Effectiveness of Animated Simulation Video Media in Promoting Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Grade 10 High School Physics Material
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251905Keywords:
HOTS, animated simulation, quantitative, physics, instructional mediaAbstract
Introduction: physics instruction in Grade 10 of senior high school is still predominantly conducted through conventional approaches with minimal interactivity, making it less effective in fostering students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Preliminary studies indicate that both teachers and students face difficulties in understanding and teaching abstract physics concepts due to the lack of supportive visual media. The use of animated simulation videos serves as a strategic alternative to address this issue, as it can dynamically and contextually visualize complex concepts while also stimulating higher-level cognitive processes.
Method: this study employed a quantitative method with a quasi-experimental design of the nonequivalent control group type. The research was conducted on 10th-grade high school students who were divided into two groups is the experimental group, which received treatment using animated simulation video media, and the control group, which followed conventional instruction.
Results: the research findings show that students who learned using animated simulation video media achieved higher HOTS scores compared to those who learned through conventional methods. The HOTS instrument used was validated and found to be reliable, and the data met the requirements for normality and homogeneity. T-tests and ANOVA revealed significant differences in students' abilities in analysis, evaluation, and creation between the experimental and control groups.
Conclusions: animated simulation video media has been proven effective in enhancing students’ higher-order thinking skills in Grade 10 physics material.
References
1. Haleem A, Javaid M, Qadri MA, Suman R. Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustain Oper Comput. 2022 Jan 1;3(2):275–85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412722000137 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
2. Naz Z, Azam A, Khan MUG, Saba T, Al-Otaibi S, Rehman A. Development and evaluation of immersive VR laboratories of organic chemistry and physics for students education. Phys Scr. 2024 Mar;99(5):62–71. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad3024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad3024
3. Nazym Zhanatbekova, Yerlan Andasbayev, Yerlan Khaimuldanov, Aigerim Abdulayeva, Farzana Boribekova. The development of research skills in physics laboratory works of secondary school students in an information and education environment. Sci Her Uzhhorod Univ Ser “Physics.” 2024 Jun 5;56(56):1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54919/physics/56.2024.0fer1
4. Muliyati D, Rodhiyah A, Bakri F. Animated video: Fun physics learning. AIP Conf Proc. 2021 Mar 2;2320(1):020017. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0037465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0037465
5. Anggraeni DM, Prahani BK, Suprapto N, Shofiyah N, Jatmiko B. Systematic review of problem based learning research in fostering critical thinking skills. Think Ski Creat. 2023 Sep 1;49:101334. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871187123001037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101334
6. Megalina Y, Sahyar S, Hutahaean J. The Development of Video Media on Measurement of Basic Quantities Mechanic. In: The Development of Video Media on Measurement of Basic Quantities Mechanic. Medan, Indonesia; 2018. https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287383
7. Karimi A, Sari WP, Yassin A. Fostering Critical Thinking Skills: The Role of Simulations in Science Education. Bul Edukasi Indones. 2024;3(03):87–92. https://journal.iistr.org/index.php/BEI/article/view/601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56741/bei.v3i03.601
8. Nyirahabimana P, Minani E, Nduwingoma M, Kemeza I. Assessing the impact of multimedia application on student conceptual understanding in Quantum Physics at the Rwanda College of Education. Educ Inf Technol. 2024 Feb 1;29(3):3423–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11970-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11970-8
9. Pratiwi FAI, Kuswanto H, Ariswan A. Student’s Conceptual Understanding in Physics Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. JIPF J Ilmu Pendidik Fis. 2025 Jan 2;10(1):57–66. https://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JIPF/article/view/5953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v10i1.5953
10. Mitrevski B. Teaching critical thinking and problem solving in physics. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. Sofia, Bulgaria; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5091398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5091398
