Validity of the CASEL-IoT Model Based on Cultural Heritage in Social Studies Education: Innovation and Implementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251904Keywords:
CASEL-IoT Mode, Cultural Heritage, IoT in Education, Research and development, Social Studies Education, Student EngagementAbstract
Introduction: the study evaluated the validity of the CASEL-IoT model, a cultural heritage-based framework, in enhancing Social Studies (IPS) education. It aimed to assess the model’s innovation and effectiveness in improving learning processes and outcomes.
Methods: this study employs a research and development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model to develop and validate the CASEL-IoT framework for Social Studies education. Data was collected through questionnaires, observations, and expert validation, then analyzed via quantitative and qualitative methods to evaluate effectiveness and implementation feasibility.
Results: the CASEL-IoT model significantly improved student engagement and IPS comprehension. IoT integration facilitated interactive, culturally contextualized learning, bridging theoretical knowledge with cultural heritage. Surveys indicated high model validity, while observations highlighted its practicality in classroom settings.
Conclusions: the study confirmed the theoretical validity and practical effectiveness of the CASEL-IoT model in IPS education. Its technology-culture synergy offers a replicable framework for enriching student-centered learning.
References
1. Fiqri YA, Suroyo S, Ibrahim B. Pengembangan Historical Tourisim E-Book Berbasis Cultural Heritage Bandar Senapelan Pekanbaru. J Ind Pariwisata. 2023;6(1):102–9.
2. Iswari M, Afdal A, Nurhastuti N, Syahputra Y, Ismail RN. Validation of Career Planning Instrument for Deaf (CPID): Rasch Model Analysis. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing; 2023.
3. Nisa C. Cultural Management of Religious Tolerance in Multicultural-Based Islamic Education Learning in State Schools. Istawa J Pendidik Islam. 2021;6(1):30.
4. Irmada F, Yatri I. Keefektifan Pembelajaran Online Melalui Zoom Meeting Di Masa Pandemi Bagi Mahasiswa. J Basicedu. 2021;5(4):2423–9.
5. Luthfiah Q, Sartika D. Metode Pembelajaran Karya Wisata Candi Muaro Jambi: Pengaruh Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Muatan Pembelajaran IPS Di Sekolah Dasar. J Basic Educ Res. 2021;2(3):70–4.
6. Ura SK, Castro-Olivo SM, d’Abreu A. Outcome Measurement of School-Based SEL Intervention Follow-Up Studies. Assess Eff Interv. 2020;46(1):76–81.
7. Shi J, Cheung ACK, Zhang Q, Tam WWY. Development and validation of a social emotional skills scale: Evidence of its reliability and validity in China. Int J Educ Res. 2022;114.
8. Thi Dinh HV, Phuoc CTN, Thi Tran TA, Dau ML, Nguyen T V. The Vietnamese version of the social and emotional competence questionnaire (SECQ): Psychometric properties among adolescents. TPM - Testing, Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol. 2021;28(2):251–66.
9. Cavioni V, Conte E, Grazzani I, Ornaghi V, Cefai C, Anthony C, et al. Validation of Italian students’ self-ratings on the SSIS SEL brief scales. Front Psychol. 2023;14.
10. Frye KE, Boss DL, Anthony CJ, Du H, Xing W. Content Analysis of the CASEL Framework Using K–12 State SEL Standards. School Psych Rev.. 2022;
11. Kong LC. Self-Determination and social & emotional learning for students with special educational needs. In: Self-Determination Theory and Socioemotional Learning. 2023. p. 167–202.
12. Levin O, Segev Y. The Missing Piece in the CASEL Model: The Impact of Social–Emotional Learning on Online Literature Teaching and Learning. Educ Sci. 2023;13(11).
13. Syarifuddin H, Riza Y, Harisman Y, Ismail RN. Students’ Response to the Use of a Flipped Learning Model (FLM) in Abstract Algebra Course. In: Unima International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (UNICSSH 2022). Atlantis Press; 2023. p. 1435–41.
