The Influence of SaLDI Biology Learning Model Integrated with TPACK on 4C Skills and Student Learning Independence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251931Keywords:
High School Students, Learning Independence, SaLDI Biology Learning Model, TPACK, 21st Century Skills (4C)Abstract
Introduction: 21st century skills such as critical thinking, creativity, communication, collaboration (4Cs), and learning independence are essential competencies that learners must have to face the challenges of the global era that are important to integrate with technology. However, in many schools, these skills are still low, largely due to the dominance of teacher-centred learning methods and the lack of optimal use of technology.
Purpose: To analyse the effect of SaLDI Biology learning model integrated with TPACK on students' critical thinking skills, creativity, communication, collaboration, and learning independence.
Methods: This research is a quasi-experiment with post-test control group design. The population was class XI students of SMAN 14 Makassar. A random sample of 64 students was divided into experimental and control groups. Instruments included a description test and observation sheet. Data analysis used MANOVA test to measure differences in 4C skills and learning independence between groups.
Results: The research results of this study are the SaLDI Biology learning model integrated with TPACK can improve critical and creative thinking skills, communication, collaboration and learning independence. The sig evidences this value <0.05.
Conclusions: The implementation of the TPACK-integrated SaLDI Biology learning model can improve critical thinking skills, creativity, communication, collaboration, and learning independence. These findings indicate that the model is an innovative strategy to develop 21st century skills (4C).
References
1. Nganga L. Preservice teachers perceptions of teaching for global mindedness and social justice: Using the 4Cs (Collaboration, Critical thinking, Creativity and Communication) in teacher education. Journal of Social Studies Education Research. 2019;10(4):26-57. https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/1262/407.
2. Shinta EM, Triastuti A. Communicative language teaching and its application in developing slow learners' 21st century skills. Teacher Education and Professional Development in Industry 4.0. Taylor & Francis: Milton Park, Oxfordshire; 2020. p. 261-6. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003035978-40/communicative-language-teaching-application-developing-slow-learners-21st-century-skills-shinta-triastuti.
3. Thornhill-Miller B, Camarda A, Mercier M, Burkhardt JM, Morisseau T, Bourgeois-Bougrine S, et al. Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence. 2023;11(3):54. doi:10.3390/jintelligence11030054.
4. Ye P, Xu X. A case study of interdisciplinary thematic learning curriculum to cultivate "4C skills". Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14:1080811. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080811.
5. Wecshler SM, Saiz C, Rivas SF, Vendramini CMM, Almeida LS, Mundim MC, et al. Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components?. Thinking skills and creativity. 2018;27:114-22. doi:10.1016/J.TSC.2017.12.003.
6. Ahmady S, Shahbazi S. Impact of social problem-solving training on critical thinking and decision making of nursing students. BMC nursing. 2020;19(1):94. doi:10.1186/s12912-020-00487-x.
7. Hasan N, Pandey MK, Ansari SN, Purohit VR. An Analysis of English Communication Skills. World Journal of English Language. 2022;12(3):194-202. doi:10.5430/wjel.v12n3p194.
8. Liebech-Lien B, Sjølie E. Teachers' conceptions and uses of student collaboration in the classroom. Educational Research. 2021;63(2):212-28. doi:10.1080/00131881.2020.1839354.
9. Lin TJ, Kraatz E, Ha SY, Hsieh MY, Glassman M, Nagpal M, et al. Shaping classroom social experiences through collaborative small-group discussions. British Journal of Educational Psychology. Psychol. 2022;92(10):131-54. doi:10.1111/bjep.12442.
10. Polivanova K, Bochaver A. Is Students' Autonomy Possible at Contemporary School? Psychology and education. 2022;27(3):6-15. doi:10.17759/pse.2022270301.
11. Garashkina N, Druzhinina A. Technology of organising students' project activities towards the development of educational independence of a future pedagogue. Perspectives of Science and Education. 2023;65(5):145-62. doi:10.32744/pse.2023.5.9.
12. Hockings C, Thomas L, Ottaway J, Jones R. Independent learning - what we do when you're not there. Teaching in Higher Education. 2018;23(2):145-61. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031.
13. Leeuwen A, Janssen J. A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review. 2019;21:71-89. doi:10.1016/J.EDUREV.2019.02.001.
14. Adnan A, Abimanyu S, Patta R, Arsyad N. The Improving of junior high school student in learning motivation through implementation constructivistic biology learning model based on information and communication technology. Journal of Education and Practice. 2014;5(2):63-71. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/10639.
