Moving Out Of The Class And Developing Environmental Awareness: Experiential Learning Based Ecopedagogy In Action
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20262586Keywords:
Ecological intelligence, ecopedagogy, environmental awareness, experiential learning, sustainability educationAbstract
Introduction: Integrating experiential learning into ecopedagogy provides a practical framework for fostering students’ ecological intelligence and environmental awareness through authentic, context-based experiences. However, conventional science education in Indonesia remains dominated by classroom-based instruction, limiting students’ engagement with real environmental issues. This study aimed to develop and implement the Experiential Learning–Based Ecopedagogy (ELCoCare) model to bridge theoretical understanding with environmental action.
Method: This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach to design, implement, and evaluate an experiential learning-based ecopedagogy model (ELCoCare) to enhance students’ environmental awareness. The model comprised five experiential stages—experiencing, reflecting, constructing, performing, and continuing—integrated with ecopedagogical principles. Data were collected through observations, questionnaires, reflective journals, and interviews, and analyzed using a mixed-methods approach that combined descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.
Results: The findings indicated a marked improvement in students’ environmental awareness, reflective thinking, and sense of ecological responsibility. Participants exhibited higher sensitivity to local environmental problems and developed innovative solutions through vertical and straightforward farming projects. The structured ELCoCare cycle effectively linked theoretical knowledge with action-oriented sustainability practices.
Conclusions: The ELCoCare model successfully enhanced students’ environmental awareness and ecological intelligence by merging experiential learning with ecopedagogy. The approach promoted critical reflection, problem-solving, and sustainable behavior, preparing students to act as environmentally responsible citizens. The model demonstrates strong potential for integration into higher education curricula to strengthen sustainability-oriented teaching and learning.
References
1. Swaim JA, Maloni MJ, Napshin SA, Henley AB. Influences on Student Intention and Behavior Toward Environmental Sustainability. J Bus Ethics. 2014;124(3):465–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1883-z
2. Kozar JM, Connell KYH. Socially and environmentally responsible apparel consumption: Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. Soc Responsib J. 2013;9(2):316–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2011-0076
3. Jensen BB. Knowledge , Action and Pro- environmental Behaviour Knowledge , Action and Pro-environmental Behaviour. Environ Educ Res. 2002;8(3):37–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145474
4. Mongar K. The impacts of environmental science on Bhutanese students’ environmental sustainability competences. Aust J Environ Educ. 2023;10(2):437–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2023.2
5. Schusler T, Krasny M. Environmental action as context for youth development. J Environ Educ. 2010;41(4):208–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960903479803
6. Russell CL, Hodson D. Whalewatching as critical science education? Can J Sci Math Technol Educ. 2002;2(4):485–504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150209556537
7. Tompkins LJ. A Case for Community-Base Education. Sci Teach. 2005;72(4):34–6.
8. Figueroa Jr. R. TRUCE Carrie McCracken Community Garden Action Project: Garden Mosaics. [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://www.gardenmosaics.cornell.edu/pgs/data/actionread.aspx?garden=107
9. Sun PH, Lee SY. The importance and challenges of outcomebased education - A case study in a private higher education institution. Malaysian J Learn Instr. 2020;17(2):253–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17.2.9
10. Asli S, Abu-Alhiga R, Teti T, Algmal S, Hofstein A, Shehadeh-Nasser A, et al. How Participation in a Teachers’ Eco-Pedagogy Workshop Affects the Promotion of Teachers’ Environmental Education and Organizational Concepts. Eur J Educ Res. 2024;13(1):341–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.341
11. HUNG R. Towards Ecopedagogy: An Education Embracing Ecophilia. Educ Stud Japan. 2017;11(0):43–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.11.43
12. Berberoglu EO. The Effect of Ecopedagogy Based Environmental Education on Environmental Attitude of In-. Int Electron J Environ Educ. 2015;5(2):86–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18497/iejee-green.09988
13. Misiaszek GW. Ecopedagogy: teaching critical literacies of ‘development’, ‘sustainability’, and ‘sustainable development.’ Teach High Educ [Internet]. 2020;25(5):615–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1586668 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1586668
14. Alkan F. Experiential learning: Its effects on achievement and scientific process skills. J Turkish Sci Educ [Internet]. 2016;13(2):15–26. Available from: https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/639
15. Alfaro SMA. Linking Experiential Learning and Real Life: A Design Case Featuring Immersive Learning. J Learn Spaces [Internet]. 2022;11(1):132–42. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1359058%0Ahttps://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1359058.pdf
16. Coker JS, Heiser E, Taylor L, Book C. Impacts of experiential learning depth and breadth on student outcomes. J Exp Educ. 2017;40(1):5–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825916678265
17. Sholeh M. Geography Lesson Development based Ecoliteracy. Adv Soc Sci Educ Humanit Res. 2017;79(Icge 2016):362–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icge-16.2017.70
18. Mohamad Termizi B, Zurida I. Pre-Service Teachers’ Perception Toward Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours. Malaysian J Learn Instr. 2011;8:117–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli.8.2011.7629
