Effectiveness of Nurse-Led Education and Telehealth on Mental Health in Chronic Disease in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251818Keywords:
Nurse-led education, Telehealth, mental health, Chronic disease, Saudi Arabia, systematic reviewAbstract
Background: Depression, anxiety, and chronic pain are highly prevalent among ambulatory patients and significantly impair their quality of life. Nurse-Led Education (NLE) and Telehealth (TH) interventions have emerged as promising strategies to address mental health challenges in outpatient settings. However, evidence comparing the effectiveness of these two approaches remains inconclusive, especially in culturally sensitive contexts like Saudi Arabia.
Objective: To systematically review and compare the effectiveness of NLE and TH interventions in improving mental health outcomes—depression, anxiety, and pain—among ambulatory patients, and to explore the mediating role of anxiety.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from 2010 to 2024. The review adhered to PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs, and systematic reviews evaluating NLE or TH interventions for adult outpatient populations. Outcomes of interest included depression (measured by PHQ-9), anxiety (STAI), and pain (VAS). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB tool and ROBINS-I. Data synthesis was narrative due to heterogeneity in study designs.
Results: Of 1,124 records identified, 21 studies met inclusion criteria. Telehealth interventions were associated with significantly greater reductions in depression and pain scores compared to NLE. Anxiety was effectively managed by both interventions, with comparable outcomes. Several studies demonstrated that anxiety served as a key mediator in the relationship between intervention type and improvements in depression and pain. Cultural context, digital access, and patient preferences significantly influenced intervention effectiveness.
Conclusion: Both NLE and TH interventions are effective in improving mental health outcomes in ambulatory patients. Telehealth offers greater flexibility and impact on depression and pain, while NLE provides culturally grounded peer support, particularly valuable in collectivist societies. The choice of intervention should be informed by patient needs, technological access, and cultural acceptability.
References
1. de Araújo MR, Haddad M, Dieckmann LHJ, Mari JD. The burden of comorbidity between mental and physical disorders: Identification, management, and treatment. In: Comorbidity between mental and physical disorders: Identification, management and treatment. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2025. p. 3–32. doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81802-8_1.
2. Mitchell AJ, Cogswell IE, Dalos J, Tsakalos G, Lei J, Oros A, et al. Estimating global direct health-care spending on neurological and mental health between 2000 and 2019: A modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2025;10(5): e401–11.doi.org/ 10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00089-1.
3. Hohls JK, König HH, Quirke E, Hajek A. Anxiety, depression and quality of life: A systematic review of evidence from longitudinal observational studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):12022. doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212022.
4. Löchner J, Santangelo PS, Ansell E, Bolger N, Ebner-Priemer U, Fried E, et al. Ambulatory assessment in mental health research: Expert consensus on current practices and future directions. Front Psychiatry. 2025.
5. Hawsawi T, Appleton J, Al-Adah R, Al-Mutairy A, Sinclair P, Wilson A. Mental health recovery in a collectivist society: Saudi consumers, carers and nurses' shared perspectives. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2024;33(4):1013–25. doi.org/10.1111/inm.13304.
6. Happell B, Furness T, Jacob A, Stimson A, Curtis J, Watkins A, et al. Nurse-led physical health interventions for people with mental illness: A scoping review of international literature. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2023;44(6):458–73. doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2023.2212772.
7. Charalambous J, Hollingdrake O, Currie J. Nurse practitioner led telehealth services: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33(3):839–58.doi.org/ 10.1111/jocn.16898.
8. TURNER, James Bradley, et al. Report on a scoping review of nursing interventions for young people's psychological wellbeing. British Journal of Child Health, 2022, 3.2: 90-94. doi.org/10.12968/chhe.2022.3.2.90.
9. Alattar N, Felton A, Stickley T. Mental health and stigma in Saudi Arabia: A scoping review. Ment Health Rev J. 2021;26(2):180–96. doi/10.1108/mhrj-08-2020-0055/full/html.
10. Gkintoni E, Vassilopoulos SP, Nikolaou G. Next-generation cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression: Integrating digital tools, teletherapy, and personalization for enhanced mental health outcomes. Medicina. 2025;61(3):431. doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030431.
11. Uraif A. Developing healthcare infrastructure in Saudi Arabia using smart technologies: Challenges and opportunities. Commun Netw. 2024;16(3):51–73.doi.org/ 10.4236/cn.2024.163003.
12. Luo T, Zhang Z, Li J, Li Y, Xiao W, Zhou Y, et al. Efficacy of nurse-led telepsychological intervention for patients with postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Alpha Psychiatry. 2024;25(3): 304.doi.org/ 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231492.
13. Giovanetti AK, Punt SE, Nelson EL, Ilardi SS. Teletherapy versus in-person psychotherapy for depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Telemed e-Health. 2022;28(8):1077–89. doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0294
14. Weiss CR, Roberts M, Florell M, Wood R, Johnson-Koenke R, Amura CR, et al. Best practices for telehealth in nurse-led care settings: A qualitative study. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2024;25(1):47–57.doi.org/ 10.1177/15271544231201417.
