Embedding Digital Literacy into Problem-Based Learning to Foster Creativity in Diagnosing EFI Systems: A Vocational Education Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251938Keywords:
Digital Literacy, Vocational Education, Creativity, EFI Diagnosis, Problem-Based LearningAbstract
Introduction: Vocational students often struggle to diagnose EFI systems due to the abstract nature of the concepts and limited digital skills. Conventional teaching methods fall short in fostering creativity for solving complex technical problems. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a Problem-Based Learning model integrated with Digital Literacy (PBL-DL) to enhance students’ creativity in diagnosing EFI systems.
Method: Using an adapted Borg and Gall development model, the study involved 176 participants, including teachers, students, and media/material experts. The research proceeded through four stages: preliminary study, design and development, user response testing, and effectiveness testing. Data collection instruments included questionnaires, expert validation checklists, and creativity observation sheets. Analyses used descriptive statistics, paired t-tests, and independent t-tests.
Results: The PBL-DL model significantly improved students’ creativity in diagnosing EFI systems. Indicators such as fluency, originality, and elaboration showed statistically significant increases. The integration of digital tools also enhanced students’ access to and engagement with learning materials. The model shows potential for broader application in other complex vocational learning contexts.
Conclusion: Integrating digital literacy into problem-based learning strengthens students’ creative problem-solving and classroom engagement. The PBL-DL framework contributes to more effective vocational education while supporting the development of essential 21st-century skills.
References
1. Kurniawan R, Jaedun A, Mutohhari F, Kusuma WM. The Absorption of Vocational Education Graduates in The Automotive Sector in The Industrial World. J Educ Technol. 2021;5(3):482–490. doi: 10.23887/jet.v5i3.35365.
2. Mutohhari F, Sutiman S, Nurtanto M, Kholifah N, Samsudin A. Difficulties in implementing 21st century skills competence in vocational education learning. Int J Eval Res Educ. 2021;10(4):1229–36.
3. Clark L, Winch C. Vocational Education : International Approaches, Developments and Systems. New York: Routledge; 2007.
4. Fadhilah Makunti J, Widjanarko D. Increasing vocational school students’ competency of automotive brake system by implementing diagnostic problem-based e-jobsheet. In: ICoVEMAT. Automotive Engineering Education, UniversitasNegeri Semarang, Indonesia: Institute of Physics Publishing; 2019. p. 1–10. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1273/1/012004.
5. Sutiman S, Sofyan H, Arifin Z, Nurtanto M, Mutohhari F. Industry and Education Practitioners’ Perceptions Regarding the Implementation of Work-Based Learning through Industrial Internship (WBL-II). Int J Inf Educ Technol [Internet]. 2022;12(10):1090–7. doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.10.1725.
6. Nasrudi M, Pardjono, Efendi A, Noviansyah W. Case study of electronic fuel injection competence acquisition of students at SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. p. 1–9. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1833/1/012070.
7. Ag Damit MA, Omar MK, Mohd Puad MH. Issues and challenges of outcome-based education (OBE) implementation among Malaysian vocational college teachers. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2021;11(3):1–14. doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i3/8624.
8. Denton T. Advanced Automotive Fault Diagnosis. Second. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2006.
9. Jabarullah NH, Iqbal Hussain H. The effectiveness of problem-based learning in technical and vocational education in Malaysia. Educ Train. 2019;61(5):552–67. doi: 10.1108/ET-06-2018-0129.
10. Jonassen DH. Learning to Solve Problems. San Francisco: Pfeiffer; 2004.
11. Nurtanto M, Sofyan H, Fawaid M, Rabiman R. Problem-based learning (PBL) in industry 4.0: Improving learning quality through character-based literacy learning and life career skill (LL-LCS). Univers J Educ Res. 2019;7(11):2487–94. doi: 10.13189/ujer.2019.071128.
12. Haryanto, Kusuma WM, Mutohhari F, Nurtanto M, Suyitno S. Innovation Media Learning: Online Project-Based Learning (O-PBL) on Drawing Competence in Automotive Engineering Using Video on YouTube [Internet]. Vol. 2111, Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2111/1/012020.
13. Kassymova G, Akhmetova A, Baibekova M, Kalniyazova A, Mazhinov B, Mussina S. E-learning environments and problem-based learning. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 2020;29(7 Special Issue):346–56.
14. Perdana R, Jumadi J, Rosana D, Riwayani R. The online laboratory simulation with concept mapping and problem based learning (Ols-cmpbl): Is it effective in improving students’ digital literacy skills? Cakrawala Pendidik. 2020 Jun;39(2):382–94. doi: 10.21831/cp.v39i2.31491.
