The Effect Of Treffinger Type Cooperative Learning Model On Creativity And Problem-Solving Ability In Class XI Science Students Of Sman 6 Padang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251468Keywords:
Cooperative Learning Models, Learning Treffinger, Creativity, Problem-Solving AbilityAbstract
This research aims to investigate the effect of the cooperative learning type Treffinger for creativity and problem-solving conferences of students at class XI of SMAN 6 Padang. The type of this research is quasi quasi-experimental research design using factorial 2x2. Technical sampling is cluster random sampling. The beginning of data were collected from day examination I. The results of the data cognitive were collected from the final test using an essay instrument test. The Affective data were collected from observation using paper format observation. Then psychomotor data were collected from practice using rubric psychomotor. Technical Data analysis cognitive, affective, and psychomotor using two-way ANOVA test with differentiates’ test. The results showed that there is Student’creativity who had cooperative Learning type Treffinger was higher than students who had a conventional learning approach. Student’creativity with beginning high competence was higher than students' lower competence in cooperative Learning type Treffinger. There was no interaction between cooperative Learning type Treffinger with beginning competence in influencing creativity. Students’ problem solving that had cooperative Learning type Treffinger was higher than students who had conventional learning approach. Students’ problem-solving with beginning high competence was higher than students with beginning lower competence in cooperative Learning type Treffinger. There was no interaction between the cooperative learning type Treffinger with beginning competence in influencing problem-solving.
References
1. Arnawa IM. J-Rafki-Made. 2018;285(Icm2e):144–9.
2. Depdiknas. Undang-Undang RI Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 2003.
3. Ismail RN, Yerizon, Fauzan A. Students’ Perception of the Digital Learning System for Junior High Schools in Padang, Indonesia. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences. 2023;50(1):10–9.
4. Ismail RN, Arnawa IM, Yerizon Y. Student worksheet usage effectiveness based on realistics mathematics educations toward mathematical communication ability of junior high school student. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1554(1).
5. Depdiknas. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta; 2006.
6. Ismail RN, Yerizon, Fauzan A. Exploring Self-Regulated Learning and Their Impact on Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills on the Topic of Number Patterns With the Blended Learning System. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice. 2023;23(16):207–24.
7. Ismail RN, Fauzan A, Yerizon. Analysis of students’ motivation and self-regulation profiles in online mathematics learning junior high school at Padang city. AIP Conf Proc. 2023;2698(May 2020).
8. Arnellis A, Syarifuddin H, Ismail RN. Optimizing students’ mathematical critical and creative thinking skills through the flip-a-team model with e-learning. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 2023;14(1):133–40.
9. Syarifuddin H, Riza Y, Harisman Y, Ismail RN. Students’ Response to the Use of a Flipped Learning Model (FLM) in Abstract Algebra Course [Internet]. Atlantis Press SARL; 2023. 1435–1441 p. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-35-0_172
10. Ismail RN, Fauzan A, Yerizon, Arnawa IM. Analysis of Student Learning Independence as the Basis for the Development of Digital Book Creations Integrated by Realistic Mathematics. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1742(1).
11. Syah M. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada; 2009.
12. Polamato SW. Pengaruh Penerapan Model Treffinger pada Pembelajaran Matematika dalam Mengembangkan Kemampuan Kreatif dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia; 2005.
13. Haryono AD. Pembelajaran model treffinger untuk menumbuhkan kreativitas dalam pemecahan masalah operasi hitung pecahan siswa kelas V SD Islam Bani Hasyim Singosari Malang. Universitas Negeri Malang; 2010.
14. Adzkia S. THE EFFECTS OF TREFFINGER LEARNING MODEL TOWARDS SCIENCE LEARNING OUTCOMES IN CLASS V SDN 43 SUNGAI SAPIH PADANG THE EFFECTS OF TREFFINGER LEARNING MODEL TOWARDS SCIENCE LEARNING OUTCOMES IN CLASS V SDN 43 SUNGAI SAPIH PADANG. 2021;(October 2019).
15. Ridwan R, Ridwan, Supriyadi E, Nurmanita M. The Effect of Treffinger Learning Model on Critical Thinking Ability of Students in SMK 3 Yogyakarta. 2019;(2012):742–8.
16. Marta E, Elvina E, Efendi R, Rejeki R, Ginda AP, Angreani S. Treffinger Model on Student Learning Outcomes in Grade IV Science Learning at Elementary School. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 2024;10(3):1375–82.