19. Depdiknas. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas; 2008.
20. Bauerle TL, Park TD. Experiential Learning Enhances Student Knowledge Retention in the Plant Sciences. Hort Technol. 2012;22(5):715–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.22.5.715
21. Taneja M, Kiran R, Bose SC. Understanding the relevance of experiential learning for entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A gender-wise perspective. Int J Manag Educ [Internet]. 2023;21(1):100760. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100760 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100760
22. Beukers E, Bertolini L. Learning for transitions: An experiential learning strategy for urban experiments. Environ Innov Soc Transitions [Internet]. 2021;40(September):395–407. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.09.004
23. Jacob SA, Power A, Portlock J, Jebara T, Cunningham S, Boyter AC. Competency-based assessment of practice-based experiential learning in undergraduate pharmacy programmes. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021;19(4):1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2021.4.2482
24. Shammas N. Experiential Learning Through the Eyes of Emirati Students. Asian J Univ Educ. 2021;17(4):302–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16217
25. Gauthier VS, Joseph J, Fusco C. Lessons From Critical Race Theory: Outdoor Experiential Education and Whiteness in Kinesiology. J Exp Educ. 2021;44(4):409–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259211006739
26. Freire P. Education for critical consciousness. Seabury Press; 1973.
27. Kopnina H, Bedford T. From Pseudo to Genuine Sustainability Education: Ecopedagogy and Degrowth in Business Studies Courses. Aust J Environ Educ. 2024;574–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2023.39
28. Kidner DW. Why ‘anthropocentrism’ is not anthropocentric. Dialect Anthropol. 2014;38(4):465–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10624-014-9345-2
29. Misiaszek GW. Ecopedagogy: Freirean teaching to disrupt socio-environmental injustices, anthropocentric dominance, and unsustainability of the Anthropocene. Educ Philos Theory [Internet]. 2023;55(11):1253–67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2130044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2130044
30. Zocher JL, Hougham RJ. Implementing Ecopedagogy as an Experiential Approach to Decolonizing Science Education. J Exp Educ. 2020;43(3):232–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825920908615
31. Fede JH, Gorman KS, Cimini ME. Student employment as a model for experiential learning. J Exp Educ. 2018;41(1):107–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825917747902
32. Pipitone JM. Place as pedagogy: Toward study abroad for social change. J Exp Educ. 2018;41(1):54–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825917751509
33. Ricke A. Finding the right fit: Helping students apply theory to service-learning contexts. J Exp Educ. 2018;41(1):8–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825917750407
34. Fang WT, Hassan A, Lepage BA. The Living Environmental Education: Sound Science Toward a Cleaner, Safer, and Healthier Future. Vol. Part F2745, Sustainable Development Goals Series. 2023. 1–264 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4234-1
35. Wibowo NA, Sumarmi S, Utaya S, Bachri S, Kodama Y. Students’ Environmental Care Attitude: A Study at Adiwiyata Public High School Based on the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP). Sustainability. 2023 May;15(11):8651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118651
36. Simbolon B. Investigating the students’ attitude on environmental care at universitas Kristen Indonesia. J Adv Res Dyn Control Syst. 2020;12(2):2574–81.
37. Ichsan IZ, Sigit DV, Miarsyah M, Azrai EP, Heryanti E. Students’ pro-environmental behavior and environmental learning outcomes based on green consumerism. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidik Biol Indones. 2019 Feb;5(1):109–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.6447
38. Aribowo S, Nadiroh N, Faesal M. Implementation of Experiential Learning Methods in Environmental Education. Int J Business, Law, Educ. 2025;6(1):468–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1037
39. Payne PG. Critical Curriculum Theory and Slow Ecopedagogical Activism. Aust J Environ Educ. 2015;31(2):165–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2015.32
40. Aswita D. Experiential Education for Meaningful Learning: A Literature Study. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Multidiciplinary Research. 2020. p. 83–92.
