Validation of the developed value clarification technique by short video project (vct-svp) learning model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20262633Keywords:
Development, Validity, Value Clarification Technique, Short Video Project, and Pancasila EducationAbstract
Introduction: Pancasila education in Indonesia is a compulsory general subject, and Pancasila education in higher education institutions has experienced ups and downs. In addition, the policy of implementing Pancasila education in higher education is not always well implemented in both public and private universities. This study aims to develop a Value Clarification Technique Learning Model through Short Video Projects (VCT-SVP) to foster the character value of patriotism in Pancasila Education courses at the university level.
Method: This study uses the ADDIE development model, focusing on the analysis, design, and development stages. This model combines the Value Clarification Technique (VCT) with short video projects, providing a platform for students to express and internalize character values. Validity testing included instrument validation, self-evaluation, and expert validation. Aiken's V and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were applied to determine the validity and reliability of the developed product.
Conclusions: The findings showed that the instruments and prototype of the VCT-SVP model were valid and feasible for further implementation. Specifically, the model book obtained an average Aiken's V value of 0.77, categorized as valid. Meanwhile, the lecturer's and student's books obtained Aiken's V values of 0.84 and 0.85, respectively, both of which are included in the "very valid" category.
References
Karras, T., Laine, S., Aittala, M., Hellsten, J., Lehtinen, J., & Aila, T. (2020). Analyzing and Improving the Image Quality of StyleGAN. 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00813 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00813
2. Ibtehaz, N., & Rahman, M. S. (2020). MultiResUNet: Rethinking the U-Net architecture for multimodal biomedical image segmentation. Neural Networks, 121, 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2019.08.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2019.08.025
3. Cano, T., & Gracia, P. (2022). The Gendered Effects of Divorce on Mothers’ and Fathers’ Time with Children and Children’s Developmental Activities: A Longitudinal Study. In European Journal of Population (Vol. 38, Issue 5). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09643-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-022-09643-2
4. Noviarsyh Dasaprawira, M., Zulkardi, & Susanti, E. (2019). Developing mathematics questions of Pisa type using Bangka context. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.5366.303-314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.5366.303-314
5. Garcia, S. N., Osburn, B. I., & Jay-Russell, M. T. (2020). One Health for Food Safety, Food Security, and Sustainable Food Production. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4(January), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00001
6. Nyarugwe, S. P., Linnemann, A. R., & Luning, P. A. (2020). Prevailing food safety culture in companies operating in a transition economy - Does product riskiness matter? Food Control, 107(June 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.106803
7. Filippaki, A. (2023). Building a Collective School Culture to Achieve Education for Sustainability: The Contribution of Teachers’ Perceptions. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11. https://www.scirp.org/journal/jss DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.114003
8. Yadewani, D., & Wijaya, R. (2019). The relationship between reward, work discipline, motivation and employee job satisfaction among employees of inews tv padang, indonesia. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2 Special Issue 9), 491–494. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1109.0982S919 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1109.0982S919
9. Nieveen, N.&Folmer, E. (2013). Formatif Evaluation in Educational Desain Research. In Plomp, T. & Nieveen, N. (Eds)Educational Design Research. Part A: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
10. Syafriandi, S., Fauzan, A., & Armiati, L. L. and A. (2020). Designing hypothetical learning trajectory for learning the importance of hypothesis testing. 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012045
11. Nyarugwe, S. P., Linnemann, A. R., Ren, Y., Bakker, E. J., Kussaga, J. B., Watson, D., Fogliano, V., & Luning, P. A. (2020). An intercontinental analysis of food safety culture in view of food safety governance and national values. Food Control, 111(September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107075
12. Taniredja, Tukiran, et al. (2015). Indonesia baru: empat konsensus satu dasar berbangsa dan bernegara Indonesia: Pancasila, Proklamasi Kemerdekaan, UUD 1945, NKRI, dan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika. Ombak.
13. Buchori, Rahmawati, S., & Wardani, S. (2017). The Development of A Learning Media for Visualizing the Pancasila Values Based on Information and Communication Technology. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(3), 502–521. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i3.12748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i3.12748
14. Widiana, I. W., Kertih, I. W., Kristiantari, M. G. R., Parmiti, D. P., & Adijaya, M. A. (2022). The Effect of Project Based Assessment with Value Clarification Technique in Improving Students’ Civics Learning Outcomes by Controlling the Family Environment. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 1969–1979. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.1969 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.1969
15. Minsih., H. B. &. (2023). The Value Clarification Technique Learning Model Improves the Character of Elementary School Students. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(2), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i2.58502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i2.58502
16. Pgsd, P. S., Pendidikan, U., Kampus, I., & Abdurachman, J. M. (2018). The Implementation of Character Education at. 00085, 4–9.
