Narrative Inquiry into Teachers' Technology Readiness for Effective Classroom Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252422Keywords:
Classroom management, narrative inquiry study, teacher, technology readinessAbstract
Technology readiness of teachers is considered important in the current learning process, as it plays a vital role in improving the quality of education. This study aims to explore teachers’ experiences in classroom management, including planning, implementation, and evaluation with the support of digital technology. A qualitative approach using a narrative inquiry design was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and classroom observations involving seven teachers from urban primary schools in Surakarta City, Indonesia, selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were analyzed with narrative analysis. The findings reveal that teachers' technological readiness in the planning stage is demonstrated by their ability to integrate digital tools, utilise educational videos, and prepare interactive learning media in their lesson plans. During implementation, teachers' technology readiness was demonstrated by their ability to operate devices such as laptops, LCD projectors, and Chromebooks independently, while also employing applications like Canva, Quizizz, and Liveworksheet to promote active and creative student participation in the classroom. In the evaluation stage, teachers applied both process- and product-based assessments using digital tools such as Google Forms and performance rubrics to measure students’ creativity and digital competencies. This research makes a significant contribution to the field of education by providing empirical data on teachers’ technological readiness and underscores the importance of continuous professional development and adequate infrastructure to support the effectiveness of technology-enhanced learning environments.
References
1. la Velle L. Translational research and knowledge mobilisation in teacher education: towards a ‘clinical’, evidence-based profession?. J Educ Teach. 2015 Oct 20;41(5):460–3. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02607476.2015.1105534
2. Sunthonkanokpong W, Murphy E. Quality, Equity, Inclusion and Lifelong Learning in Pre-service Teacher Education. J Teach Educ Sustain. 2019 Dec 1;21(2):91–104. Available from: https://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/jtes-2019-0019
3. Islam ME, Hasan Polas MR, Jahanshahi AA, Falahat M. Valuing Teachers’ Voices in Educational Reform. In: Institutes of Higher Education (IHE) and Workforce Collaboration for Digital Literacy. IGI Global; 2025. p. 153–80. Available from: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/979-8-3373-0004-7.ch006
4. Tatto MT. Comparative research on teachers and teacher education: global perspectives to inform UNESCO’s SDG 4 agenda. Oxford Rev Educ. 2021 Jan 2;47(1):25–44. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03054985.2020.1842183
5. UN. The Sustainable Development Goals Report. United Nations. 2024. Available from: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2021/#
6. Othman LB, Robinson R, Molfenter NF. Emerging Issues With Consequential Use of the edTPA: Overall and Through a Special Education Lens. Teach Educ Spec Educ J Teach Educ Div Counc Except Child. 2017 Nov 14;40(4):269–77. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0888406417718251
7. Ditjen GTK. Tentang Model Kompetensi Guru. 2023;1–14.
8. Kaynardağ AY. Pedagogy in HE: does it matter? Stud High Educ. 2019 Jan 2;44(1):111–9. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2017.1340444
9. Kali Y, Sagy O, Benichou M, Atias O, Levin‐Peled R. Teaching expertise reconsidered: The Technology, Pedagogy, Content and Space (TPeCS) knowledge framework. Br J Educ Technol. 2019 Sep 10;50(5):2162–77. Available from: https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjet.12847
10. Liu D, Chaemchoy S, Siribanpitak P. Unlocking Teacherpreneur Potential in Higher Education: Validating a Competency Measurement Scale. Educ Sci. 2024 Sep 13;14(9):1005. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/9/1005
11. Angers K, Gu P, Lasagna CA, McLaughlin MM, Taylor SF, Tso IF, et al. The relationship of neurocognitive and social cognitive performance to social competence and appropriateness on a performance-based social skills assessment in individuals with psychosis and unaffected controls. J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Nov;179:15–20. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022395624005077
12. Carstensen B, Klusmann U. Assertiveness and adaptation: Prospective teachers’ social competence development and its significance for occupational well‐being. Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Mar 10;91(1):500–26. Available from: https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjep.12377
