AELI® KINETEST vinculated to the clinical method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt202257Keywords:
Kinesiology, Diagnosis, Education, PremedicalAbstract
Introduction: kinesiology is a system that attempts to evaluate numerous aspects of structural, chemical and mental health through manual muscle testing combined with other standard diagnostic methods. AELI® is a methodology that synthesizes, with its own protocol, scientifically proven methods using the arm reflex muscle test as the main tool, thus complementing the clinical record that is performed in conventional medicine by applying the clinical method, allowing prevention, diagnosis and treatment of the human being in its interrelationship with people, animals and plants, and habitat in general.
Objective: to describe the contribution of AELI® KINETEST teaching to the clinical method.
Development: the clinical method consists of 5 stages: Formulation of the problem, search for information, formulation of the hypothesis, contrast and verification of the diagnosis, organized steps that every attending physician applies in the search for the diagnosis in each of his patients. By means of the application of AELI® KINETEST, all the stages of the clinical method are favored, of which in the Clinical Propedeutics and Medical Semiology subject, the first three have protagonism, through the contribution in the information in the anamnesis both proximate and remote and the physical examination in the clinical file, allowing the analysis of the patient from the biopsychosocial point of view, recognizing the fair role that emotions deserve in the life of a human being
References
1. Gin RH, Green BN. George Goodheart, Jr., D.C., and a history of applied kinesiology. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1997;20:331-7.
2. Cuthbert SC, Goodheart GJ. On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review. Chiropr Osteopat 2007;15:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-15-4.
3. Rosner AL, Cuthbert SC. Applied kinesiology: distinctions in its definition and interpretation. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2012;16:464-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.04.008.
4. Estrázulas JA, Bueno LS, Lombardi LR de O, Estrázulas JA, Fernandes TG, Baltar JA. Accuracy of the Applied Kinesiology Muscle Strength Test for Sacroiliac Dysfunction. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2020;55:293-7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700832.
5. Lillo J. Los 360 grados de la comunicación. Madrid: Rasche; 2014.
6. Hall S, Lewith G, Brien S, Little P. A review of the literature in applied and specialised kinesiology. Forsch Komplementmed 2008;15:40-6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000112820.
7. Am E, López X, Sastrique P. Un viaje al Reino de la Metáfora DEI (Diagnóstico Energético Integral). Buenos Aires: Pandemia; 2000.
8. Valdés izquierdo L, Varela Rodríguez LA. AELI. 2015-0999, 2015.
9. del Rio Diez L, Argentina SF. ¿Por qué seguimos negando la “medicina de síntesis” en el paradigma actual de la salud? IntraMed journal 2018;7:1-11.
10. Sharamon S, Baginski BJ, Knörr E, Sharamon S. El gran libro de los chakras: conocimiento y técnicas para despertar la energía interior. Madrid: Editorial EDAF; 2018.
11. Gerber R. La curacion energetica: la revolucionaria medicina vibracional, nuevas alternativas para sanar. Colombia: Robinbook; 1993.
12. Cecil-Sterman A, Didner P. Advanced acupuncture: a clinic manual: protocols for the complement channels of the complete acupuncture system: the sinew, luo, divergent and eight extraordinary channels; includes drawings of the primary channels. New York: Classical Wellness Press; 2018.
13. Sanchez MS, Suárez NH, Calzadilla DM, Duarte LV, Ravelo DD. Implementación de estrategias curriculares en la asignatura Propedéutica Clínica y Semiología Médica. Revista de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río 2019;24:4151.
14. Brito E, Darío A. Viejas y nuevas implicaciones de la relación médico-paciente y del método clínico. Revista Cubana de Medicina 2017;56:150-4.
15. Guerra AF, Figueredo SAS, Castro MAM, Lalama JJ, Sevilla DVV. El método Clínico: Perspectivas actuales. Bionatura 2017;2:255-60. https://doi.org/10.21931/RB/2017.02.01.8.
16. Moreno Rodríguez MA. El método clínico. Lecturas y lecciones. La Habana: ECIMED; 2012.
17. Solis Cartas U, Valdés González JL, Calvopina Bejarano S, Larrarte JPM, Flor Mora OP, Menes Camejo I. El método clínico como pilar fundamental en la enseñanza médica. Revista Cubana de Reumatología 2018;20:1-7. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1174368.
18. Moreto G, González Blasco P, Piñero A. Reflexiones sobre la deshumanización de la educación médica: empatía, emociones y posibles recursos pedagógicos para la educación afectiva del estudiante de medicina. Educación Médica 2018;19:172-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2016.12.013
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Libertad E. Valdés Izquierdo, Lidia Ahymé Varela Rodríguez, Ana Claribel Herrera Wainshtok (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
