Fostering Students’ Creativity and Scientific Attitudes Through a Digital Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI)-Based Learning Module
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20262535Keywords:
Socio-scientific issues, creativity, scientific attitudes, digital module, science education, 21st centuryAbstract
Introduction: Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) learning connects science with real-world contexts and promotes creativity and scientific attitudes essential for 21st-century education. Despite its potential, SSI-based learning is rarely integrated into digital modules for elementary schools in Indonesia.
Objective: This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a digital SSI-based learning module in fostering students’ creativity and scientific attitudes in elementary science education.
Method: A parallel convergent mixed-methods design with a quasi-experimental approach was used. The participants were 93 fifth-grade students (47 males, 46 females) from B-accredited public elementary schools in Sragen Regency, Indonesia, divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group learned with a digital SSI-based module, while the control group used conventional methods. Quantitative data on creativity were collected using a modified Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT), and qualitative data on scientific attitudes were obtained through observations and teacher interviews. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and thematic analysis with SPSS version 27.
Results: The findings showed that the digital SSI-based module significantly improved students’ creativity and scientific attitudes compared to conventional learning. The effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.88) indicated a strong influence, and qualitative analysis revealed enhanced curiosity, openness, honesty, and collaborative behavior.
Conclusions: Integrating SSI into digital modules effectively promotes creativity and scientific attitudes among elementary students. The study recommends adopting SSI-based digital learning to strengthen 21st-century competencies and encourage critical, creative, and socially aware learners.
References
1. Ritter SM, Gu X, Crijns M, Biekens P. Fostering students’ creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training program. Wei D, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020 Mar 20;15(3):e0229773. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229773
2. Benek İ, Akcay B. The effects of socio-scientific STEM activities on 21st century skills of middle school students. Particip Educ Res [Internet]. 2022 Mar 1;9(2):25–52. Available from: http://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.17275/per.22.27.9.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.27.9.2
3. Thornhill-Miller B, Camarda A, Mercier M, Burkhardt JM, Morisseau T, Bourgeois-Bougrine S, et al. Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. J Intell. 2023;11(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
4. Al Kandari AM, Al Qattan MM. E-task-based learning approach to enhancing 21st-century learning outcomes. Int J Instr. 2020;13(1):551–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13136a
5. Mulyono Y, Suranto S, Yamtinah S, Sarwanto S. Development of Critical and Creative Thinking Skills Instruments Based on Environmental Socio-Scientific Issues. Int J Instr [Internet]. 2023 Jul 1;16(3):691–710. Available from: http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2023_3_37.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16337a
6. Suryandai KC, Rokhmaniyah, Salimi M, Fatimah S. Involvement of Teachers, Parents, and School Committees in Improving Scientific Attitudes of Elementary School Students: Application of Rasch Model Analysis. Int J Educ Methodol. 2022;8(4):783–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.783
7. Puriwat W, Tripopsakul S. Preparing for industry 4.0-will youths have enough essential skills?: An evidence from Thailand. Int J Instr. 2020;13(3):89–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1337a
8. Alpahmi Aji S, Sulistyo S, Sutarno, Harjana, Fais Nurul Hadi. Learning Model Experiential-Based Environmental Socio-Scientific Issues (ESSI) and Their Effect on Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. J Pendidik IPA Indones [Internet]. 2024 Aug 30;13(3):471–82. Available from: https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpii/article/view/1993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/v0k0yh04
9. Suryandari KC, Rokhmaniyah, Wahyudi. The Effect of Scientific Reading Based Project Model in Empowering Creative Thinking Skills of Preservice Teacher in Elementary School. Eur J Educ Res. 2021;10(3):1329–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1329
