The role of Artificial Intelligence in modifying research practices in the social sciences of Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252185Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Qualitative Research, Social Sciences, Higher Education, EcuadorAbstract
Introduction: the progressive incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has transformed research practices at the global level. However, in Ecuador, specifically within the Faculty of Social Sciences at the Technical University of Manabí, its adoption remains incipient.
Objective: the objective of the study was to develop a theoretical framework that examines the impact of artificial intelligence on the research practices of UTM Social Sciences teachers, considering their discourses, experiences, and reinterpretations regarding the emerging or resisted use of these technologies.
Methods: the study followed a qualitative approach with phenomenological design and ethnomethodological elements. A purposive sample of 51 professors was selected from a population of 79. Analysis was based on predefined analytical categories, open/axial coding in Atlas.ti, and data–investigator–theory triangulation.
Results: results revealed three main categories: positive perceptions of AI, challenges in its implementation, and proposals for responsible integration. Professors valued AI for aiding text organization and access to up-to-date sources but expressed concerns about ethical ambiguity and lack of institutional guidance.
Conclusion: AI is perceived as a methodological support tool. However, its integration requires institutional policies, ethical accompaniment, and ongoing training to align with the epistemological values of social sciences.
References
1. Berti S, Grazia V, Molinari L. Active Student Participation in Whole-School Interventions in Secondary School. A Systematic Literature Review. Educ Psychol Rev [Internet]. 2023 May 4 [cited 2025 July 18];35(2):1–27. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-023-09773-x
2. Baig MI, Yadegaridehkordi E. Factors influencing academic staff satisfaction and continuous usage of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education. Int J Educ Technol High Educ [Internet]. 2025 Feb 3 [cited 2025 July 18];22(1):5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00506-4
3. Tosi D, Kokaj R, Roccetti M. 15 years of Big Data: a systematic literature review. J Big Data [Internet]. 2024 May 14 [cited 2025 July 18];11(1):73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-024-00914-9
4. Alam A, Mohanty A. Educational technology: Exploring the convergence of technology and pedagogy through mobility, interactivity, AI, and learning tools. Cogent Eng [Internet]. 2023 Dec 29 [cited 2025 July 18];10(2):2283282. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2283282
5. Yim IHY. Artificial intelligence literacy in primary education: An arts-based approach to overcoming age and gender barriers. Comput Educ Artif Intell [Internet]. 2024 Dec 1 [cited 2025 July 18];7:100321. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666920X24001243
6. Zheng L, Yang Y. Research perspectives and trends in Artificial Intelligence-enhanced language education: A review. Heliyon [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 July 18];10(19):e38617. Available from: https://www.cell.com/heliyon/abstract/S2405-8440(24)14648-8
7. Qu G, Jing H. Is new technology always good? Artificial intelligence and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China. Int Rev Econ Finance [Internet]. 2025 Mar 1 [cited 2025 July 18];98:103949. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025001121
8. Tamrin MH, Muhafidin D, Nurasa H, Muhtar EA. Stakeholders analysis of tourism governance in Dalegan beach ecotourism, East Java, Indonesia. J Infrastruct Policy Dev [Internet]. 2024 Jan 16 [cited 2025 July 18];8(3):3107. Available from: https://systems.enpress-publisher.com/index.php/jipd/article/view/3107
9. Joo KH, Park NH. Teaching and Learning Model for Artificial Intelligence Education. Procedia Comput Sci [Internet]. 2024 Jan 1 [cited 2025 July 18];239:226–33. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050924014091
10. Díaz-Rodríguez N, Del Ser J, Coeckelbergh M, López de Prado M, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. Connecting the dots in trustworthy Artificial Intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation. Inf Fusion [Internet]. 2023 Nov 1 [cited 2025 July 18];99:101896. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566253523002129
