A Post-Pandemic Management Model for Enhancing Junior High School Teachers’ Professional Competence in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Development and Validation

Authors

  • Vezir Ashyrnepesov Doktoral student at Prodi Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta,Jawa Tengah ,Indonesia Author
  • Suyanto Prodi Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta,Jawa Tengah ,Indonesia Author
  • Cepi Safruddin Abd Jabar Prodi Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta,Jawa Tengah ,Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20262608

Keywords:

Teacher Professional Competence, Post-Pandemic Education, Management Model, Blended Professional Development, Yogyakarta

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic exposed critical gaps in the professional competence of Indonesian teachers, particularly in digital pedagogy and adaptive instruction. In the Special Region of Yogyakarta, government-led initiatives such as the Zoning-Based Learning Competency Development Program (PKP) and the Teacher Leadership Program (PPGP) were implemented during the pandemic but exhibited systemic weaknesses, including inconsistent execution, weak monitoring, and limited reach to suburban and remote schools. This study investigates the management models applied during the pandemic, identifies their operational shortcomings, and proposes a novel, empirically grounded conceptual model for post-pandemic teacher professional development. Using a mixed-methods research and development design adapted from Borg and Gall, data were collected through observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis involving 70 teachers, school principals, supervisors, and education officials in Bantul Regency. Findings reveal that existing models relied on only four classical management functions and suffered from poor planning, inadequate technological integration, and insufficient follow-up. In response, the researchers developed a six-function management model—planning, organizing, facilitating, actuating, controlling, and evaluating—centered on blended collaborative study groups and university–school partnerships. Expert validation (n = 8) and three phases of field trials (n = 10, 20, and 30 teachers) demonstrated high effectiveness (mean = 3.73), efficiency (mean = 3.73), and practicality (mean = 3.67) on a 4-point Likert scale. The model offers a scalable, context-sensitive framework for post-pandemic teacher development in Indonesia and similar Global South contexts.

References

1.

Ashyrnepesov V. Management model for enhancing junior high school teachers’ competence after the COVID-19 pandemic in Yogyakarta [thesis]. Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta State University; 2025.

2.

Moorhouse BL. Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course “forced” online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. J Educ Teach. 2020;46(4):609-611. doi:10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205

3.

Pace C, Pettit SK, Barker KS. Best practices in middle level quaran-teaching: strategies, tips and resources amidst COVID-19. Becoming J Ga Assoc Middle Level Educ. 2020;31(1):2-13. doi:10.20429/becoming.2020.310102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20429/becoming.2020.310102

4.

Azhari B, Fajri I. Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: school closure in Indonesia. Int J Math Educ Sci Technol. 2022;53(7):1934-1954. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2021.1875072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1875072

5.

Viner RM, et al. School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(5):397-404. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30095-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30095-X

6.

Talidong KJB, Toquero CMD. Philippine teachers’ practices to deal with anxiety amid COVID-19. J Loss Trauma. 2020;25(6-7):573-579. doi:10.1080/15325024.2020.1759225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1759225

7.

Zaharah Z, Kirilova GI, Windarti A. Impact of coronavirus outbreak towards teaching and learning activities in Indonesia. Salam J Sos Budaya Syar-i. 2020;7(3):269-281. doi:10.15408/sjsbs.v7i3.15104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i3.15104

8.

Almarzooq Z, Lopes M, Kochar A. Virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a disruptive technology in graduate medical education. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(20):2635-2638. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.015

9.

Nonthamand N. Guideline to develop an instructional design model using video conference in open learning. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2020;15(3):140-149. doi:10.3991/ijet.v15i03.11521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.10842

10.

Napitupulu RM. Dampak pandemi COVID-19 terhadap kepuasan pembelajaran jarak jauh. J Inov Teknol Pendidik. 2020;7(1):23-33. doi:10.21831/jitp.v7i1.32771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v7i1.32771

11.

