Developing and Assessing the Impact of an Integrated STEM Project-Based Learning Model in Vocational Education for Enhanced Competence and Employability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251786Keywords:
STEM Project-Based Learning, Vocational Education, Industrial Automation EngineeringAbstract
The increasing demand for skilled professionals in technical fields such as Industrial Automation Engineering necessitates the implementation of effective teaching methods in vocational education. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an Integrated STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Project-Based Learning (PBL) model in enhancing students’ competence and employability at SMK Negeri 1 Pariaman. Employing a quasi-experimental Nonequivalent Control Group Design, the research involved 60 students divided equally into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group received instruction through the integrated STEM-PBL approach, while the control group followed conventional teaching methods. Data were collected using pre- and post-tests, as well as qualitative surveys and interviews, to assess students’ academic performance, learning engagement, and perceptions of the educational experience. The findings revealed that students exposed to the STEM-PBL model showed significant improvements in both theoretical knowledge and practical skills, outperforming those in the control group. Additionally, qualitative data indicated that the STEM-PBL approach fostered greater student engagement, motivation, and the development of critical 21st-century skills, such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and teamwork, which are essential for success in the industrial workforce. The study concludes that integrating STEM principles with project-based learning substantially enhances vocational students’ readiness for employment by providing both cognitive and non-cognitive competencies. It recommends broader implementation of this model within vocational institutions. Future research is encouraged to explore the integration of emerging technologies to further strengthen the impact of project-based learning in technical and vocational education settings.
References
1. Krismadinata, Verawardina U, Jalinus N, et al. Blended learning as instructional model in vocational education: Literature review. Universal Journal of Educational Research 2020; 8: 5801–5815.
2. Feng J, Hou H. STEM in Vocational Education and Training: The Future Direction. Stem Education Review; 1. Epub ahead of print 2023. DOI: 10.54844/stemer.2023.0431.
3. Rosina H, Virgantina V, Ayyash Y, et al. Vocational Education Curriculum: Between Vocational Education and Industrial Needs. Asean Journal of Science and Engineering Education 2021; 1: 105–110.
4. Oke A, Fernandes FAP. Innovations in Teaching and Learning: Exploring the Perceptions of the Education Sector on the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity 2020; 6: 31.
5. Mala R, Priyanto P, Iskandar R. ICT to Vocational Education National Curriculum Implementation in Indonesia: Requirements, Challenges, and Opportunities. International Journal of Management and Humanities 2020; 4: 69–72.
6. Ridlo A, Jumintono J, Achsan BN. The Teacher’s Role in Increasing Employability Skills of the Drawing Building Engineering Vocational High School Students. Journal of Vocational Education Studies 2018; 1: 13.
7. Kyslitsyn V, Shevchenko L, Umanets V, et al. Applying the Python Programming Language and Arduino Robotics Kits in the Process of Training Future Teachers of Computer Science. Environment Technology Resources Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference 2024; 2: 162–167.
8. Maryanti R, Nandiyanto ABD. Curriculum Development in Science Education in Vocational School. Asean Journal of Science and Engineering Education 2021; 1: 151–156.
9. Jalinus N, Nabawi A, Mardin A. The Seven Steps of Project Based Learning Model to Enhance Productive Competences of Vocational Students. 2017.
10. Oriza Candra. The Development of aFlexibility-Project Based Learning Model on Vocational Education: A Need Analysis. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (Turcomat) 2021; 12: 2782–2786.
11. Wahyu Y, Supardi K, Mulu M, et al. The Effect of Problem-Based Approach Assisted With Mobile Augmented Reality Toward Students’ Science Process Skills and Achievement. Prisma Sains Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan Ipa Ikip Mataram 2021; 9: 420.
12. Deveau AM, Wang Y, Small D. Reflections on Course-Based Undergraduate Research in Organic and Biochemistry During COVID-19. J Chem Educ 2020; 97: 3463–3469.
13. Syamsidah Ms. Investigating the Project Based Learning Practice on Students’ Social Skill Enhancement. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.2991/icamr-18.2019.88.
14. Rohanai R, Othman H, Daud KAM, et al. Concept of Correlation Between Active Learning and Employability Skills in TVET. Online Journal for Tvet Practitioners; 04. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.30880/jtet.2020.05.01.003.
15. Haniah AU, Ngadiso N, Setyaningsih E. Students’ Perception on the Implementation of Online Project-Based Learning in Teaching 4Cs. Ijeltal (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) 2021; 6: 123.
