Early Versus Delayed Surgical Repair in Neonates with Esophageal Atresia: A Systematic Review of Long-Term Survival and Complications

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251648

Keywords:

Esophageal atresia, neonatal surgery, early repair, delayed repair, long-term survival, complications, anastomotic strictures, gastroesophageal reflux, recurrent fistulas, feeding difficulties, vacterl association, congenital anomalies, neonatal outcomes

Abstract

This systematic review is aimed to explore long-term survival and complications associated with early versus delayed surgical repair in neonates with long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA).Through analysis of studies published from 2012-2025 was conducted and we collected data from 7 papers, with long-term follow-up, up to one year. Delayed primary anastomosis (DPA) was most frequently employed intervention with mean repair timing of 11.9 weeks. Results indicate that over 90% of patients achieved functional esophageal continuity with the majority able to eat without swallowing difficulties. Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) was prevalent complication which was affecting 30%–40.8% of cases with strictures occurring in 53.7%–60% of patients and statistically significant association with anastomotic leaks (p < 0.0001). Dysphagia was also linked to GER (p = 0.0174) and need long-term monitoring and management. Early surgical repair while reducing the duration of preoperative interventions, demonstrated a higher incidence of anastomotic leaks (22.7%–30%) and strictures increasing need for subsequent dilations or surgical revisions. All the evidences that we reported find delayed repair as a feasible approach with favorable long-term outcomes like high esophageal preservation rates and reduced early postoperative complications. Patient selection and institutional expertise play critical roles in optimizing surgical outcomes and study limitations include heterogeneity in study designs or large variations of follow-up durations and outcome definitions. Further prospective studies can establish standardized treatment protocols which can minimize complications which are associated with both early and delayed approaches.

 

References

1. Rothenberg SS. 27 Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula Malformations. In: Holcomb and Ashcraft's Pediatric Surgery E-Book. 2019 Apr 14:437.

2. Krishnan U, Dumont MW, Slater H, Gold BD, Seguy D, Bouin M, Wijnen R, Dall’Oglio L, Costantini M, Koumbourlis AC, Kovesi TA. The International Network on Oesophageal Atresia (INoEA) consensus guidelines on the transition of patients with oesophageal atresia–tracheoesophageal fistula. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Nov;20(11):735-55.

3. Van Lennep M, Singendonk MM, Dall’Oglio L, Gottrand F, Krishnan U, Terheggen-Lagro SW, Omari TI, Benninga MA, van Wijk MP. Oesophageal atresia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Apr 18;5(1):26.

4. Pinheiro PFM. Current knowledge on esophageal atresia. World J Gastroenterol [Internet]. 2012 Jan 1;18(28):3662. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3406418/

5. Mubang RN, Sigmon DF, Stawicki SP. Esophageal trauma [Internet]. StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470161/

6. Höllwarth ME, Till H. Esophageal atresia. In: Springer eBooks [Internet]. 2017. p. 1–20. Available from: https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-642-38482-0_48-1

7. Ramsay M, Birnbaum R. Feeding difficulties in children with esophageal atresia: treatment by a multidisciplinary team. Dis Esophagus [Internet]. 2013 May 1;26(4):410–2. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23679033/

8. Baldwin DL, Yadav D. Esophageal atresia [Internet]. StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560848/

9. Esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula Treatment & management: approach considerations, indications for and timing of surgical intervention, options for surgery [Internet]. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/935858-treatment

10. Spitz L. Esophageal atresia: lessons I have learned in a 40-year experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Oct 1;41(10):1635-40.

11. Friedmacher F, Puri P. Delayed primary anastomosis for management of long-gap esophageal atresia: A meta-analysis of complications and long-term outcome. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012;28(9):899–906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-012-3142-2

12. Friedmacher F. Delayed primary anastomosis for repair of long-gap esophageal atresia: Technique revisited. Pediatr Surg Int. 2023;39:Article 40.

13. Finck C, Zendejas B, Knod JL, Tramontozzi PJ, Jungbauer D, Anderson M, et al. Perioperative management and outcomes in long-gap esophageal atresia: A retrospective analysis from the Eastern Pediatric Surgery Network.

14. Penikis AB, Sescleifer AM, Kunisaki SM. Management of long-gap esophageal atresia. Transl Pediatr. 2024;13(2). https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-23-453

15. Stadil T, Koivusalo A, Svensson JF, Jönsson L, Engstrand Lilja H, Thorup JM, et al. Surgical treatment and major complications within the first year of life in newborns with long-gap esophageal atresia Gross type A and B: A systematic review. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(11):2242–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.06.017

16. Zwaveling S, Groen H, Van Der Zee D, Hulscher J, Gallo G. Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia: a Meta-Analysis of Jejunal Interposition, Colon Interposition, and Gastric Pull-Up. Eur J Pediatr Surg [Internet]. 2012 Dec 4;22(06):420–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23212741/

17. Liu J, Yang Y, Zheng C, Dong R, Zheng S. Surgical outcomes of different approaches to esophageal replacement in long-gap esophageal atresia: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(21):e6942. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006942

18. Besendörfer M, Müller H, Weiss C, Wagner A, Schellerer V, Hoerning A, et al. Association of clinical factors with postoperative complications of esophageal atresia. Pediatr Neonatol [Internet]. 2020 Sep 7;62(1):55–63. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187595722030142X

19. Petrosyan M, Estrada J, Hunter C, Woo R, Stein J, Ford HR, et al. Esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula in very low-birth-weight neonates: improved outcomes with staged repair. J Pediatr Surg [Internet]. 2009 Dec 1;44(12):2278–81. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20006009/

20. Tanny SPT, Comella A, Hutson JM, Omari TI, Teague WJ, King SK. Quality of life assessment in esophageal atresia patients: a systematic review focusing on long-gap esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg [Internet]. 2019 Oct 5;54(12):2473–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31669125/

21. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram — PRISMA statement [Internet]. PRISMA Statement. Available from: https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-28

How to Cite

1.
Navarro Acevedo JA, Consuegra Montes Y, Maturana Leudo DJ, Mosquera Gil LM, Muhamad Saldaña AC. Early Versus Delayed Surgical Repair in Neonates with Esophageal Atresia: A Systematic Review of Long-Term Survival and Complications. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 28 [cited 2025 Apr. 18];5:1648. Available from: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/1648