What Makes Online Learning Effective from a Self-Regulated Learning Point of View
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251463Keywords:
Learning success, Student Achievement Index, Self-Regulated LearningAbstract
The transition to autonomous learning during the epidemic is a challenging and complex undertaking for educators and students. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between the five sub-variables of self-regulating learning and the student accomplishment index. This study employs the explanatory sequential design approach. The research sample was gathered at random. Data were collected from 500 samples of Yogyakarta State University students, totaling 29,451. Data gathering methods included an online questionnaire, interviews, and final exam results. The study's findings revealed that self-regulating online learning had an effect on students' cumulative achievement index with a Determinant Coefficient of 0.220. Self-regulated online learning goal formulation, environment structuring, task methods, time management, help-seeking, and self-evaluation all had a significant impact on the academic accomplishment index. The ability to define goals had the greatest contribution, while students' ability to seek aid was the least. Another aspect influencing the student accomplishment index is the psychological factor of students. More research is expected to improve the method of self-regulated online learning on the aid-seeking element.
References
1. Huang L, Zhang J, Liu Y. Antecedents of student MOOC revisit intention: Moderation effect of course difficulty. Int J Inf Manage. 2017;37(2):84–91.
2. Brahmasrene T, Lee JW. Determinants of intent to continue using online learning: A tale of Two Universities. Interdiscip J Information, Knowledge, Manag. 2012;7:1–20.
3. Guo Z, Xiao L, Van Toorn C, Lai Y, Seo C. Promoting online learners’ continuance intention: An integrated flow framework. Inf Manag. 2016;53(2):279–95.
4. Lee BC, Yoon JO, Lee I. Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Comput Educ. 2009;53(4):1320–9.
5. Karim A, Shahed FH, Rahman MM, Mohamed AR. Revisiting innovations in ELT through online classes: An evaluation of the approaches of 10 minute school. Turkish Online J Distance Educ. 2019;20(1):248–66.
6. Raes A, Vanneste P, Pieters M, Windey I, Van Den Noortgate W, Depaepe F. Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Comput Educ. 2020;143(April 2019):1–16.
7. Magd H, Nzomkunda A, Negi S, Ansari M. Critical Success Factors of E-Learning Implementation in Higher Education Institutions: A Proposed Framework for Success. An Int J. 2022;14(2s):20–38.
8. Helmi A. An analysis on the impetus of online education Curtin University of Technology, Western Australia. Internet High Educ. 2002;4(3–4):243–53.
9. Matsani N, Rafsanjani MA. Peran Kemandirian Belajar dalam Memediasi Pengaruh Motivasi Berprestasi terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Selama Pembelajaran Daring. J Pendidik Ekon Undiksha. 2021;13(1):9.
10. Boekaerts M. Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learn Instr. 1997;7(2):161–86.
11. Pintrich PR. A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educ Psychol Rev. 2004;16(4):385–407.
12. Zimmerman BJ. Attaining self-regulation : A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), handbook of self-Regulation. In: Cambridge, MA : Academic Press. 2000. p. 13–39.
13. Kim Y eun, Brady AC, Wolters CA. College students’ regulation of cognition, motivation, behavior, and context: Distinct or overlapping processes? Learn Individ Differ. 2020;80(May 2019):101872.
14. Pintrich P, Garcia T. Student Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: A LISREL Model. 1991;
15. Papamitsiou Z, Economides AA. Exploring autonomous learning capacity from a self-regulated learning perspective using learning analytics. Br J Educ Technol. 2019;50(6):3138–55.
16. Carver, C.S. and Scheier MF. Self-Regulation of Action and Affect. In: Handbook of Self-Regulation. New York: In: Vohs, K. and Baumeister, R.F., Eds., : Research, Theory, and Applications, The Guilford Press; 2011. p. 3–21.