16. Adi NH, Giatman M, Huda A, et al. Enhancing Learning Outcomes through Cooperative Project-Based Learning with Augmented Reality Integration. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología 2025; 5: 1473.
17. Dewanti DMI. Student’s Perception of Project-Based Learning Model With Canva in English Writing Class at SMK Negeri 1 Busungbiu. 2023; 1: 49–58.
18. Wannapiroon P, Nilsook P, Techakosit S, et al. STEM Literacy of Students in Vocational Education. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science 2021; 5: 527–549.
19. ROEMİNTOYO R, Budiarto MK. Project-Based Learning Model to Support 21st Century Learning: Case Studies in Vocational High Schools. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation 2023; 7: 662–670.
20. Hanif S, Wijaya AFC, Winarno N. Enhancing Students’ Creativity Through STEM Project-Based Learning. Journal of Science Learning 2019; 2: 50.
21. Astuti NH, Rusilowati A, Subali B. STEM-Based Learning Analysis to Improve Students’ Problem Solving Abilities in Science Subject: A Literature Review. Journal of Innovative Science Education 2021; 9: 79–86.
22. Muliyati D. Development of STEM Project-Based Learning Student Worksheet for Physics Learning on Renewable Energy Topic. J Phys Conf Ser 2023; 2596: 012078.
23. Rahmiati R, Jalinus N, Effendi H, et al. Assessing the Impact of a STEM Learning Project Model on Artificial Intelligence Education in Higher Learning Institutions. Data and Metadata; 3. Epub ahead of print 31 December 2024. DOI: 10.56294/dm2024.623.
24. Jannah DR, Sahrina A, Utomo DH. The Effect of Stem Integrated Project Based Learning Model on Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Geography Subjects. JPP (Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran) 2023; 30: 54.
25. Guzey SS, Moore TJ, Harwell MR. Building Up STEM: An Analysis of Teacher-Developed Engineering Design-Based STEM Integration Curricular Materials. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-Peer); 6. Epub ahead of print 2016. DOI: 10.7771/2157-9288.1129.
26. Kartini FS, Widodo A, Winarno N, et al. Promoting Student’s Problem-Solving Skills Through STEM Project-Based Learning in Earth Layer and Disasters Topic. Journal of Science Learning 2021; 4: 257–266.
27. Lee H, Cheng Y, Wang W, et al. Exploring the Learning Process and Effectiveness of STEM Education via Learning Behavior Analysis and the Interactive-Constructive- Active-Passive Framework. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2023; 61: 951–976.
28. Joseph OB, Uzondu NC. Curriculums Development for Interdisciplinary STEM Education: A Review of Models and Approaches. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences 2024; 6: 1575–1592.
29. Thibaut L, Ceuppens S, Loof H De, et al. Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education. European Journal of Stem Education; 3. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.20897/ejsteme/85525.
30. Ing M. Can Parents Influence Children’s Mathematics Achievement and Persistence in STEM Careers? J Career Dev 2013; 41: 87–103.
31. Hall AE, Miro D. A Study of Student Engagement in Project‐Based Learning Across Multiple Approaches to STEM Education Programs. Sch Sci Math 2016; 116: 310–319.
32. Christensen R, Knezek G, Tyler‐Wood T. Alignment of Hands-on STEM Engagement Activities With Positive STEM Dispositions in Secondary School Students. J Sci Educ Technol 2015; 24: 898–909.
33. Loof H De, Struyf A, Pauw JB, et al. Teachers’ Motivating Style and Students’ Motivation and Engagement in STEM: The Relationship Between Three Key Educational Concepts. Res Sci Educ 2019; 51: 109–127.
34. Struyf A, Loof H De, Pauw JB, et al. Students’ Engagement in Different STEM Learning Environments: Integrated STEM Education as Promising Practice? Int J Sci Educ 2019; 41: 1387–1407.
35. Morris JE, Slater E, Boston J, et al. Teachers in Conversation With Industry Scientists: Implications for STEM Education. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education; 29. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.30722/ijisme.29.01.004.
36. Mayes RL, Rittschof KA. Development of Interdisciplinary STEM Impact Measures of Student Attitudes and Reasoning. Front Educ (Lausanne); 6. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.631684.
37. Creswell JW,, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. . Sage publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Akmal, Ambiyar, Usmeldi, Rahmat Fadillah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
