Module of Environmental Science to Improve Environmental Worldview in Students of Higher Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251508

Keywords:

Module, Environmental Science, Environmental Worldview, New Ecological Paradigm

Abstract

Introduction: A low environmental worldview contributes significantly to several environmental problems. It often leads to a lack of understanding and appreciation of the environment, which fosters negative behaviour towards environmental conservation and sustainability. Of course, efforts must be made to overcome these problems, one of which is through the education sector. This study aims to analyze the role of the module of environmental science in improving students' environmental worldviews.

Methods: This research includes quasi-experimental designs with the type of nonrandomized control-group pretest-posttest design. The participants in this study were students of the biology education study program, with as many as four classes and a total of 78 students. The selected classes were equivalent classes obtained from the results of the equality test, and they were willing to become research participants. The New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) scale measured the environmental worldviews.

Results: The results showed that there was a significant difference in the use of teaching materials of environmental science on environmental worldview with a p-value of 0.000. E-module of environmental science based on PjBL and module of environmental science based on PjBL play an important role in facilitating an environmental worldview by integrating scientific content that can increase engagement through interactive learning. 

Conclusions: By utilizing e-modules and modules, educators can educate an environmentally conscious generation ready to tackle today’s pressing environmental issues. Applying an environmental worldview is essential to understanding and promoting pro-environmental behaviour. Enhancing the environmental worldview through education can foster more positive environmental behaviour, which is essential for effective environmental management.

References

1. Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE. Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues. 2000;56(3):425–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176

2. Dunlap RE. The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use. The Journal of Environmental Education. 2008 Sep 1;40(1):3–18. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.1.3-18

3. Ong AKS. 3D Bioprinted Meat: The Values-Beliefs-Norms Evaluation of Perceived Future Food Source Among Younger Generations. British Food Journal. 2024;126(9):3505–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2024-0283

4. Lu P. Exploring the Environmentally Responsible Behavior of Generations Y and Z From a Cross-Cultural Perspective in the Context of Nature-Based Tourism. Land. 2023;12(10):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101909

5. Wu L. The Relationships Between Environmental Sensitivity, Ecological Worldview, Personal Norms and Pro‐environmental Behaviors in Chinese Children: Testing the Value–belief–norm Model With Environmental Sensitivity as an Emotional Basis. Psych Journal. 2018;7(3):111–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.217

6. Woodworth BL, Steen-Adams MM, Mittal P. Role of an Environmental Studies Course on the Formation of Environmental Worldviews: A Case Study of a Core Curriculum Requirement Using the NEP Scale. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. 2011;1(2):126–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-011-0013-4

7. Ling S, Landon A, Tarrant M, Rubin D. Sustainability Education and Environmental Worldviews: Shifting a Paradigm. Sustainability. 2020;12(19):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198258

8. Liobikienė G, Poškus MS. The Importance of Environmental Knowledge for Private and Public Sphere Pro-Environmental Behavior: Modifying the Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Sustainability. 2019;11(12):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123324

9. Sueb, Suhadi, Suwarni, Shofiyah A, Putri DR, Diartika EI, et al. Correlation between Age and Environmental Concern at Tourism Village in Malang, East Java, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019;546(2):1–6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/546/2/022025

10. Sueb, Suwarni, Suhadi, Putri DR, Zahroh VRA, Shofiyah A, et al. Community Environmental Awareness of Tourism Area in Jodipan and Arema Village. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2020 Apr 21;2231(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0002734

11. Suhadi, Sueb, Syamsussabri M. Mercury and Cyanide Pollution on the Aquatic Organism in Sekotong People Gold Mining. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1417(1):1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012032

12. Suhadi, Zubaidah S, Sueb, Farahilda R, Syamsussabri M, Rochmah AN. Identification of Mercury and Cyanide Degrading Bacteria in Sekotong People’s Mining. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Biology, Science and Education (IcoBioSE 2021). Atlantis Press International BV; 2023. p. 354–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-166-1_46

13. Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A, Tassell-Matamua N. Worldviews and Environmental Ethics: Contributions of Brain Processing Networks. EXPLORE. 2023;19(5):630–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.explore.2023.03.005

14. Bányai O. The Theory of Worldviews from an Environmental Law Perspective. World Futures. 2021;77(8):613–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2021.1929790

15. Hyytinen H, Laakso S, Pietikäinen J, Ratvio R, Ruippo L, Tuononen T, et al. Perceived Interest in Learning Sustainability Competencies Among Higher Education Students. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2023;24(9):118–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2022-0198

16. Landrum NE, Ohsowski BM. Identifying Worldviews on Corporate Sustainability: A Content Analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reports. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2017;27(1):128–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1989

17. Köhrsen J. Eco-Spirituality in Environmental Action. Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture. 2018;12(1):34–54. https://doi.org/10.1558/jsrnc.33915

18. Abu-Rayash A, Sabbah E. Analysis of Environmental Sustainability in the Holy Quran: Maqasid Framework. Journal of Contemporary Maqasid Studies. 2023;2(1):61–94. https://dx.doi.org/10.52100/jcms.v2i1.96

19. Torkar G, Debevec V, Johnson B, Manoli CC. Assessing Children’s Environmental Worldviews and Concerns. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. 2020;11(1):49–65. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.793

20. Peterson. The Very Idea of an Ecological Worldview. Ethics and the Environment. 2021;26(1):21–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2979/ETHICSENVIRO.26.1.02

21. Syamsussabri M, Suhadi, Sueb. The Effect of Environmental Pollution Module on Environmental Worldview in Senior High School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1417(1):1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012076