17. Pintrich PR, De Groot E V. A Motivational Science Perspective on the Role of Student Motivation in Learning and Teaching Contexts. J Educ Psychol. 2003;95(4):667–86.
18. Huang J (Peter), Benson P. Autonomy, Agency and Identity in Foreign and Second Language Education. Chinese J Appl Linguist. 2013;36(1):7–28.
19. Kitsantas A. a. J Adv Acad. 2008;20(1):42–68.
20. Wolters CA, Won S, Hussain M. Examining the relations of time management and procrastination within a model of self-regulated learning. Metacognition Learn. 2017;12(3):381–99.
21. Ben-Eliyahu A, Linnenbrink-Garcia L. Integrating the regulation of affect, behavior, and cognition into self-regulated learning paradigms among secondary and post-secondary students. Metacognition Learn. 2015;10(1):15–42.
22. Hadwin AF, Winne PH, Stockley DB, Nesbit JC, Woszczyna C. Context moderates students’ self-reports about how they study. J Educ Psychol. 2001;93(3):477–87.
23. Cetin B. Academic Motivation And Self-Regulated Learning In Predicting Academic Achievement in College. J Int Educ Res. 2015;11(2):95–106.
24. Kulusakli E. Exploring self regulated online learning skills of EFL learners in distance education. Turkish Online J Distance Educ. 2022;23(1):86–96.
25. Jansen RS, van Leeuwen A, Janssen J, Kester L. Validation of the Revised Self-regulated Online Learning Questionnaire. Lect Notes Comput Sci (including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics). 2018;11082 LNCS:116–21.
26. Alhamami M. Beliefs about and intention to learn a foreign language in face-to-face and online settings. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2018;31(1–2):90–113.
27. Hood M. Bricks or clicks? Predicting student intentions in a blended learning buffet. Australas J Educ Technol. 2013;29(6):762–76.
28. Jansen RS, Leeuwen A Van, Janssen J, Conijn R, Kester L. Supporting learners ’ self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses Computers & Education Supporting learners ’ self-regulated learning in Massive Open Online Courses. Comput Educ [Internet]. 2019;146(January 2020):103771. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103771
29. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2021.
30. Eckhardt AL, DeVon HA. The MIXED framework: A novel approach to evaluating mixed-methods rigor. Nurs Inq. 2017;24(4):1–13.
31. Draucker CB, Rawl SM, Vode E, Carter-Harris L. Integration Through Connecting in Explanatory Sequential Mixed Method Studies. West J Nurs Res. 2020;42(12):1137–47.
32. Sugiyono. Wiac.Info-Pdf-Buku-Metode-Penelitian-Sugiyono-Pr_287184C379B531858Bcafefa4E2Bd86E. 2016.
33. Chakraborty A, Bhattacharya A, Mallick BK. Bayesian sparse multiple regression for simultaneous rank reduction and variable selection. Biometrika. 2020;107(1):205–21.
34. Elliott VF. The qualitative report : an online journal dedicated to qualitative research since 1990. Qual Rep. 2018;23(11):2850–61.
35. Latiffah N. SELF-REGULATED LEARNING AND ONLINE LEARNING : 2017;(October).
36. Mahmud, Yogi Saputra & German E. ONLINE SELF-REGULATED LEARNING STRATEGIES AMID A GLOBAL PANDEMIC : INSIGHTS FROM INDONESIAN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS Yogi Saputra Mahmud & 2 Emilius German Faculty of Humanities , President University , West Java , Indonesia. Malaysian J Learn Instr. 2021;2(2):45–68.
37. Al-hawamleh MS, Alazemi AF, Al-jamal DAH, Shdaifat S Al, Gashti ZR. Online Learning and Self-Regulation Strategies : Learning Guides Matter Online Learning and Self-Regulation Strategies : Learning. 2022;(April).
38. Albantani AM, Madkur A, Rozak A. Student Self Regulated Learning Strategy In Online Arabic Learning. J Arab Learn. 2022;5(1):179–91.
