Does Adaptive e-Module (Ae-M) effective in enhancing students’ numeracy literacy ability?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251480Keywords:
Literacy numeracy, Adaptive e-Module, learning style, Plomp ModelAbstract
Numeracy literacy is an important skill for students to master. Nevertheless, the numeracy literacy ability of students who were still low. For this reason, it is necessary to design textbooks that are suitable for students with different learning styles. Ae-M is a digital teaching material designed for students with different learning styles. Learning using Ae-M is suitable for differentiated learning strategies which are peculiarities of the independent curriculum in Indonesia. Differentiated learning views all students as having their own uniqueness in learning. Numeracy literacy ability is one of the learning objectives in the independent curriculum. The purpose of the study was to reveal whether the use of Ae-M was effective in enhancing the numeracy literacy ability of students. This type of research is development research with the Plomp model which consists of three phases, namely preliminary research, development or prototyping phase, and assessment phase. The instruments used are interview guidelines, observation sheets, checklists, questionnaires, and numeracy literacy ability tests. The results showed that Ae-M was able to facilitate students according to their learning styles and improve numeracy literacy ability. The use of video is able to facilitate visual and auditory students in learning. With activities that use digital media, kinesthetic students can do learning according to their learning style. The conclusion of this research is Ae-M was effective in enhancing the numeracy literacy ability of students.
References
1. Ambarwati D, Kurniasih MD. Pengaruh Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Media YouTube Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa. J Cendekia J Pendidik Mat. 2021;5(3):2857–68.
2. Ate D, Lede YK. Analisis Kemampuan Siswa Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Literasi Numerasi. J Cendekia J Pendidik Mat. 2022;6(1):472–83.
3. Tasyanti T, Wardono, Rochmad. Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Berdasarkan Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation. In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika. 2018. p. 334–46.
4. Sa’adah A, Ningrum FZ, Farikha N. Scaffolding Dalam Pembelajaran Trigonometri Berbantuan Soal Hots Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Matematika. Semin Nas Pendidik Mat UNIKAL. 2021;2(1).
5. Widiantari NKK, Suparta IN, Sariyasa. Meningkatkan Literasi Numerasi dan Pendidikan Karakter dengan e-Modul Bermuatan Etnomatematika. J Ilm Pendidik Mat. 2022;10(2):331–43.
6. Widiastuti ER, Kurniasih MD. Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Software Cabri 3D V2 Terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa. J Cendekia J Pendidik Mat. 2021;5(2):1687–99.
7. Atasoy R, Güçlü N. Evaluation of Numeracy Skills of Adults According to the Results of PIAAC 2015 in Turkey. World J Educ. 2020;10(2):27–49.
8. Ellefson MR, Zachariou A, NG FF-Y, Wang Q, Hughes C. Do Executive Functions Mediate the Link Between Socioeconomic Status and Numeracy Skills? A Cross-Site Comparison of Hong Kong and the United Kingdom. J Exp Child Psychol. 2020;1–48.
9. Rosidi AA, Nimah M, Rahayu E. Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa SMP Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. J Kewarganegaraan. 2022;6(2):3303–15.
10. Pulungan SA. Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi pada Materi Persamaan Linear Siswa SMP PAB 2 Helvetia. J Teach Educ [Internet]. 2022;3(3):266–74. Available from: https://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id/index.php/jote/article/view/4574/3287
11. Winarni S, Kumalasari A, Marlina, Rohati. Efektivitas Video Pembelajaran Matematika Untuk Mendukung Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Dan Digital Siswa. J Progr Stud Pendidik Mat. 2021;10(2):574–83.
12. Larasaty BM, Mustiani, Pratini HS. Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Bopkri 3 Yogyakarta Melalui Pendekatan PMRI Berbasis PISA pada Materi Pokok SPLDV. In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Etnomatnesia [Internet]. 2018. p. 622–33. Available from: https://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/etnomatnesia/article/view/2393
13. Ayuningtyas N, Sukriyah D. Analisis Pengetahuan Numerasi Mahasiswa Matematika Calon Guru. Delta-Pi J Mat dan Pendidik Mat. 2020;9(2):237–47.
14. Pangesti FTP. Menumbuhkembangkan Literasi Numerasi pada Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Soal HOTS. Indones Digit J Math Educ. 2018;5(9):566–75.