11. Gao Z, Yang H. Application of Physical Animation and Simulation Technology Based on Multimedia Technology in the Interpretation of Physical Complex Concepts. Int J Educ Humanit. 2023;11(1):201–4. https://drpress.org/ojs/index.php/ijeh/article/view/13153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v11i1.13153
12. Hidayatullah Z, Wilujeng I, Nurhasanah N, Gusemanto TG, Makhrus M. Synthesis of the 21st Century Skills (4C) Based Physics Education Research In Indonesia. J Ilmu Pendidik Fis. 2021;6(1):88–97. https://journal.stkipsingkawang.ac.id/index.php/JIPF/article/view/1889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i1.1889
13. Ding M, Chen Z, Du T, Luo P, Tenenbaum JB, Gan C. Dynamic Visual Reasoning by Learning Differentiable Physics Models from Video and Language. In: Dynamic Visual Reasoning by Learning Differentiable Physics Models from Video and Language. Sydney, Australia.; 2021. http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.15358
14. Syifa A, Mastul ARH. Enhancing Students’ Learning Interest through the Use of Vascak Physics Animation as a Physics Learning Medium. J Prakt Baik Pembelajaran Sekol Dan Pesantren. 2023 Sep 11;2(03):88–95. https://journal.iistr.org/index.php/PBPSP/article/view/366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56741/pbpsp.v2i03.366
15. Lebedev P, Lindstrøm C, Sharma MD. Making linear multimedia interactive: questions, solutions and types of reflection. Eur J Phys. 2020;42(1):015707. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/abbaaf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/abbaaf
16. Yang FJ, Su CY, Xu WW, Hu Y. Effects of developing prompt scaffolding to support collaborative scientific argumentation in simulation-based physics learning. Interact Learn Environ. 2023;31(10):6526–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2041673 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2041673
17. Adri HT, Sa Y, Mawardini A, Sesrita A. Using Animated Video Based on Scientific Approach to Improve Students Higher Order Thinking Skill. Indones J Soc Res IJSR. 2020;2(1):9–17. https://iojs.unida.ac.id/index.php/IJSR/article/view/23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30997/ijsr.v2i1.23
18. Kandukuri RK, Achterhold J, Moeller M, Stueckler J. Physical Representation Learning and Parameter Identification from Video Using Differentiable Physics. Int J Comput Vis. 2022;130(1):3–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-021-01493-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-021-01493-5
19. Natasya Z, Yani IP, Putri S, Desnita D, Usmeldi U. Media: The Existence Based on Senior High School Students’ Perspective in Physics Learning. J Penelit Pembelajaran Fis. 2025;16(1):49–54. https://journal2.upgris.ac.id/index.php/jp2f/article/view/1054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v16i1.1054
20. Faridi H, Tuli N, Mantri A, Singh G, Gargrish S. A framework utilizing augmented reality to improve critical thinking ability and learning gain of the students in Physics. Comput Appl Eng Educ. 2021;29(1):258–73. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cae.22342 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22342
21. Shen Z, Pritchard MJ. Cognitive engagement on social media: A study of the effects of visual cueing in educational videos. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2022;73(9):1253–67. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.24630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24630
22. Verawati NNSP, Nisrina N. Reimagining Physics Education: Addressing Student Engagement, Curriculum Reform, and Technology Integration for Learning. Int J Ethnoscience Technol Educ. 2025 Mar 1;2(1):158–81. https://e-journal.undikma.ac.id/index.php/ijete/article/view/14058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/ijete.v2i1.14058
23. Subagiyo L, Riani SA, Hakim A. Exploring Students’ Critical Thinking Skills with A Problem-based Learning Model Assisted by Animated Video in Static Fluid Learning. Berk Ilm Pendidik Fis. 2023 Sep 30;11(2):218–29. https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journal/index.php/bipf/article/view/15815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v11i2.15815
24. Fathulkhair F, Werdhiana IK, Darsikin D, Napitupulu ND, Muslimin M. STUDENT’S HIGHER ORDER THINKING SKILLS AS TRANSFER IN HIGH SCHOOL PHYSICS. J Pendidik Fis. 2024;13(2):122–9. https://jurnal.unimed.ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf/article/view/58926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jpf.v13i2.58926
25. Sucipto TLA, Sajidan S, Akhyar M, Roemintoyo R. Mapping Teacher’s Readiness to Improve the Government Policy in Implementing Higher-Order Thinking Skills-Based Learning. Qubahan Acad J. 2025 Mar 31;5(1):764–81. https://journal.qubahan.com/index.php/qaj/article/view/1577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n1a1577
