A Systematic Review of Tiktok-Based Gamification for Civic Education Among Generation Z
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252291Keywords:
Civic Education, Gamification, Generation Z, Political Literacy, TikTokAbstract
This research presents a systematic review of empirical studies addressing the integration of TikTok-based gamification in civic education aimed at Generation Z. As digital natives, Gen Z has distinctive learning patterns and is heavily influenced by mobile technology and social media. TikTok, with its participatory and algorithmic features, offers unique potential to enhance political literacy, learning motivation, and civic engagement when combined with gamification strategies. This review was conducted based on the PRISMA 2020 guidelines by searching the literature in three databases: Scopus, ScienceDirect, and ERIC. Of the 616 identified articles, a screening and selection process based on inclusion criteria using the PICOS framework yielded 19 empirical articles eligible for thematic analysis. The selected articles were peer-reviewed publications published between 2021 and 2025. The analysis shows that TikTok-based gamification positively impacts Gen Z's political awareness, learning motivation, and engagement in democratic processes. Effective strategies include the use of AR filters, short videos, storylines, reward systems, and integration into digital learning platforms. However, challenges were also identified, such as algorithmic bias, low critical digital literacy, and institutional resistance to the use of social media in formal education. This study provides conceptual contributions in mapping theoretical foundations and implementation models, as well as practical contributions to the development of contextual, inclusive, and adaptive citizenship learning strategies for the characteristics of the digital generation.
References
1. Anderson LW. Civic Education, Citizenship, and Democracy. Educ Policy Anal Arch. 2023;31(103):5–6.
2. Yoldaş ÖB. Civic Education and Learning Democracy: Their Importance for Political Participation of Young People. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2015;174(286):544–9.
3. Demarest L, Kuppens L. Opportunities or risks for civic education in electoral democracies? Evidence from Nigeria. Int J Educ Dev. 2025;117(June):103316.
4. Galston WA. Political Knowledge, Political Engagement, and Civic Education. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 2001;4(1):217–34.
5. Ayane ZT, Mihiretie DM. Developing good person and citizen through civic and ethical education in Ethiopia: A content analysis of secondary school textbooks. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2024;10(April):100913.
6. Japar M, Hermanto, Muyaroah S, Susila HR, Alfani H. Digital Literacy-Based Multicultural Education through Civic Education in Indonesian Junior High Schools. J Soc Stud Educ Res. 2023;14(4):328–49.
7. Nuryadi MH, Widiatmaka P. Strengthening civic literacy among students through digital literacy in society 5.0. J Educ Learn. 2023;17(2):215–20.
8. Bowyer B, Kahne J. The digital dimensions of civic education: Assessing the effects of learning opportunities. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2020;69(June):101162.
9. Mertala P, López-Pernas S, Vartiainen H, Saqr M, Tedre M. Digital natives in the scientific literature: A topic modeling approach. Comput Human Behav. 2024;152:108076.
10. Lee C-Y, Der Pan PJ, Liao C-J, Chen H-Y, Walters BG. E-character education among digital natives: Focusing on character exemplars. Comput Educ. 2013;67:58–68.
11. Shorey S, Chan V, Rajendran P, Ang E. Learning styles, preferences and needs of generation Z healthcare students: Scoping review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021;57:103247.
12. Shahzad F, Shahid M, Bibi H, Shabbir A. Social Media as a Tool for Political Education among Gen Z. Crit Rev Soc Sci Stud. 2025;3(2):1729–41.
13. Hashim NNI. Nexus of political issues towards behavioural patterns on social media: a narrative literature review among Gen Z in Malaysia. In: Forum Komunikasi. Faculty of Communication and Media Studies (FCMS); 2024. p. 157–77.
14. Keegan P, Vaughan KP. The Impact of Polarization on the Political Engagement of Generation Z Elementary Preservice Teachers and Their Teaching. Democr Educ. 2023;31(1):1–13.
15. Cervi L, Tejedor S, Lladó CM. TikTok and the new language of political communication: the case of Podemos. Cult Leng y Represent. 2021;26:267–87.
16. Literat I, Kligler-Vilenchik N. TikTok as a Key Platform for Youth Political Expression: Reflecting on the Opportunities and Stakes Involved. Soc Media Soc. 2023;9(1).
17. Tenri, Hilvan. 55 % Pemilih Didominari Generasi Muda, Bantu KPU Dalam Penyelenggaran Pemilu. Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia. 2024.
18. Muhamad N. KPU: Pemilih Pemilu 2024 didominasi oleh kelompok Gen Z dan Milenial. Katadata Databoks. 2023.
19. We Are Social & Meltwater. Digital 2024: Indonesia. Data Reportal. 2024.
20. Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification.” In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2011. p. 9–15. (MindTrek ’11).