15. Patriana WD, Sutama, Wulandari MD. Pembudayaan Literasi Numerasi untuk Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum dalam Kegiatan Kurikuler pada Sekolah Dasar Muhammadiyah. J Basicedu. 2021;5(5):3413–29.
16. Evans J, Yasukawa K, Mallows D, Creese B. Numeracy Skills and the Numerate Environment: Affordances and Demands. Adults Learn Math An Int J. 2017;12(1):17–26.
17. Arnawa IM, Yerizon, Nita S. Improvement Students’ Level of Proof Ability in Abstract Algebra Trough APOS Theory Approach. Int J Sci Technol Res. 2019;8(7):128–31.
18. Yulianti E, Jaya I, Eliza D. Pengaruh Role Playing Terhadap Pengenalan Literasi Numerasi di Taman Kanak-Kanak Twin Course Pasaman Barat. Aulad J Early Child. 2019;2(2):41–50.
19. Winarni S, Kumalasari A, Marlina, Rohati. Efektivitas Video Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Mendukung Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi dan Digital Siswa. Aksioma J Progr Stud Pendidik Mat. 2021;10(2):574–83.
20. Wulandari W, Fauziati E. Merdeka Belajar Dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Yang Membebaskan Paulo Freire. J Ilm Indones. 2016;7(3):1–23.
21. Marlina. Panduan Pelaksanaan Model Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi di Sekolah Inklusif. 2019. 1–63 p.
22. Marks A, Woolcott G, Markopoulos C. Differentiating Instruction: Development of a Practice Framework for and with Secondary Mathematics Classroom Teachers. Int Electron J Math Educ. 2021;16(3):1–19.
23. Smets W, Struyven K. A Teachers’ Professional Development Programme to Implement Differentiated Instruction in Secondary Education: How Far do Teachers Reach? Cogent Educ [Internet]. 2020;7:1–17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1742273
24. Hiruy A, Melesse S. Examining Theory-practice Gap in Implementing Differentiated Instruction (DI) in the Ethiopian TVET System: The Case of TVET Colleges in Bahir Dar City. Cogent Educ [Internet]. 2022;9(1):1–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2114223
25. Godor BP. The Many Faces of Teacher Differentiation: Using Q Methodology to Explore Teachers Preferences for Differentiated Instruction. Teach Educ [Internet]. 2021;56(1):43–60. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2020.1785068
26. Hanifah AN, Mirna, Mulianty HR, Fitriani N. Hubungan Antara Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis dengan Habits of Mind Siswa SMK yang Menggunakan Pendekatan Model Eliciting Activities (MEAs). J Pembelajaran Mat Inov. 2018;1(1):29–36.
27. Altun H, Serin O. Determination of Learning Styles and Achievements of Talented Students in the Fields of Science and Mathematics. Cypriot J Educ Sci. 2019;14(1):80–9.
28. Carvalho JV, Pereira RH, Rocha Á. A Systematic Literature Review on Maturity Models for Information Systems in Higher Education Institutions. Innov Educ Teach Int [Internet]. 2020;57(4):434–49. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1648219
29. Nurtanto M, Kholifah N, Masek A, Sudira P, Samsudin A. Crucial Problems in Arranged the Lesson Plan of Vocational Teacher. Int J Eval Res Educ. 2021;10(1):345–54.
30. Rodríguez-gómez G, Quesada-serra V, Ibarra-sáiz MS. Learning-oriented e-Assessment: The Effects of a Training and Guidance Programme on Lecturers’ Perceptions. Assess Eval High Educ. 2014;1–18.
31. Haelermans C. The Effects of Group Differentiation by Students’ Learning Strategies. Instr Sci. 2022;50:223–50.
32. Alhafiz N. Analisis Profil Gaya Belajar Siswa untuk Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi di SMP Negeri 23 Pekanbaru. J Pengabdi Kpd Masy. 2022;1(8):1913–22.
33. Herwina W. Optimalisasi debutuhan Murid dan Hasil Belajar Dengan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi. Perspekt Ilmu Pendidik. 2021;35(2):175–82.
