Digital Innovation in Higher Education: Assessing the P-OUS Open Distance Learning Model through the Integration of Science and Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252434Keywords:
e-learning, open and distance e-learning, higher education, CIPP evaluation, student engagementAbstract
Introduction: The rapid growth of digital innovation has reshaped higher education, making open and distance e-learning essential for accessibility and flexibility. This study focuses on the P-OUS (Peruse, Offer, Uphold, and Sow) Open Distance Learning Model implemented at Pangasinan State University – Open University Systems, highlighting its integration of science and technology to support graduate education in diverse fields.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of the P-OUS model by examining its relevance, resource adequacy, implementation quality, and program outcomes.
Method: Guided by Stufflebeam’s CIPP evaluation framework, the study utilized a structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms to students from the Doctor of Education, Master of Arts in Education, Master of Science in Fisheries, and Master in Development Management programs. Data analysis combined descriptive statistics for demographics, technology access, and satisfaction levels with thematic analysis of qualitative feedback on perceived barriers and experiences.
Results and Conclusion: Findings indicate that the P-OUS model effectively promotes inclusive and flexible learning. Quantitative results show that 83% of students reported high satisfaction with course design and interaction, while 78% expressed positive engagement in collaborative learning. The overall mean satisfaction score of 4.32/5 reflects strong approval of learning flexibility and accessibility. However, challenges remain, including technical limitations (42%), pedagogical inconsistencies (31%), and personal time-management constraints (27%). The study concludes that the P-OUS model enhances learner inclusion, adaptability, and engagement in graduate online education. Sustainable implementation requires optimizing workload and assessment pacing, strengthening communication and faculty presence, expanding mobile-first and offline access.
References
Bozkurt A, Sharma RC. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to Coronavirus pandemic. Asian J Distance Educ. 2020;15(1):i–vi. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3778083
Joaquin JJB, Biana HT, Dacela MA. The Philippine higher education sector in the time of COVID-19. Front Educ. 2020;5:576371. doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.576371
Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2000;2(2–3):87–105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, Trust T, Bond A. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Rev. 2020;27:1–12. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Rapanta C, Botturi L, Goodyear P, Guàrdia L, Koole M. Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigit Sci Educ. 2020;2(3):923–45. doi:10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
Tria JZ. Transactional distance in a flexible learning environment: scale development and validation in the Philippine context. Knowl Manag E-Learn. 2024;16(1):88–109. doi:10.34105/j.kmel.2024.16.004
Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2019;16(1):39. doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Stufflebeam DL, Shinkfield AJ. Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
Jonassen DH. Designing constructivist learning environments. In: Reigeluth CM, editor. Instructional Theories and Models. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 1999. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781410603784-12/designing-constructivist-learning-environments-1-david-jonassen
Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1978.
Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–40. doi:10.2307/249008
Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–78. doi:10.2307/30036540
Bates AW. Teaching in a digital age: guidelines for designing teaching and learning. 2nd ed. Vancouver: Tony Bates Associates Ltd; 2019.
Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Garrison DR. E-learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2017.
Trist EL. The evolution of socio-technical systems. Ontario: Ontario Ministry of Labour; 1981
Stufflebeam DL, Coryn CLS. Evaluation theory, models, and applications. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118995594
Taherdoost H. Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. Int J Acad Res Manage. 2016;5(3):28–36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053
Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2018. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506386706
Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
British Educational Research Association. Ethical guidelines for educational research. 4th ed. London: BERA; 2018. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1qv1f6n
Jung I, Gunawardena CN. Culture and online learning: Global perspectives and research. Sterling: Stylus Publishing; 2014.
Stoet G, Geary DC. Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality. Intelligence. 2015;48:137–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.11.006
Stone C. Online learning in Australian higher education: Opportunities, challenges and transformations. Student Success. 2019;10(2):1–11. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v10i2.1299
Zawacki-Richter O, Alturki U, Aldraiweesh A. Review of distance education research (2000–2015): An analysis of research areas, methods, and authorship patterns. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2017;18(3):1–26. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.2806
Allen IE, Seaman J. Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group; 2017. https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/digtiallearningcompassenrollment2017.pdf
Bates T. The 2019 survey of online learning in Canadian post-secondary education: Digital learning 2019. Canadian Digital Learning Research Association; 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3563174
Kahu ER, Stephens C, Leach L, Zepke N. Linking academic emotions and student engagement: Mature-aged distance students’ transition to university. J Furth High Educ. 2015;39(4):481–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.895305
Falloon G. Moore’s Theory of Transactional Distance and its relevance to the online learning context. J Res Technol Educ. 2011;43(3):187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782569
Pan J, Wang W, Xie W. The application of Moore’s online learning interactions to student learning outcomes: A structural equation modeling approach. Educ Inf Technol. 2024;29:187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11628-5
Alharbi S, Dimitriadi Y. Instructional immediacy practices in online learning environments: Empirical evidence. J Learn Teach. 2018;11(2):411–29.