17. Widyatiningtyas, R., Kusumah, Y. S., Sumarmo, U., & Sabandar, J. (2015). The impact of problem-based learning approach tosenior high school students’ mathematics critical thinking ability. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(2), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.6.2.2165.107-116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.6.2.2165.107-116
18. Charlton, P. H., Paliakaite, B., Pilt, K., Bachler, M., Zanelli, S., Kulin, D., Allen, J., Hallab, M., Bianchini, E., Mayer, C. C., Terentes-Printzios, D., Dittrich, V., Hametner, B., Veerasingam, D., Zikic, D., & Marozas, V. (2022). Assessing hemodynamics from the photoplethysmogram to gain insights into vascular age: a review from VascAgeNet. American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 322(4), H493–H522. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00392.2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00392.2021
19. Laitinen-Väänänen et al., S. (2024). The Role of EdTech in Higher Education: Enhancing Nationalism Values Through Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222241299693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222241299693
20. Mutodi, P. (2014). The Influence of Students ` Perceptions on Mathematics Performance . A Case of a Selected High School in South Africa The Influence of Students ` Perceptions on Mathematics Performance . A Case of a Selected High School in South Africa. March. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n3p431 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n3p431
21. Maemanah, A., & Winarso, W. (2019). Pengaruh kecerdasan logis matematis terhadap disposisi matematis siswa. 4(1), 48–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2019.4.1.48-57
22. Sulfemi & Mayasari, N., W. B. (2019). he Role of the Value Clarification Technique Learning Model Assisted by Audio-Visual Media in Enhancing Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Pendidikan Inovasi, 23(3), 78–90.
23. Astiti, N. K. ., Arini, N. ., & Suarjana, I. . (2017). The Influence of the Power Point-Assisted VCT Learning Model on Pancasila Education Learning Outcome. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 12(2), 121–130.
24. Lisievici, P., & Andronie, M. (n.d.). Teachers Assessing the Effectiveness of Values Clarification Techniques in Moral Education. Journal of Moral Education, 45(1).
25. Aka, K.A., & Sahari, S. (2017). Development Of Interactive Multimedia Teaching Materials In Pkn Learning For Grade V Elementary School Oriented On Value Clarification Techniques | Semantic Scholar.
26. Sugiyono. (2022). Quantitaive, Qualitative and R &D Research method. - Flipbook by Perpustakaan Literasi Digital | FlipHTML5. Alfabeta, CV.
27. Zuo, L., Strauss, J., & Zuo, L. (2021). The digitalization transformation of commercial banks and its impact on sustainable efficiency improvements through investment in science and technology. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU131911028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911028
28. Lira, M. A. (2023). The Father’s Responsibility for the Fulfillment of Child Support Post-Divorce. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 59–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v5i2.291
29. Taksonomijos, B. (2021). Izabela SAVICKIENĖ sampraTa paGal Bloomo Taksonomijos eMoCinĘ sritĮ concepTion oF learninG ouTcomes in The Bloom’s TaXonomy aFFecTiVe DoMain. 37–59.
30. Bayu, E. S., Fauzan, A., & A. (2023). The development of teacher and student’s book based on realistic mathematics education in statistics for package a program. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.119
31. Bashooir, K., & S. (2018). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Asesmen Kinerja Literasi Sains Pelajaran Fisika Berbasis STEM (Validity and Reliability of Science Literacy Performance Assessment Instruments in STEM-Based Physics Lessons). Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.19590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.19590
32. Irawan, E. & W. (2020). Development of an online mathematical misconception instrument. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012080
33. Murti, B. (2011). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Pengukuran. Martikulasi Program Doktoral, Fakultas Kedokteran, UNS.
