Virtual reality for enhancing spatial ability in interior design Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252234Keywords:
Virtual reality, spatial ability, interior design education, immersive learning, mixed methodsAbstract
Introduction: This study investigated the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) technology in enhancing spatial ability among interior design students.
Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving a quasi-experimental design with pre- and post-tests. Sixty-two second-year interior design students were divided into an experimental group (n=28), which received VR-based instruction, and a control group (n=34), which underwent traditional teaching. The intervention utilized a head-mounted display (HMD) VR system in a dedicated immersive classroom. Standardized instruments, including the Spatial Reasoning Instrument (SRI) and the Architecture and Interior Design Spatial Ability Test (AISAT), were used to measure spatial ability. Semi-structured interviews provided qualitative insights.
Results: The experimental group showed significant improvements in mental rotation (F=16.07, p<0.001，η²=0.25) and spatial visualization (F=20.83, p<0.001，η²=0.16), as well as overall spatial ability (F=23.56, p<0.001，η²=0.12). No significant change was observed in spatial orientation. Qualitative data indicated that students found VR immersive, intuitive, and beneficial for understanding spatial relationships.
Conclusions: The study demonstrated that VR-based instruction significantly enhances specific spatial abilities in interior design education. However, spatial orientation requires further targeted intervention. These findings support the integration of VR into design curricula, guided by experiential and cognitive learning theories.
References
1. Uttal DH, Meadow NG, Tipton E, Hand LL, Alden AR, Warren C, et al. The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychol Bull. 2013;139(2):352-402.
2. Mix KS, Levine SC, Cheng Y-L, Stockton JD, Bower CJJoEP. Effects of spatial training on mathematics in first and sixth grade children. 2021;113(2):304.
3. Guevara D, de Laski-Smith D, Ashur SJSSS. Interior design students’ perception of virtual reality. 2022;2(8):152.
4. Balalle HJDE. Learning beyond realities: exploring virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality in higher education—a systematic literature review. 2025;4(1):151.
5. Marougkas A, Troussas C, Krouska A, Sgouropoulou CJE. Virtual reality in education: a review of learning theories, approaches and methodologies for the last decade. 2023;12(13):2832.
6. Sweller J. Cognitive load theory. Psychology of learning and motivation. 55: Elsevier; 2011. p. 37-76.
7. Kolb DA. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. 2014.
8. Hein GEJIfI. Constructivist learning theory. 1991;14.
9. Serrano-Ausejo E, Mårell-Olsson EJE, Technologies I. Opportunities and challenges of using immersive technologies to support students’ spatial ability and 21st-century skills in K-12 education. 2024;29(5):5571-97.
10. Dawson JC, Goldringer IJOcb. Breeding for genetically diverse populations: variety mixtures and evolutionary populations. 2012:77-98.
11. Shadish WRJPm. Revisiting field experimentation: field notes for the future. 2002;7(1):3.
12. Johnson RB, Christensen LB. Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches: Sage publications; 2024.
13. Fareed, M., Ahmad A., S. S. M. M., Noor, W. S. W. M. & Isa, M. F. M. (2022). What Makes Human Resource Professionals Effective? An Exploratory Lesson from Techno-Based Telco Firms of a Developing Country. Front. Psychol. 13:774165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.774165
14. Fareed, M., Ahmad, A., Salleh, S. S. M. M., & Saoula, O. (2019). What makes HR Professionals Effective? Qualitative Evidence from Telecom Sector of a Developing Country. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 28(4), 603-617. https:// doi 10.24205/03276716.2019.1141
15. Ramful A, Lowrie T, Logan T. Measurement of Spatial Ability: Construction and Validation of the Spatial Reasoning Instrument for Middle School Students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2017;35(7):709-27.
16. Cho JY, Suh J. The Architecture and Interior Design Domain-Specific Spatial Ability Test (AISAT): Its Validity and Reliability. Journal of Interior Design. 2022;47(2):11-30.
17. Legault J, Zhao J, Chi Y-A, Chen W, Klippel A, Li P. Immersive Virtual Reality as an Effective Tool for Second Language Vocabulary Learning. 2019;4(1):13.
18. Cho JY, Suh J. UNDERSTANDING SPATIAL ABILITY IN INTERIOR DESIGN EDUCATION: 2D-TO-3D VISUALIZATION PROFICIENCY AS A PREDICTOR OF DESIGN PERFORMANCE. 2019.
19. Sweller JJEpr. Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. 2010;22:123-38.
20. Assali I, Alaali A. Integrating Technology into Interior Design Education: A Paradigm Shift in Teaching and Learning. Board Diversity and Corporate Governance: Springer; 2024. p. 565-76.
21. Darwish M, Kamel S, Assem A. Extended reality for enhancing spatial ability in architecture design education. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2023;14(6).
22. Weisberg SM, Schinazi VR, Ferrario A, Newcombe NSJJoEPL, Memory,, Cognition. Evaluating the effects of a programming error on a virtual environment measure of spatial navigation behavior. 2023;49(4):575.
23. Csikszentmihalyi M, Csikszentmihalyi M, Abuhamdeh S, Nakamura JJF, Csikszentmihalyi tfoppTcwoM. Flow. 2014:227-38.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zheng Wang, Asmidah Alwi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