26. Kurniawan ES, Mundilarto M, Istiyono E. Improving student higher order thinking skills using SynecticHOTS-oriented learning model. Int J Eval Res Educ IJERE. 2024 Apr 1;13(2):1132–40. https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/25002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.25002
27. Fauzi MR, Hamami T, Kim HJ. Islamic Religious Education Curriculum Innovation: Fethullah Gülen’s Perspective. J Pendidik Agama Islam. 2024 Jun 30;21(1):186–200. https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/tarbiyah/jpai/article/view/v21i1.7089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.7089
28. Ouyang F, Chen S, Li X. Effect of three network visualizations on students’ social-cognitive engagement in online discussions. Br J Educ Technol. 2021 [ci;52(6):2242–62. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjet.13126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13126
29. Rahayu S, Alsulami NM. Assessing higher order thinking skills of the 21st century learners using socio-scientific issues as a context. AIP Conf Proc. 2024;3106(1):21–8. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0214793 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0214793
30. Sumarni RA, Bhakti YB, Astuti IAD, Sulisworo D, Toifur M. The Development of Animation Videos Based Flipped Classroom Learning on Heat and Temperature Topics | Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2021 Aug 25; https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/IJSME/article/view/7017
31. Nurnaifah II, Akhfar M, Said S. The Effect of Using Animation Media on Students’ Physics Learning Outcomes in Linear Motion Material. J Ilm Pendidik Fis. 2024;8(1):136–44. https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journals/index.php/jipf/article/view/11530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/jipf.v8i1.11530
32. Rante H, Zainuddin MA, Achmad ZM, Ramadhanti KS, Arissabarno C. Analyzing Bloom’s Taxonomy to Interactions in Virtual Reality Application for Education. In: 2024 International Electronics Symposium (IES). 2024. p. 734–9. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10665778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IES63037.2024.10665778
33. Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE; 2014. 305 p.
34. Rachman A. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan R&D. CV Saba Jaya Publisher; 2024. https://id.scribd.com/document/703487690/Sugiyono-2019
35. Gurung R, Gurung BB. Laboratory Work and Its Impact in Learning Chemistry at Middle Secondary Schools of Trongsa, Bhutan. Asian J Educ Soc Stud. 2023;48(3):175–84. https://journalajess.com/index.php/AJESS/article/view/1078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v48i31078
36. Issah I, Baalongbuoro V, Oware SA. The Impact of Laboratory Practical Activities on Students’ Academic Performance at Queen of Peace Senior High School in The Nadowli-Kaleo District of The Upper West Region of Ghana. Int J Sci Res Manag IJSRM. 2023;11(03):2727–39. https://ijsrm.net/index.php/ijsrm/article/view/4502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v11i03.el2
37. Habibah F, Marwinda Y, Viani S, Ramadani P. The Role and Urgency of Animation Media In The Development of Students’ Cognitive Domain. Int J Educ Teach Zone. 2024;3(2):143–51. https://jurnal.yayasannurulyakin.sch.id/index.php/ijetz/article/view/175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v3i2.175
38. Uwamahoro J, Ndihokubwayo K, Ralph M, Ndayambaje I. Physics Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Geometric Optics: Revisited Analysis. J Sci Educ Technol. 2021;30(5):706–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09913-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09913-4
39. Luo X, Li B, Liu J, Ma S, Wei X, Cen Y. Elevating Learning Effectiveness in Solid-State Physics Through Interactive Software and Stereoscopic Projection. IEEE Trans Educ. 2025 Apr;68(2):224–33. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10935327 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2025.3545696
40. Abdoune A, Meraoui ME, Abderrahman M, Khaldi M. Using multimedia learning theory in physics teaching and learning: Work methodology. Glob J Eng Technol Adv. 2024;21(3):091–6. https://gjeta.com/content/using-multimedia-learning-theory-physics-teaching-and-learning-work-methodology DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2024.21.3.0230
41. Meier JM, Hesse P, Abele S, Renkl A, Glogger-Frey I. Video-based modeling examples and comparative self-explanation prompts for teaching a complex problem-solving strategy. J Comput Assist Learn. 2024;40(4):1852–70. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcal.12991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12991
42. Wang Y, Gong S, Cao Y, Fan W. The power of affective pedagogical agent and self-explanation in computer-based learning. Comput Educ. 2023 Apr 1;195:104723. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131522002949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104723