17. Lasaiba MA, Lasaiba D. Enhancing Process Skills and Learning Outcomes: A Comparative Study of the Treffinger Learning Model. Journal of Innovative Science Education. 2023;12(2):180–91.
18. Sukatin S, Mahdeyeni M, Ginanjar A, Fatonah N, Meiliani E, Pahmi P. Blended Learning Model to Improve Learning Independence in Students of Elementary School Teacher Education. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan. 2023;15(1):433–42.
19. Wahyuningsih V, Hendikawati P, Mariani S. Meta Analysis : The Effect of Treffinger Learning Model on Students ’ Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability. 2025;09(01):75–86.
20. Putra Utama E, Sudarsana IK. Effectiveness of Treffinger Model Implementation to Improving Mathematics Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences. 2023;1(2):232–40.
21. Kurniawati F, Suyitno H, Mulyono M, Muhammadiyah Jatikulon Kudus M, Bulung Kulon DR, Jekulo Kab Kudus K. Mathematical Communication Ability in terms of Student Learning Styles in Inquiry Based Learning Assisted by Module. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research [Internet]. 2021;10(2):202–10. Available from: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer
22. Sari IP, Fathoni A. Problem Based Learning Model Assisted by Renderforest Video Animation on Mathematics Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Elementary Education [Internet]. 2022;6(3):648–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v6i4.56304
23. Mahanal S, Zubaidah S, Sumiati ID, Sari TM, Ismirawati N. RICOSRE: A learning model to develop critical thinking skills for students with different academic abilities. International Journal of Instruction. 2019;12(2):417–34.
24. JASMINE K. DIFFERENCES IN MATHEMATICS LEARNING OUTCOMES OF STUDENTS WHO ACQUIRED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING AND CONVENTIONAL LEARNING ON CUBE AND BEAM DISCOURSE IN CLASS VIII SMP N 16 BENGKULU CITY. Penambahan Natrium Benzoat Dan Kalium Sorbat (Antiinversi) Dan Kecepatan Pengadukan Sebagai Upaya Penghambatan Reaksi Inversi Pada Nira Tebu. 2014;5(April):63–70.
25. Ridwan R, Ridwan, Supriyadi E, Nurmanita M. The Effect of Treffinger Learning Model on Critical Thinking Ability of Students in SMK 3 Yogyakarta. 2019;(March).
26. Akbarani R, Putri NMAA. The Challenges of Using Treffinger Learning Model in Improving Speaking. ELTALL: English Language Teaching, Applied Linguistic and Literature. 2022;3(1):1.
27. Gusti VYK, Rahayu W. the Influence of the Treffinger Learning Model and Self-Directed Learning on Students’ Mathematic Critical Thinking Skills. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 2023;8(1):49–62.
28. Munandar U. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat / Utami Munandar. 2014.
29. Open DOF, Learning D. E d u c a t i o n.
30. Tibo P, Ginting NA. The Role of Religious Teachers in Increasing the Motivation of Students in Grade VII Catholic Religious Education and Budi Pekerti Subjects at Tri Sakti-1 Medan Junior High School. Journal of Educational Analytics. 2024;3(3):429–46.
31. MANGUNHARJANA. A.Pembinaan. 1986.
32. Rahayu, Wardani S, Haryani S, Baharuddin Bin Abdul Rahman M. International Journal of Active Learning Development of a Creativity-Based Cognitive Test Design to Measure Students’ Problem-Solving Abilities. 2023;8(1):21–30. Available from: http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/ijal
33. Meyer J, Speech N. Resolved : Creativity is a more powerful force than intelligence Table of Contents.
34. Fatmawati B, Jannah BM, Sasmita M. Students’ Creative Thinking Ability Through Creative Problem Solving based Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 2022;8(4):2384–8.
35. CoPo ARI. Students Initial Knowledge State And Test Design: Towards A Valid And Reliable Test Instrument. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC). 2015;12(3):189–94.
36. Ummah MS. PENGEMBANGKAN KREATIVITAS ANAK USIA DINI DI ERA REVOLUSI 4.0. Sustainability (Switzerland) [Internet]. 2019;11(1):1–14. Available from: http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI
37. Ambarita AE, Dibyantini RE, Sutiani A, Muchtar Z, Sinaga M. Development of Initial Ability Test Instrument Based on Science Generic Skills. Jurnal Pena Sains. 2024;11(1):18–26.