14. Ismail RN, Fauzan A, Yerizon. Analysis of students’ motivation and self-regulation profiles in online mathematics learning junior high school at Padang city. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC; 2023. p. 60025.
15. Maba W, Mantra IBN, Widiastuti IAMS. Teachers of 21st Century: Teachers’ Roles, Strategies Innovation and Challenges. Int J Soc Sci. 2023;2(6):2405–12.
16. Nana Supriatna. Pengembangan Kreativitas Imajinatif Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah. Hist J Pendidik dan Peneliti Sej. 2019;II(2):73–82.
17. V.A.R.Barao, R.C.Coata, J.A.Shibli, M.Bertolini, J.G.S.Souza. Pengembangan Media Komik Berbasis Kearifan Lokal dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu. Braz Dent J. 2022;33(1):1–12.
18. Anggara DS, Abdillah C. Content validity analysis of literacy assessment instruments. Cakrawala Pendidik. 2023;42(2):447–59.
19. Ismail RN, Mudjiran M, Neviyarni N, Nirwana H. Creative approach guidance and counseling facing independence learning policy: Minimum competency assessment and survey characters in the industrial revolution 4.0. E-Tech. 2020;8(1):391345.
20. Fauzan A, Nasuha R, Zafirah A. The Roles of Learning Trajectory in Teaching Mathematics Using RME Approach. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Congress on Mathematical Education: Volume II: Invited Lectures. World Scientific; 2024. p. 197–209.
21. Ismail RN, Arnawa IM. Improving StudentsReasoning and Communication Mathematical Ability by Applying Contextual Approach of The 21st Century at A Junior High School In Padang. In: 2nd International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education 2018 (ICM2E 2018). Atlantis Press; 2018. p. 144–9.
22. Ismail RN, Fauzan A. Exploring Self-Regulated Learning and Their Impact on Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills on the Topic of Number Patterns With the Blended Learning System. J High Educ Theory Pract. 2023;23(16).
23. Ismail RN, Fauzan A, Arnawa IM. Analysis of student learning independence as the basis for the development of digital book creations integrated by realistic mathematics. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing; 2021. p. 12041.
24. Ismail RN, Yerizon AF. Students’ Perception of the Digital Learning System for Junior High Schools in Padang, Indonesia. J Hunan Univ Nat Sci. 2023;50(1).
25. Ismail RN, Mudjiran N. Membangun karakter melalui Implementasi Teori Belajar behavioristik pembelajaran matematika berbasis kecakapan abad 21. Menara Ilmu J Penelit dan Kaji Ilm. 2019;13(11).
26. Yerizon I, Ismail RN. Improving Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills Through Mathematics Worksheet Based on Realistic Mathematics Education. 2020;
27. Arianti NNS, Astawan IG, Krisnaningsih M. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran ICARE Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPS Siswa Kelas IVB SD. J Ilm Pendidik Profesi Guru. 2021;4(2):240–50.
28. Novianti U, Ngatari N. Studi Pustaka Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran IPS Terpadu Di Sekolah Dasar. J Soc Knowl Educ. 2021;2(1):16–20.
29. Damayanti NNAA, Sukadi S, Kertih IW. Pengaruh Penerapan Media Audiovisual Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Dan Keterampilan Sosial Dalam Pembelajaran Ips Pada Siswa Kelas Vii SMP Ganesha Denpasar. J Pendidik Ips Indones. 2019;1(2):47–54.
30. Maslahah W, Rofiah L, Makrifah D. Pembelajaran IPS Dalam Manifestasi Keterampilan Abad 21 Di MTs Nurul Huda Bantur Malang. Entita J Pendidik Ilmu Pengetah Sos Dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sos. 2022;4(2):169–82.
31. Ramadhani MI. Peningkatan Hasil Belajar IPS Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Make a Match Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif J Ilmu Pendidik. 2021;3(4):2237–44.