Liu W, Hudson S, Yuen HP, Bradley SP. The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. J Educ Online. 2021;18(1):1–30. https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2021.18.1.7
Woods R. Interaction and immediacy in online learning. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2002;3(2):1–15. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i2.107
Chen L, Chen P, Lin Z. Transactional distance and college students’ learning engagement: The mediating role of social presence and autonomous motivation. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1041234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1041234
Abuhassna H, Alnawajha S. The transactional distance theory and distance learning contexts: Theory integration, research gaps, and future agenda. Educ Sci. 2023;13(2):112. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020112
Baker CM, Moore W. The impact of instructor immediacy and presence for online student affective learning, cognition, and motivation. J Educ Online. 2010;7(1):1–30.
Crawford CM. Instructor immediacy and authenticity. In: Creating teacher immediacy in online learning environments. Hershey: IGI Global; 2016. p. 15–36. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9995-3.ch002
Alharbi S. Instructional immediacy in online environments: A review and framework. Read Educ Rev. 2018;14(1):1–13.
Bozkurt A, Sharma RC. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to Coronavirus pandemic. Asian J Distance Educ. 2020;15(1):i–vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
Alipio M. Education during COVID-19 era: Philippine context. Pedagog Res. 2020;5(4):em0063. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947
Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2000;2(2–3):87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, Trust T, Bond A. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Rev. 2020;27:1–12. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Rapanta C, Botturi L, Goodyear P, Guàrdia L, Koole M. Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigit Sci Educ. 2020;2(3):923–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
Commission on Higher Education (CHED). Policies, Standards and Guidelines for Distance Education. Quezon City: CHED; 2019.
Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2019;16(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Stufflebeam DL, Shinkfield AJ. Evaluation theory, models, and applications. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, Trust T, Bond A. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Rev. 2020;27:1–12. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Martin F, Sun T, Westine CD. A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Comput Educ. 2020;159:104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Bao W. COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2020;2(2):113–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191
Rapanta C, Botturi L, Goodyear P, Guàrdia L, Koole M. Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigit Sci Educ. 2020;2:923–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
Bond M, Bedenlier S, Marín VI, Händel M. Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021;18:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Bozkurt A, Sharma RC. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to Coronavirus pandemic. Asian J Distance Educ. 2020;15(1):i–vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
Sangrà A, Vlachopoulos D, Cabrera N. Building an inclusive definition of e-learning: An approach to the conceptual framework. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2012;13(2):145–59. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1161
Kirkpatrick JD, Kirkpatrick WK. Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training Evaluation. 2nd ed. Alexandria: ATD Press; 2016. ISBN: 9781607280088
Anderson T, Dron J. Three generations of distance education pedagogy. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2011;12(3):80–97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890
Moore JL, Dickson-Deane C, Galyen K. E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? Internet High Educ. 2011;14(2):129–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Sun A, Chen X. Online education and its effective practice: A research review. J Inf Technol Educ Res. 2016;15:157–90. https://doi.org/10.28945/3502
Means B, Toyama Y, Murphy R, Bakia M, Jones K. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 2010. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505824
Hrastinski S. What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends. 2019;63:564–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5
Anderson T. The theory and practice of online learning. 2nd ed. Edmonton: AU Press; 2008. Available from: https://auspace.athabascau.ca/handle/2149/411
Nuryanto UW, Basrowi, Quraysin I, Pratiwi I. Environmental management control system, blockchain adoption, cleaner production, and product efficiency on environmental reputation and performance: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Sustain Futur [Internet]. 2024;7:100190. Tersedia pada: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824000406
Lisaria R, Prapanca D, Amatul S, Arifin K. Uncertain Supply Chain Management Forging a resilient pathway : Uncovering the relationship between the supply chain sustainability and the tax compliance , and the sustainable future of the micro , small, and medium enterprise. 2024;12:1097–112.
Nuryanto UW, Basrowi, Quraysin I, Pratiwi I. Magnitude of digital adaptability role: Stakeholder engagement and costless signaling in enhancing sustainable MSME performance. Heliyon [Internet]. 2024;10(13):e33484. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33484
Shofwa Y, Hadi R, Isna A, Amaludin A. Uncertain Supply Chain Management Harmonization of social capital and philanthropic culture : A catalyst for smooth household supply chains and successful economic development. 2024;12:1053–64.
Saeri M, Burhansyah R, Kilmanun JC, Hanif Z. Uncertain Supply Chain Management Strategic resilience : Integrating scheduling , supply chain management , and advanced operations techniques in production risk analysis and technical efficiency of rice farming in flood-prone areas. 2024;12:1065–82.
