Phonological awareness and reading skills: a correlational study from pedagogical practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251605Keywords:
phonological awareness, reading comprehension, written production, early literacy, pedagogical practiceAbstract
Phonological awareness has been widely recognized as a key skill in learning to read and write, particularly during the early years of formal education. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between phonological awareness and the development of reading and writing skills students from a public educational institution in Ecuador. A quantitative, correlational, and cross-sectional approach was used, with a sample of 160 students. Standardized instruments were applied to assess phonological awareness, reading comprehension, reading fluency, and written production. Additional information was collected regarding students’ frequency of out-of-school reading. Statistical analyses included Pearson correlations, one-way ANOVA, and Student’s t-test. The findings revealed significant positive correlations between phonological awareness and reading comprehension (r = 0.46), as well as written production (r = 0.41), confirming the influence of this metalinguistic skill on academic performance. However, reading frequency outside school did not show statistically significant differences in phonological awareness levels among the groups compared (p > 0.05). These results suggest that reading alone, without explicit pedagogical guidance, may not be sufficient to foster phonological development. It was concluded that systematic and planned instruction in phonological awareness must be an integral part of early literacy programs. Additionally, enhancing teacher training in phonological strategies and promoting family reading practices with guided support are recommended. This research provides relevant empirical evidence for the design of sustainable interventions in Latin American school contexts and contributes to the ongoing discussion on educational quality and effective literacy learning.
References
1. Adams MJ. Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990.
2. Alegría J, Domínguez A. Evaluación de la conciencia fonológica en lengua española. Rev Psicodidáctica. 2017;22(2):129–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2016.09.002
3. Bravo L, Guzmán L. Currículo y conciencia fonológica: análisis de su integración en programas oficiales. Educ y Pedagogía. 2020;32(83):113–29.
4. Bravo-Valdivieso L, Villalón R, Orellana E. Estrategias fonológicas y conciencia metalingüística en la lectura inicial. Psicol Esc Educ. 2020;24(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-35392020205728
5. Bus AG, van IJzendoorn MH, Pellegrini AD. Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Rev Educ Res. 1995;65(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065001001
6. Castro J, Guzmán M. Diagnóstico de habilidades lectoras en estudiantes de primaria en América Latina. Rev Educ Latinoam. 2022;57(2):89–104.
7. Catts HW, Fey ME, Zhang X, Tomblin JB. Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Sci Stud Read. 2001;5(4):281–300.
8. Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Langdon R, Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol Rev. 2001;108(1):204–56.
9. Cordero L, López V. Evaluación de la conciencia fonológica y lectura en niños bilingües. Rev Latinoam Psicol. 2019;51(3):205–14. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2019.v51.n3.5
10. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2018.
11. Dehaene S. How we learn: Why brains learn better than any machine… for now. Penguin; 2021.
12. Ehri LC. Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Sci Stud Read. 2014;18(1):5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356
13. Ehri LC, Nunes SR, Stahl SA, Willows DM. Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res. 2001;71(3):393–447.
14. Gillon GT. Phonological awareness: From research to practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2017.
15. Goswami U. Cognitive development and literacy learning: The dynamic interplay of brain and experience. Dev Sci. 2020;23(1):e12844. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12844
16. Høien T, Lundberg I. Dyslexia: From theory to intervention. Dordrecht: Springer; 2000.
17. Jiménez JE, Guzmán R. Relación entre conciencia fonológica y comprensión lectora en lengua española. Rev Psicol Educ. 2019;25(1):45–58.
18. Jiménez JE, O'Shanahan I. Eficacia de un programa de intervención fonológica para la mejora de la lectura en estudiantes hispanohablantes. An Psicol. 2021;37(2):277–86. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.430141
19. Lonigan CJ, Shanahan T. Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy; 2008.
20. López M, García J, Herrera F. Conciencia fonológica y rendimiento lector en escolares de Quito. Rev Investig Educ. 2023;18(1):66–78.
21. Melby-Lervåg M, Lyster SA, Hulme C. Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2012;138(2):322–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026744
22. Ministerio de Educación de Ecuador. Currículo de Educación General Básica. Quito: MINEDUC; 2020.
23. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2019.
24. Mol SE, Bus AG. To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychol Bull. 2011;137(2):267–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890
25. Mousty P, Leybaert J, Alegría J. BEPROLE: Batería de Evaluación del Procesamiento Lector. Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée; 1994.
26. Nag S, Perfetti C. The learning challenge: Teaching decoding in alphabetic and nonalphabetic orthographies. In: Joshi RM, Aaron PG, editors. Handbook of orthography and literacy. New York: Routledge; 2013. p. 189–205.
27. National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment. Washington, DC: NIH; 2000.
28. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2015.
29. Pérez J, Vásquez T. Formación docente y estrategias fonológicas en el aula ecuatoriana. Educ Real. 2022;7(3):88–95.
30. Rodríguez A, Morales S, Paredes D. Desarrollo fonológico y dificultades lectoras: un estudio en escuelas públicas de Ecuador. Rev Latinoam Psicol Educ. 2022;10(2):123–36.
31. Snow CE. Who's at risk for early school failure? In: Neuman SB, Dickinson DK, editors. Handbook of early literacy research. New York: Guilford Press; 2001. p. 97–110.
32. Solari EJ, Sánchez del Rosario C. Predictors of phonological awareness in Mexican children from low-income families. Early Child Educ J. 2020;48(1):57–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00960-8
33. Torgesen JK. Preventing reading failure: What does the research say? In: Neuman SB, Dickinson DK, editors. Handbook of early literacy research. New York: Guilford Press; 2001. p. 269–81.
34. UNESCO. Informe GEM 2023: Inclusión y educación. París: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura; 2023.
35. UNICEF. Informe de brechas de aprendizaje en América Latina y el Caribe. Nueva York: Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia; 2021.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Verónica Zaldumbide López, Edison Andrade-Sánchez, Newton Antonio Gallardo Pérez (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