34. Matarazzo, M., Penco, L., Profumo, G., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Digital transformation and customer value creation in Made in Italy SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 123, 642–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.033
35. Joyce & Weil, M., B. (1980). Models of Teaching. Journal of Educational Research, 73(5), 40–50.
36. Darmansyah. (2023). Model Model Desain Instruksional. Rajawali Pers.
37. Kemendikbud. (2024). Kurikulum Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, Dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. Permendikbud Ristek Nomor 12 Tahun 2024, 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59966/arunikawidya.v1i1.18
38. Bruce, 2011. (2013). 済無No Title No Title. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53, Issue 9). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
39. Alya, N. A. (2023). Implementation of the value clarification technique (VCT) learning model to improve students’ discussion skills in civics subjects for class V UPTD SD Negeri 64 Barru. https://eprints.unm.ac.id/34016/
40. Badeni, Meylani, Y., & Juwita, P. (2020). Development of value clarification technique learning models-based role-playing game to increase internalization of student character values. Advances in Social Science. Education and Humanities Research, 422, 345–351. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.147 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.147
41. Anantama Dewantoro, K. E. S. (2019). THE INFLUENCE OF VALUE CLARIFICATION TECHNIQUE (VCT) LEARNING MODEL ON HOMELAND ATTITUDE AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Journal «ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education», 32(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2019.177106
42. Destari, D., Kurniawati, H., Yolanda, AT, Tannady, H., & Magdalena, M. (2023). The analysis of improving student learning outcomes using the value clarification technique learning model. Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 3300–3305. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3395 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3395
43. Oktavia, SS, & Abdulkarim, A. (2022). The use of the VCT model in civic education to build the moral awareness of students in the global era. Proceedings of the Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2021), 412–416. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220108.075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220108.075
44. Halimah, S. (2020). The effect of value clarification technique learning models and learning styles on the achievement learning outcomes of class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong. Kelas VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong. https://bircu-journal.com/index.php/birle/article/view/118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i3.1189
45. Nisa’, A. (2020). The effectiveness of value clarification technique (VCT) and problem-based learning (PBL) models on social problem solving skills viewed from emotional intelligence. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/322539554.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.734977
46. Akhwani, A., & Nurizka, R. (2021). Meta-Analisis on Quasi Eksperimental Model; learning Value Clarification Technique (VCT) toward students achievements in elementary school. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.706 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i2.706
47. Hidayat, R., & Abdillah, A. (2019). Educational sciences: Concept, theory and applications Indonesian education development care institution. http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/8064/1/Buku Ilmu Pendidikan Rahmat Hidayat %26 Abdillah.pdf
48. Gleneagles, D. B., Larasyifa, F., & Fawaiz, R. (2024). Peran Teknologi Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) dalam Meningkatkan Efisiensi Proses Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipline, 2(5), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11364580
49. Blanka, C., Krumay, B., & Rueckel, D. (2022). The interplay of digital transformation and employee competency: A design science approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121575. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2022.121575 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121575
50. Kumar, R., & Singh, D. (2019). Challenges in implementing project-based learning: A review of the literature. In Journal of Educational Development, 47(4).
51. Garcia, S. N., Osburn, B. I., & Jay-Russell, M. T. (2020). One Health for Food Safety, Food Security, and Sustainable Food Production. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4(January), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00001
52. Ariningsih, I., & Amalia, R. (2020). building students’ character though Islamic intergrated mathematics learning. Journal on Teacher Education, 1(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31004/jote.v1i2.511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jote.v1i2.511
53. Sarifuddin, N., & Ahmad, A. (2023). The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning Using the Jigsaw II Method in Writing History Essays. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (Mjssh), 8(1). https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i1.2030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i1.2030
54. Sriyanto, R. K., Edi Suresman, & S. A. (2024). The Effectiveness of the Value Clarification Technique Learning Model on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in PAI Learning. Tarbiyatuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.54471/tarbiyatuna.v17i1.2572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54471/tarbiyatuna.v17i1.2572
55. Thurlings, M., Koopman, M., Brok, P. Den, Brok, D., Portraying, B., Thurlings, M., Koopman, M., Brok, P. Den, & Pepin, B. (2019). Portraying Primary Fraction Teaching : A Variety of Mathematical Richness , Pedagogic Strategies , and Use of Curriculum Materials To cite this article : Portraying Primary Fraction Teaching : A Variety of Mathematical Richness , Pedagogic Strategies , an. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.552452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.552452
56. Lee Kim, S., & Kim, S., J. (2017). Model as a Comprehensive Representation in Educational Design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1037–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9516-7
57. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Qi Dong, J., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
58. Abdullah, M. A., & Hussain, F. (2022). Educational practices in the 21st century: Project-based learning for holistic student development. International Journal of Educational Research, 93(3), 45–46.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Silvia Anggreni BP, Azwar Ananda, Afriva Khaidir (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