22. Sueb, Muhdhar MHI Al, Zahroh VRA. The Effect of Inquiry-Based Ecosystem Learning Module from Fishponds as a Learning Resource on Students’ Cognitive Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021;1842(1):1–6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012041

23. Purnama CY, Srisayekti W, Fitriana E, Djunaidi A. Pro-environmental Behavior to Improve the Quality of Life with Social Value Orientation as Moderator: Findings from Indonesia. International Journal of Environmental Health Research. 2024;1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2024.2415902

24. Starovoitova M, Vodneva S, Klets T, Nikiforova E, Presnyakova N. Ecological Worldview Formation of Engineering Students in the Context of Foreign Language Training. Environment Technology Resources Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. 2021;2:267–73. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2021vol2.6585

25. Goldschagg P, Long D. Influencing Generations: Pre-Service Teachers’ Environmental Worldviews at a South African University. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education. 2021;37(1):106–23. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajee.v37i1.8

26. Reddy C. Environmental Education, Social Justice and Teacher Education: Enabling Meaningful Environmental Learning in Local Contexts. South African Journal of Higher Education. 2021 Mar 21;35(1):161–77. https://doi.org/10.20853/35-1-4427

27. Aswirna P. Integrated Science E-Module Assisted by the Flip PDF Professional Application to Integrate Character Education Values in Science Learning for Junior High Schools. Journal of Natural Science and Integration. 2023;6(1):14–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v6i1.16262

28. Tanti T, Kurniawan DA, Anggraini L, Perdana R. Digitalisation Guide Book of Basic Physics Practicum Equilibrium Material. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan. 2021;23(1):70–80. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v23i1.14646

29. Maurer M, Koulouris P, Bogner FX. Green Awareness in Action—How Energy Conservation Action Forces on Environmental Knowledge, Values and Behaviour in Adolescents’ School Life. Sustainability. 2020;12(3):1–15. http://doi.org/10.3390/su12030955

30. Retnowati R, Awaludin M, Heryawati ER. Developing an Integrated Biology Module for Students’ Environmental Attitude Instruments. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia). 2020;6(2):327–34. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.11163

31. Sueb S, Damayanti J. The Effect of Macrozoobenthos Diversity Module based on Problem-based Learning on Junior High School Students’ Environmental Attitudes. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 2021 Sep 29;10(3):400–6. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30766

32. Susilawati S, Aznam N, Paidi P, Irwanto I. Socio-Scientific Issues as a Vehicle to Promote Soft Skills and Environmental Awareness. European Journal of Educational Research. 2021;10(1):161–74. http://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.161

33. Kement Ü, Çavuşoğlu S, Çalik İ, Durmaz Y. The Effect of Environmental Value and Ecological Worldview on Eco-Recreative Attitude: An Application in Turkey. Tourism & Management Studies. 2023;19(2):7–19. https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2023.190201

34. Blye CJ, Hvenegaard GT, Halpenny E. Are We Creatures of Logic or Emotions? Investigating the Role of Attitudes, Worldviews, Emotions, and Knowledge Gain From Environmental Interpretation on Behavioural Intentions of Park Visitors. Journal of Outdoor Recreation Education and Leadership. 2023;15(1):9–28. https://doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2022-11654

35. Asilsoy B, Oktay D. Understanding Environmental Worldview of Famagusta Residents and Its Determinants Through Survey Research. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture. 2016;10(5):544–52. http://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2016.05.003

36. Švajda J, Koróny S, Zięba A, Adamski P. Perceptions of Natural Disturbance in Tatra National Park, Poland. Central European Forestry Journal. 2016;62(2):105–9. https://sciendo.com/article/10.1515/forj-2016-0011

37. Flanagan CA, Gallay E, Pykett A, Smallwood M. The Environmental Commons in Urban Communities: The Potential of Place-Based Education. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10(1):1–11. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00226

38. Tsai MN, Liao YF, Chang YL, Chen HC. A Brainstorming Flipped Classroom Approach for Improving Students’ Learning Performance, Motivation, Teacher-student Interaction and Creativity in a Civics Education Class. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2020;38(September):100747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100747

39. Zunaidah A. Meaningful Synergy in E-Learning Integrating Environmental Awareness and Project-Based Learning in EFL. Academy of Education Journal. 2024;15(1):816–25. http://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v15i1.2314

40. Dalida CS, Malto GAO, Lagunzad CGB. Enhancing Students’ Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes Through Community-Based Learning. In: Kne Social Sciences. 2018. p. 205–20. http://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i6.2381

41. Rahmayati R, Rengganis R. Literary Works Based on Environment as Teaching Materials in Literature Learning Oriented Environmental Education. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Progressive Education. 2021. p. 1–10. http://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-10-2020.2305238

42. Eilam E, Trop T. Environmental Attitudes and Environmental Behavior—Which Is the Horse and Which Is the Cart? Sustainability. 2012;4(9):2210–46. http://doi.org/10.3390/su4092210

43. Akhmedova I, Pinigina E, Prituzhalova O, Sulkarnaeva L, Zherebyateva N. Experience of Environmental Education Products Designing. In: Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. 2020. p. 673–80. http://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200324.125

44. Zhao H, Chen HX, Huang Z. Comparative Study of Environmental Education at Home and Abroad. Advanced Materials Research. 2012;524(527):2505–9. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.524-527.2505.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-18

How to Cite

1.
Syamsussabri M, Suhadi S, Sueb S, Sari MS. Module of Environmental Science to Improve Environmental Worldview in Students of Higher Education. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 18 [cited 2025 Apr. 18];5:1508. Available from: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/1508