13. Hammer S, Ufer S. Professional competence of mathematics teachers in dealing with tasks in lesson planning. Teach Teach Educ. 2023 Oct;132:104246. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0742051X23002342
14. Alieto E, Abequibel-Encarnacion B, Estigoy E, Balasa K, Eijansantos A, Torres-Toukoumidis A. Teaching inside a digital classroom: A quantitative analysis of attitude, technological competence and access among teachers across subject disciplines. Heliyon. 2024 Jan;10(2):e24282. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S240584402400313X
15. Howorth SK, Marino MT, Flanagan S, Cuba MJ, Lemke C. Integrating emerging technologies to enhance special education teacher preparation. J Res Innov Teach Learn. 2024 Nov 18; Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JRIT-08-2024-0208/full/html
16. Consoli T, Schmitz M-L, Antonietti C, Gonon P, Cattaneo A, Petko D. Quality of technology integration matters: Positive associations with students’ behavioral engagement and digital competencies for learning. Educ Inf Technol. 2024 Oct 29; Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10639-024-13118-8
17. Mao Q, Fang X, Jiang L, Zhu L. Enhancement or Impediment? How University Teachers’ Use of Smart Classrooms Might Impact Interaction Quality. Sustainability. 2023 Nov 10;15(22):15826. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/15826
18. Kamahina RS, Yakovenko TV, Daibova EV. Teacher’s Readiness to Work under the Conditions of Educational Space Digitalization. Int J High Educ. 2019 Oct 28;8(7):79. Available from: http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/16547
19. Jiang L. Digital Technology Boosts the Construction of English Smart Classroom in Colleges and Universities. Appl Math Nonlinear Sci. 2024 Jan 1;9(1). Available from: https://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/amns-2024-0658
20. Rawal DM. Mapping of school teachers’ digital competency in the context of digital infrastructure: a systematic review and empirical study of India. J Prof Cap Community. 2024 Jul 16;9(3):173–95. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JPCC-01-2024-0016/full/html
21. Villa G. The IntersTICES-Type Activity (ITA) and Its Impact on Pre-service Teacher Trainers’ e-Learning Culture. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2018. p. 629–37. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_73
22. Saxena A. Issues and impediments faced by canadian teachers while integrating ICT in pedagogical practice. Turkish Online J Educ Technol. 2017;16(2):58–70. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85017021912&partnerID=40&md5=7a2a25be92544ad21752f804a290d7a3
23. Mercader C. Explanatory model of barriers to integration of digital technologies in higher education institutions. Educ Inf Technol. 2020 Nov 17;25(6):5133–47. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10639-020-10222-3
24. Stockwell G, Wang Y. Exploring the Challenges of Technology in Language Teaching in the Aftermath of the Pandemic. RELC J. 2023 Aug 25;54(2):474–82. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00336882231168438
25. Dinçer S. Bridging the gap in technology integration in education: An examination of science teachers’ competencies and needs. J Turkish Sci Educ. 2024 Nov 24;21(4):620–34. Available from: https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/2312
26. El-Sayary A. An investigation of teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. J Comput Assist Learn. 2024 Jun 22;40(3):931–45. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.12926
27. Razukhan N, Zhiyenbayeva A, Konieczna I, Erdenebaatar B, Gursed V. Challenges in Teachers’ Knowledge and Use of Accessible Digital Technologies for Inclusive Learning in Mongolia. Educ Process Int J. 2025;15(1). Available from: https://edupij.com/index/arsiv/76/498/challenges-in-teachers-knowledge-and-use-of-accessible-digital-technologies-for-inclusive-learning-in-mongolia
28. Özgün Z, Saritepeci M. Determination of the factors affecting teachers’ perceptions of classroom management competence in technology assisted courses. Technol Pedagog Educ. 2021 Oct 20;30(5):673–91. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1956579
29. Akram H, Abdelrady AH, Al-Adwan AS, Ramzan M. Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Integration in Teaching-Learning Practices: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 6;13(June):1–9. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317/full
30. Badri M, Rashedi A Al, Yang G, Mohaidat J, Hammadi A Al, Hammad A Al. Technology Readiness of School Teachers: An Empirical Study of Measurement and Segmentation. J Inf Technol Educ Re- search. 2014;13(04):257–75. Available from: https://www.omicsgroup.org/journals/technology-readiness-of-school-teachers-an-empirical-study-of-measurement-and-segmentation-2169-0316.1000117.php?aid=20178
31. Alghamdi J, Mostafa F, Abubshait A. Exploring technology readiness and practices of kindergarten student-teachers in Saudi Arabia: A mixed-methods study. Educ Inf Technol. 2022;7851–68.
