Revealing the Information Delivery of Diabetes Prevention in K-12: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251727Keywords:
Diabetes, K12 education, learning, prevention, PRISMA methodAbstract
Introduction: Diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents correlates with reduced quality of life and heightened mortality rates. Incorporating diabetes education into early learning is essential as a proactive prevention strategy.
Objective: This study seeks to examine and optimize the teaching of diabetes mellitus within K–12 education, aiming to bolster preventive measures among students.
Methods: This research examines diabetes education within K–12 environments through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR), utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. A total of 1,192 articles were obtained from the Scopus database, with 17 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria and selected for detailed analysis.
Results: The review identified various diabetes-related curricula and instructional strategies utilized in preschool, elementary, middle, and high school classrooms. The main learning objectives involved enhancing student awareness of diabetes and comprehending its risk factors. Preschool programs frequently involved parents to foster the development of healthy behaviors. Strategies employed in elementary and secondary schools encompassed class discussions, investigative learning, simulations, modelling, and community action projects. These methods enhanced students' comprehension of diabetes, facilitated sustained behavior modification, and fostered the acquisition of self-regulation skills.
Conclusion: The main objective of diabetes education in schools is to equip students with the understanding that diabetes can be largely prevented through healthy lifestyle choices. Effective lessons enable students to reflect on their behaviors and make informed decisions that promote long-term health and prevent diabetes.
References
1. Fifty-first World Health Assembly. Health-for-all policy for the twenty-first century. Fifty-first World Heal Assem [Internet]. 1998;(May):54. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gb/archive/pdf_files/WHA51/ea5.pdf%0Ahttps://www.zdravamesta.cz/cb21/archiv/material/worldhealthdeclaration.pdf
2. Lin J, Thompson TJ, Cheng YJ, Zhuo X, Zhang P, Gregg E, et al. Projection of the future diabetes burden in the United States through 2060. Popul Health Metr. 2018;16(1):1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-018-0166-4
3. Federation ID. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 9th edn [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/
4. Jackson CC, Albanese-O’neill A, Butler KL, Chiang JL, Deeb LC, Hathaway K, et al. Diabetes care in the school setting: A position statement of the American diabetes association. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(10):1958–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc15-1418
5. Singh R, Gholipourmalekabadi M, Shafikhani SH. Animal models for type 1 and type 2 diabetes: advantages and limitations. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15(February):1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1359685
6. Bonsembiante L, Targher G, Maffeis C. Type 2 diabetes and dietary carbohydrate intake of adolescents and young adults: What is the impact of different choices? Vol. 13, Nutrients. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103344
7. Akter F, Rashid SMM, Alam N, Lipi N, Qayum MO, Nurunnahar M, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of diabetes among secondary school-going children in Bangladesh. Front Public Heal. 2022;10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1047617
8. Chandrasekaran P, Weiskirchen R. The Role of Obesity in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus—An Overview. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25031882
9. Arulmohi M, Vinayagamoorthy V, R. DA. Physical Violence Against Doctors: A Content Analysis from Online Indian Newspapers. Indian J Community Med. 2017;42(1):147–50.
10. Jourdan D, Gray NJ, Barry MM, Caffe S, Cornu C, Diagne F, et al. Supporting every school to become a foundation for healthy lives. Lancet Child Adolesc Heal [Internet]. 2021;5(4):295–303. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30316-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30316-3
11. Vaivada T, Sharma N, Das JK, Salam RA, Lassi ZS, Bhutta ZA. Interventions for Health and Well-Being in School-Aged Children and Adolescents: A Way Forward. Pediatrics. 2022;149(May 2022):1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-053852M
12. Fináncz J, Podráczky J, Deutsch K, Soós E, Bánfai-Csonka H, Csima M. Health Education Intervention Programs in Early Childhood Education: A Systematic Review. Educ Sci. 2023;13(10). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100988
13. Pansier B, Schulz PJ. School-based diabetes interventions and their outcomes: A systematic literature review. J Public health Res. 2015;4(1):65–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2015.467
14. Naef AN, Wilhelm C, Tezcan-Güntekin H, Amelung VE. Impact of digital health interventions for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus on health literacy: a systematic review. BMC Endocr Disord [Internet]. 2023;23(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01321-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-023-01321-6
15. Asadzandi S, Sedghi S, Bigdeli S, Sanjari M, Sanjari M. A systematized review on diabetes gamification. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34(1):1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.34.168
16. An R, Li D, Cole M, Park K, Lyon AR, White NH. Implementation of School Diabetes Care in the United States: A Scoping Review. J Sch Nurs. 2022;38(1):61–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10598405211026328
17. Karimi N, Saadat-Gharin S, Tol A, Sadeghi R, Yaseri M, Mohebbi B. A Problem-based learning health literacy intervention program on improving health-promoting behaviors among girl students. Journal of Education and Health Promotion; 2019. p. 11.
