Political Discourse Space: Critical Cognitive Analysis on Inauguration Speech of President Prabowo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251645Keywords:
Critical Cognitive Analysis, inauguration speech, Political discourse, ideological representationAbstract
Objectives: This study aims to analyze the inauguration speech of President Prabowo through the lens of Critical Cognitive Analysis, focusing on the interplay between language and ideological representation in political discourse. The research seeks to understand how Prabowo positions himself within the political landscape and addresses both national and international challenges.
Methods: Employing a qualitative approach grounded in a Critical Cognitive Framework, the study analyzes linguistic elements extracted from online news portals. Data collection and analysis are executed through an interactive model, allowing for simultaneous data presentation, reduction, and conclusion drawing. The analysis incorporates the theoretical foundations of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Cognitive Linguistics.
Results: The findings reveal that Prabowo’s speech strategically positions him as a leader with a broad vision, utilizing language to frame national identity, collective goals, and public expectations. The use of deictic expressions and references to historical figures enhances his rhetorical impact, reinforcing his legitimacy as a leader committed to the welfare of the Indonesian people.
Conclusions: Prabowo's inauguration speech exemplifies the effective use of language as a tool for ideological framing and public mobilization. It significantly contributes to understanding the role of political discourse in shaping societal perceptions and collective identity.
References
1. Hamed D. Keywords and collocations in US presidential discourse since 1993: a corpus-assisted analysis. J Humanit Appl Soc Sci. 2021;3(2):137–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHASS-01-2020-0019
2. Clementson DE, Pascual-Ferrá P, Beatty MJ. How Language Can Influence Political Marketing Strategy and a Candidate’s Image: Effect of Presidential Candidates’ Language Intensity and Experience on College Students’ Ratings of Source Credibility. J Polit Mark. 2016;15(4):388–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2014.959689
3. Garifullina DB, Khismatullina LG, Giniyatullina AY, Garaeva MR, Gimadeeva AA. Inaugural speech is a tool for forming a speech portrait of the president. Linguist Cult Rev. 2021;5(S1):413–21. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS1.1429
4. Fanani A, Setiawan S, Purwati O, Maisarah M, Qoyyimah U. Donald Trump’s grammar of persuasion in his speech. Heliyon [Internet]. 2020;6(1):e03082. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03082
5. Saputra E. Hybrid Identity of Urban Muslim Youth: The Case of Teras Dakwah Yogyakarta. ESENSIA J Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin. 2022;23(1):103–23. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7802-8140
6. Inas Pratiwi F. The Role of Identity in Politics and Policy Making [Internet]. 2019. 221 p. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337008287
7. WANG Q. From Divergence to Convergence: Towards Integration of Cognitive Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis in Political Discourse. Adv Soc Sci Res J. 2019;6(11):401–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.14738/assrj.611.7442
8. Amalia MN. SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: METAPHOR, PROTOTYPE, AND MEANING ANALYSIS IN COGNITIVE LINGUISTIC STUDIES. J English Study Progr. 2025;8(1):83–93. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v8i1.18021
9. Kachur I. The Correlation Between Language and Reality. Philol Rev. 2021;17(1):45–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.31499/2415-8828.1.2021.232648
10. Kronrod A. Language Research in Marketing. Found Trends Mark. 2022;16(3):308–421. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359831158_Language_Research_in_Marketing
11. Rao VCS. Cognitive Linguistics: An Approach to the Study of Language and Thought. J Res Sch Prof English Lang Teach [Internet]. 2021;5(24):22–31. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/45656719/Cognitive_Linguistics_An_Approach_to_the_Study_of_Language_and_Thought
12. Mei AL. How Does Language Influence Our Minds? From a Linguistics Perspective. Lect Notes Educ Psychol Public Media. 2024;42(1):205–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/42/20240840
