Enhancing Hospitality Competencies: The Role of Mobile Augmented Reality In Indonesian Vocational Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252271Keywords:
Augmented Reality, Hospitality Competencies, Vocational Education, Immersive Learning, Gender Equity, Employability SkillsAbstract
The integration of immersive technologies such as augmented reality (AR) in tourism and hospitality education remains limited, particularly in developing countries like Indonesia, where textbook-based instruction often restricts student engagement and practical skill development, leaving gaps in spatial, procedural, and conceptual competencies. This study examined the effectiveness of mobile AR applications in improving hospitality competencies and explored gender-based differences in learning outcomes among vocational school students. A quasi-experimental design was implemented with 420 eleventh-grade students from four vocational schools over eight weeks, where the experimental group used AR to simulate hotel operations while the control group received textbook-based instruction. Hospitality Competency Test scores were analyzed using ANCOVA controlling for pre-test scores, and qualitative data from semi-structured interviews were thematically analyzed to complement the quantitative results. Findings showed a significant positive effect of AR on overall competency (F(1,417)=175.36, p<.001, ηp²=.296; Cohen’s d=1.18), with higher post-test performance in spatial awareness, procedural knowledge, and conceptual understanding. A significant gender-by-intervention interaction (F(1,415)=5.04, p=.025, ηp²=.012) indicated that females in the AR group achieved greater gains in procedural knowledge (d=0.43) and spatial learning. Qualitative findings reinforced these outcomes, revealing increased engagement, collaboration, and comprehension of complex service processes, with only minor technical challenges. These results suggest that AR can be effectively integrated into competency-based vocational curricula to accelerate skill acquisition, enhance engagement, and promote gender equity in hospitality training, provided that adequate infrastructure and teacher professional development are ensured. Future research should include multi-site longitudinal studies to assess retention, workplace transfer, cost-effectiveness, and the potential benefits of integrating AR with VR, AI, and learning analytics for scalable implementation.
References
Bacca J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R, Graf S, Kinshuk. Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Comput Educ. 2014;76:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2013. doi:10.4324/9780203771587
Diegmann P, Schmidt-Kraepelin M, Van den Eynden S, Basten D. Benefits of augmented reality in educational environments—A systematic literature review. i-com. 2015;14(3):179–94. doi:10.1515/icom-2015-0031
Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2013.
Garzón J, Pavón J, Baldiris S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Real. 2019;23(4):447–59. doi:10.1007/s10055-019-00379-9
Hou L, Wang X. A study on the benefits of augmented reality in retaining working memory in assembly tasks: A focus on differences in gender. Autom Constr. 2013;32:38–45. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2012.12.007
Ibáñez MB, Delgado-Kloos C. Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Comput Educ. 2018;123:109–23. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002
Johnson-Glenberg MC. Immersive VR and education: Embodied design principles that include gesture and hand controls. Educ Psychol Rev. 2018;30(3):603–19. doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9326-3
Makransky G, Petersen GB. A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning: The Cognitive Affective Model of Immersive Learning (CAMIL). Comput Educ. 2021;177:104429. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429
Moreno R, Mayer RE. Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educ Psychol Rev. 2007;19(3):309–26. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2
Pallant J. SPSS survival manual. 7th ed. London: McGraw-Hill Education/Open University Press; 2020.
Radianti J, Majchrzak TA, Fromm J, Wohlgenannt I. A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Comput Educ. 2020;147:103778. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Sweller J. Cognitive load theory. In: Mestre JP, Ross BH, editors. Psychol Learn Motiv. Vol. 55. San Diego: Academic Press; 2011. p. 37–76. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 7th ed. Boston: Pearson; 2019.
Tom Dieck MC, Jung T, Rauschnabel PA. Determining visitor engagement through augmented reality at science festivals. J Destin Mark Manag. 2018;8:134–43. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.12.004
Uttal DH, Meadow NG, Tipton E, Hand LL, Alden AR, Warren C, Newcombe NS. The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychol Bull. 2013;139(2):352–402. doi:10.1037/a0028446
Yung R, Khoo-Lattimore C. New realities: A systematic literature review on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism research. Curr Issues Tour. 2019;22(17):2056–81. doi:10.1080/13683500.2017.1417359
Zhao J, Wang M, Sun Y. Technological affordances of augmented reality in higher education: A systematic review. Educ Res Rev. 2020;30:100326. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326
Steele CM, Aronson J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(5):797–811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
Spencer SJ, Logel C, Davies PG. Stereotype threat. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:415–37. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235
Makransky G, Petersen GB. A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning: The Cognitive Affective Model of Immersive Learning (CAMIL). Comput Educ. 2021;177:104429. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429
Bacca J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R, Graf S, Kinshuk. Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Comput Educ. 2014;76:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hermansyah, Dina Amsari, Kurnia Ilahi Manvi, Retnaningtyas Susanti, Azmen Kahar, Khairani Saladin, Heriani, Vischa Mansyera Pratama, Ahmad Fauzan Yusman (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.