32. Laily S. Persepsi Dan Pengalaman Siswa Di MI Ma’arif NU Penaruban Dalam Memahami Manfaat Pembelajaran IPS Dalam Lingkungan Sekolah Dan Masyarakat. J Kependidikan. 2023;11(2):185–98.
33. Tetep, purnamasari maharani. Integrasi Metode Pada Pembelajaran Tematik Ips Dan PKN Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Di Sdit Alam Garut. J Civ Soc Stud. 2021;5(1):137–46.
34. Marhayani DA. Pembentukan Karakter Melalui Pembelajaran Ips. Edunomic J Pendidik Ekon. 2018;5(2):67.
35. Erianjoni E, Hardi E. Efektivitas Penerapan Pembelajaran IPS Berbasis Projek (Project Based Learning) Di Kalangan Guru IPS SMP Negeri Di Kecamatan Rao Selatan Kabupaten Pasaman. J Kronologi. 2020;2(2):111–23.
36. Mayastika NJ. Pengembangan Vlog Situs Tegalsari (V-Sitri) Berbasis Leaflet Qr-Code Pada Materi Peninggalan Sejarah Masa Islam Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X Ips Sman 1 Bungkal Kabupaten Ponorogo. J Pendidik Sej Indones. 2023;6(1):174.
37. Dewi UNPS, Sujana IW. E-Comic Berbasis Problem Based Learning Muatan IPS Materi Jenis-Jenis Pekerjaan Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. J Edutech Undiksha. 2022;10(2):253–61.
38. Adiutami NKE. Aplikasi Android Berorientasi Teori Ausubel Pada Muatan IPS. J Pedagog Dan Pembelajaran. 2022;5(1):150–9.
39. Nadilla DF, Sariyatun S, Sunardi S. The Living History approach to Improve The Empathy in Historical Learning. Int J Multicult Multireligious Underst. 2018;5(3):72.
40. Riniwanti R. Pengembangan Media Audio Visual Interaktif Berbasis Kinemaster Dalam Pembelajaran IPS Pada Peserta Didik Kelas v UPTD SDN 14 Samanggi Kabupaten Maros. J Pendidik Dan Pembelajaran Indones. 2024;4(1):263–77.
41. Li Y, Kendziora K, Berg J, Greenberg MT, Domitrovich CE. Impact of a schoolwide social and emotional learning implementation model on student outcomes: The importance of social-emotional leadership. J Sch Psychol. 2023;98:78–95.
42. Subakti DP, Marzal J, Hsb MHE. Pengembangan E-LKPD berkarakteristik budaya jambi menggunakan model discovery learning berbasis STEM untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis. J Cendekia J Pendidik Mat. 2021;05(02):1249–64.
43. Agusta AR, Lestari NC, Suriansyah A, Nofirman, Rukhmana T. Pendidikan Inspiratif Era Cybernetics (Strategi Menjadikan Iklim Pembelajaran Bermakna di Era Digital) Akhmad. J Pendidikn dan Konseling. 2022;4(5):4303–11.
44. Anthony CJ, Brann KL, Elliott SN, Garis EJ. Examining the structural validity of the SSIS SEL brief scales—Teacher and student forms. Psychol Sch. 2022;59(2):260–80.
45. Najib MA, Maunah B. Inovasi Pendidikan Di Era Digital (Studi Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Di Jenjang Sd-Smp Kabupaten Tulungagung). TADBIR J Manaj Pendidik Islam. 2022;10(1):1–17.
46. Hidayah Y, Suyitno S, Ali YF. A Study on Interactive–Based Learning Media to Strengthen the Profile of Pancasila Student in Elementary School. Jed (Jurnal Etika Demokrasi). 2021;6(2):283–91.
47. Sirkemaa S, Varpelaide H. The Need for Digital Learning Environments. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res. 2018;
48. Winarto PDM. Buku Metodologi Penelitian. Angew Chemie Int Ed 6(11), 951–952. 2018;(Mi):5–24.
49. Ambarwangi S, Rachman M. Holistic Academic Supervision Model for Cultural Art Teachers of Vocational High Schools. Harmon J Arts Res Educ. 2015;15(1):62.