15. Wongsila S, Yuenyong C. Enhancing grade 12 students’ critical thinking and problem-solving ability in learning of the STS genetics and DNA technology unit. J Educ Gift Young Sci. 2019;7(2):215–35. doi: 10.17478/jegys.549005.
16. Nurtanto M, Nurhaji S, Widjanarko D, Wijaya MBR, Sofyan H. Comparison of scientific literacy in engine tune-up competencies through guided problem-based learning and non-integrated problem-based learning in vocational education. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018. p. 1–7. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012038.
17. Nurtanto M, Arifin Z, Sofyan H, Warju W, Nurhaji S. Development of model for professional competency assessment (Pca) in vocational education: Study of the engine tune-up injection system assessment scheme. J Tech Educ Train. 2020;12(2):34–45. doi: 10.30880/jtet.2020.12.02.004.
18. Nurtanto M, Fawaid M, Sofyan H. Problem Based Learning (PBL) in Industry 4.0: Improving Learning Quality through Character-Based Literacy Learning and Life Career Skill (LL-LCS). In Department of Mechanical Engineering Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang, Indonesia: IOP Publishing Ltd; 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1573/1/012006.
19. Tan O-S. Problem Based Learning and Creativity. Singapore: Cengage Learning Asia Pte Ltd; 2009.
20. Piirto J. Creativity for 21st Century Skills: How to Embed Creativity into the Curriculum. Netherlands: Sense Publishers; 2011.
21. Farida RN, Utomo DP, Zukhrufurrohmah Z. The effectiveness of problem based learning in terms of creativity and learning outcomes. Math Educ J. 2020;4(2):1–14. doi: 10.22219/mej.v4i2.12277.
22. Piirto J. Understanding Creativity. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press; 2004.
23. Tūtlys V, Spöttl G. Disruption of qualifications in manufacturing: challenges and prospects. Eur J Train Dev. 2021;16(06):1–13. doi: 10.1108/EJTD-07-2020-0121.
24. Zhou C, Purushothaman A. The need to foster creativity and digital inclusion among women users in developing context-addressing second order digital divide in online skills. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2015;10(3):69–74. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v10i3.4248.
25. Akhter A, Anwarul Islam KM, Karim MM, Bin Latif W. Examining determinants of digital entrepreneurial intention: A case of graduate students. Probl Perspect Manag. 2022;20(3):1–14. doi: 10.21511/ppm.20(3).2022.13.
26. Rabiman R, Sudira P, Sofyan H, Nurtanto M. Practical Learning Media in Subject Maintenance of Chassis and Power (MCP) Based Online: Simple Learning Using Videos on YouTube. Int J Interact Mob Technol. 2021;15(3):130–45.
27. Mutohhari F, Sudira P, Nurtanto M. Automotive Engineering Drawing Learning: Effective Online Learning Using Autocad Application. J Educ Technol. 2021;5(2):214–9. doi: 10.23887/jet.v5i2.33197.
28. Astuti M, Arifin Z, Nurtanto M, Mutohhari F, Warju W. The maturity levels of the digital technology competence in vocational education. Int J Eval Res Educ [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2022 Jan 18];11(2):596–603. doi: 10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22258.
29. Fletcher J, Everatt J, Mackey J, Fickel LH. Digital Technologies and Innovative Learning Environments in Schooling: A New Zealand Experience. New Zeal J Educ Stud. 2020;55(1):91–112. doi: 10.1007/s40841-020-00156-2.
30. Jatmoko D, Suyitno S, Rasul MS, Nurtanto M, Kholifah N, Masek A, et al. The Factors Influencing Digital Literacy Practice in Vocational Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Eur J Educ Res. 2023;12(2):1109–21. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.1109.
31. Falloon G. From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educ Technol Res Dev [Internet]. 2020;68(5):2449–72. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
32. Polizzi G. Digital literacy and the national curriculum for England: Learning from how the experts engage with and evaluate online content. Comput Educ. 2020;152(February):103859. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103859.
33. Frank T, Castek J. From digital literacies to digital problem solving: Expanding technology-rich learning opportunities for adults. J Res Pract Adult Literacy, Second Basic Educ. 2017;4(2):66–70.
34. Akker J van den, Bannan B, Kelly AE, Nieveen N, Plomp T. An Introdution to Educational Design Research. East China Normal University. 2007. 129 p. doi: 10.26209/ijea21n2.
35. Rahmawati Y, Hadinugrahaningsih T, Ridwan A, Palimbunga US, Mardiah A. Developing the critical thinking skills of vocational school students in electrochemistry through STEM - Project-based learning (STEM-PjBL). In: AIP Conference Proceedings. 2021. p. 1–7. doi: 10.1063/5.0041915.
