Nursing care in critical care units: perception of family members.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252299Keywords:
Care, Nursing, Family, Intensive Care UnitAbstract
Introduction: the family experience is conditioned by the quality of care, humane treatment, and communication, factors that directly affect their satisfaction and trust in the healthcare system.
Method: a qualitative approach with a phenomenological hermeneutic design was used, guided by COREQ criteria. The sample consisted of 12 family members (spouses, parents, and adult children), selected through convenience and saturation sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually, lasting an average of 40 minutes, and were analyzed using the Colaizzi method with an EMIC-ETIC approach to identify categories and subcategories.
Results: the results revealed four main categories: 1) attitudes and care provided by nursing staff, highlighting both negative behaviors such as lack of empathy, impersonal treatment, and poor communication, and positive behaviors such as respect and emotional support; 2) therapeutic limitations in critical services, associated with shortages of medical supplies, a lack of human resources, and excessive workloads; 3) comprehensive care and nursing professionalism, where dignified treatment, patience, and empathy towards patients and families were recognized; and 4) interpersonal relationships and communication, with divergent perceptions between a lack of information and the willingness of some professionals to provide cordial and continuous support.
Conclusions: nursing care in the ICU has strengths and weaknesses. Lack of resources, work overload, and poor communication limit the quality of care; however, empathy, commitment, and willingness on the part of staff are key to humanized care that includes the family as an essential part of the process.
References
1. Berstain I, Álvarez A, Huerta-Baltazar MI, Casique-Casique L. Teoría de los cuidados de Kristen Swanson: revisión de literatura. SANUS. 2022; 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36789/revsanus.vi1.212
2. Duque C, Arias M. Nurse-family relationship. Beyond the opening of doors and schedules. Enferm Intensiva. 2020; 31 (4): 192-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfie.2019.09.003
3. Fletcher L. Peplau’s theory of interpersonal relations and its applications in aesthetic nursing. J Aesthet Nurs. 2023; 12 (3):145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/joan.2023.12.3.145
4. Momeni P, Ewertzon M, Årestedt K, Winnberg E. Family members’ experiences with the healthcare professionals in nursing homes – a survey study. Nurs Res Rev. 2022; 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/nrr.s345452
5. Oguro N, Suzuki R, Yajima N, Sakurai K, Wakita T, Hall MA, et al. The impact that family members’ health care experiences have on patients’ trust in physicians. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07172-y
6. Quille D, Chipantiza Barrera M. Percepción de los familiares de pacientes en unidades de cuidados intensivos sobre la atención recibida. LATAM Rev Lat Cienc Soc Humanid. 2023; 4 (1):13-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56712/latam.v4i1.220
7. Babaei S, Abolhasani S. Family’s supportive behaviors in the care of the patient admitted to the cardiac care unit: a qualitative study. J Caring Sci. 2020; 9(2):80-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/jcs.2020.012
8. Moayed M, Khalili R, Ebadi A, Parandeh A. Factors determining the quality of health services provided to COVID-19 patients from the perspective of healthcare providers: Based on the Donabedian model. Front Public Health. 2022; 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.967431
9. Conejero J. Una aproximación a la investigación cualitativa. Neumol Pediátr. 2020; 15 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.51451/np.v15i1.57
10. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19 (6):349-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
11. Corona J, Maldonado J. Investigación cualitativa: enfoque emic-etic. Rev Cuba Invest Bioméd. 2018; 37 (4):1-4. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ibi/v37n4/ibi22418.pdf
12. Colazzi P. Psychological research as the phenomenologist’s view it. En: Vale R, King M, editores. Existential–phenomenological alternatives for psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1978. Disponible en: https://philpapers.org/rec/COLPRA-5
13. Noreña A, Alcázar N, Rojas J, Rebolledo D. Aplicabilidad de los criterios de rigor y éticos en la investigación cualitativa. Aquichan. 2012; 12 (3):263-274. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S1657-59972012000300006&script=sci_arttext
14. Melita R, Jara C, Moreno P. Percepción de pacientes hospitalizados en unidades médico-quirúrgicas sobre el cuidado humanizado de enfermería. Enferm Cuid Humaniz. 2021; 10 (1):89-105. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2393-66062021000100089&nrm=iso
15. Olsson H, Hammerud B, Schröder A. Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit, a cross-sectional study from Norway. BMC Emerg Med. 2021; 21(1):126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-021-00412-8
16. Reyes J, Macias J, Cabrera J. Desafíos que enfrenta el personal de enfermería durante la implementación del cuidado humanizado en servicios críticos. Cienc enferm. 2025; 31. Disponible en: https://revistas.udec.cl/index.php/cienciayenfermeria/article/view/20469
17. Pinargote H, Anchundia A, Cabrera J. Desgaste laboral en cuidados intensivos percepción de enfermería sobre pérdida de compromiso profesional. Revista Científica Multidisciplinaria Arbitrada Yachasun. 2025; 9 (16). Disponible en: https://www.editorialibkn.com/index.php/Yachasun/article/view/658
18. Barragán G, Cabrera J. Ethical conflicts in nursing care: dilemmas, professional burnout and coping strategies. South Health and Policy. 2025; 4 (338). Disponible en: https://shp.ageditor.ar/index.php/shp/article/view/338
19. Jimenez M, Muñoz C, Zambrano S. Cuidado humanizado a la persona en estado crítico y familia: Percepción de enfermería. Revista Científica Arbitrada Multidisciplinaria PENTACIENCIAS. 2024; 7 (1): 99–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59169/pentaciencias.v7i1.1364
20. Chen C, Wittenberg E, Sullivan S, Lorenz R, Chang Y. The Experiences of Family Members Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021; 38 (7):869-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091211006914
21. Villacreses K, Bravo G, Zambrano E, Tigse L. Atención humanizada en UCI. RECIMUNDO. 2023; 7 (4):261-271. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/7.(4).oct.2023.261-271
22. Solanas V, Salazar P, Chincolla A, Pardina S, Cillas M. La importancia de las UCIs abiertas y la percepción de las enfermeras. Rev Sanit Investig. 2024; 4. Disponible en: https://revistasanitariadeinvestigacion.com/la-importancia-de-las-ucis-abiertas-y-la-percepcion-de-las-enfermeras
23. Gorordo L, Garduño J, Castañón J. Unidad de cuidados intensivos de puertas abiertas: la familia dentro de cuidados intensivos. Rev Hosp Jua Mex. 2020; 87 (2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24875/RHJM.200000172
24. Dragoi L, Munshi L, Herridge M. Visitation policies in the ICU and the importance of family presence at the bedside. Intensive Care Med. 2022; 48 (12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06848-13.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lisset Alexandra Manzano Gallegos , Deicy Dolores Quizhpi Pallchizaca , Shirley Karina Encalada Pilamunga, Ana Gissela Calderón Bailón , Jorge Leodan Cabrera Olvera , Jessica Mariuxi Figueroa Andrade (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
