A Systematic Review Looking at Digital Integration in Entrepreneurship Education in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251864Keywords:
Entrepreneurship Education, Digital Entrepreneurshi, Vocational, Higher EducationAbstract
Introduction: digital entrepreneurship has grown significantly in recent years, yet studies that specifically explore its integration into higher and vocational education remain limited. This gap highlights the need for a comprehensive synthesis of existing research to understand developments and identify future opportunities.
Methods: the author conducted a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) using articles indexed in ScienceDirect and Springer databases, published between 2019 and 2024. Keywords included “digital,” “entrepreneurship,” “education,” and “higher education.” A total of 1,081 articles were identified, then filtered using PRISMA guidelines. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion criteria, 60 articles were analyzed. Bibliometric analysis was also performed using VOSviewer.
Results: the review found that the International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research published the most articles on this topic. Research activity and citations increased significantly from 2018 to 2022. Qualitative methods were the most commonly used, and the most cited authors were from developed countries, especially the USA and Europe. Two major research foci emerged: the role of digital entrepreneurial ecosystems and pedagogical models used in digital entrepreneurship education.
Conclusions: digital entrepreneurship is gaining scholarly attention, especially in developed economies. However, its educational dimensions are still underrepresented. The findings suggest the need for more research on innovative teaching models, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and global approaches to support the development of digital entrepreneurship education in higher education settings.
References
1. Fiandra YA, Yulastri A, Ganefri, Sakti RH. The Impact of Work Experience on Entrepreneurial Intention Among Vocational Education Students. J Tech Educ Train. 2023;15:37–49. doi: 10.30880/jtet.2023.15.04.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2023.15.04.004
2. Barba-Sánchez V, Atienza-Sahuquillo C. Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: The role of entrepreneurship education. Eur Res Manag Bus Econ. 2018;24:53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.04.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.04.001
3. Martínez-Gregorio S, Badenes-Ribera L, Oliver A. Effect of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship intention and related outcomes in educational contexts: a meta-analysis. Int J Manag Educ. 2021;19:100545. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100545
4. Granados ML, Rosli A, Gotsi M. Staying poor: Unpacking the process of barefoot institutional entrepreneurship failure. J Bus Ventur. 2022;37:106204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106204
5. Grilo R, Moreira AC. The social as the heart of social innovation and social entrepreneurship: An emerging area or an old crossroads? Int J Innov Stud. 2022;6:53–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijis.2022.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2022.03.001
6. Muldoon J, Davis PE, Bendickson JS, McDowell WC, Liguori EW. Paved with good intentions: Moral disengagement and social entrepreneurship. J Innov Knowl. 2022;7:100237. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100237
7. Neumann T. Impact of green entrepreneurship on sustainable development: An ex-post empirical analysis. J Clean Prod [Internet]. 2022;377:134317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134317
8. Ogbari ME, Olokundun MA, Uzuegbunam J, Isiavwe DT, Ilogho JE, Obi JN, Moses CL. Data on entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial performance of aspiring entrepreneurs in selected Nigerian universities. Data Br. 2018;20:108–112. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.07.044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.07.044
9. Saptono A, Wibowo A, Widyastuti U, Narmaditya BS, Yanto H. Entrepreneurial self-efficacy among elementary students: the role of entrepreneurship education. Heliyon. 2021;7:e07995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07995
10. Shokhnekh A, Yovanovich T, Glinskaya O, Dugina T, Makarova A. Genesis of social entrepreneurship in the development of the transport sector in the region. Transp Res Procedia. 2022;63:956–961. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.094
11. Tiernan P, Deveci İ. Irish and Turkish pre-service teachers understanding and perceptions of enterprise education. Heliyon. 2021;7. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07591
12. Yulastri A. Development of Entrepreneurship Training Model of “Smart Entrepreneur Model” (SEM) at the Universitas Negeri Padang. J Pendidik Dan Kel. 2020;12:12. doi: 10.24036/jpk/vol12-iss01/764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jpk/vol12-iss01/764
13. Handayati P, Wulandari D, Soetjipto BE, Wibowo A, Narmaditya BS. Does entrepreneurship education promote vocational students’ entrepreneurial mindset? Heliyon. 2020;6:e05426. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05426
14. Yulastri A, Hidayat H, Islami S, Edya F. Developing an Entrepreneurship Module by Using Product-Based Learning Approach in Vocational Education. Int J Environ Sci Educ. 2017;12:1097–1109.
