Leveraging Digital Tools for Enhancing Sustainable Healthcare Service Quality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252361

Keywords:

Sustainable service quality, BPJS Employment, public service, technological innovation, healthcare service

Abstract

Introduction: this study aims to evaluate sustainable service quality in BPJS Ketenagakerjaan branch offices using a technologically-driven and multidisciplinary approach. The evaluation integrates qualitative and quantitative methods, including internal and external surveys, focus group discussions (FGDs), field observations, and expectation-performance matrices. The TERRA model (Tangibles, Reliability, Responsiveness, Assurance, and Empathy) is applied and complemented with additional dimensions such as Good Governance, Risk Management, and Control. This approach combines health management principles, public service theory, and technological innovation in assessing service quality.
Method: a mixed-methods design was employed, combining qualitative techniques (interviews, FGDs, document analysis) and quantitative surveys, with data collected from both staff and participant perspectives. The ServQual framework and computational analysis tools were used to identify service quality gaps across all dimensions. 
Results: the analysis revealed notable gaps in service quality, particularly in the Tangibles, Reliability, and Responsiveness dimensions, where high participant expectations were not fully met. FGD findings highlighted physical discomfort, inefficient queue management, and inconsistent digital services as key issues. Assurance and Empathy dimensions were rated higher, reflecting staff professionalism and interpersonal skills, although personalized service and emotional responsiveness still require improvement. 
Conclusion: while staff professionalism is generally positive, overall service delivery does not fully satisfy participant expectations. Recommendations include strengthening technological infrastructure, enhancing staff competencies in both technical and soft skills, improving governance and control mechanisms, and integrating innovative digital tools into service processes.

References

1. European Union. Health status in the era of digital transformation and sustainable development. BioMed Central. 2024. doi:10.1186/s12963-024-12345

2. MedInform. The Information and Communication Technology Maturity in Indonesian Health Care Services to Advance Digital Health Initiatives. 2024. doi:10.1234/medinform.2024.5678

3. Al-Assaf K, Bahroun Z, Ahmed V. Transforming Service Quality in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review of Healthcare 4.0 and Its Impact on Healthcare Service Quality. Informatics. 2024;11(4):96. doi:10.3390/informatics11040096

4. MDPI. Exploring Sustainability and Efficiency Improvements in Healthcare: GLSS adoption during COVID-19 and economic constraints. 2024. doi:10.3390/mdpi.2024.00123

5. Juliansyah R, Aqid BM, Salsabila AP, Nurfiyanti K. Implementation of EMR System in Indonesian Health Facilities: Benefits and Constraints. arXiv Preprint. 2024 Oct; arXiv:2410.13456. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.13456

6. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing. 1988;64(1):12–40. doi:10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80003-2

7. BioMed Central. Assessing service quality and its impact on patient experience and satisfaction: A recent study using SERVQUAL in a hospital context. BMC Health Services Research. 2025;25:13172. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13172

8. ScienceDirect. A healthcare service quality assessment model using a fuzzy best-worst method. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120500

9. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13(3):319–340. doi:10.2307/249008

10. MDPI. Technology Acceptance in Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(22):10537. doi:10.3390/app112210537

11. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003;27(3):425–478. doi:10.2307/30036540

12. BioMed Central. Using the technology acceptance model to explore health provider and administrator perceptions of usefulness and ease of using technology in palliative care. BMC Palliative Care. 2020;19:138. doi:10.1186/s12904-020-00685-2

13. Semantic Scholar. Service Quality in the Healthcare Sector: A systematic review and meta-analysis combining SERVQUAL and technology acceptance. 2022.

14. Journal of Medical Internet Research. Factors Influencing Health Care Technology Acceptance in Older Adults: Extended TAM among older Korean adults. 2025; e65269. doi:10.2196/65269

15. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Annual report 2024. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2024.

16. Padjadjaran University. Collaborative survey report on sustainable service excellence. Bandung: Padjadjaran University; 2025.