15. Adnan A, Saenab S, Rahmatullah, Almunawarah R, Sahira S, Aldi S. Model Pembelajaran Citizen Science Project. NTB: Penerbit P4I; 2024. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Model_Pembelajaran_Citizen_Science_Proje.html?id=Jc4gEQAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y.
16. Aldi S, Adnan A, Azis AA. The Influence of SaLDI Learning Model (Stimulation, Learning Community, Discovery, Inferring) on Activity, Motivation, and Learning Outcomes of Biology of High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 2024;10(11):9064-77. doi:10.29303/jppipa.v10i11.9379.
17. Aldi S, Ismail I. Keterampilan Proses Sains: Panduan Praktis untuk Melatih Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Purbalingga: Eureka Media Aksara; 2023. https://repository.penerbiteureka.com/publications/560571/keterampilan-proses-sains-panduan-praktis-untuk-melatih-kemampuan-berpikir-tingk.
18. Adnan A, Aldi S, Dzulkarnain AF, Marliyah S. Pengaruh e-LKPD Berbasis Keterampilan Proses Sains terhadap Hasil Belajar, Motivasi Belajar, dan Kemampuan Metakognitif Peserta Didik Kelas XI SMA. Bioeduscience,. 2022;6(3):304-13. doi:10.22236/jbes/6310259.
19. Supena I, Darmuki A, Hariyadi A. The Influence of 4C (Constructive, Critical, Creativity, Collaborative) Learning Model on Students' Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction. 2021;14(3):873-92. doi:10.3390/jintelligence11030054.
20. Dahlan T, Judijanto L, Hali F. Improving the quality of mathematics teacher education: An integrated approach to the 4C skills. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education). 2024;9(1):16-33. doi:10.23917/jramathedu.v9i1.2687.
21. Khalaf BK, Mohammed Zin ZB. Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction. 2018;11(4):545-64. doi:10.12973/IJI.2018.11434A.
22. Maddens L, Depaepe F, Raes A, Elen J. Fostering students' motivation towards learning research skills: the role of autonomy, competence and relatedness support. Instructional Science. 2023;51(1):165-99. doi:10.1007/s11251-022-09606-4.
23. Børte K, Nesje K, Lillejord S. Barriers to student active learning in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education. 2023;28(3):597-615. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1839746.
24. Asrizal A, Yurnetti Y, Usman E. ICT Thematic Science Teaching Material with 5E Learning Cycle Model to Develop Students' 21st-Century Skills. Indonesian Journal of Science Education. 2022;11(1):61-72. doi:10.15294/jpii.v11i1.33764.
25. Sun J, Chen Q, Zhang Q, Li Y, Li H, Wei D, et al. Training your brain to be more creative: brain functional and structural changes induced by divergent thinking training. Human Brain Mapping. 2016;37(10):3375-87. doi:10.1002/hbm.23246.
26. Lorencová H, Jarošová E, Avgitidou S, Dimitriadou C. Critical thinking practices in teacher education programmes: a systematic review. Studies in Higher Education. 2019;44(7):844-59. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1586331.
27. Rehm M, Mulder RH, Gijselaers W, Segers M. The impact of hierarchical positions on the type of communication within online communities of learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 2016;10(2):158-70. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.065.
28. Jäppinen AK, Leclerc M, Tubin D. Collaborativeness as the core of professional learning communities beyond culture and context: Evidence from Canada, Finland, and Israel. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2016;27(3):315-32. doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1067235.
29. Oyarzun B, Martin F. A Systematic Review of Research on Online Learner Collaboration from 2012-21: Collaboration Technologies, Design, Facilitation, and Outcomes. Online Learning. 2023;27(1):71-106. doi:10.24059/olj.v27i1.3407.
30. Simamora RE, Saragih S. Improving Students' Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 2019;14(1):61-72. doi:10.12973/iejme/3966.
31. Stoilescu D. A Critical Examination of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2015;52(4):514-47.
32. Glover I, Hepplestone S, Parkin H, Rodger H, Irwin B. Pedagogy first: Realising technology enhanced learning by focusing on teaching practice. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2016;47(5):993-1002. doi:10.1111/bjet.12425.
33. Adnan A, Muharram M, Jihadi A. Pengembangan e-book biologi berbasis konstruktivistik untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa SMA Kelas XI. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies. 2019;22(2):112-9. doi:10.26858/ijes.v22i2.11773.
