Perceptions on neoliberal extractivist practices of the thermoelectric industries in the fishing community of Coronel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20252043Keywords:
Extractivism, Environmental justice, Thermoelectric plantsAbstract
Introduction: In Chile, the neoliberal extractivist model has favored industries such as thermoelectric plants, generating serious ecological, social, and cultural impacts in coastal communities like Coronel. This system, sustained by privatizing legal frameworks, has led to territorial dispossession, socio-environmental conflicts, and community resistance to the loss of identity and rights.
Objective: To describe the perceptions of artisanal fishers and shoreline harvesters regarding the ecological, social, and cultural impacts of thermoelectric extractivist practices, identifying meanings, impacts, and forms of community resistance.
Methods: A qualitative methodology with a phenomenological approach was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight people linked to coastal fishing and harvesting, and thematic content analysis was used. The process included open coding, clustering, and triangulation, allowing for a situated understanding of the lived experience.
Results: Three main themes emerged: i) thermoelectric plants as a symbol of plunder and dispossession, ii) the emotional experience of territorial and environmental loss, and iii) the reconstruction of a collective identity based on resistance. The testimonies reflect a deterioration in living conditions, loss of marine biodiversity, emotional impacts, and a breakdown in the sociocultural fabric.
Conclusions: Neoliberal extractivism has produced multidimensional dispossession in Caleta Lo Rojas. In response, the community has developed collective responses based on roots, memory, and environmental justice. There is an urgent need for inclusive public policies that recognize the centrality of the territory as a living space.
References
1. 1. Svampa M. Neo-extractivism in Latin America: Socio-environmental Conflicts, the Territorial Turn, and New Political Narratives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. (Elements in Politics and Society in Latin America). https://www.cambridge.org/core/elements/abs/neoextractivism-in-latin-america/EB7C46C43B99ABE7C72F9F43A1CC842D
2. Gudynas E. Extractivisms: Tendencies and consequences in Latin America. In: Environmental Governance in Latin America. Cham: Springer; 2016. 61-85. https://gudynas.com/wp-content/uploads/GudynasExtractivismsTendenciesConsquences18.pdf
3. Burchardt H-J, Dietz K. (Neo-)extractivism – a new challenge for development theory from Latin America. Third World Q. 2014;35(3):468–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.893488
4. Maillet A, Allain M, Delamaza G, Irarrazabal F, Rivas R, Stamm C, et al. Conflicto, territorio y extractivismo en Chile. Aportes y límites de la producción académica reciente. Rev Geogr Norte Gd. 2021;(80):59–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-34022021000300059
5. Valenzuela-Fuentes K, Alarcón-Barrueto E, Torres-Salinas R. From resistance to creation: Socio-environmental activism in Chile’s “sacrifice zones”. Sustainability. 2021;13(6):3481. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13063481
6. Gutiérrez L, Valenzuela-Fuentes K, Soto D. Justicia ambiental y zonas de sacrificio en Chile. Sustainability. 2020;12(24):10481. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su122410481.
7. Aguirre R. Sacrifice Zones and Socio-environmental Recovery in Chile. Ambiente & Sociedade. 2021;24:e02671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200267vu2021l3oa.