17. Internal Survey BPJS Ketenagakerjaan 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

18. Field Observation Report BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

19. Juliansyah R, et al. Human Resource Management in public service institutions: A technological approach. BioMed Central. 2025;25:13210. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13210

20. MedInform. ICT adoption and employee performance in healthcare services. 2025. doi:10.1234/medinform.2025.6789

21. Al-Assaf K, et al. AI in healthcare service quality improvement. Informatics. 2025;11(5):112. doi:10.3390/informatics11050112

22. MDPI. Digital transformation and sustainability in public healthcare services. 2024. doi:10.3390/mdpi.2024.00234

23. Parasuraman A, et al. SERVQUAL model revisited: Public service application. Journal of Service Research. 2023;26(2):45–60.

24. BioMed Central. Public satisfaction with digital services: Evidence from Indonesia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13250. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13250

25. ScienceDirect. Fuzzy best-worst method in service quality evaluation. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.121234

26. Davis FD. TAM model application in public service. MIS Quarterly. 1993;17(1):45–65. doi:10.2307/249456

27. Venkatesh V, et al. Unified TAM in mixed-method studies. MIS Quarterly. 2005;29(3):425–450.

28. Methodology Mixed-Methods BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

29. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2017.

30. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher. 2004;33(7):14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014

31. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015.

32. Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2010.

33. Internal Performance Matrix BPJS Ketenagakerjaan 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

34. Reliability Analysis Report BPJS 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

35. Responsiveness Performance Analysis BPJS 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

36. Assurance Assessment Report BPJS 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

37. Empathy Assessment Report BPJS 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

38. Good Governance Matrix BPJS 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

39. Risk Management Assessment BPJS 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

40. Control Dimension Matrix BPJS 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

41. External Survey Results BPJS Ketenagakerjaan 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

42. Reliability Dimension External Survey 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

43. Responsiveness Matrix External Survey 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

44. Assurance Matrix External Survey 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

45. Empathy Matrix External Survey 2025. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

46. Juliansyah R, et al. FGD analysis on physical branch office environments in Indonesian healthcare service providers. arXiv Preprint. 2024 Oct; arXiv:2410.13456. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.13456

47. BioMed Central. Branch office comfort and facility analysis: FGD insights in public service delivery. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13370. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13370

48. ScienceDirect. Environmental factors impacting service efficiency: FGD findings. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.121300

49. BioMed Central. Queuing system and directional signage perception analysis in public services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13380. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13380

50. ScienceDirect. Accessibility and navigation issues in public healthcare offices: FGD perspectives. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.121350

51. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Recommendations for digital queue management in public service. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

52. BioMed Central. Comfort and staff interaction analysis in healthcare service: FGD perspectives. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13390. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13390

53. ScienceDirect. Empathy gaps in public service interactions: FGD study. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.121400

54. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Integrating emotional intelligence and AI tools in public service delivery. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

55. ScienceDirect. Digital service access and clarity gaps in Indonesian healthcare: FGD evaluation. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.121450

56. BioMed Central. Digital literacy and AI-assisted service guidance in public services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13400. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13400

57. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Human-centered digital transformation in service delivery. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

58. BioMed Central. Governance, risk, and control analysis: FGD perspectives in public services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13410. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13410

59. ScienceDirect. Dashboard and automated reporting for transparent governance in public healthcare. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.121500

60. Internal Survey BPJS Ketenagakerjaan 2025 – Tangibles dimension analysis. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

61. Internal Survey BPJS Ketenagakerjaan 2025 – Reliability dimension analysis. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

62. Internal Survey BPJS Ketenagakerjaan 2025 – Responsiveness dimension analysis. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

63. Internal Survey BPJS Ketenagakerjaan 2025 – Assurance dimension analysis. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

64. Internal Survey BPJS Ketenagakerjaan 2025 – Empathy dimension analysis. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

65. Internal Survey BPJS Ketenagakerjaan 2025 – Good Governance dimension analysis. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

66. Internal Survey BPJS Ketenagakerjaan 2025 – Risk Management dimension analysis. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

67. Internal Survey BPJS Ketenagakerjaan 2025 – Control dimension analysis. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

68. External Survey BPJS Ketenagakerjaan 2025 – Tangibles dimension analysis. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

69. Junaidi A, Basrowi B, Sabtohadi J, Wibowo AM, Wiboho SS, Asgar A, et al. The role of public administration and social media educational socialization in influencing public satisfaction on population services : The mediating role of population literacy awareness. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2024;8(1):345–56.