34. Helikar T, Cutucache C, Dahlquist L, Herek T, Larson J, Rogers J. Integrating Interactive Computational Modelling in Biology Curricula. PLoS Computational Biology. 2015;11(3):e1004131. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004131.
35. Jenkinson J. Molecular Biology Meets the Learning Sciences: Visualisations in Education and Outreach. Journal of molecular biology. 2018;430(21):4013-27. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2018.08.020.
36. Oliver JS, Hodges GW, Moore JN, Cohen A, Jang Y, Brown SA, et al. Supporting high school student accomplishment of biology content using interactive computer-based curricular case studies. Research in science education. 2019;49(2):1783-808. doi:10.1007/s11165-017-9675-6.
37. Alqurashi E, Gokbel E, Carbonara D. Teachers' knowledge in content, pedagogy and technology integration: A comparative analysis between teachers in Saudi Arabia and United States. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2017;48(6):1414-26. doi:10.1111/bjet.12514.
38. Christodoulou A, Angeli C. Adaptive Learning Techniques for a Personalised Educational Software in Developing Teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Frontiers in education. 2022;7:789397. doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.789397.
39. Jeong H, Hmelo-Silver C. Seven Affordances of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: How to Support Collaborative Learning? How Can Technologies Help? Educational Psychologist. 2016;51(2):247-65. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654.
40. Sun Z, Liu R, Luo L, Wu M, Shi C. Exploring collaborative learning effect in blended learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2017;33(6):575-87. doi:10.1111/jcal.12201.
41. Al-Zahrani, A. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students' creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133-1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12353
42. Hwang G, Lai C, Liang J, Chu H, Tsai C. A long-term experiment to investigate the relationships between high school students' perceptions of mobile learning and peer interaction and higher-order thinking tendencies. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2018;66(6):75-93. doi:10.1007/S11423-017-9540-3.
43. Liu Z, Lomovtseva N, Korobeynikova E. Online Learning Platforms: Reconstructing Modern Higher Education. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2020;15(13):4-21. doi:10.3991/ijet.v15i13.14645.
44. Mihai D, Mihailescu M, Cărăbaş M, Tapus N. Integrated High-Workload Services for E-Learning. IEEE Access. 2023;11(13):8441-54. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3238967.
45. Castro R. Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies. 2019;24(4):2523-46. doi:10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3.
46. Hoic-Bozic N, Dlab MH, Mornar V. Recommender system and web 2.0 tools to enhance a blended learning model. IEEE Transactions on education. 2015;59(1):39-44. doi:10.1109/TE.2015.2427116.
47. Ennis RH. Nationwide Testing of Critical Thinking for Higher Education. Teaching Philosophy. 2011;31(1). doi:10.5840/teachphil20083111.
48. Guilford JP. Intelligence, Creativity, and Their Educational Implications. San Diego: Robert R. Knapp; 1968.
49. Greenstein L. Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. California: Corwin; 2012.
50. Borich GD. Effective teaching methods. Pearson Education India; 2017.
51. Herzog, C., Handke, C., & Hitters, E. Analyzing talk and text II: Thematic analysis (pp. 385 401). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.; 2019.
52. Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components?. Thinking skills and creativity, 27, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2017.12.003
53. Shi Y. Talk About Evidence During Argumentation. Discourse Processes. 2020;57(9):770-92. doi:10.1080/0163853x.2020.1777498.
54. Ma Q, Lee H, Gao X, Chai C. Learning by design: Enhancing online collaboration in developing pre-service TESOL teachers' TPACK for teaching with corpus technology. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2024;55(6):2639-67. doi:10.1111/bjet.13458.
55. Lixia W, Jun L, Choi. TPACK and EdTech Integration in Teaching and Learning Process: A Systematic Literature Review (2014-2024). Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis. 2024;31(7s):487-505. doi:10.52783/cana.v31.1381.
56. Kwangmuang P, Jarutkamolpong S, Sangboonraung W, Daungtod S. The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon. 2021;7(6):e07309. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309.
57. Nisa H, Isnaini M, Utami LS, Islahudin I. Collaborative learning effect on improving students’ creativity and critical thinking in the independent curriculum. AL-ISHLAH; Jurnal Pendidikan. 2023;15(3):4038-48. doi:10.35445/alishlah.v15i3.3538.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suhardi Aldi, Adnan, Andi Asmawati Azis, Bahri HS. Syamsul (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