50. Mackiewicz J. A Mixed-Method Approach. Writing Center Talk over Time. 2018. 37–60 p.
51. Moodle M, Peningkatan T, Belajar K. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Fisika. 2021;(1):54–60.
52. Plomp T, Nieveen NM. An introduction to educational design research. 2010;
53. Nieveen N. Educational Design Research Educational Design Research. Educ Des Res [Internet]. 1999;1–206. Available from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ815766
54. Suhaizal H, Rahman KAA, Khamis N, Shukor UH, Lah NHC, Zulkifli NN. The Design and Development of Augmented Reality (AR) Application for Internet Evolution Learning Topics. Int J Interact Mob Technol. 2023;17(5):162–81.
55. Febliza A, Afdal Z, Copriady J, Ariani DN, Sumantri MS, Wibowo FC, et al. Combination of M-learning with Problem Based Learning: Teaching Activities for Mathematics Teachers. Int J Interact Mob Technol. 2023;17(7):4–16.
56. Hariastuti RM, Budiarto MT. From Culture to Classroom : Study Ethnomathematics in House of Using Banyuwangi. 2019;2(2):76–80.
57. Branch RM, Kopcha TJ. Instructional design models. In: Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Springer; 2013. p. 77–87.
58. Plomp, T. & Nieveen N (Eds). Educational Design Research Part A: An introduction Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO). In 2013.
59. Plomp T, Nieveen N. Educational Design Research. Educ Des Res - PART A AN Introd. 2013;1–206.
60. Molenda M. The ADDIE model. Encycl Educ Technol ABC-CLIO. 2003;
61. Molenda M. In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Perform Improv. 2003;42(5):34–7.
62. Peterson AT. Predicting the geography of species’ invasions via ecological niche modeling. Q Rev Biol. 2003;78(4):419–33.
63. Peterson RS, Smith DB, Martorana P V, Owens PD. The impact of chief executive officer personality on top management team dynamics: one mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):795.
64. Dick DM, Agrawal A, Keller MC, Adkins A, Aliev F, Monroe S, et al. Candidate gene–environment interaction research: Reflections and recommendations. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(1):37–59.
65. Dick JJ, Tetzlaff D, Birkel C, Soulsby C. Modelling landscape controls on dissolved organic carbon sources and fluxes to streams. Biogeochemistry. 2015;122:361–74.
66. Dick JTA, Alexander ME, Ricciardi A, Laverty C, Downey PO, Xu M, et al. Functional responses can unify invasion ecology. Biol Invasions. 2017;19:1667–72.
67. Gustafson KL, Branch RM. What is instructional design. Trends issues Instr Des Technol. 2002;2:10–6.
68. Morrison GR, Ross SJ, Morrison JR, Kalman HK. Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
69. Sibanda S, Rambuda AM. The Implementation of Formal Assessments in Intermediate Phase Mathematics at Primary Schools in South Africa. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res. 2021;20(8):300–20.
70. Kholid MN, Rofi’ah F, Ishartono N, Waluyo M, Maharani S, Swastika A, et al. What Are Students’ Difficulties in Implementing Mathematical Literacy Skills for Solving PISA-Like Problem? J High Educ Theory Pract. 2022;22(2):181–200.
71. Edmonds WA, Kennedy TD. Solomon N-Group Design. An Applied Guide to Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. 2020. 93–102 p.
72. Thinking C, Student IN. Bridging the Theory to Practice Gap: Improving Critical Thinking Skills in BScN Nursing Students. 2020;(July).
73. DALIAH, LIAH (UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA SP. LOCAL INSTRUCTION THEORY MATERI LINGKARAN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH UNTUK MENGEMBANGKAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA SMP. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;6(1):5–10.