10. Lestari IB, Sudarmin S, Ellianawati E, ... Development of Parijoto EthnoVlog Media to Explain the Scientific Reconstruction and Explanation of Parijoto (Medinilla javanensis) as Body Immunity. Int … [Internet]. 2021;7:260–6. Available from: https://proceeding.unnes.ac.id/index.php/ISET/article/view/1967
11. Erdogan F. The relationship between prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ critical thinking skills and reflective thinking skills. Particip Educ Res [Internet]. 2020 Feb 19;7(1):220–41. Available from: http://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.17275/per.20.13.7.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.13.7.1
12. Davletova A, Nazarova A, Alzhanova A, Lazareva Y. How does student creativity depend on teaching methods at the institute? Modern information technologies for education and creativity as manifestations of the specifics of the psyche. Cogent Educ [Internet]. 2025 Dec 31;12(1). Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2482502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2482502
13. Li M, Mu A. Implementation Creative-Based Learning on Enhancing the Innovative Abilities of Education Students. J Ecohumanism [Internet]. 2025 Jan 19;4(1). Available from: https://ecohumanism.co.uk/joe/ecohumanism/article/view/5942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.5942
14. Li Y, Kim M, Palkar J. Using emerging technologies to promote creativity in education: A systematic review. Int J Educ Res Open [Internet]. 2022;3:100177. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S266637402200053X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100177
15. Müller JW. Education and inspirational intuition - Drivers of innovation. Heliyon [Internet]. 2021 Sep;7(9):e07923. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405844021020260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07923
16. Jirout JJ. Supporting Early Scientific Thinking Through Curiosity. Front Psychol. 2020;11(August):1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01717
17. Seppälä H, Lindblom-Ylänne S, Kallio EK. Integrating epistemic knowledge and logical reasoning skills in adult cognitive development 1. In: Development of Adult Thinking [Internet]. Routledge; 2020. p. 33–46. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781351740180/chapters/10.4324/9781315187464-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315187464-3
18. Chi S, Wang Z. Students’ science learning experiences and career expectations: mediating effects of science-related attitudes and beliefs. Int J Sci Educ [Internet]. 2023 Jun 13;45(9):754–80. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2023.2175184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2175184
19. Rahmawati R, Marmoah S, Mohd Roslan R. Ethnoscience Materials to Build Scientific Literacy. Semin Med Writ Educ [Internet]. 2025 Aug 16;4:747. Available from: https://mw.ageditor.ar/index.php/mw/article/view/747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025747
20. Ruano‐Borbalan J. Understanding and fostering the development of critical thinking education and competences. Eur J Educ [Internet]. 2023 Sep 10;58(3):347–53. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12572
21. Danchin A. Science, method and critical thinking. Microb Biotechnol [Internet]. 2023 Oct 18;16(10):1888–94. Available from: https://sfamjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1751-7915.14315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.14315
22. Bicaj A, Berisha F, Gisewhite R. Exploring In-Service Science Teachers’ Self-Perceptions of Competence and Pedagogical Approaches to Socioscientific Issues in Education. Educ Sci [Internet]. 2024 Nov 14;14(11):1249. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/11/1249 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111249
23. Genisa MU, Subali B, Djukri, Agussalim A, Habibi H. Socio-scientific issues implementation as science learning material. Int J Eval Res Educ. 2020;9(2):311–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20530
24. Smit R, Rietz F, Büchel D. Using the socioscientific issue approach to foster secondary students’ argumentation skills, science self-efficacy beliefs and science interest. Int J Sci Educ [Internet]. 2025;0693:1–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2460050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2025.2460050
25. Chrysti KS, Rokhmaniyah, Chamdani M. Enhancement of Artifact Based Activities Learning in Natural Science Through Scientific Reading Based Project (SRBP) Model for Preservice Teacher Using Design Based Research (DBR). In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education [Internet]. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2021. (ICLIQE 2020). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3452210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3452210