36. Mardapi D. Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendekia Press; 2012.
37. Sharma P. Digital Revolution of Education 4.0. Int J Eng Adv Technol. 2019;9(2):3558–64. doi: 10.35940/ijeat.a1293.129219.
38. Sudira P. TVET Abad XXI Filosofi, Teori, Konsep, dan Strategi Pembelajaran Vokasional. Ed.2, Cet. Hartono, editor. UNY Press. Yogyakarta: UNY Press; 2017. 295 p.
39. Jones RH, Hafner CA. Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction. Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction. 2012. doi: 10.4324/9780203095317.
40. Erstad O, Flewitt R, Meibauer BK, Pereira iris SP. The Routledge Handbook of Digital Literacies in Early Childhood. The Routledge Handbook of Digital Literacies in Early Childhood. 2019. doi: 10.4324/9780203730638.
41. Spante M, Hashemi SS, Lundin M, Algers A. Digital competence and digital literacy in higher education research: Systematic review of concept use. Vol. 5, Cogent Education. 2018. p. 1–21. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2018.1519143.
42. Reddy P, Sharma B, Chaudhary K. Digital literacy: A review of literature. Int J Technoethics. 2020;11(2):1–16. doi: 10.4018/IJT.20200701.oa1.
43. Jonassen DH. Leraning to Solve Problems: A Handbook for Designing Problem-Solving Learning Environments. New York: Routledge; 2011.
44. Ramadhani R, Umam R, Abdurrahman A, Syazali M. The effect of flipped-problem based learning model integrated with LMS-google classroom for senior high school students. J Educ Gift Young Sci. 2019;7(2):137–58. doi: 10.17478/jegys.548350.
45. Putri AU, Rusyati L, Rochintaniawati D. The Impact of Problem-Solving Model on Students’ Concept Mastery and Motivation in Learning Heat Based on Gender. J Sci Learn. 2018;1(2):71–6. doi: 10.17509/jsl.v1i2.9793.
46. Laar E v., Deursen AJAM van, Dijk J v., Haan J d. The Relation Between 21st-Century Skills and Digital Skills: A systematic Literature Review. Comput Human Behav. 2017;72:577–88. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010.
47. Fernández YO. Digital Skills and Digital Literacy: New Trends in Vocational Training. Int J Early Child Spec Educ. 2020 Jun;12(1):370–7. doi: 10.9756/INT-JECSE/V12I1.201016.
48. Setuju S, Surjono HD, Dwiningrum D, Triyono MB, Muhtadi A, Widowati A. Digital Literacy Competencies of Mechanical Engineering Vocational Education Teacher Candidates. Turkish J Comput Math Educ. 2021;12(6):2119–24. doi: 10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.4817.
49. Astuti M, Arifin Z, Mutohhari F, Nurtanto M. Competency of Digital Technology: The Maturity Levels of Teachers and Students in Vocational Education in Indonesia. J Educ Technol. 2021;5(2):254–62. doi: 10.23887/jet.v5i3.35108.
50. Rabiman R, Sudira P, Sofyan H, Nurtanto M. Practical Learning Media in Subject Maintenance of Chassis and Power (MCP) Based Online: Simple Learning Using Videos on YouTube. Int J Interact Mob Technol. 2021;15:130–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i03.14943.
51. Kholifah N, Kurdi MS, Nurtanto M, Mutohhari F, Fawaid M, Subramaniam TS. The role of teacher self-efficacy on the instructional quality in 21st century: A study on vocational teachers, Indonesia. Int J Eval Res Educ. 2023;12(2):998–1006.
52. Nurtanto M, Widjanarko D, Sofyan H, Rabiman R, Triyono MB. Learning by creating: Transforming automotive electrical textual material into visual animation as a creative learning products (clp). Int J Sci Technol Res. 2019;8(10):1634–42.
53. Kholifah N, Sofyan H, Pardjono P, Sudira P, Nurtanto M. Explicating the Experience of Beginner Vocational Teachers. TEM J [Internet]. 2021;10(2):719–23. doi: 10.18421/TEM102-28.
54. Jaedun A, Nurtanto M, Mutohhari F, Saputro IN, Kholifah N. Perceptions of vocational school students and teachers on the development of interpersonal skills towards Industry 5.0. Cogent Educ [Internet]. 2024;11(1):1–20. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2375184.
55. van Laar E, van Deursen AJAM, van Dijk JAGM, de Haan J. The Relation between 21st-Century Skills and Digital skills: A Systematic Literature Review. Comput Human Behav. 2017;72(12):577–88. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sulaeman Deni Ramdani, Muhammad Nurtanto, Deddy Supriyatna, Farid Mutohhari, Valiant Lukad Perdana Sutrisno, Bayu Rahmat Setiadi, Herlina Pratiwi, Nabila Naila Fatin (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