32. Lazarides R, Watt HMG, Richardson PW. Teachers’ classroom management self-efficacy, perceived classroom management and teaching contexts from beginning until mid-career. Learn Instr. 2020 Oct;69:101346. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959475219302245
33. Lyons D, Scull J. Critiquing narrative inquiry’s epistemological pillars within a large-scale study into the teaching of phonics. Int J Res Method Educ. 2024;47(2):114–25.
34. Sevilla-Liu A. The theoretical basis of a functional-descriptive approach to qualitative research in CBS: With a focus on narrative analysis and practice. J Context Behav Sci. 2023 Oct;30:210–6. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2212144723001230
35. Cowger T, Tritz J. Narrative analysis research: A tool for extension educators. J Ext. 2019;57(6).
36. Wiles JL, Rosenberg MW, Kearns RA. Narrative analysis as a strategy for understanding interview talk in geographic research. Area. 2005 Mar 30;37(1):89–99. Available from: https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2005.00608.x
37. Hugo J, Callaghan R, Cronje J. A Strategy Development Framework for Educational Technology: An integrated Design Science Research and Modified Delphi Approach. Electron J e-Learning. 2024 Jun 20;22(5):60–75. Available from: https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/3568
38. Prestridge S. Examining the shaping of teachers’ pedagogical orientation for the use of technology. Technol Pedagog Educ. 2017 Aug 8;26(4):367–81. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1258369
39. Garrido A, Onaindia E. Assembling Learning Objects for Personalized Learning: An AI Planning Perspective. IEEE Intell Syst. 2013 Mar;28(2):64–73. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5749995/
40. Müller FA, Wulf T. Technology-supported management education: a systematic review of antecedents of learning effectiveness. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2020 Dec 28;17(1):47. Available from: https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-020-00226-x
41. Boateng SL, Penu OKA, Boateng R, Budu J, Marfo JS, Asamoah P. Educational technologies and elementary level education – A bibliometric review of scopus indexed journal articles. Heliyon. 2024 Apr;10(7):e28101. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S240584402404132X
42. Lee C-J, Kim C. A technological pedagogical content knowledge based instructional design model: a third version implementation study in a technology integration course. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2017 Dec 26;65(6):1627–54. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11423-017-9544-z
43. McKenney S, Visscher AJ. Technology for teacher learning and performance. Technol Pedagog Educ. 2019 Mar 15;28(2):129–32. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1600859
44. Lin H-CK, Lu L-W, Lu R-S. Integrating Digital Technologies and Alternate Reality Games for Sustainable Education: Enhancing Cultural Heritage Awareness and Learning Engagement. Sustainability. 2024 Oct 30;16(21):9451. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9451
45. Reeves TD, Li Z. Teachers’ technological readiness for online professional development: evidence from the US e-Learning for Educators initiative. J Educ Teach. 2012 Oct 29;38(4):389–406. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02607476.2012.707921
46. Ayyash MM, Alkhateeb MAA, Abdalla RAM. Smartphone-based learning and academic performance in higher education institutions: extending task-technology-fit with technology readiness constructs. Int J Innov Learn. 2024;36(2):131–55. Available from: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=140260
47. Setati PP, Paledi VN. Conceptualised Framework for Assessing Teachers’ E-learning Readiness in South African Rural Schools. In: 2019 Open Innovations (OI). IEEE; 2019. p. 320–30. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8908204/
48. Vatanartiran S, Karadeniz S. A Needs Analysis for Technology Integration Plan: Challenges and Needs of Teachers. Contemp Educ Technol. 2015 Sep 1;6(3). Available from: https://www.cedtech.net/article/a-needs-analysis-for-technology-integration-plan-challenges-and-needs-of-teachers-6150
49. Marmoah S, Supianto, Sukmawati F, Poerwanti JIS, Yantoro. The Elementary School Teachers Adoption of Learning Management System: A UTAUT Model Analysis. Ing des Syst d’Information. 2024;29(2):715–22.