15. Gkintoni E, Vassilopoulos SP, Nikolaou G. Next-generation cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression: Integrating digital tools, teletherapy, and personalization for enhanced mental health outcomes. Medicina. 2025;61(3):431. doi.org/10.3390/medicina61030431.
16. Petrini L, Arendt-Nielsen L. Understanding pain catastrophizing: Putting pieces together. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:603420. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603420.
17. Oliva E. How integrated telemental health services produced clinically meaningful results for anxiety and depression. J Telemed Telecare. 2020.
18. WAUGH, MARYANN, et al. Telehealth in an integrated care environment. Integrating behavioral health and primary care, 2017, 121-133.
19. Mani ZA, Goniewicz K. Transforming healthcare in Saudi Arabia: A comprehensive evaluation of Vision 2030’s impact. Sustainability. 2024;16(8):3277. doi.org/10.3390/su16083277.
20. Johnson C, Ingraham MK, Stafford SR, Guilamo-Ramos V. Adopting a nurse-led model of care to advance whole-person health and health equity within Medicaid. Nurs Outlook. 2024;72(4):102191. doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102191.
21. Fortney JC, Pyne JM, Mouden SB, Mittal D, Hudson TJ, Schroeder GW, et al. Practice-based versus telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression in rural federally qualified health centers: A pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial. Focus. 2017;15(3):361–72. doi/pdf/10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12050696.
22. Milosevic I, Cameron DH, Milanovic M, McCabe RE, Rowa K. Face-to-face versus video teleconference group cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and related disorders: A preliminary comparison. Can J Psychiatry. 2022;67(5):391–402. doi.org/10.1177/070674372110273.
23. Lalor I, Costello C, O'Sullivan M, Rice C, Collins P. Brief psychological interventions in face-to-face and telehealth formats: A comparison of outcomes in a naturalistic setting. Ment Health Rev J. 2023;28(1):82–92. doi/10.1108/mhrj-05-2022-0029/full/html.
24. Greenwood H, Krzyzaniak N, Peiris R, Clark J, Scott AM, Cardona M, et al. Telehealth versus face-to-face psychotherapy for less common mental health conditions: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JMIR Ment Health. 2022;9(3): e31780.doi.org/ 10.2196/31780.
25. Rabner J, Norris LA, Olino TM, Kendall PC. A Comparison of Telehealth and In-Person Therapy for Youth Anxiety Disorders. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2024 Jul 12:1-12. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2024.2372770. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38995683; PMCID: PMC11724934.
26. Axelsson E, Andersson E, Ljótsson B, Björkander D, Hedman-Lagerlöf M, Hedman-Lagerlöf E. Effect of internet vs face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for health anxiety: A randomized noninferiority clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(9):915–24.
27. Krzyzaniak N, Greenwood H, Scott AM, Peiris R, Cardona M, Clark J, et al. The effectiveness of telehealth versus face-to-face interventions for anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2024;30(2):250–61. doi.org/10.1177/1357633X211053.
28. Irvine A, Drew P, Bower P, Brooks H, Gellatly J, Armitage CJ, et al. Are there interactional differences between telephone and face-to-face psychological therapy? A systematic review of comparative studies. J Affect Disord. 2020; 265:120–31. doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.057.
29. Stubbings DR, Rees CS, Roberts LD, Kane RT. Comparing in-person to videoconference-based cognitive behavioral therapy for mood and anxiety disorders: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(11): e258.
30. Snoswell CL, Chelberg G, De Guzman KR, Haydon HM, Thomas EE, Caffery LJ, et al. The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019. J Telemed Telecare. 2024;30(10):1667. doi.org/10.1177/1357633X211022907.
31. Xiao Z, Han X. Evaluation of the effectiveness of telehealth chronic disease management system: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25: e44256.
32. Sánchez‐Gutiérrez C, Gil‐García E, Rivera‐Sequeiros A, López‐Millán JM. Effectiveness of telemedicine psychoeducational interventions for adults with non‐oncological chronic disease: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(5):1267–80.doi.org/ 10.1111/jan.15151.
33. Scott AM, Bakhit M, Greenwood H, Cardona M, Clark J, Krzyzaniak N, et al. Real-time telehealth versus face-to-face management for patients with PTSD in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2022;83(4):41146.
34. Walton CJ, Gonzalez S, Cooney EB, Leigh L, Szwec S. Engagement over telehealth: Comparing attendance between dialectical behaviour therapy delivered face-to-face and via telehealth for programs in Australia and New Zealand during the COVID-19 pandemic. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2023;10(1):16. doi.org/10.1186/s40479-023-00221-4.
35. Bellanti DM, Kelber MS, Workman DE, Beech EH, Belsher BE. Rapid review on the effectiveness of telehealth interventions for the treatment of behavioral health disorders. Mil Med. 2022;187(5–6): e577–88.
36. Berryhill MB, Halli-Tierney A, Culmer N, Williams N, Betancourt A, King M, et al. Videoconferencing psychological therapy and anxiety: A systematic review. Fam Pract. 2019;36(1):53–63.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ateya Megahed Ibrahim , Donia Elsaid Fathi Zaghamir (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