21. Triantafyllou SA, Georgiadis C, Sapounidis T. Gamification in education and training: A literature review. Vol. 71, International Review of Education. Springer Netherlands; 2025. 483–517 p.
22. Jaramillo-Mediavilla L, Basantes-Andrade A, Cabezas-González M, Casillas-Martín S. Impact of Gamification on Motivation and Academic Performance: A Systematic Review. Educ Sci. 2024;14(6).
23. Subhash S, Cudney EA. Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Comput Human Behav. 2018;87:192–206.
24. Rinjeni TP, Rakhmawati NA, Nadlifatin R. Design of Academic Gamification Model Based on Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Mbti) Through Pre-Experimental Design. J Inf Technol Educ Res. 2024;23.
25. Sukmawati F, Suparmi, Prihatin R, Santosa EB. Design and evaluation a mobile augmented reality to enhance critical thinking skills for vocational high schools. Salud, Cienc y Tecnol. 2024;
26. Wang Z, Harun J, Yuan Y. Enhancing Reading Instruction Through Gamification: a Systematic Review of Theoretical Models, Implementation Strategies, and Measurable Outcomes (2020–2024). J Inf Technol Educ Res. 2024;23:1–27.
27. Behl A, Jayawardena N, Pereira V, Islam N, Giudice M Del, Choudrie J. Gamification and e-learning for young learners: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and future research agenda. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2022;176(June 2021):121445.
28. Kuo HC, Weng TL, Chang CC, Chang CY. Designing Our Own Board Games in the Playful Space: Improving High School Student’s Citizenship Competencies and Creativity through Game-Based Learning. Vol. 15, Sustainability (Switzerland). 2023.
29. Campillo Ferrer J, Miralles Martínez P, Sánchez Ibáñez R. Gamification in Higher Education: Impact on Student Motivation and the Acquisition of Social and Civic Key Competencies. Sustainability. 2020;12(12):4822.
30. Vijay D, Gekker A. Playing Politics: How Sabarimala Played Out on TikTok. Am Behav Sci. 2021;65(5):712–34.
31. Conde-Caballero D, Castillo-Sarmiento CA, Ballesteros-Yánez I, Rivero-Jiménez B, Mariano-Juárez L. Microlearning through TikTok in Higher Education. An evaluation of uses and potentials. Educ Inf Technol. 2024;29(2):2365–85.
32. Apoko TW, Waluyo B. Social media for English language acquisition in Indonesian higher education: Constructivism and connectivism frameworks. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2025;11:101382.
33. Iskandar R, Maksum A, Marini A. Digital citizenship literacy in Indonesia: The role of privacy awareness and social campaigns. Soc Sci Humanit Open. 2025;12:101697.
34. Slamet J, Basthomi Y, Ivone FM, Eliyanah E. Utilizing an SDL approach in designing a gamification-based MOOC to enhance autonomous learning. J Inf Technol Educ Res. 2024;23:10.
35. Puspaningtyas KAY, Mutia F, Ghazali AM. Civic Literacy in the information age: a survey of vocational high school student in Sidoarjo, Indonesia. Cogent Soc Sci. 2024;10(1).
36. Trang TTN, Chien Thang P, Thi Truong Nguyen G, Thi Minh Nguyen H. Factors driving Gen Z’s news engagement on TikTok: A hybrid analysis through CB-SEM and PLS-SEM. Comput Hum Behav Reports. 2025;18:100645.
37. Attia NAHM, Ahmed NTI. Is TikTok a Public Sphere for Democracy in Egypt? The Application of Habermas’s “Pseudo-Public Sphere.” Stud Media Commun. 2025;13(2):336–41.
38. Literat I, Kligler-Vilenchik N. How Popular Culture Prompts Youth Collective Political Expression and Cross-Cutting Political Talk on Social Media: A Cross-Platform Analysis. Soc Media Soc. 2021;7(2).
39. Tian W, Reijmersdal EA van, Daas R, Larsen H, Peter J. Augmented youth: Prevalence and predictors of AR filter use on social media among adolescents. Comput Human Behav. 2025;170:108686.
40. Cartes-Barroso MJ, García-Estévez N, Méndez-Muros S. Attracting the Vote on TikTok: Far-Right Parties’ Emotional Communication Strategies in the 2024 European Elections. Journal Media. 2025;6(1):1–28.
41. Lampe NM. Teaching with TikTok in Online Sociology of Sex and Gender Courses. Vol. 51, Teaching Sociology. 2023. p. 323–35.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Reno Fernandes, Eka Vidya Putra, Haldi Patra, Rhavy Ferdyan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