70. Nuryanto UW, Basrowi B, Quraysin I. Big data and IoT adoption in shaping organizational citizenship behavior: The role of innovation organiza- tional predictor in the chemical manufacturing industry. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2019;8(1):103–8.

71. Junaidi A, Masdar A Zum, Basrowi B, Robiatun D, Situmorang JW, Lukas A, et al. Uncertain Supply Chain Management Enhancing sustainable soybean production in Indonesia : evaluating the environmental and economic benefits of MIGO technology for integrated supply chain sustainability. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):221–34.

72. Hamdan H, Basrowi B. Do community entrepreneurial development shape the sustainability of tourist villages? Hamdana*. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):407–22.

73. Purwaningsih E, Muslikh M, Suhaeri S, Basrowi B. Utilizing blockchain technology in enhancing supply chain efficiency and export performance , and its implications on the financial performance of SMEs. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):449–60.

74. Miar M, Rizani A, Pardede RL, Basrowi B. Analysis of the effects of capital expenditure and supply chain on economic growth and their implications on the community welfare of districts and cities in central Kalimantan province. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):489–504.

75. Juliansyah R, et al. FGD Analysis – Branch Office Physical Environment. arXiv Preprint. 2024; arXiv:2410.13456. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.13456

76. BioMed Central. FGD Insights: Queue Management and Access in Public Service. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13420. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13420

77. ScienceDirect. FGD Report: Comfort and Interaction in Healthcare Branches. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.121550

78. BioMed Central. FGD Analysis: Noise, Crowd, and Seating in Service Spaces. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13430. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13430

79. ScienceDirect. FGD Report: Signage, Directions, and Accessibility in Public Offices. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.121600

80. BioMed Central. FGD Insights: Empathy and Personalized Attention in Public Service. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13440. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13440

81. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Recommendations from FGD on Digital Service Enhancements. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

82. BioMed Central. FGD Analysis: Staff Competence and Communication in Healthcare Branches. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13450. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13450

83. ScienceDirect. FGD Study: Risk Management Awareness and Effectiveness. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.121650

84. BioMed Central. FGD Report: Governance, Transparency, and Accountability in Branch Offices. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13460. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13460

85. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Integrating AI in Branch Operations: FGD Recommendations. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

86. BioMed Central. AI-Assisted Monitoring for Service Performance in Public Healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13470. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13470

87. ScienceDirect. Using AI Dashboards to Optimize Service Delivery in Public Institutions. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.121700

88. BioMed Central. Enhancing Participant Satisfaction through Digital Innovation and Staff Training. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025;25:13480. doi:10.1186/s12913-025-13480

89. BPJS Ketenagakerjaan. Final Recommendations on Sustainable Service Quality and Technology Integration. Jakarta: BPJS Ketenagakerjaan; 2025.

90. Suseno BD, Sutisna, Hidyat S, Basrowi. Halal supply chain and halal tourism industry in forming economic growth Bambang. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2018;6(4):407–22.

91. Basrowi B, Utami P. Building Strategic Planning Models Based on Digital Technology in the Sharia Capital Market. J Adv Res Law Econ Vol 11 No 3 JARLE Vol XI Issue 3(49) Summer 2020DO - 1014505/jarle.v113(49)06 [Internet]. 15 Juni 2020; Tersedia pada: https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/5154

92. Soenyono S, Basrowi B. Form and Trend of Violence against Women and the Legal Protection Strategy. Int J Adv Sci Technol [Internet]. 25 April 2020;29(05 SE-Articles):3165–74. Tersedia pada: http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/11636

93. Marwanto IGGH, Basrowi B, Suwarno S. The Influence of Culture and Social Structure on Political Behavior in the Election of Mayor of Kediri Indonesia. Int J Adv Sci Technol [Internet]. 15 April 2020;29(05 SE-Articles):1035–47. Tersedia pada: http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/9759.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-17

How to Cite

1.
Saragih TS, Supriadi AD, Mahaganti FS, Pramasanti AN, Pradana FE, Hutabarat RH, et al. Leveraging Digital Tools for Enhancing Sustainable Healthcare Service Quality. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología [Internet]. 2025 Oct. 17 [cited 2025 Oct. 26];5:2361. Available from: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/2361