Effectiveness of Blended Project-Based Learning in Enhancing Computer Network Education: An Evaluation Based on Student Learning Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252223Keywords:
Blended Project-Based Learning, Computer Network Education, Student Learning Outcomes, EffectivenessAbstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of Blended Project-Based Learning (PBL) in enhancing student learning outcomes in Computer Network Education. As traditional methods often fall short in preparing students for industry demands, the research aimed to determine if a blended PBL model could lead to statistically superior gains in students' theoretical and practical skills. A quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control group design was employed. The experimental group (n=28) participated in a blended PBL intervention, while the control group (n=27) received traditional instruction. Data were collected via pre- and post-tests to assess technical skills and problem-solving abilities. Quantitative analysis, including one-way ANCOVA, compared post-test scores while controlling for pre-test scores, and paired-samples t-tests measured learning gains. Qualitative data from student surveys and interviews were analyzed thematically. The results indicated a significant difference in adjusted post-test scores between the groups, with the experimental group showing substantially greater learning gains. Qualitative findings further revealed that the blended PBL approach significantly enhanced student motivation, engagement, and the development of teamwork and critical thinking skills. In conclusion, the Blended PBL model is a highly effective pedagogical approach for technical education. Its success advocates for a fundamental paradigm shift toward active, student-centered methodologies that truly prepare graduates for a complex and evolving professional landscape.
References
1. Bostan A. Teaching Computer Networks: Theory and Problem Solving. Journal of Advances in Computer Networks 2015; 3: 299–302.
2. Rashid N bin A, Othman MdZ Bin, Johan R, et al. Cisco Packet Tracer Simulation as Effective Pedagogy in Computer Networking Course. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (Ijim) 2019; 13: 4.
3. Sangwan KS, Singh R. An Experiential Learning-Integrated Framework to Improve Problem-Solving Skills of Engineering Graduates. Higher Education Skills and Work-Based Learning 2021; 12: 241–255.
4. Zhou S, Lin L, Shu Y, et al. The Construction and Practice of Computer Network Course Driven by Innovative Thinking. Matec Web of Conferences 2020; 309: 05017.
5. Wani Et al. TA. A Review of Fuzzy Logic and Artificial Neural Network Technologies Used for MPPT. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (Turcomat) 2021; 12: 2912–2918.
6. Fan D. Construction of a Teaching Evaluation System for Computer Network Courses Under a Blended Teaching Mode. Epub ahead of print 2024. DOI: 10.4108/eai.24-11-2023.2343618.
7. Nurdiyanto H, Surjono HD, Priyanto P, et al. Collaborative Learning Model With Computer Supported Learning Approach. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.2991/icedutech-17.2018.45.
8. Husamah H. Blended Project Based Learning: Metacognitive Awareness of Biology Education New Students. Journal of Education and Learning (Edulearn) 2015; 9: 274–281.
9. Mielikäinen M. Towards Blended Learning: Stakeholders’ Perspectives on a Project-Based Integrated Curriculum in ICT Engineering Education. Industry and Higher Education 2021; 36: 74–85.
10. Krismadinata, Verawardina U, Jalinus N, et al. Blended learning as instructional model in vocational education: Literature review. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2020; 8: 5801–5815.
11. Lin J, Lai Y, Chang L. Fostering Self‐regulated Learning in a Blended Environment Using Group Awareness and Peer Assistance as External Scaffolds. J Comput Assist Learn 2015; 32: 77–93.
12. Tika IN, Agustiana IGAT. The Effect of a Blended Learning Project Based Learning Model on Scientific Attitudes and Science Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar 2021; 5: 557–566.
13. Jalinus N, Nabawi A, Mardin A. The Seven Steps of Project Based Learning Model to Enhance Productive Competences of Vocational Students. 2017.
14. Servant-Miklos V, Kolmos A. Student Conceptions of Problem and Project Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Phenomenographic Investigation. Journal of Engineering Education 2022; 111: 792–812.