26. Bossér U. Transformation of School Science Practices to Promote Functional Scientific Literacy. Res Sci Educ [Internet]. 2024 Apr 2;54(2):265–81. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11165-023-10138-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10138-1
27. Sulistina O, Rahayu S, Dasna IW, Yahmin. Enhancing the scientific argumentation skills of prospective chemistry teacher using integrated chemical literacy strategy. Int J Eval Res Educ. 2024;13(6):4346–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i6.26935
28. Nurrahman M, Suhartono S, Suryandari KC. Penerapan Model Scientific Reading Based Project (SRBP) untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas dalam Pembelajaran IPAS [Implementation of the Scientific Reading Based Project (SRBP) Model to Increase Creativity in Science Learning]. Kalam Cendekia J Ilm Kependidikan [Internet]. 2025 Mar 1;13(1). Available from: https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jkc/article/view/87175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jkc.v13i1.87175
29. Macalalag AZ, Kaufmann A, Van Meter B, Ricketts A, Liao E, Ialacci G. Socioscientific issues: promoting science teachers’ pedagogy on social justice. Discip Interdiscip Sci Educ Res [Internet]. 2024 Dec 20;6(1):28. Available from: https://diser.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43031-024-00118-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-024-00118-4
30. Genisa MU, Subali B, Djukri, Habibi H. Decision-making style profiles of pre-service biology teachers in socio-scientific issues. Int J Eval Res Educ. 2021;10(3):760–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21376
31. Alcaraz-Dominguez S, Barajas M. Conceiving socioscientific issues in stem lessons from science education research and practice. Educ Sci. 2021;11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050238
32. Viehmann C, Fernández Cárdenas JM, Reynaga Peña CG. The Use of Socioscientific Issues in Science Lessons: A Scoping Review. Sustainability [Internet]. 2024 Jul 9;16(14):5827. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16145827
33. Suryandari KC, Rokhmaniyah, Wahyudi. The effect of whatsapp as a tool for learning in Scientific Reading Based Project (SRBP) model to enhance collaborative and critical thinking skill of teacher candidats. In: The 3rd International Conference On Science, Mathematics, Environment, And Education [Internet]. Surakarta: AIP Publishing; 2023. p. 110021. Available from: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article/2873784 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0106243
34. Dawson V. Is There a Place for Socioscientific Issues in Australian Secondary School Science? In 2024. p. 67–76. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-63382-9_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63382-9_6
35. Lange C, Costley J. Improving online video lectures: learning challenges created by media. Int J Educ Technol High Educ [Internet]. 2020 Dec 5;17(1):16. Available from: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-020-00190-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00190-6
36. Rusdin D, Indrawati I, Marzuki, BHidayati. Indonesian High School Teachers’ Views on Media Education: Challenges and Prospects in EFL Instruction. Int J Media Inf Lit [Internet]. 2023 Dec 5;8(2). Available from: https://ijmil.cherkasgu.press/journals_n/1703612645.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/ijmil.2023.2.360
37. Khairiah K, Amin A, Muassomah M, Mareta M, Sulistyorini S, Yusuf M. Challenges to professional teacher development through workplace culture management. Int J Eval Res Educ [Internet]. 2024 Apr 1;13(2):714. Available from: https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/25666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.25666
38. Sucipto TLA, Sajidan S, Akhyar M, Roemintoyo R. Mapping Teacher’s Readiness to Improve the Government Policy in Implementing Higher-Order Thinking Skills-Based Learning. Qubahan Acad J [Internet]. 2025 Mar 31;5(1):764–81. Available from: https://journal.qubahan.com/index.php/qaj/article/view/1577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n1a1577
39. OECD. Education GPS. 2023 [cited 2024 May 10]. Indonesia Student performance (PISA 2022). Available from: https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry=IDN&treshold=10&topic=PI
40. Kwangmuang P, Jarutkamolpong S, Sangboonraung W, Daungtod S. The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon [Internet]. 2021 Jun;7(6):e07309. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2405844021014122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309
41. Koivula M, Laaksonen SM, Villi M. Practical, Not Radical: Examining Innovative Learning Culture in a Public Service Media Organization. Journal Stud [Internet]. 2022 Jul 4;23(9):1018–36. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2065339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2065339