50. Ifinedo E, Kankaanranta M. Understanding the influence of context in technology integration from teacher educators’ perspective. Technol Pedagog Educ. 2021 Mar 15;30(2):201–15. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1867231
51. Ley T, Tammets K, Sarmiento-Márquez EM, Leoste J, Hallik M, Poom-Valickis K. Adopting technology in schools: modelling, measuring and supporting knowledge appropriation. Eur J Teach Educ. 2022 Aug 8;45(4):548–71. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02619768.2021.1937113
52. Love ML, Simpson LA, Golloher A, Gadus B, Dorwin J. Professional Development to Increase Teacher Capacity for the Use of New Technologies. Interv Sch Clin. 2020 Nov 27;56(2):115–8. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1053451220914886
53. Salikhova NR, Lynch MF, Salikhova AB. Psychological Aspects of Digital Learning: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. Contemp Educ Technol. 2020 Oct 8;12(2):ep280. Available from: https://www.cedtech.net/article/psychological-aspects-of-digital-learning-a-self-determination-theory-perspective-8584
54. Hepp K. P, Prats Fernández MÀ, Holgado García J. Teacher training: technology helping to develop an innovative and reflective professional profile. RUSC Univ Knowl Soc J. 2015 Apr 29;12(2):30. Available from: http://rusc.uoc.edu/rusc/ca/index.php/rusc/article/view/v12n2-hepp-prats-holgado.html
55. ElSayary A. The impact of a professional upskilling training programme on developing teachers’ digital competence. J Comput Assist Learn. 2023 Aug 7;39(4):1154–66. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.12788
56. Gestiardi R, Sarwanto S, Chumdari C, Maryani I. Using an Technology Readiness Model to Understand Perceived Usefulness of Learning in the Covid-19 Era. Int J Elem Educ. 2021;5(4):631.
57. Molina RIR, Amaris RRA, Palencia DAB, Raby NDL, Barraza LL. Support Systems and Technological Capabilities in Digital Transformation According to the Nature of the Company. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science. 2023. p. 202–14. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-28180-8_14
58. Herterich MM, Uebernickel F, Brenner W. Empowering technical customer service by cyber-physical industrial equipment: Exploring rationales, opportunities, and impediments. In: Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2015 - Proceedings. 2015. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85011031743&partnerID=40&md5=e11660cff43f649d7ce42f4bbe0c873d
59. Gestiardi R. Pengaruh Self-Efficacy dan Collaboration Skillterhadap Technology Readiness Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar di Yogyakarta. Universitas Sebelas Maret; 2022.
60. A. Arvesu H. Technology Readiness on Students’ Behavior and Engagement. Int J Res Publ. 2023;123(1):539–52.
61. Asad MM, Hussain N, Wadho M, Khand ZH, Churi PP. Integration of e-learning technologies for interactive teaching and learning process: an empirical study on higher education institutes of Pakistan. J Appl Res High Educ. 2021 Jun 7;13(3):649–63. Available from: http://www.emerald.com/jarhe/article/13/3/649-663/193614
62. ElSayary A. Using Interactive Technology to Enable Interactive E-learning Environment. In: Overcoming Challenges in Online Learning. London: Routledge; 2023. p. 145–50. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003342335/chapters/10.4324/9781003342335-17
63. Shadiev R, Reynolds BL, Li R. The Use of Digital Technology for Sustainable Teaching and Learning. Sustainability. 2024 Jun 24;16(13):5353. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/13/5353
64. Huang Y. The role of digital readiness innovative teaching methods in music art e-learning students’ satisfaction with entrepreneur psychological capital as a mediator: Evidence from music entrepreneur training institutes. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 8;13. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.979628/full
65. Kallas K, Pedaste M. How to Improve the Digital Competence for E-Learning? Appl Sci. 2022 Jun 29;12(13):6582. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/13/6582
66. Petko D, Prasse D, Cantieni A. The Interplay of School Readiness and Teacher Readiness for Educational Technology Integration: A Structural Equation Model. Comput Sch. 2018 Jan 2;35(1):1–18. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2018.1428007
67. Mubarak S, Wibowo S, Rahamathulla M, Yang R, Schönert S. Blending Emerging Technologies for Student-Centred Teaching. In: Digital Transformation and Disruption of Higher Education. Cambridge University Press; 2022. p. 102–19. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781108979146%23CN-bp-9/type/book_part