15. Ganefri G, Hidayat H, Yulastri A, Yondri S. The empirical analysis of production-based entrepreneurship training model, readiness and locus of control towards students entrepreneurship self efficacy. Int J Res Couns Educ. 2021;5:56. doi: 10.24036/00434za0002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/00434za0002
16. Haneberg DH, Aaboen L, Williams Middleton K. Teaching and facilitating action-based entrepreneurship education: Addressing challenges towards a research agenda. Int J Manag Educ. 2022;20:100711. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100711
17. Yeh CH, Lin HH, Wang YM, Wang YS, Lo CW. Investigating the relationships between entrepreneurial education and self-efficacy and performance in the context of internet entrepreneurship. Int J Manag Educ. 2021;19:100565. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100565
18. Aparicio G, Iturralde T, Maseda A. Conceptual structure and perspectives on entrepreneurship education research: A bibliometric review. Eur Res Manag Bus Econ. 2019;25:105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.04.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.04.003
19. Walmsley A, Wraae B. Entrepreneurship education but not as we know it: Reflections on the relationship between Critical Pedagogy and Entrepreneurship Education. Int J Manag Educ. 2022;20:100726. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100726
20. Weng X, Chiu TKF, Tsang CC. Promoting student creativity and entrepreneurship through real-world problem-based maker education. Think Ski Creat. 2022;45:101046. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101046
21. Knox S. Fostering student engagement in virtual entrepreneurship education environments. Int J Manag Educ. 2022;20:100705. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100705
22. Sadeghi A, Kibler E. Do bankruptcy laws matter for entrepreneurship? A Synthetic Control Method analysis of a bankruptcy reform in Finland. J Bus Ventur Insights. 2022;18:e00346. doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00346
23. Lara-Bocanegra A, García-Fernández J, Gálvez-Ruiz P, Grimaldi-Puyana M, Bohórquez Gómez-Millán MR. Does background matter? Analysis of the influence of sex, socioeconomic status and the existence of an entrepreneurial family member as a precursor to entrepreneurship in university students of Sport Sciences. J Hosp Leis Sport Tour Educ. 2022;31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlste.2022.100394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2022.100394
24. Boubker O, Naoui K, Ouajdouni A, Arroud M. The effect of action-based entrepreneurship education on intention to become an entrepreneur. MethodsX. 2022;9:101657. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101657
25. Ubochi NE, Osuji JC, Ubochi VN, Ogbonnaya NP, Anarado A, Iheanacho PN. The drive process model of entrepreneurship: A grounded theory of nurses’ perception of entrepreneurship in nursing. Int J Africa Nurs Sci. 2021;15:100377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijans.2021.100377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2021.100377
26. Jones C, English J. A contemporary approach to entrepreneurship education. Educ Train. 2004;46:416–423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910410569533
27. Lee L, Wong PK. Entrepreneurship Education—A Compendium of Related Issues BT - The Life Cycle of Entrepreneurial Ventures. In: Parker S, editor. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2007. p. 79–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32313-8_4
28. Liñán F. Intention-based models of entrepreneurship education. Piccolla Impresa/Small Bus. 2004;3:11–35.
29. Mahfud T, Triyono MB, Sudira P, Mulyani Y. The influence of social capital and entrepreneurial attitude orientation on entrepreneurial intentions: the mediating role of psychological capital. Eur Res Manag Bus Econ. 2020;26:33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.12.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.12.005
30. Beynon MJ, Jones P, Pickernell D. Country-level entrepreneurial attitudes and activity through the years: A panel data analysis using fsQCA. J Bus Res. 2020;115:443–455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.021
31. Cassol A, Tonial G, Machado HPV, Dalbosco IB, Trindade S. Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions and the moderation of entrepreneurial education: A study of the Brazilian context. Int J Manag Educ [Internet]. 2022;20:100716. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100716
32. Ganefri G, Hidayat H, Yulastri A, Mardin A, Sriwahyuni D, Zoni AA. Perangkat Pembelajaran Pedagogi Entrepreneurship Dengan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berbasis Produk di Pendidikan Vokasi. Pros Semin Nas Int. 2018.