42. Marmoah S, Poerwanti JIS, Suharno. Literacy culture management of elementary school in Indonesia. Heliyon [Internet]. 2022 Apr;8(4):e09315. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09315
43. Simanjuntak MP, Hutahaean J, Marpaung N, Ramadhani D. Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning Combined with Computer Simulation on Students’ Problem-Solving and Creative Thinking Skills. Int J Instr [Internet]. 2021 Jul 1;14(3):519–34. Available from: http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2021_3_30.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14330a
44. Tabieh AAS, Hamzeh M. The Impact of Blended-Flipped Learning on Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills. J Educ Online [Internet]. 2022 Sep 30;19(3). Available from: https://www.thejeo.com/download/archive/archive/2022_193/tabieh__hamzehpdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2022.19.3.15
45. Supratman S, Zubaidah S, Corebima AD, Ibrohim I. The Effect Size of Different Learning on Critical and Creative Thinking Skills of Biology Students. Int J Instr [Internet]. 2021 Jul 1;14(3):187–206. Available from: http://www.e-iji.net/dosyalar/iji_2021_3_11.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14311a
46. OECD. PISA 2022 Results (Volume III): Creative Minds, Creative Schools Factsheets Singapore [Internet]. Vol. I, PISA. 2024. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2022-results-volume-i_53f23881-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/germany-1a2cf137/
47. Lopez TMS, Xu D, Bokov D. Retracted Article: Creative thinking and its influence on students’ scientific achievements. Innov Educ Teach Int [Internet]. 2023 Aug 23;1–14. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14703297.2023.2249867 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2249867
48. Faisal, Martin SN. Exploring Indonesian Biology Teachers’ Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Instruction. Asia-Pacific Sci Educ. 2022;8(1):256–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10042
49. Mang HMA, Chu HE, Martin SN, Kim CJ. An SSI-Based STEAM Approach to Developing Science Programs. Asia-Pacific Sci Educ [Internet]. 2021 Dec 9;7(2):549–85. Available from: https://brill.com/view/journals/apse/7/2/article-p549_12.xml DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177-bja10036
50. Lee H, Lee H, Zeidler DL. Examining tensions in the socioscientific issues classroom: Students’ border crossings into a new culture of science. J Res Sci Teach [Internet]. 2020 May 16;57(5):672–94. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.21600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21600
51. Kim SS, Prasad A, Nayak MM, Chen H, Srisoem C, DeMarco RF, et al. Predictors of Nicotine Replacement Therapy Adherence: Mixed-Methods Research With a Convergent Parallel Design. Ann Behav Med [Internet]. 2024 Mar 12;58(4):275–85. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/abm/article/58/4/275/7613891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaae006
52. Ke L, Kirk E, Lesnefsky R, Sadler TD. Exploring system dynamics of complex societal issues through socio-scientific models. Front Educ [Internet]. 2023 Sep 18;8(September). Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1219224/full DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1219224
53. Hernández-Ramos J, Pernaa J, Cáceres-Jensen L, Rodríguez-Becerra J. The Effects of Using Socio-Scientific Issues and Technology in Problem-Based Learning: A Systematic Review. Educ Sci [Internet]. 2021 Oct 14;11(10):640. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/10/640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100640
54. Siew NM, Abd Rahman MS. Effects Of Socio-Scientific Issues Based On Thinking Maps Approach On Future Thinking Of Secondary School Students. J Balt Sci Educ [Internet]. 2022 Oct 28;21(5):888–901. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/1224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.888
55. Ke L, Sadler TD, Zangori L, Friedrichsen PJ. Developing and Using Multiple Models to Promote Scientific Literacy in the Context of Socio-Scientific Issues. Sci Educ. 2021;30(3):589–607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1
56. Idema JL, Daniel KL. Socioscientific Issues and the Potential for Fostering Engagement Through Exhibits. In: How People Learn in Informal Science Environments [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 271–97. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-13291-9_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13291-9_14