Marwanto IGGH, Basrowi, Suwarno. The Influence of Culture and Social Structure on Political Behavior in the Election of Mayor of Kediri Indonesia. Int J Adv Sci Technol [Internet]. 15 April 2020;29(05 SE-Articles):1035–47. Tersedia pada: http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/9759
Basrowi, Ali H, Suyanto T. Customer Satisfaction Modelling of The Indonesia. Int J Sci Appl Sci Conf Ser P-ISSN [Internet]. 2022;6(2):2549–4635. Tersedia pada: http://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ijsascs
Himmatul I, Nugroho I, Mardian T, Syakina D, Suryo A, Sutoto A, et al. Uncertain Supply Chain Management Enhancing company performance and profitability through agile practices : A comprehensive analysis of three key perspectives. 2024;12:1205–24.
Kharis A, Masyhari A, Suci W, Priatnasari Y. Uncertain Supply Chain Management Optimizing state revenue through government-driven supply chain efficiency and fair corporate taxation practices. 2024;12:659–68.
Suseno BD, Sutisna, Hidyat S, Basrowi. Halal supply chain and halal tourism industry in forming economic growth Bambang. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2018;6(4):407–22.
Basrowi B, Utami P. Building Strategic Planning Models Based on Digital Technology in the Sharia Capital Market. J Adv Res Law Econ Vol 11 No 3 JARLE Vol XI Issue 3(49) Summer 2020DO - 1014505/jarle.v113(49)06 [Internet]. 15 Juni 2020; Tersedia pada: https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/5154
Soenyono S, Basrowi B. Form and Trend of Violence against Women and the Legal Protection Strategy. Int J Adv Sci Technol [Internet]. 25 April 2020;29(05 SE-Articles):3165–74. Tersedia pada: http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/11636
Marwanto IGGH, Basrowi B, Suwarno S. The Influence of Culture and Social Structure on Political Behavior in the Election of Mayor of Kediri Indonesia. Int J Adv Sci Technol [Internet]. 15 April 2020;29(05 SE-Articles):1035–47. Tersedia pada: http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/9759
Suwarno Basrowi, IGGHM. Technology of Qualitative Analysis to Understand Community Political Behaviors in Regional Head Election in Wates District, Kediri, Indonesia. Int J Adv Sci Technol [Internet]. 23 April 2020;29(05 SE-Articles):2624–35. Tersedia pada: http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/11159
Hadi R, Shafrani YS, Hilyatin DL, Riyadi S, Basrowi B. Digital zakat management, transparency in zakat reporting, and the zakat payroll system toward zakat management accountability and its implications on zakat growth acceleration. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2019;8(1):103–8.
Yusuf ZFA, Yusuf FA, Nuryanto UW, Basrowi B. Assessing organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in ensuring the smoothness of the supply chain for medical hospital needs towards a green hospital : Evidence from Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):181–94.
Miar M, Rizani A, Pardede RL, Basrowi B. Analysis of the effects of capital expenditure and supply chain on economic growth and their implications on the community welfare of districts and cities in central Kalimantan province. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):489–504.
Alexandro R, Basrowi B. Measuring the effectiveness of smart digital organizations on digital technology adoption : An em- pirical study of educational organizations in Indonesia. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2024;8(1):139–50.
Purwaningsih E, Muslikh M, Suhaeri S, Basrowi B. Utilizing blockchain technology in enhancing supply chain efficiency and export performance , and its implications on the financial performance of SMEs. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):449–60.
Hamdan H, Basrowi B. Do community entrepreneurial development shape the sustainability of tourist villages? Hamdana*. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):407–22.
Junaidi A, Masdar A Zum, Basrowi B, Robiatun D, Situmorang JW, Lukas A, et al. Uncertain Supply Chain Management Enhancing sustainable soybean production in Indonesia : evaluating the environmental and economic benefits of MIGO technology for integrated supply chain sustainability. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):221–34.
Alexandro R, Basrowi B. The influence of macroeconomic infrastructure on supply chain smoothness and national competitiveness and its implications on a country ’ s economic growth : evidence from BRICS. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):167–80.
Nuryanto UW, Basrowi B, Quraysin I. Big data and IoT adoption in shaping organizational citizenship behavior: The role of innovation organiza- tional predictor in the chemical manufacturing industry. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2019;8(1):103–8.
Junaidi A, Basrowi B, Sabtohadi J, Wibowo AM, Wiboho SS, Asgar A, et al. The role of public administration and social media educational socialization in influencing public satisfaction on population services : The mediating role of population literacy awareness. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2024;8(1):345–56.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Phillip G. Queroda (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