34. Variacion DA, Salic-Hairulla M, Bagaloyos J. Development of Differentiated Activities in Teaching Science: Educators’ Evaluation and Self-reflection on Differentiation and Flexible Learning. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. p. 1–11.
35. Sudiara IK. Penerapan Pengunaan LKS Berstruktur dalam Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika pada Materi Bangun Datar Segiempat dan Segitiga. Inovasi [Internet]. 2022;8(9):21–5. Available from: https://jurnalinovasi.org/
36. Cindyana EA, Alim JA, Noviana E. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Berbantuan Materi Ajar Geometri Berbasis RME Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Kelas 3 Sekolah Dasar. J Pendidik dan Pengajaran. 2022;6(4):1179–87.
37. Bondie RS, Dahnke C, Zusho A. How Does Changing “One-Size-Fits-All” to Differentiated Instruction Affect Teaching? Rev Res Educ. 2019;43:336–62.
38. de Jager T. Perspectives of Teachers on Differentiated Teaching in Multi-Cultural South African Secondary Schools. Stud Educ Eval [Internet]. 2016;53:115–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.004
39. Gaitas S, Martins MA. Teacher Perceived Difficulty in Implementing Differentiated Instructional Strategies in Primary School. Int J Incl Educ. 2016;1–13.
40. Azis TN. Strategi Pembelajaran Era Digital. In: Annual Conference on Islamic Education and Social Sains. 2019. p. 308–18.
41. Ferdianto F, Dwiniasih. Learning Management System (LMS) Schoology: Why it’s Important and What it Looks Like. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019. p. 1–6.
42. Yilmaz R. Perspective Mathematics Teachers’ Cognitive Competencies on Realistic Mathematics Education. J Math Educ. 2020;11(1):17–44.
43. Ouyang F, Scharber C. The Influences of an Experienced Instructor’s Discussion Design and Facilitation on an Online Learning Community Development: A Social Network Analysis Study. Internet High Educ. 2017;35:34–47.
44. Mariani M, Borghi M. Industry 4.0: A Bibliometric Review of its Managerial Intellectual Structure and Potential Evolution in the Service Industries. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2019;149:1–24.
45. Lee L, Hung JC. Effects of Blended e-Learning: A Case Study in Higher Education Tax Learning Setting. Human-centric Comput Inf Sci [Internet]. 2015;5(13):1–15. Available from: ???
46. Ramadanti F, Mutaqin A, Hendrayana A. Pengembangan e-Modul Matematika Berbasis PBL (Problem Based Learning) pada Materi Penyajian Data untuk Siswa SMP. J Cendekia J Pendidik Mat. 2021;5(3):2733–45.
47. Nasution DH, Yerizon. Development of Student Worksheets Based on Discovery Learning to Improve Student Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in Class X Senior High School. Int J Sci Technol Res. 2019;8(6):228–31.
48. Series C. Development of an Android-Based for Math E- Module by using Adobe Flash Professional CS6 for Grade X Students of Senior High School Development of an Android-Based for Math E-Module by using Adobe Flash Professional CS6 for Grade X Students of. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1742(1):1–7.
49. Martin M, Syamsuri S, Pujiastuti H, Hendrayana A. Pengembangan E-Modul Berbasis Pendekatan Contextual Teaching And Learning Pada Materi Barisan Dan Deret Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Siswa SMP. J Deriv J Mat dan Pendidik Mat. 2021;8(2):72–87.
50. Sulistyaningrum A, Makmuri, Aziz TA. Pengembangan Modul Elektronik Matematika Berbasis Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry pada Materi Logaritma SMA Kelas X. J Ris Pembelajaran Mat Sekol. 2022;6(2):69–79.
51. Utami RE, Nugroho AA, Dwijayanti I, Sukarno A. Pengembangan E-Modul Berbasis Etnomatematika Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. JNPM (Jurnal Nas Pendidik Mat. 2018;2(2):268.
52. Plomp T, Nieveen N. Educational Design Research Educational Design Research. Netherlands Inst Curric Dev SLO. 2013;1–206.
53. Jannah N, Yerizon, Arnawa IM. The Effects of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Model on the Improvement of Student’s Mathematical Problem Solving Skill in MAN Pekanbaru City. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. p. 1–6.