Aji RHS. Dampak COVID-19 pada pendidikan di Indonesia: sekolah, keterampilan, dan proses pembelajaran. Salam J Sos Budaya Syar-i. 2020;7(5):395-402. doi:10.15408/sjsbs.v7i5.15314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i5.15313

Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología. 2026; 6:2608 6

ISSN: 2796-9711

12.

Engzell P, Frey A, Verhagen MD. Learning loss due to school closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(17):e2022376118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2022376118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022376118

13.

Minardi L, et al. Containing the epidemic: should schools close for coronavirus? Washington (DC): Center for Global Development; 2020. https://www.cgdev.org

14.

World Health Organization. Recommendations from the European Technical Advisory Group for schooling during COVID-19. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2021. https://www.who.int

15.

Mseleku Z. A literature review of e-learning and e-teaching in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Innov Sci Res Technol. 2020;5(10):588-597. https://www.ijisrt.com

16.

Stambough JB, et al. The past, present, and future of orthopaedic education: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(7 Suppl):S60-S64. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.032

17.

Reuge N, Jenkins R, Brossard M, Soobrayan B, Mizunoya S, Ackers J, et al. Education response to the COVID-19 pandemic: editorial review. Int J Educ Dev. 2021;87:102485. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102485

18.

Kaffenberger M. Modeling the long-run learning impact of the COVID-19 learning shock: actions to (more than) mitigate loss. Int J Educ Dev. 2021;81:102326. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102326

19.

Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 20 of 2003 on the National Education System. Jakarta: Government of the Republic of Indonesia; 2003. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/details/43920/uu-no-20-tahun-2003

20.

Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers. Jakarta: Government of the Republic of Indonesia; 2005. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id

21.

Ministry of National Education of the Republic of Indonesia. Regulation of the Minister of National Education No. 16/2007 on teacher competency standards. Jakarta; 2007. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/210400/Permendiknas%20Nomor%2016%20Tahun%202007.pdf

22.

Terry GR. Prinsip-prinsip manajemen. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara; 2012.

23.

Millet JD. Manajemen mutu terpadu dalam pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo; 2002.

24.

Siagian S. Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara; 2018.

25.

Huda M. Evaluasi implementasi program pengembangan keprofesian berkelanjutan berbasis zonasi. J Pendidik Kebudayaan. 2019;25(2):178-193.

26.

Riowati S, Yoenanto R. Pelatihan guru penggerak: dukungan pasca pelatihan dan implementasi di sekolah. J Manaj Pendidik. 2021;12(1):45-58.

27.

Sibagariang T, Siahaan E, Manurung R. Evaluasi efektivitas program guru penggerak. J Manaj Pendidik. 2021;11(2):88-102.

28.

Jannah M, Junaidi A. Kesiapan guru dalam menghadapi pembelajaran berbasis teknologi pasca pandemi. J Teknol Pendidik. 2020;8(2):134-145.

29.

Directorate General GTK. Petunjuk pelaksanaan Program Pengembangan Kompetensi Pembelajaran berbasis Zonasi (PKP). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan; 2019. https://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id

30.

Utami L. Pengembangan kompetensi profesional guru melalui collaborative study group (CSG). In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret; 2015. p. 86-95.

31.

Nugroho PJ, Hartanto TJ. The development of a collaborative training model for elementary school teachers in remote area Indonesia. Int J Innov Creat Change. 2021;15(5):336-353. https://www.ijicc.net

7 Ashyrnepesov V, et al

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20262608

ISSN: 2796-9711

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20262608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20262608

32.

Borg WR, Gall MD. Educational research: an introduction. 10th ed. New York: Longman; 2014.

33.

Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2015.

34.

Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382-385. doi:10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Vezir Ashyrnepesov, Suyanto, Cepi Safruddin Abd Jabar. A Post-Pandemic Management Model for Enhancing Junior High School Teachers’ Professional Competence in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Development and Validation. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 1 [cited 2025 Dec. 29];6:2608. Available from: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/2608