38. Ambarwangi S, Rachman M. Holistic Academic Supervision Model for Cultural Art Teachers of Vocational High Schools. Harmonia: Journal of Arts Research and Education. 2015;15(1):62.
39. Muhammad Ridha DS, Afridawati, Iskandar N, Mursal. Mapping the National Insight of the Salafi Group in Indonesia Based on their Fatwa on Social Media. Al-’Adalah. 2024;21(2):245–70.
40. Hasim W, Ariefka R, Prasetyo KB, Kunci K. Jurnal Lentera Pedagogi School Principal Leadership Style In Improving Teacher Performance In Elementary School Muhammadiyah Purbayan Yogyakarta. 2024;7(2):50–7.
41. Supriyanto E, Wardhono A. Development Lesson Material of Web Course Centric to Enforce Students’ Memory Store. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education. 2021;12(13):652–8.
42. Sua AT, Anshari, Maman M. The form, function, and value of buginese utterances of bone society. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2017;8(5):928–33.
43. Marmorat V. Prise En Charge Des Enfants Maltraites [1]. Arch Fr Pediatr. 1991;48(5):371.
44. Snyder TD, Hoffman CM. Digest of Education Statistics. Choice Reviews Online. 2014;51(10):51-5366-51–5366.
45. Torar L, Wahono. The Management of National Education in Year 2014/2015 at a Glance. Center for Educational and Cultural Data and Statistics [Internet]. 2016;124. Available from: http://publikasi.data.kemdikbud.go.id/uploadDir/isi_6549DA84-7A7F-44B5-AD22-829B1F002A4F_.pdf
46. Education Sector.pdf.
47. Suryadarma D, Jones GW. Education in Indonesia. Education in Indonesia. 2013. 1–278 p.
48. Salam A. Input, process and output: System approach in education to assure the quality and excellence in performance. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science. 2015;14(1):1–2.
49. Conway P, Murphy R, Rath A. Learning to teach and its implications for the continuum of teacher education: A nine-country cross-national study. The Teaching Council [Internet]. 2009;i–363. Available from: http://www.teachingcouncil.ie/_fileupload/Publications/LearningToTeach-ConwayMurphyRathHall-2009_10344263.pdf
50. Lee PJ. Evaluation Models. Statistical Methods for Estimating Petroleum Resources. 2008.
51. Sedova K, Navratilova J. Silent students and the patterns of their participation in classroom talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences [Internet]. 2020;29(4–5):681–716. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1794878
52. Getie AS. Factors affecting the attitudes of students towards learning English as a foreign language. Cogent Education [Internet]. 2020;7(1):1–37. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1738184
53. Daar GF. PROBLEMS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING IN CONTEXT (Based on some Studies in Manggarai). JPKMI (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Indonesia) [Internet]. 2020;1(2):116–24. Available from: file:///C:/Users/suani/Downloads/Problems of English Language Learning in Context (Based on some Studies in Manggarai) (1).pdf
54. Pitch N, Shell S, Point F. Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. University of California … [Internet]. 2012; Available from: http://software-carpentry.org/2011/12/organizing-instruction-and-study-to-improve-student-learning/
55. Mascolo M. Beyond student-centered and teacher-centered pedagogy: Teaching and learning as guided participation. Pedagogy and the Human Sciences. 2009;1(1):3–27.
56. Dawis AM, Meylani Y, Heryana N, Alfathoni MAM, Sriwahyuni E, Ristiyana R, et al. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. 2023. 195 p.
57. Winarto ProfDrME. Buku Metodologi Penelitian. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. 2018;(Mi):5–24.
58. Ummah MS. METODOLOGI PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF, KUALITATIF DAN KOMBINASI [Internet]. Vol. 11, Sustainability (Switzerland). 2019. 1–14 p. Available from: http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI
59. Saefudin AA. Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI). Al-Bidayah. 2012;4(1):37–48.
60. Rafki Nasuha Ismail, Mudjiran, Neviyarni HN. Creative Approach Guidance and Counseling Facing Independence Learning Policy: Minimum Competency Assessment and. Seminar Nasional: Jambore Konseling 3. 2017;00(00):XX–XX.
61. Pomalato SWD. Mengembangkan Kreativitas Matematik Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Pendekatan Model Treffinger. Mimbar Pendidikan. 2006;25(1):22–6.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ena Suma Indrawatia, Festiyed, Ratnawulan, Milya Sari (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