13. El-Sharkawy A. What is Critical Discourse Analysis ( CDA )? Vol. 6. 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311713796_What_is_Critical_Discourse_Analysis_CDA
14. Bouvier G, Machin D. Critical discourse analysis and the challenges and opportunities of social media. Rev Commun. 2018;18(3):178–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2018.1479881
15. Dijk TA Van. Critical Discourse Analysis. In: The BERA/SAGE Handbook of Educational Research: Two Volume Set. 2017. p. 812–29. https://discourses.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Teun-A.-van-Dijk-2015-Critical-discourse-Analysis.pdf
16. Mandarani V. Critical Discourse Analysis in Media Perspective. Buku Ajar Critical Discourse Analysis. 2018. 100 p. https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=QYuuqfYAAAAJ&hl=id
17. Bien DH. Construal and Its Representative Forms in Cognitive Linguistics. DALAT Univ J Sci Vol [Internet]. 2021;11(3):3–27. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351936254_CONSTRUAL_AND_ITS_REPRESENTATIVE_FORMS_IN_COGNITIVE_LINGUISTICS
18. Lim WM. Philosophy of science and research paradigm for business research in the transformative age of automation, digitalization, hyperconnectivity, obligations, globalization, and sustainability. J Trade Sci. 2023;11(2/3):3–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/jts-07-2023-0015
19. Assunção C, Araújo C, Fernandes G. From the concepts of meaning and reference to the concept of prototypicality. Onomazein. 2020;(49):68–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.49.04
20. Chilton P. Discourse Space Theory: Geometry, Brain and Shifting Viewpoint. Annu Rev Cogn Linguist. 2005;(January 2005):78–116. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312368358_Discourse_space_theory_geometry_brain_and_shifting_viewpoints
21. Wirth-Koliba V. The Diverse and Dynamic World of “Us” and “Them” in Political Discourse. Crit Approaches to Discourse Anal across Discip [Internet]. 2016;8(1):23–37. Available from: http://cadaad.net/ejournal
22. Sandal Önal E. Dimensions of Othering: Boundaries, group narratives, and the impact on political diversity [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361003341
23. Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
24. Miles MB. Qualitative Data Analysis. Vol. 11, Sustainability (Switzerland). 2014. 1–14 p. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Qualitative_Data_Analysis.html?hl=id&id=3CNrUbTu6CsC&redir_esc=y
25. Cooper D, Schindler P. The Twelfth Edition of Business Research Methods [Internet]. 2014. 1–723 p. Available from: www.mhhe.com https://contents.lspr.ac.id/2022/05/Donald-R-Cooper-Pamela-S-Schindler-Business-Research-Methods.pdf
26. Lim WM. What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australas Mark J. 2024;1–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
27. Setianto WA. The banality of Political Communication in Indonesian Presidential Election. J ASPIKOM. 2023;8(2):343–56. https://jurnalaspikom.org/index.php/aspikom/article/view/1335
28. Limenta ME, Chandra S. Indonesian Food Security Policy. Indones Law Rev. 2017;7(2). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/ilrev/vol7/iss2/6?utm_source=scholarhub.ui.ac.id%2Filrev%2Fvol7%2Fiss2%2F6&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
29. Lee SY. An Urban Explanation of Jokowi’s Rise: Implications for Politics and Governance in Post-Suharto Indonesia. J Curr Southeast Asian Aff. 2021;40(2):293–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103421990853
30. Seyranian V. Social identity framing communication strategies for mobilizing social change. Leadersh Q [Internet]. 2014;25(3):468–86. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.013
31. Bien DH. Construal and Its Representative Forms in Cognitive Linguistics. DALAT Univ J Sci [Internet]. 2021;11(3):3–27. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351936254_CONSTRUAL_AND_ITS_REPRESENTATIVE_FORMS_IN_COGNITIVE_LINGUISTICS
32. Mulyani M, Nurviyani V. The Analysis of Soekarno's Speech on Nation Foundation: Demystifying the Ideology of Pancasila Using Foucauldian Methods. In: Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research (ASSEHR). 2017. p. 122–6. https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-16.2017.26.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Murni Fidiyanti, Suhartono, Syamsul Sodiq (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