33. Rosin AF, Proksch D, Stubner S, Pinkwart A. Digital new ventures: Assessing the benefits of digitalization in entrepreneurship. J Small Bus Strateg. 2020;30:59–71.
34. Elia G, Margherita A, Passiante G. Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2020;150:119791. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791
35. Secundo G, Rippa P, Meoli M. Digital transformation in entrepreneurship education centres: preliminary evidence from the Italian Contamination Labs network. Int J Entrep Behav Res. 2020;26:1589–1605. doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-11-2019-0618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2019-0618
36. Gregori P, Holzmann P. Digital sustainable entrepreneurship: A business model perspective on embedding digital technologies for social and environmental value creation. J Clean Prod. 2020;272:122817. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122817
37. Tikhomirova O. E-Governance and social inclusion of entrepreneurship and businesses: Toward the social inclusive digital society. Int J E-entrepreneursh Innov. 2020;10:1–25. doi: 10.4018/IJEEI.2020070101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEEI.2020070101
38. Hull CE kur, Hung Y-TC, Hair N, Perotti V, DeMartino R. Taking advantage of digital opportunities: a typology of digital entrepreneurship. Int J Netw Virtual Organ. 2007;4:290–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJNVO.2007.015166
39. Ngoasong MZ. Digital entrepreneurship in a resource-scarce context: A focus on entrepreneurial digital competencies. J Small Bus Enterp Dev. 2018;25:483–500. doi: 10.1108/JSBED-01-2017-0014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2017-0014
40. Giones F, Brem A. Digital Technology Entrepreneurship: A Definition and Research Agenda. Technol Innov Manag Rev. 2017;7:44–51. doi: 10.22215/timreview1076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1076
41. Suseno Y, Abbott L. Women entrepreneurs’ digital social innovation: Linking gender, entrepreneurship, social innovation and information systems. Inf Syst J. 2021;31:717–744. doi: 10.1111/isj.12327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12327
42. Koç H, Hennig E, Jastram S, Starke C. State of the art in context modelling–a systematic literature review. Int Conf Adv Inf Syst Eng. Springer; 2014. p. 53–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07869-4_5
43. Kitchenham B, Brereton OP, Budgen D, Turner M, Bailey J, Linkman S. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol. 2009;51:7–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
44. van Dinter R, Tekinerdogan B, Catal C. Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review. Inf Softw Technol. 2021;136:106589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106589
45. Villalobos D, Povedano-Montero J, Fernández S, López-Muñoz F, Pacios J, del Río D. Scientific research on verbal fluency tests: A bibliometric analysis. J Neurolinguistics. 2022;63:101082. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101082
46. Amjad T. Digital entrepreneurial marketing: A bibliometric analysis reveals an inescapable need of business schools. Int J Manag Educ. 2022;20:100655. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100655
47. San-Martín P, Pérez A, Fernández-Laviada A. Turning teachers into entrepreneurship role models: Development of a measurement scale of useful characteristics. Int J Manag Educ [Internet]. 2022;20:100721. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100721
48. Peschl H, Deng C, Larson N. Entrepreneurial thinking: A signature pedagogy for an uncertain 21st century. Int J Manag Educ. 2021;19:100427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100427
49. van Ewijk AR, Oikkonen E, Belghiti-Mahut S. Linking methods to outcomes: A multi-course mixed-method study of the effects of active and passive pedagogy on entrepreneurial intentions. Int J Manag Educ. 2020;18:100420. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100420
50. Khurana I, Dutta DK, Singh Ghura A. SMEs and digital transformation during a crisis: The emergence of resilience as a second-order dynamic capability in an entrepreneurial ecosystem. J Bus Res. 2022;150:623–641. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.06.048
51. Holzmann P, Gregori P. The promise of digital technologies for sustainable entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Int J Inf Manage. 2023;68:102593. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102593
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asmar Yulastri, Ganefri, Yudha Aditya Fiandra, Feri Ferdian, Elfizon (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