43. Elim EHSY. Promoting cognitive skills in AI-supported learning environments: the integration of bloom’s taxonomy. Int J Prim Elem Early Years Educ. 2024;2(1):3–13. Ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2332469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2332469
44. Prasetya RN, Budiman RDA, Astuti A, Friani DA, Siradjuddin S. Student Perceptions of the Use of Interactive Digital Media in Improving Learning Motivation. Juwara J Wawasan Dan Aksara. 2025;5(1):32–41. https://jurnal.smpharapanananda.sch.id/index.php/juwara/article/view/313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58740/juwara.v5i1.313
45. Kwarikunda D, Schiefele ,Ulrich, Ssenyonga ,Joseph, and Muwonge CM. The Relationship between Motivation for, and Interest in, Learning Physics among Lower Secondary School Students in Uganda. Afr J Res Math Sci Technol Educ. 2020;24(3):435–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1841961 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1841961
46. Beautemps J, Bresges A, Becker-Genschow S. Enhancing Learning Through Animated Video: An Eye-Tracking Methodology Approach. J Sci Educ Technol. 2025 Feb 1;34(1):148–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10162-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10162-4
47. Wang C, Wei B. Analysis of visual-based physics questions of the senior high school entrance examination in China. Phys Rev Phys Educ Res. 2024 Mar 5;20(1):010112. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010112
48. Kamaluddin, Sani NK, Darmadi IW, Nurgan N. Analysis of Students Scientific Reasoning Ability and the Correlation to Students Cognitive Ability in Physics Learning. J Penelit Pendidik IPA. 2023;9(11):10173–9. Ahttps://jppipa.unram.ac.id/index.php/jppipa/article/view/5657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5657
49. Wang C, Wei B. Analysis of visual-based physics questions of the senior high school entrance examination in China. Phys Rev Phys Educ Res. 2024 Mar 5;20(1):010112. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.010112
50. Kerekes J. The Impact of the Lack of Chemistry and Physics Laboratories in Schools. Educ 21. 2024;1(1):1–15. https://discovery.researcher.life/article/the-impact-of-the-lack-of-chemistry-and-physics-laboratories-in-schools/747c7e53826535a48d1f60dd3f220d17
51. Okokon E, Allahoki ND, Essien QE, Unoh CE. Problems Relating to the Acquisition of Practical Laboratory Skills in Physics and Associated Cognitive Learning in College of Health Technology, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. World J Adv Res Rev. 2022;13(3):283–94. https://wjarr.com/content/problems-relating-acquisition-practical-laboratory-skills-physics-and-associated-cognitive DOI: https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.13.3.0232
52. Manurung SR, Panggabean DD. Improving Students’ Thinking Ability In Physics Using Interactive Multimedia Based Problem Solving. J Cakrawala Pendidik. 2020;39(2):460–70. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/article/view/28205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.28205
53. Huang T, Zhang H, Zeng Y, Zhang Z, Li H, Zuo W, et al. DreamPhysics: Learning Physics-Based 3D Dynamics with Video Diffusion Priors. In: DreamPhysics: Learning Physics-Based 3D Dynamics with Video Diffusion Priors. 2024. http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.01476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i4.32389
54. Yuan H, Lee JH, Zhang S. Research on simulation of 3D human animation vision technology based on an enhanced machine learning algorithm. Neural Comput Appl. 2023;35(6):4243–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07083-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-022-07083-x
55. Putri SA, Rohmani, Apriza B, Elizar. Effectiveness of Using Animation Videos in Science Learning in Elementary Schools: A Systematic Literature Reviews. Indones J Educ Res Rev. 2024;7(3):667–78. Ahttps://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJERR/article/view/82242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i3.82242
56. Ariesta L, Movitaria MA. Analysis of the Application of Animated Video Media on Students’ Understanding of Science Learning. Int J Res. 2023 Jul 30;1(1):47–60. http://ojs.iaisumbar.ac.id/index.php/ijr/article/view/320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55062//IJR.2023.v1i1/320/1
57. Kandukuri RK, Achterhold J, Möller M, Stückler J. Learning to Identify Physical Parameters from Video Using Differentiable Physics. In T ̈ubingen, Germany: Preliminary version; 2020. http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.08292
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rosynanda Nur Fauziah, Anik Ghufron, Ali Muhtadi, Muhamad Restu Fauzi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