54. Fitriani N, Arnawa IM. An Initial Observation of Learning Devices and Mathematical Problem Solving Ability of Senior High School Students. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020. p. 1–7.
55. Putri I, Armiati, Permana D, Yerizon. Curriculum Analysis Design and Creative Product Craft Expertise Program in the Developing the Mathematics Learning Devices Based on Realistic Mathematics Education Approach. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020. p. 1–6.
56. Nasution ML, Yerizon Y, Gusmiyanti R. Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Abilities Through the Application of Learning Models Problem Based Learning. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2018;335(1).
57. Yerizon, Putra AA, Subhan M. Student Responses Toward Student Worksheets Based on Discovery Learning for Students with Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Intelligence. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018. p. 1–4.
58. Yerizon, Musdi E. Practicality of APOS-Mathematics Worksheet to Improve Student’s Mathematical Communication Ability of Seventh Grade Students in Junior High School. In: University of Muhammadiyah Malang’s 1st International Conference of Mathematics Education (INCOMED 2017). 2018. p. 222–4.
59. Juwita R, Fauzan A. Preliminary Reasearch Development of Mathematics Learning Device Based on Cognitive Conflict to Improve Critical Thinking Ability of 1st Grade Senior High School Students. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020. p. 1–5.
60. Hakim L, Noer SH. Penggunaan Multimedia Berbantuan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Berbasis Metode Penemuan Terbimbing. J Progr Stud Pendidik Mat. 2021;10(2):1234–41.
61. Khomariah N, Zawawi I, Suryanti S. Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Peserta Didik SMP Ditinjau dari Pola Pikir Matematis. Aksioma J Mat dan Pendidik Mat. 2022;13(3):381–91.
62. Rezky M, Hidayanto E, Parta IN. Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Konteks Sosial Budaya pada Topik Geometri Jenjang SMP. J Progr Stud Pendidik Mat. 2022;11(2):1548–62.
63. Hayati TR, Kamid. Analysis of Mathematical Literacy Processes in High School Students. Int J Trends Math Educ Res. 2019;2(3):116–9.
64. Aji BS, Bhakti CP. Pengembangan Modul Digital Eksplorasi Karir Berdasarkan Teori Multiple Intelligences untuk Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama. In: Seminar Nasional Bimbingan dan Konseling Islami. 2021. p. 199–213.
65. Ramadhani R, Fitri Y. EPUB3 Based Mathematical e-Modules Using the Sigil Application as A Solution in Teaching and Learning Process Through Covid-19 Pandemic. J Ilm Pendidik MIPA. 2021;11(1):35–48.
66. Bina NS, Ramadhani R, Hasan HI. Digitalisasi Pembelajaran Bermakna Melalui Perancangan Video Animasi Berbasis Powtoon Animation Bagi Guru Sekolah Dasar. J Masy Mandiri. 2022;6(4):2615–28.
67. Coman C, Țîru LG, Meseșan-Schmitz L, Stanciu C, Bularca MC. Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education during the Coronavirus Pandemic: Students’ Perspective. Sustainability. 2020;12:1–24.
68. Baron LS, Hogan TP, Schechter RL, Hook PE, Brooke EC. Can Educational Technology Effectively Differentiate Instruction for Reader Profiles? Read Writ [Internet]. 2019;32:2327–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09949-4
69. Aprima D, Sari S. Analisis Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka pada Pelajaran Matematika SD. Cendikia Media J Ilm Pendidik. 2022;13(1):95–101.
70. Damayanti HT, Sumardi. Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of Junior High School Students in Solving Open-ended Problem. J Res Adv Math Educ. 2018;3(1):36–45.
71. Lestari IA, Hanifah. Peningkatan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Serta Self Confidence Siswa SMP dengan Menggunakan Model Eliciting Activities (MEAs). In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. 2018. p. 459–68.
72. Wolla S. Evaluating the effectiveness of an online module for increasing financial literacy. Soc Stud Res Pract. 2017;12(2):154–67.
73. Sandy DN, Cholily YM, Zukhrufurrohmah, Ummah SK. Pengembangan Flipbook Bermuatan Literasi Numerasi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis. J Tadris Mat. 2022;5(2):135–48.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yerizon, Arnellis, Suherman, I Made Arnawa, Cholis Sa’dijah , Lathiful Anwar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
