A Qualitative Needs Analysis for Developing a Design Thinking Pedagogical Framework for Secondary Science Teachers in Malaysia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252187Keywords:
Design Thinking, STEM education, pedagogical model, needs analysis, Malaysian science teachers, DDR, constructivismAbstract
Introduction: In response to the Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013–2025 and the pedagogical demands of Industrial Revolution 4.0, this study investigates the need for a contextualized Design Thinking (DT) pedagogical model for secondary school science teachers in Malaysia. Methods: Guided by Phase I of the Design and Development Research (DDR) methodology, this qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews with three experienced science educators to explore their perceptions, challenges, and expectations related to DT integration in classroom instruction. Thematic analysis revealed three dominant themes: (1) the absence of a structured implementation framework, (2) challenges in aligning DT with national assessment practices, and (3) systemic barriers such as limited resources and time constraints. Informants emphasized the need for localized, practical guidelines, adaptable assessment tools, and sustainable training mechanisms.
Results: These findings highlight a critical gap in current pedagogical practice and serve as empirical grounding for the development of a DT pedagogical model in Phase II.
Conclusions: The study contributes to STEM education by advocating for a model that is both theoretically robust and operationally feasible within the Malaysian educational landscape.
References
1. Saseendran A, Thomas MV. Design thinking in science and integrated STEM / STEAM education : Trends , challenges , and future directions from a systematic review. STEM Educ. 2025;(January).
2. Alvarado LF. Design thinking as an active teaching methodology in higher education: a systematic review. Front Educ. 2025;10(March).
3. Sato DH. Reform and Development in Teacher Education for the Digital Society. J Southeast Asian Educ Off J SEAMEO. 2020;1(August).
4. Henriksen D, Richardson C, Mehta R. Design thinking: A creative approach to educational problems of practice. Think Ski Creat [Internet]. 2017;26(March):140–53. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001
5. Bawaneh AK, Alnamshan MM. Design Thinking in Science Education: Enhancing Undergraduate Students’ Motivation and Achievement in Learning Biology. Int J Inf Educ Technol. 2023;13(4):621–33.
6. Ahmad Sarji AH, Wong SL, Abdul Rani MZ, Md Khambari MN, Moses P. Integrating Computational Thinking into Malaysian STEM Education : Integrating Computational Thinking into Malaysian STEM Education : Challenges , Opportunities , and Strategic Solutions. Bull Tech Comm Learn Technol [Internet]. 2025;25(1):13–20. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390161800%0D
7. BASKARAN VL, ABDULLAH N. Constraints and Challenges of Stem Education in Manjung District’S Secondary Schools. Int J Manag Stud Soc Sci Res. 2023;05(04):277–87.
8. Aina N, Juhari A, Zakaria Z. Malaysian Science Teachers’ Tech-infused Instruction and Assessment Strategies. Asian J Res Educ Soc Sci. 2024;(March).
9. Nguyện LC, Hoa HQ, Hien LHP. Integrating design thinking into STEM education: Enhancing problem-solving skills of high school students. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2025;21(4):1–11.
10. Mohamed H, Arulprasam J, Hussain MAM. Impact of Teacher’s Professional Development Programme on Students’ Performance in Secondary Schools. Int J Acad Res Progress Educ Dev. 2024;13(3):5092–106.
11. Haji Ahmad R. Educational development and reformation in Malaysia: Past, present and future. J Educ Adm. 1998;36(5):462–75.
12. Jain J, Jin MS, Ling LY. Exploring Science Teachers’ Translation of Nature of Science (Nos) Knowledge To Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Nos Pck). Malaysian J Learn Instr. 2025;22(1):200–15.
13. Hassan A, Hamzah I. Design Thinking In Education in Malaysia. Int J Acad Res Progress Educ Dev. 2024;13(3):2838–49.
14. Mahmud SND, Nasri NM, Samsudin MA, Halim L. Science teacher education in Malaysia: Challenges and way forward. Asia-Pacific Sci Educ. 2018;4(1):1–12.
15. Ali QB, Zin MLBM, Ismail SA bin. Empowering knowledge management in enhancing the performance of higher education institutions in the era of industrial revolution 4 . 0 : A mediating role of innovation. 2025;
16. Jabbar R, Sajjad A, Ali QB. Exploring the Impact of Flexible Working Hours on Job Satisfaction : The Mediating Role of Work-Life Balance Exploring the Impact of Flexible Working Hours on Job Satisfaction : The Mediating Role of Work-Life Balance. 2025;(July).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Norzilawati Zainal Abidin, Farah Mohamad Zain , Abdul Hamid Busthami Nur (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
