Analysis of the implementation of the HyFlex model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2023367Keywords:
Hyflex Model, Innovation, Teaching And Learning Process, Hybrid Education, Educational FlexibilityAbstract
The main purpose of the research was to determine the relationship between the HyFlex model and the teaching-learning process at the INEI 34 Educational Institution, located in the district of Chancay, Peru. In terms of methodology, a quantitative approach was used, with a non-experimental, transectional and correlational design. The study had a population of 90 teachers and a participating sample of 73 teachers. Likewise, the information was compiled by means of a survey, using a questionnaire designed on a Likert scale as an instrument. The hypotheses were tested using Spearman's Rho coefficient. It was demonstrated with a positive and moderate correlation of 0,640 and an asymptotic significance (0,001) lower than the significance level (0,05), that the HyFlex model has a direct relationship with the teaching-learning process in the INEI 34 Educational Institution, Chancay. This allowed inferring that the HyFlex model contributes to the implementation of content and educational commitment, using technology, to provide flexibility in the educational experience of the students. In other words, this model contributes to improve the teaching-learning process in a hybrid environment, in which students benefit from learning and in which the teacher is an agent of support for them
References
1. Area-Moreira M. La enseñanza remota de emergencia durante la COVID-19. Los desafíos postpandemia en la Educación Superior. Propuesta Educativa. 2021;2(56):57-70.
2. Abu Talib M, Bettayeb AM, Omer RI. Analytical study on the impact of technology in higher education during the age of COVID-19: Systematic literature review. Educ Inf Technol. 2021; 26:6719-6746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10507-1
3. Barlow A, Adekola J, Siddiqui N. Current and Future Online and Blended Learning Provisions. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice;9(2):39-53. https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v9i2.480
4. García L. COVID-19 y educación a distancia digital: preconfinamiento, confinamiento y posconfinamiento. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 2021;24(1):9-25. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.24.1.28080
5. Area-Moreira M, Bethencourt-Aguilar A, Martín-Gómez S. HyFlex: Enseñar y aprender de modo híbrido y flexible en la educación superior. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 2023; 26(1):141-161. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.26.1.34023
6. Beatty B. Hybrid-Flexible Course Design: Implementing Student-Directed Hybrid Classes. United States of America: EdTech Books; 2019.
7. Bostock JR. A Model of Flexible Learning: Exploring Interdependent Relationships Between Students, Lecturers, Resources and Contexts in Virtual Spaces. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice. 2018; 6(1). https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i1.298
8. Nortvig AM, Petersen AK, Balle SH. A Literature Review of the Factors Influencing E-Learning and Blended Learning in Relation to Learning Outcome, Student Satisfaction and Engagement. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 2018;16(1):46-55.
9. Bayona Arévalo Y, Bolaño García M. Scientific production on dialogical pedagogy: a bibliometric analysis. Data & Metadata. 2023;2:7. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm20237
10. Sangrà A, Guitert-Catasús M, Behar PA. Competencias y metodologías innovadoras para la educación digital. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia. 2023;26(1):9-16. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.26.1.36081
11. Romero HY, Chávez NV, Gutiérrez IM. HyFlex, hybrid and flexible model for university education: Case study: Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja - Ecuador. 11th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). 2016:1202-1204.
12. Martínez Sánchez R. Transforming online education: the impact of gamification on teacher training in a university environment. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research. 2023;2:47. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202347
13. Ministerio de Educación. Diseño Curricular Básico Nacional de la Formación Inicial Docente. 2020. http://www.iesppmfgb.
edu.pe/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Diseño-Curricular-Básico-Nacional-2019-Educación-Primaria-09082019.pdf
14. Hernández R, Mendoza C. Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. 1ra. Ed. Ciudad de México: Mc-Graw Hill; 2018
15. Lanuza F, Rizo M, Saavedra L. Uso y aplicación de las TIC en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Revista Científica de FAREM-Estelí Medio ambiente, tecnología y desarrollo humano. 2018(5):16-30. https://doi.org/10.5377/farem.v0i25.5667
16. Naffi N. The Hyber-Flexible Course Design Model (HyFlex): A Pedagogical Strategy for Uncertain Times. Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire. 2020;17(2):136-143. https://doi.org/10.18162/ritpu-2020-v17n2-14
17. Albarracín Vanoy RJ. STEM Education as a Teaching Method for the Development of XXI Century Competencies. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research. 2022;1:21. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202221
18. Lohmann MJ, Randolph KM, Oh JH. Classroom Management Strategies for Hyfex Instruction: Setting Students Up for Success in the Hybrid Environment. Early Childhood Education Journal. 2021;(49):807-814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01201-5
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rosario Caldas Jayo, Abrahán Cesar Neri Ayala , Algemiro Julio Muñoz Vilela , Edgar Tito Susanibar Ramirez , Sergio la Cruz Orbe (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