8. Jaque Castillo E del C, Lara San Martin A, Merino González C. Fortaleciendo el uso de los instrumentos de planificación urbana, para la gestión de riesgos. Ciudad de Coronel, Región del Biobío. Rev. INVI [Internet]: 32(90):107-24. https://revistainvi.uchile.cl/index.php/INVI/article/view/62726
9. Gómez-Barris M. The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives. Durham: Duke University Press; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822372561
10. Vásquez A, Salgado M. Desigualdades socioeconómicas y distribución inequitativa de los riesgos ambientales en las comunas de Peñalolén y San Pedro de la Paz: una perspectiva de justicia ambiental. Rev Geogr Norte Gd. 2009;(43):95-110. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34022009000200006
11. Grosfoguel R. La descolonización del conocimiento: perspectivas y debates. Tabula Rasa. 2016;24:153-74. https://doi.org/10.25058/20112742.287
12. Heredia Chaz E. Extractivismo y territorio en las ciudades latinoamericanas: la persistente colonialidad de la urbanización capitalista. Rev. INVI. 2023;38(107):76-96. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0718-8358.202
13. Martinez-Alier J, Temper L, Del Bene D, Scheidel A. Is there a global environmental justice movement? J Peasant Stud. 2016;43(3):731–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1141198
14. Villasana López PE, Dörner Paris AP, Estay Sepúlveda JG, Moreno Leiva GM, Monteverde Sánchez A. Zonas de Sacrificio y Justicia Ambiental en Chile. Una Mirada Crítica desde los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible 2030. HALAC [Internet];10(3):342-65. https://www.halacsolcha.org/index.php/halac/article/view/492
15. Ojeda CG, Jaque Castillo E. Formas de representación de la naturaleza, problemas ambientales e (in)justicia en el debate constituyente para Chile. Rev geogr Norte Gd. 2022;(81):283-303. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-340220220
16. Bravo Ferretti C, Sandoval-Díaz J, Astudillo Pizarro F. Narrativas del acorralamiento. Identidad de lugar en la bahía de Coronel a partir de la reconversión productiva. Rev hist (Concepción). 2022;29(1):73-105. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.29393/rh29-4n
17. Acosta A. El Buen Vivir: Sumak Kawsay, una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos. Barcelona: Icaria Editorial; 2017.
18. Santos BS. The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham: Duke University Press; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002000
19. 9. Temper L, Shmelev S. Mapping the frontiers and front lines of global environmental justice: the EJAtlas. J Polit Ecol. 2015;22(1):255. http://dx.doi.org/10.2458/v22i1.21108
20. Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2018. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book266033#reviews
21. Kvale S, Brinkmann S. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2015. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/interviews/book239402
22. Iphofen R, Tolich M. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research ethics. Iphofen R, Tolich M, editores. Londres, Inglaterra: SAGE Publications; 2018. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435446
23. Urkidi L, Walter M. Environmental justice and large-scale mining conflicts in Latin America: A call for EJ research. Geoforum. 2011;42:683-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.06.003
24. Squella Soto R. Conflicto socioambiental, participación ciudadana y disputa territorial: La mirada de la Psicología Ambiental Comunitaria. Psicoperspectivas. 2021;20(2):79-90. https://dx.doi.org/10.5027/psicoperspectivas-vol20-issue2-fulltext
25. Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. En: APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2012. p. 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
26. Flick U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research. 6th ed. London: Sage Publications; 2018. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/an-introduction-to-qualitative-research/book278983
27. 12. Brand U, Dietz K, Lang M. Neo-Extractivism in Latin America – one side of a new phase of global capitalist dynamics. Cienc política. 2016;11(21). http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/cp.v11n21.57551
28. Svampa M. Neo-extractivism in Latin America: socio-environmental conflicts, the territorial turn, and new political narratives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108752589
29. 13. Smart S. The political economy of Latin American conflicts over mining extractivism. Extr Ind Soc. 2020;7(2): 767–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.02.004
30. Arboleda M. Planetary mine: territories of extraction under late capitalism. London: Verso; 2020.https://www.versobooks.com/en-gb/products/813-planetary-mine?srsltid=AfmBOooHBkH52QOSC-qCYPYavWp6e-_MGXJmU_Wfv-yyAFBOrRlKpvT_
31. Rodríguez I. Latin American decolonial environmental justice. Environ Justice. 2020;13(3):73-80. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429029585
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nataly Hernández Tapia, Isidora Angulo Rodríguez, Yasna Anabalón Anabalón, Angel Roco-Videla, Raúl Aguilera-eguia (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.