple hélice (universidad-empresa-estado) y el trabajo investigativo de los semilleros con noción emprendedora. Gestión y Desarrollo Libre 2021;6.
5. Pullen-Sansfaçon A, Spolander G, Engelbrecht L. Migration of Professional Social Workers: Re-flections on Challenges and Strategies for Education. Social Work Education 2012;31:1032-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2011.609543.
6. González Ortiz J. Semilleros de Investigacion: una estrategia formativa. Psychología: Avances de la Disciplina 2008;2:185-90.
7. Giraldo Martinez GA, Valencia Pérez LR, Giraldo Martinez GA, Valencia Pérez LR. The Triple Helix and its Intervention in the Research and Development of Products for International Security and Defense. Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad 2022;17:31-46. https://doi.org/10.18359/ries.5600.
8. Gómez Cano CA. Ingreso, permanencia y estrategias para el fomento de los Semilleros de In-vestigación en una IES de Colombia. Región Científica 2022;1:46-56. https://doi.org/10.55204/rc.v1i1.28.
9. Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix -- University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development 1995.
10. Etzkowitz H. La triple hélice: universidad, industria y gobierno. Implicaciones para las políticas y la evaluación. Estocolmo: Science Policy Institute; 2002.
11. Carayannis EG, Campbell DFJ. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? : A Proposed Framework for a Trans-disciplinary Analysis of Sustainable Development and Social Ecology. IJSESD 2010;1:41-69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105.
12. Cai Y, Etzkowitz H. Theorizing the Triple Helix model: Past, present, and future. Triple Helix 2020;7:189-226. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10003.
13. Hou B, Hong J, Shi X. Efficiency of university–industry collaboration and its determinants: evi-dence from Chinese leading universities. Industry and Innovation 2021;28:456-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1706455.
14. Castillo HGC. El modelo de la triple hélice como un medio para la vinculación entre la universi-dad y empresa. Revista Nacional de Administración 2010;1:85-94. https://doi.org/10.22458/rna.v1i1.286.
15. Jurado DB, Larrea GN, Abril KR, Vélez JC. Academia, gobierno y empresas una perspectiva desde la vinculacion con la colectividad. Revista de Investigación Enlace Universitario 2020;19:60-71.
16. Rodrigues C, Melo A. The Triple Helix Model as an Instrument of Local Response to the Econo-mic Crisis. European Planning Studies 2012;20:1483-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.709063.
17. Castillo L, Lavín J, Pedraza N. La gestión de la triple hélice: fortaleciendo las relaciones entre la universidad, empresa, gobierno. Multiciencias 2014;14:19482.
18. Mora MC. El modelo de la triple hélice en la comprensión y desarrollo de proyectos sociales complejos en Costa Rica. Revista Nacional de Administración 2014;5:115-30. https://doi.org/10.22458/rna.v5i1.679.
19. Rojo Gutiérrez MA, Bonilla Jurado DM, Masaquiza Caiza CS, Rojo Gutiérrez MA, Bonilla Jurado DM, Masaquiza Caiza CS. El desarrollo de nuevos productos y su impacto en la producción: caso de estudio BH Consultores. Revista Universidad y Sociedad 2018;10:134-42.
20. Alvarez JC, Inche Mitma JL, Hadzich M, Quispe Santivañez GW, Armacanqui JS, Samamé CE. Attempts for an Effective Renewable-Energy Knowledge Transfer at Peruvian Universities: En: Günay D, Asunakutlu T, Yildiz O, editores. Advances in Higher Education and Professional De-velopment, IGI Global; 2021, p. 220-35. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3901-9.ch011.
21. Rodríguez AER, Montero ABM, Pérez EA, García RM. La Triple hélice social para el desarrollo desde la gestión del conocimiento. DELOS: DESARROLLO LOCAL SOSTENIBLE 2018;11.
22. Borda-Rivera EA, Ortega-Paredes GC, Borda-Rivera EA, Ortega-Paredes GC. Rol de la universi-dad en la cooperación universidad-empresa-gobierno como un sistema regional de innovación: el caso Arequipa, Perú. Formación universitaria 2021;14:13-24. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062021000600013.
23. Chang Y-C, Chen P-H, Teng M-J. How do institutional changes facilitate university-centric net-works in Taiwan? The Triple Helix model of innovation view. Science and Public Policy 2021;48:309-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa076.
24. Rowan NJ, Casey O. Empower Eco multiactor HUB: A triple helix ‘academia-industry-authority’ approach to creating and sharing potentially disruptive tools for addressing novel and emerging new Green Deal opportunities under a United Nations Sustainable Development Goals frame-work. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health 2021;21:100254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2021.100254.
25. Albats E. Triple Helix Futures. Triple Helix 2021;8:393-403. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-12340005.
26. Fe TG de la. El modelo de Triple Hélice de relaciones universidad, industria y gobierno: un aná-lisis crítico. Arbor 2009;185:739-55. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2009.738n1049.
27. Pineda Márquez K, Rubiano MM, Riaga MO. Modelos y mecanismos de interacción universidad-empresa-estado: retos para las universidades colombianas. Equidad y Desarrollo 2011;1:41-67. https://doi.org/10.19052/ed.193.
28. Antúnez AF, Díaz E. El modelo de la triple hélice y el desarrollo sostenible 2019.
29. Torres P. El modelo de la triple hélice como propuesta para incorporar innovación en la acuicul-tura nacional. Gestión de las Personas y Tecnología 2019;12:59-75.
30. Ranga M, Etzkowitz H. Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education 2013;27:237-62. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165.
31. Bonilla Jurado DM, Ocampo León CS, Camacho Escobar MA, Pinos Morales GJ. Estudio legal y estrategias sobre vinculación universitaria con la colectividad, Caso Ecuador. Killkana sociales: Revista de Investigación Científica 2019;3:57-64.
32. Berghaeuser H, Hoelscher M. Reinventing the third mission of higher education in Germany: political frameworks and universities’ reactions. Tert Educ Manag 2020;26:57-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-019-09030-3.
33. Compagnucci L, Spigarelli F. The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2020;161:120284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284.
34. Guevara C, Guevara RL, Jurado DMB. Bricoleurs: Resilience in Improvised Work in a Publishing House. Industrial Cognitive Ergonomics and Engineering Psychology, vol. 35, AHFE Open Acces; 2022. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001610.
35. Leydesdorff L, Park HW. Can synergy in Triple Helix relations be quantified? A review of the development of the Triple Helix indicator. Triple Helix 2014;1:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-014-0004-z.
36. Hassan NA. University business incubators as a tool for accelerating entrepreneurship: theoretical perspective. Review of Economics and Political Science 2020;ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/REPS-10-2019-0142.
37. Kopczynska E, Ferreira JJ. The Role of Government Measures in University-Industry Collabora-tion for Economic Growth: A Comparative Study across Levels of Economic Development. Triple Helix 2021;8:486-533. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10023.
38. Arévalo YB, García MB. Scientific production on dialogical pedagogy: a bibliometric analysis. Data & Metadata 2023;2:7. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm20237.
39. Peralta-González MJ, Gregorio-Chaviano O. Scientific activity evaluation in Cuban universities: Analysis based on Scival (2011-2021). Iberoamerican Journal of Science Measurement and Communication 2022;2. https://doi.org/10.47909/ijsmc.145
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Diego Bonilla-Jurado , Cesar Guevara , Ivanna Karina Sánchez Montero , Sarah Jacqueline Iza Pazmiño (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