18. Tedja B, Al Musadieq M, Kusumawati A, Yulianto E. Systematic literature review using PRISMA: exploring the influence of service quality and perceived value on satisfaction and intention to continue relationship. Futur Bus J [Internet]. 2024;10(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00326-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00326-4
19. Lesiak AJ, Griswold JC. Blood Sugar Balance: A Glucose Metabolism Web Game for Diabetes Education. Vol. 85, American Biology Teacher. 2023. p. 270–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2023.85.5.270
20. Modell SM, Bayer IS, Kardia SLR, Morales CJ, Adler I, Greene-Moton E. Health in Our Hands: diabetes and substance use education through a new genomic framework for schools and communities. J Community Genet [Internet]. 2023;14(2):211–25. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-022-00631-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-022-00631-x
21. Venditti EM, Giles C, Firrell LS, Zeveloff AD, Hirst K, Marcus MD. Interactive Learning Activities for the Middle School Classroom to Promote Healthy Energy Balance and Decrease Diabetes Risk in the HEALTHY Primary Prevention Trial. Health Promot Pract. 2014;15(1):55–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912469377
22. Zuercher JL, Gopalan C. Introducing physiology of diabetes to American Asian middle school and high school students. Adv Physiol Educ. 2020;44(44):587–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00088.2020
23. Machado SS, Schillinger D, Avina L, Cortez G, Daniels R, Thompson HR. Seeing “The Bigger Picture:” Impact of an Arts-Focused Type 2 Diabetes Education Program in High Schools. J Health Commun [Internet]. 2021;26(10):696–707. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1998845 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1998845
24. Lesiak A, Griswold JC, Moylan A, Starks H. Development and Evaluation of Integrated Diabetes Curricula for Teaching Gene by Environment Concepts to High School Health and Biology Students. J STEM outreach [Internet]. 2024 Mar 19;7(1):1–22. Available from: https://www.jstemoutreach.org/article/115429-development-and-evaluation-of-integrated-diabetes-curricula-for-teaching-gene-by-environment-concepts-to-high-school-health-and-biology-students DOI: https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v7i1.04
25. Mingueneau M, Chaix A, Scotti N, Chaix J, Reynders A, Hammond C, et al. A multidisciplinary guided practical on type I diabetes engaging students in inquiry-based learning. Adv Physiol Educ. 2015;39(1):383–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00045.2015
26. Triantafyllidis A, Alexiadis A, Elmas D, Gerovasilis G, Votis K, Tzovaras D. A social robot-based platform for health behavior change toward prevention of childhood obesity. Univers Access Inf Soc [Internet]. 2023;22(4):1405–15. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00922-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00922-7
27. Yachina NP, Khuziakhmetov AN. Project of health-caring educational school environment for children with diabetes mellitus. Eurasian J Anal Chem. 2017;12(5):559–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejac.2017.00190a
28. Calle-Bustos AM, Juan MC, García-García I, Abad F. An augmented reality game to support therapeutic education for children with diabetes. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184645
29. Elinder LS, Patterson E, Nyberg G, Norman Å, WHO, The GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators. Atlas of Childhood Obesity. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2017;18(October):1–242. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204235/1/%0Ahttps://www.worldobesity.org/nlsegmentation/global-atlas-on-childhood-obesity DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5354-4
30. Raffali A, Asraf RM. Fostering Growth Mindset Principles in the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Through a Narrative Game. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res. 2023;22(2):244–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.2.14
31. Ameneh PD, Mohtasham G, Sakineh R, Yadollah M, Ali R. School-based peer-led diabetes intervention among female adolescents: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2023;23(1):1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15430-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15430-3
32. Safajou S, Rezaeian M, Abadi YS, Nasirzadeh M. The Effect of Educational Intervention Based on Health Belief Model on Smoking Preventive Behaviors Among Female Students. J Educ Community Heal. 2022;9(3):162–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34172/jech.2022.24
33. Mourão DM, Sedlmaier BMG, Pires VLR, Borges GF. Effectiveness of a diabetes educational intervention at primary school. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries [Internet]. 2023;43(1):83–90. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-021-01033-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-021-01033-4
34. Soares GM, Zangerolamo L, Rosa LRO, Branco RCS, Carneiro EM, Barbosa-Sampaio HC. Impact of a playful booklet about diabetes and obesity on high school students in Campinas, Brazil. Adv Physiol Educ. 2019;43(3):266–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00160.2018
35. Kaneto LA, Damião EBC, Verissimo M de LÓR, Rossato LM, Toriyama ATM, Szylit R. Educational workshop using games improves self-monitoring of blood glucose among children. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018;26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2400.3039