68. Tang C, Mao S, Naumann SE, Xing Z. Improving student creativity through digital technology products: A literature review. Think Ski Creat. 2022 Jun;44:101032. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1871187122000359
69. Videnovik M, Vlahu‐Gjorgievska E, Trajkovik V. To code or not to code: Introducing coding in primary schools. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 2021 Sep 3;29(5):1132–45. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22369
70. Al-Qora’n LF, Jawarneh A, Nganji JT. Toward Creating Software Architects Using Mobile Project-Based Learning Model (Mobile-PBL) for Teaching Software Architecture. Multimodal Technol Interact. 2023 Mar 15;7(3):31. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/7/3/31
71. Lin R, Yang J, Jiang F, Li J. Does teacher’s data literacy and digital teaching competence influence empowering students in the classroom? Evidence from China. Educ Inf Technol. 2023 Mar 2;28(3):2845–67. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10639-022-11274-3
72. Bećirović S. Digital Competence of Teachers and Students. In: Digital Pedagogy. Springer; 2023. p. 39–50. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-99-0444-0_4
73. Joseph GV, Thomas KA, Nero A. Impact of Technology Readiness and Techno Stress on Teacher Engagement in Higher Secondary Schools. Digit Educ Rev. 2021 Dec 27;(40):51–65. Available from: https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/der/article/view/32271
74. Matalka M Al, Ayasrah FTM, Jarrah HY, Jawarneh M, Alkhawaldeh BY, Darawsheh SR, et al. The importance of effective learning technology utilization, teacher leadership, student engagement, and curriculum in the online learning environment. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2024;8(3):1727–40. Available from: http://www.growingscience.com/ijds/Vol8/ijdns_2024_38.pdf
75. Slijepcevic N, Huang W. Evaluating the impact of online course development and teaching certificate academy on university faculty teaching practices through student learning experiences and faculty perceptions. Internet High Educ. 2025 Oct;67:101020. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1096751625000296
76. Mohamadi Z, Malekshahi N. Designing and validating a potential formative evaluation inventory for teacher competences. Lang Test Asia. 2018 Dec 17;8(1):6. Available from: https://languagetestingasia.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40468-018-0059-2
77. Panke S. Evaluating Blended Learning: Instructional Design Case Studies. In: Case Studies on Blended Learning in Higher Education: Policy, Planning and Quality Assurance. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2024. p. 223–44. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-97-9388-4_13
78. Ashcroft E, Gill L, Campbell C. Assessment in creative Technologies education. In: Creative Technologies Education. London: Routledge; 2025. p. 223–38. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781003490715/chapters/10.4324/9781003490715-15
79. Aquije-Mansilla ME, Rios TCDL, Solis-Trujillo BP, Pérez-Ruiz JC. Teaching strategies and development of creativity in education. Edelweiss Appl Sci Technol. 2025 Feb 12;9(2):1273–82. Available from: https://learning-gate.com/index.php/2576-8484/article/view/4749
80. Blundell CN. Teacher use of digital technologies for school-based assessment: a scoping review. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract. 2021 May 4;28(3):279–300. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1929828
81. Zaremohzzabieh Z, Ahrari S, Abdullah H, Abdullah R, Moosivand M. Effects of educational technology intervention on creative thinking in educational settings: a meta-analysis. Interact Technol Smart Educ. 2024 Jul 2;22(2):235–65. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ITSE-11-2023-0224/full/html
82. Papak PP, Mezak J. Attitudes of Students, Future Teachers, to the Importance of Using Media in Teaching. In: 2021 44th International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO). IEEE; 2021. p. 636–40. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9596854/
83. Henning-Kahmann J, Hellmann K. Entwicklung und Überprüfung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung studentischer Bedarfe an medienbezogenen Lehrkompetenzen im Lehramtsstudium. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychol. 2025 Jan;39(1–2):81–94. Available from: https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1024/1010-0652/a000358.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ratna Widya Irmayanti , Sri Marmoah , Mohamed Nor Azhari Azman , Karsono (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