74. Know WS, Do CAN. PISA 2018 Results (Volume I) [Internet]. Vol. I. 2019. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-i_5f07c754-en
75. Rahmatika N, Hanapi MH bin M, Jendriadi, Sariasih Y, Imami MKW, Uslan. The Impact of Flipped Learning on Students` Critical Thinking; A Systematic Literature Review. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res. 2024;23(10):180–206.
76. Ismail RN, Yerizon, Fauzan A. Students’ Perception of the Digital Learning System for Junior High Schools in Padang, Indonesia. J Hunan Univ Nat Sci. 2023;50(1):10–9.
77. Ellis AB, Ozgur Z, Kulow T, Dogan MF, Amidon J. An Exponential Growth Learning Trajectory: Students’ Emerging Understanding of Exponential Growth Through Covariation. Math Think Learn. 2016;18(3):151–81.
78. Retnawati H, Hendriana H, Prahmana RCI, Hidayat W, Ellis AB, Ozgur Z, et al. The innovation of learning trajectory on multiplication operations for rural area students in Indonesia. J Phys Conf Ser [Internet]. 2018;1088(1):369–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1276225
79. Durlak JA. Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and practice. Guilford Publications; 2015.
80. Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews. Sage; 2015.
81. Al-Nawaiseh SJ. The impact of using the digital educational games blog on enhancing mathematical concepts among sixth-grade students in Jordan. Int J Innov Res Sci Stud. 2025;8(1):1421–8.
82. Mascolo M. Beyond student-centered and teacher-centered pedagogy: Teaching and learning as guided participation. Pedagog Hum Sci. 2009;1(1):3–27.
83. Eltahir ME, Mohd F, Babiker E. The Influence of Artificial Intelligence Tools on Student Performance in e-Learning Environments : Case Study. 2024;22(9):91–110.
84. Soltanlou M, Artemenko C, Dresler T, Fallgatter AJ, Ehlis AC, Nuerk HC. Math anxiety in combination with low visuospatial memory impairs math learning in children. Front Psychol. 2019;10(JAN):1–10.
85. Munirah Ghazali. SUSTAINABLE PEDAGOGY IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION. Sch Educ Stud Univ Malaysia,. 2557;4(1):88–100.
86. Sari AL, Rahim R, Goacademica C V. 1st Virtual Workshop on Writing Scientific Article for International Publication Indexed SCOPUS. 1st Virtual Workshop on Writing Scientific Article for International Publication Indexed SCOPUS. 2022.
87. Group I, Education M, Version D. mathematics. 2019.
88. Galvan JL, Galvan MC. Writing Literature Reviews: A Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences: Seventh Edition. Writing Literature Reviews: A Guide for Students of the Social and Behavioral Sciences: Seventh Edition. 2017. 1–288 p.
89. Benjamin DJ, Berger JO, Johannesson M, Nosek BA, Wagenmakers EJ, Berk R, et al. Redefine statistical significance. Nat Hum Behav. 2018;2(1):6–10.
90. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006 Jan 1;3:77–101.
91. Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999;34(5 Pt 2):1189.
92. Kaiser K. Protecting respondent confidentiality in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2009;19(11):1632–41.
93. Ross KM, Tolan P. Social and Emotional Learning in Adolescence: Testing the CASEL Model in a Normative Sample. J Early Adolesc. 2018;38(8):1170–99.
94. Rahmi T, Agustiani H, Harding D, Fitriana E. Adaptasi Employee Well-Being Scale (EWBS) Versi Bahasa Indonesia. J Psikol. 2021;17(2):93.
95. MUJIBURRAHMAN M, Suhardi M, HADIJAH SN. Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Project Base Learnig Di Era Kurikulum Merdeka. Community J Pengabdi Kpd Masy. 2023;2(2):91–9.
96. Rahmawati MI, Subardjo A. INTERNET OF THINGS (IoT) DAN BLOCKCHAIN DALAM PERSPEKTIF AKUNTANSI. J Akunt Dan Keuang. 2023;28(1):28–36.