41. Konak A, Clark TK, Nasereddin M. Using Kolb’s Experiential Learning Cycle to improve student learning in virtual computer laboratories. Comput Educ [Internet]. 2014;72:11–22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.013
42. Kolb DA. Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Inc. 1984. 20–38 p.
43. Gundala RR, Singh M, Cochran TK. Perceptions of Integrated Experiential Learning of Graduate Marketing Students. J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2018;18(2):74–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v18i2.22498
44. Learning- E. Experiential Learning- A Theoritical Framework for Perioperative Education. Dennis H Sewchuk RN. 2005;81(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2092(06)60396-7
45. Kolb AY. Kolb Learning-Style Inventory 3.1 2005 technical specification. Vol. 2000. Boston Ma: Hay Resource Direct; 2005. 166–171 p.
46. Friman H, Banner I, Sitbon Y, Sahar-Inbar L, Shaked N. Experiential Learning for Sustainability: A Catalyst for Global Change. Educ Adm Theory Pract. 2024;2024(5):8508–14.
47. Lowenstein E, Martusewicz R, Voelker L. Developing Teachers’ Capacity for EcoJustice Education and Community-Based Learning. Teach Educ Q. 2010;37(4):99–118.
48. Jurka Lepicnik V, Aleksandra S. Early Childhood Education For Sustainability In Preschools With Eco-Programs : Implementation And Learning Outcomes. J Balt Sci Educ. 2025;24(2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/25.24.133
49. Eric H. Outdoor Experiential Education: Learning Through the Body. Educ Child Psychol. 2012;28(114):155.
50. Yildiz K. Experiential learning from the perspective of outdoor education leaders. J Hosp Leis Sport Tour Educ [Internet]. 2022;30(June 2021):100343. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100343 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100343
51. Cooley SJ, Burns VE, Cumming J. The role of outdoor adventure education in facilitating groupwork in higher education. High Educ. 2015;69(4):567–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9791-4
52. Yakup D, Ahmet S, Ahmet SK. Preservice Teachers ’ Perceptions Of Environmental Issues. J Balt Sci Educ. 2025;24(1).
53. Bandura A. The self system in reciprocal determinism. Am Psychol. 1978;33(4):344–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.33.4.344
54. Yeşilyurt M, Balakoğlu MÖ, Erol M. The impact of environmental education activities on primary school students’ environmental awareness and visual expressions. Qual Res Educ. 2020;9(2):188–216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2020.5115
55. Charyton C, Merrill JA. Assessing general Creativity and Creative engineering Design in first year engineering students. J Eng Educ. 2009;98(2):145–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01013.x
56. Wurdinger SD. Using experiential learning in the classroom: Practical ideas for all educators. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9781461655398
57. Simeone L, D’Ippolito B. The potential of design-driven foresight to support strategy articulation through experiential learning. Long Range Plann. 2022;55(6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102181
58. Wijnen-Meijer M, Brandhuber T, Schneider A, Berberat PO. Implementing Kolb´s Experiential Learning Cycle by Linking Real Experience, Case-Based Discussion and Simulation. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022;9:1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205221091511
59. Gökçeli FK, Merve OA. The Link Between Eco-Anxiety and Nature Relatedness in Associate Degree Students. J Balt Sci Educ. 2025;24(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/25.24.122
60. Kimaryo LA. Integrating Environmental Education in Primary School Education in Tanzania [Internet]. 2011. 227 p. Available from: http://www.abo.fi/stiftelsen/forlag/
61. Fauville G, Lantz-Andersson A, Säljö R. ICT tools in environmental education: Reviewing two newcomers to schools. Environ Educ Res. 2014;20(2):248–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.775220
62. Education M of N. Rencana Strategis 2010-2014 Rencana Strategis. 2010.
63. Frantz CMP, Mayer FS. The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Stud Educ Eval. 2014;41:85–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.001
64. Black AE, Deci EL. 2000_BlackDeci.pdf. 2000;740–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
65. Akram TM, Ijaz A, Ikram H. Exploring the Factors Responsible for Declining Students’ Interest in Chemistry. Int J Inf Educ Technol. 2017;7(2):88–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.2.847
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dwi Yuniasih Saputri , Sukarmin, Asrowi , Riyadi, Elda Frediana Rety Kartika (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