15. Marsiti CIR, Santyasa IW, Sudatha IGW, et al. The Effect of Project-Based Blended Learning and Students’ Creativity on Eleventh-Grade Students’ Learning Achievement. International Journal of Instruction 2023; 16: 805–826.
16. Bralić A, Divjak B. Integrating MOOCs in Traditionally Taught Courses: Achieving Learning Outcomes With Blended Learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education; 15. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-017-0085-7.
17. Tegeh IM, Agustini K, Sulastri IA. Collaborative Project Based Blended Learning on Resilience and Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education Technology 2023; 7: 698–706.
18. Umar I. Building a Community of Practice for Computer Science Educators in Nigeria: Strategies, Challenges, and Outcomes. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Engineering 2024; 13–27.
19. Fu X. Study on the Improvement of Educational Management and Teaching in the Context of Education Informatization. Scientific and Social Research 2023; 5: 33–37.
20. Widiyatmoko AT, Nugroho AA, Wiyanto W. Development of Web-Based Student Registration Information System With Rapid Application Development Approach. Journal of Computer Networks Architecture and High Performance Computing; 6. Epub ahead of print 2024. DOI: 10.47709/cnahpc.v6i1.3459.
21. Akmal, Ambiyar, Usmeldi, et al. Developing and Assessing the Impact of an Integrated STEM Project-Based Learning Model in Vocational Education for Enhanced Competence and Employability. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología; 5. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2025. DOI: 10.56294/saludcyt20251786.
22. Fadillah R, Ganefri, Yulastri A, et al. Development of Mobile Learning Based on Digital Entrepreneurs Using Raspberry Pi on TVET. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 2023; 13: 2231–2239.
23. Iswan M, Syaifuddin M, Wijaya RF. The Effectiveness of Smart Learning Based on Expert Systems in Cryptography Courses. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Open Source 2021; 4: 205–215.
24. Maroš M, Korenková M, Fiľa M, et al. Project-Based Learning and Its Effectiveness: Evidence From Slovakia. Interactive Learning Environments 2021; 31: 4147–4155.
25. Fadillah R, Giatman M, Muskhir M, et al. Meta Analysis: Efektivitas Penggunaan Metode Proyect Based Learning Dalam Pendidikan Vokasi. JP2 2021; 4: 138–146.
26. Yolnasdi, Simatupang W, Sukardi, et al. Effectiveness of Project-Based Cooperative Learning Model in Electrical Installation Practical Courses. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología; 5. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2025. DOI: 10.56294/saludcyt20251779.
27. Xu E, Wang W, Wang Q. The Effectiveness of Collaborative Problem Solving in Promoting Students’ Critical Thinking: A Meta-Analysis Based on Empirical Literature. Humanit Soc Sci Commun; 10. Epub ahead of print 2023. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1.
28. Brkovic M, Ćulibrk J, Rikalović A, et al. Industry 5.0 and the Skills Gap: Strategies for Developing a Futureready Workforce. 2023; 360–365.
29. Haviland S, Robbins S, Belur V, et al. Improving Workforce Readiness Skills Among Community College Adult Learners Through New Technologies: Metrop Univ 2021; 32: 35–53.
30. Chen H, Huang J. PBL-Based Vocational Education Blended Learning Activity Design Research. Education Reform and Development 2024; 6: 88–95.
31. Anazifa RD, Djukri D. Project- Based Learning and Problem-Based Learning: Are They Effective to Improve Student’s Thinking Skills? Jurnal Pendidikan Ipa Indonesia 2017; 6: 346.
32. Agustia K, Mukhaiyar R. Developing An Instructional Model Blended Learning On Appropriate Technology Course. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.32698/GCS-PSSHERS348.
33. Pressman RS. Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill, 2010.
34. Hastuti H, Ambiyar A, Jalinus N, et al. Project-Based Learning to Enhance Creativity and Learning Outcomes. 2023; 67–73.
35. Creswell JW,, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. . Sage publications.
36. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta, 2016.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Samsir, M. Giatman, Riki Mukhaiyar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