97. Case DA, Aktulga HM, Belfon K, Ben-Shalom IY, Berryman JT, Brozell SR, et al. Amber 2023. University of California, San Francisco; 2023.
98. Vinal SA, Renshaw TL. Starting From Scratch: Toward a New Measure of Student Social-Emotional Competence. 2022;
99. Sirkemaa S, Varpelaide H. EMPOWERING GROUP-BASED LEARNING WITH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. In: ICERI2018 Proceedings. IATED; 2018. p. 3780–4.
100. Ura R, Hashimoto T, Inoue AK, Fadda D, Hayes M, Puschnig J, et al. Detections of [C ii] 158 μm and [O iii] 88 μm in a Local Lyman Continuum Emitter, Mrk 54, and Its Implications to High-redshift ALMA Studies. Astrophys J. 2023;948(1):3.
101. Segev J. The 2023 Judicial Reform That Wasn’t: From Non-decision Constitution-Making to Decision and Back. Isr Stud Rev. 2024;39(1):38–65.
102. Segev J. Reforming the Israeli High Court of Justice: Proposed versus Desirable. Isr Law Rev. 2023;56(3):440–55.
103. Wigelsworth M, Mason C, Verity L, Humphrey N, Qualter P. A Rose by any Other Name? Using Core Components to Categorize Social and Emotional Learning Provision. School Ment Health. 2023;15(3):710–21.
104. Wigelsworth M, Panayiotou M, Squires G, Byc K. The ‘FRIENDS for Life’emotional health programme: Differential impact for those at risk. Br J Educ Psychol. 2025;
105. Anthony B, Kamaludin A, Romli A, Raffei AFM, Phon DNALE, Abdullah A, et al. Blended learning adoption and implementation in higher education: A theoretical and systematic review. Technol Knowl Learn. 2022;1–48.
106. Rahmawati MI, Subardjo A. Teknologi Artificial Intelligence dan Blockchain: Sebuah Keniscayaan Pada Akuntan dan Auditor. J Ilm Akunt Dan Keuang. 2023;2(4):403–9.
107. Rahmawati MI, Subardjo A. Pemanfaatan Blockchain dalam Konsep Sistem Rantai Pasok Pangan Halal: Studi Eksplorasi. J Arastirma. 2023;3(2):395.
108. Hidayah R, Prihatin T, Utanto Y. Development of training on writing digital textbooks based in on in service learning for teacher. Innov J Curric Educ Technol. 2021;10(2):74–89.
109. Hidayah N, Fernanda J. Analisis penerimaan aplikasi pembelajaran online menggunakan technology acceptance model 3 dan partial least square structural equation model (pls-sem). J Focus Action Res Math (Factor M). 2021;3(2):161–72.
110. Cao Y, Yisimayi A, Jian F, Song W, Xiao T, Wang L, et al. BA. 2.12. 1, BA. 4 and BA. 5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection. Nature. 2022;608(7923):593–602.
111. Gu J, Cai H, Dong C, Ren JS, Timofte R, Gong Y, et al. NTIRE 2022 challenge on perceptual image quality assessment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2022. p. 951–67.
112. Levin O, Segev Y. Learning-Teaching Processes in Online Clinical Simulation within Disciplinary Training of Literature. L1-Educational Stud Lang Lit. 2023;23:1–19.
113. Dinh TCT, Lee Y. “I want to be as trendy as influencers”–how “fear of missing out” leads to buying intention for products endorsed by social media influencers. J Res Interact Mark. 2021;16(3):346–64.
114. Dinh HVT, Nguyen QAT, Phan MHT, Nguyen T, Nguyen HT. Vietnamese Students’ Satisfaction toward Higher Education Service: The Relationship between Education Service Quality and Educational Outcomes. Eur J Educ Res. 2021;10(3):1397–410.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Siti Aisyah , Heri Effendi, Yusmanila, Pebriyenni, Salman M Noer, Refli Surya Barkara, Ashabul Khairi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