57. Koç A, Büyük U. Effect of robotics technology in science education on scientific creativity and attitude development. J Turkish Sci Educ [Internet]. 2021 Mar 26;18(1):54–72. Available from: https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/1445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.52
58. Jack BM, Chen CC, Smith TJ, Wang HH. Predicting Students’ Genuine Learning Interest in Socio-Scientific Issues within an Engaged Learning Context. J Psychoeduc Assess [Internet]. 2024 Oct 11;42(7):771–84. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/07342829241252464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829241252464
59. Badeo JM, Duque DA. The effect of Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) in teaching science: A meta-analysis study. J Technol Sci Educ [Internet]. 2022 Jun 7;12(2):291. Available from: https://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse/article/view/1340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1340
60. Mahler LS, Mayer RE. Anime as a medium for science learning. J Comput Assist Learn [Internet]. 2024 Apr 5;40(2):787–96. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.12908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12908
61. Roemmele C, M. Rainear A. The Science and Media Connection: Developing a Product-Based Course for Connecting Physical and Social Science Students. J Coll Sci Teach [Internet]. 2025 Jul 3;1–7. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0047231X.2025.2520789
62. Pertiwi NP, Saputro S, Yamtinah S, Kamari A. Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills Through Stem Problem-Based Contextual Learning: An Integrated E-Module Education Website With Virtual Experiments. J Balt Sci Educ [Internet]. 2024 Aug 25;23(4):739–66. Available from: https://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/?q=node/1403 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.739
63. Ban S, Mahmud SND. Research and Trends in Socio-Scientific Issues Education: A Content Analysis of Journal Publications from 2004 to 2022. Sustainability [Internet]. 2023 Aug 1;15(15):11841. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/15/11841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511841
64. Namdar B, Namdar AO. Fostering Students’ Values Through Role Play about Socioscientific Issues. Phys Teach [Internet]. 2021 Sep 1;59(6):497–9. Available from: https://pubs.aip.org/pte/article/59/6/497/153013/Fostering-Students-Values-Through-Role-Play-about DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0019320
65. Kinskey M, Newton M. Teacher candidates’ views of future SSI instruction: a multiple case study. Discip Interdiscip Sci Educ Res [Internet]. 2024 Feb 14;6(1):8. Available from: https://diser.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s43031-024-00098-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-024-00098-5
66. Sparks RA, Jimenez PC, Kirby CK, Dauer JM. Using Critical Integrative Argumentation to Assess Socioscientific Argumentation across Decision-Making Contexts. Educ Sci [Internet]. 2022 Sep 23;12(10):644. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/10/644 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100644
67. Dilekçi A, Karatay H. The effects of the 21st century skills curriculum on the development of students’ creative thinking skills. Think Ski Creat [Internet]. 2023 Mar;47:101229. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1871187122002309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101229
68. Bobrowicz K. Precursors of 21st century skills are malleable in early childhood but may have little impact on lifetime success. Learn Individ Differ [Internet]. 2024 Dec;116:102569. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1041608024001626 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102569
69. Lavi R, Tal M, Dori YJ. Perceptions of STEM alumni and students on developing 21st century skills through methods of teaching and learning. Stud Educ Eval [Internet]. 2021 Sep;70:101002. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191491X21000286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101002
70. Perdue M. Practicing 21st Century Skills in the Classroom. In: 6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’20) [Internet]. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica de València; 2020. Available from: http://ocs.editorial.upv.es/index.php/HEAD/HEAd20/paper/view/10984 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/HEAd20.2020.10984
71. Tang X, Tan L, Sadler TD, Kong Y, Lin J. When Structure and Content of Socioscientific Argumentation Develop in an Unbalanced Way: A Case Study. Sci Educ [Internet]. 2025 Apr 25; Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.21975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21975
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Nurrahman, Sri Marmoah, Kartika Chrysti Suryandari (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