36. Hossain MJ, Al-Mamun M, Islam MR. Diabetes mellitus, the fastest growing global public health concern: Early detection should be focused. Heal Sci Reports. 2024;7(3):5–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.2004
37. Misra A, Gopalan H, Jayawardena R, Hills AP, Soares M, Reza-Albarrán AA, et al. Diabetes in developing countries. J Diabetes. 2019;11(7):522–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.12913
38. Berget C, Nii P, Wyckoff L, Patrick K, Brooks-Russell A, Messer LH. Equipping School Health Personnel for Diabetes Care with a Competency Framework and Pilot Education Program. J Sch Health. 2019;89(9):683–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12806
39. Erdem C, Kaya M. A meta-analysis of the effect of parental involvement on students’ academic achievement. J Learn Dev. 2020;7(3):367–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v7i3.417
40. Cia F, de Oliveira Pamplin RC, de Albuquerque Williams LC. The impact of parental involvement on children’s academic performance. Psicol em Estud. 2008;13(2):351–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722008000200018
41. Cooper MN, Mcnamara KA, de Klerk NH, Davis EA, Jones TW. School performance in children with type 1 diabetes: A contemporary population-based study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2016;17(2):101–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12243
42. Elertson KM, Liesch SK, Babler EK. The “Face” of Diabetes: Insight Into Youths’ Experiences as Expressed Through Drawing. J Patient Exp. 2016;3(2):34–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373516654771
43. Isla-Pera P, Palacin Lois M, López Matheu C, Honrubia Pérez, Rodriguez G, Armengol Camps, et al. Perceptions of diabetes obtained through drawing in childhood and adolescence. Patient Prefer Adherence [Internet]. 2013 Jun;595. Available from: http://www.dovepress.com/perceptions-of-diabetes-obtained-through-drawing-in-childhood-and-adol-peer-reviewed-article-PPA DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S45130
44. Hoobs, M & Holley D. Augmented reality for education. Encycl Educ Innov. 2019;955:1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2262-4_120-1
45. Zhao F, Guo D. Rewards in Gamification. Lect Notes Comput Sci (including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics). 2019;11595 LNCS:453–62.
46. Kim J, Castelli DM. Effects of gamification on behavioral change in education: A meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073550
47. Alotaibi MS. Game-based learning in early childhood education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vol. 15, Frontiers in Psychology. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1307881
48. Banca RO La, Laffel LMB, Volkening LK, Carvalho D, Nascimento LC, Preto R, et al. self-injection : A pilot trial in a developing country. 2022;26(1):1–20.
49. Practice C. KiDS: Bringing diabetes education to schools worldwide. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;177:8–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108961
50. Massey S. Using Emojis and drawings in surveys to measure children’s attitudes to mathematics. Vol. 25, International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2022. p. 877–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1940774
51. Schouteten JJ, Verwaeren J, Lagast S, Gellynck X, De Steur H. Emoji as a tool for measuring children’s emotions when tasting food. Food Qual Prefer [Internet]. 2018;68:322–31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.03.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.03.005
52. Momani AM, Callery P, Lin YL, Abduelkader RH, Khalil H. “I Like People to Treat Me Normally”: Barriers to Type 1 Diabetes Self-Management Among Adolescents. Vol. 40, Clinical Diabetes. 2022. p. 196–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/cd20-0116
53. Spencer BKC, Hugh-Jones S, Cottrell D, Pini S. The INSCHOOL project: Young people with long-term physical health conditions: An in-depth qualitative study of their needs at school. J Adolesc. 2024;96(2):337–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12278
54. Tullis JG, Goldstone RL. Why does peer instruction benefit student learning? Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020;5(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00218-5
55. Ghasemi V, Simbar M, Fakari FR, Naz MSG, Kiani Z. The effect of peer education on health promotion of iranian adolescents: A systematic review. Int J Pediatr. 2019;7(3):9139–57.
56. Nagy-Pénzes G, Vincze F, Bíró É. A School Intervention’s Impact on Adolescents’ Health-Related Knowledge and Behavior. Front Public Heal. 2022;10(March). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.822155
57. Verma S, Yacob MS, Kirpalani A. Outcomes of inquiry-based learning in health professions education: a scoping review. Can Med Educ J [Internet]. 2022;2(1):16–22. Available from: https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cmej/article/view/36556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.75144
58. Kangasharju AI, Ilomäki L, Toom A. Online poetry writing at school – comparing lower secondary students’ experiences between individual and collaborative poetry writing. Vol. 9, Frontiers in Education. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1380790
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jasmine Nurul Izza, Hadi Suwono, Habiddin, Hendra Susanto, Reihan Athala Rizki Putranda (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