11. Pebriana PH, Setiadi E, Ahmadi D, Rahim R, Arwansyah OD, Wijayanto K, et al. Exploring the frontiers of artificial intelligence: A bibliometric analysis of high-impact research up to 2023. J Infrastruct Policy Dev [Internet]. 2025 Feb 7 [cited 2025 July 18];9(2):10176. Available from: https://systems.enpress-publisher.com/index.php/jipd/article/view/10176
12. Evangelista E, Bensoussan Y. Standardization, Collaboration, and Education in the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology: The Key to Scalable Impact. Otolaryngol Clin North Am [Internet]. 2024 Oct 1 [cited 2025 July 18];57(5):897–908. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003066652400063X
13. Zhang X, Tsang CCS, Ford DD, Wang J. Student Pharmacists’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacy Education. Am J Pharm Educ [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 July 18];88(12):101309. Available from: https://www.ajpe.org/article/S0002-9459(24)11028-5/abstract
14. Hinostroza EMF, Mendoza DJ, Cejas MN, Trujillo EPP. Linear regression model to predict the use of artificial intelligence in experimental science students. Int Electron J Math Educ [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 July 25];20(1):em0807. Available from: https://www.iejme.com/article/linear-regression-model-to-predict-the-use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-experimental-science-15736
15. Akgun S, Greenhow C. Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. AI Ethics [Internet]. 2021 Sept 22 [cited 2025 July 18];2(3):431–40. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
16. Martínez-Comesaña M, Rigueira-Díaz X, Larrañaga-Janeiro A, Martínez-Torres J, Ocarranza-Prado I, Kreibel D. Impacto de la inteligencia artificial en los métodos de evaluación en la educación primaria y secundaria: revisión sistemática de la literatura. Rev Psicodidáct [Internet]. 2023 July 1 [cited 2025 July 18];28(2):93–103. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1136103423000114
17. Suryanarayana KS, Kandi VSP, Pavani G, Rao AS, Rout S, Siva Rama Krishna T. Artificial Intelligence Enhanced Digital Learning for the Sustainability of Education Management System. J High Technol Manag Res [Internet]. 2024 Nov 1 [cited 2025 July 18];35(2):100495. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104783102400004X
18. Wang Z. Artificial intelligence in dance education: Using immersive technologies for teaching dance skills. Technol Soc [Internet]. 2024 June 1 [cited 2025 July 18];77:102579. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001271
19. Saatçi G, Korkut S, Ünsal A. The effect of the use of artificial intelligence in the preparation of patient education materials by nursing students on the understandability, actionability and quality of the material: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Educ Pract [Internet]. 2024 Nov 1 [cited 2025 July 18];81:104186. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324003159
20. Hernández R, Mendoza C. Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw Hill. México; 2018.
21. COPE C. Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity and publication misconduct cases [Internet]. Committee on Publication Ethics; 2024 [cited 2024 July 24]. Available from: https://publicationethics.org/node/19891
22. Crompton H, Burke D. Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. Int J Educ Technol High Educ [Internet]. 2023 Apr 24 [cited 2025 July 18];20(1):22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
23. Collin S, Lepage A, Nebel L. Ethical and Critical Issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Can J Learn Technol [Internet]. 2024 Feb 6 [cited 2025 July 18];49(4):1–29. Available from: https://cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/28448
24. Gao Y, Liu S, Yang L. Artificial intelligence and innovation capability: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Int Rev Econ Finance [Internet]. 2025 Mar 1 [cited 2025 July 18];98:103923. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025000863
25. Gupta P, Ding B, Guan C, Ding D. Generative AI: A systematic review using topic modelling techniques. Data Inf Manag [Internet]. 2024 June 1 [cited 2025 July 18];8(2):100066. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2543925124000020
26. Betti E. Hermeneutics as a General Methodology of the Sciences of the Spirit [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2021. 104 p. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003157236
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Daniela Lorena Loor Lara, Irving Andrés Cevallos Bumbila, Víctor Andrés López Tuarez, Rosa Marina Mera Leones, Roberth Israel Ponce Martínez (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