39. Atmoko A, Hitipeuw I. THE IMPACT OF SELF-ADJUSTMENT ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF THE THE IMPACT OF SELF-ADJUSTMENT ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT OF THE STUDENTS. ISLLAC J Intensive Stud Lang Lit Art, Cult. 2018;2(1):1–6.
40. Ahmed W. Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning : A Multivariate Multilevel Analysis. Int J Psychol Educ Stud. 2017;4(3):1–11.
41. Magay MVF, Gorospe JD. Motivation For Learning In Virtual Environments , Online Self-Regulated Learning , And Writing Performance Of OMSC Students. Int J Educ Res Soc Sci. 2020;1016–41.
42. Khiat H. motivation and reflection in learning. J Univ Teach Learn Pract. 2022;19(2):43–59.
43. Reinders IH, Lai C, Routledge PSE. Author version ( accepted ) Handbook of Language Teaching and Learning beyond the.
44. Heydarnejad T, Fatemi AH, Ghonsooly B. The Relationship between Critical Thinking , Self-regulation , and Teaching Style Preferences among EFL Teachers : A Path Analysis Approach. J Lang Educ. 2021;7(1):96–108.
45. Maksum, Arifin;Widiana, I Wayan & Marini A. Path Analysis of Self-Regulation , Social Skills , Critical Thinking and Problem- Solving Ability on Social Studies Learning Outcomes. Int J Instr. 2021;14(July):3.
46. Tinggi S, Negara S. The Effect of Goal Setting, Self Efficacy, Interest and Peer Support on Self Regulated Learning. TARBIYA J Educ MUSLIM Soc. 2020;7(1):88–101.
47. Locke E, Latham G. Goal-setting theory. In: Organizational Behavior 1. Routledge; 2015. p. 159–83.
48. Pritchard-Wiart L, Thompson-Hodgetts S, McKillop AB. A review of goal setting theories relevant to goal setting in paediatric rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(9):1515–26.
49. Forester GL, Thorns P, Pinto JK. Importance of goal setting in virtual project teams. Psychol Rep. 2007;100(1):270–4.
50. Latham GP. The motivational benefits of goal-setting. Acad Manag Perspect. 2004;18(4):126–9.
51. Awni, Nour & Dina F. FACTORS INFLUENCING LEARNERS ’ SELF-REGULATED LEARNING SKILLS IN A MASSIVE OPEN ONLINE COURSE ( MOOC ). Turkish Online J Distance Educ. 2019;20(3):1–16.
52. Wang C, Zhang F, Wang J, Doyle JK, Hancock PA, Mak CM, et al. How indoor environmental quality affects occupants’ cognitive functions: A systematic review. Build Environ. 2021;193:107647.
53. Mulang H. The effect of competences, work motivation, learning environment on human resource performance. Golden Ratio Hum Resour Manag. 2021;1(2):84–93.
54. Sam-Kalagbor VO. Perceived influence of school physical facilities on students’ academic performance in public secondary schools in Rivers State. Int J Innov Soc Sci Educ Res. 2021;9(1):46–59.
55. Baafi RKA. School physical environment and student academic performance. Adv Phys Educ. 2020;10(2):121–37.
56. Cayubit RFO. Why learning environment matters? An analysis on how the learning environment influences the academic motivation, learning strategies and engagement of college students. Learn Environ Res. 2022;25(2):581–99.
57. Steiner HH. The Strategy Project : Promoting Self-Regulated Learning through an Authentic Assignment. Int J Teach Learn High Educ. 2016;28(2):271–82.
58. Fatwa I, Rofiq Z. Relationship between Student Activity Unit Involvement and Cumulative Achievement Index of Students at the Departement of Mechanical Engineering Education, State University of Medan. In: 3rd International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2018). Atlantis Press; 2019. p. 280–3.
59. Adeniji SM, Ameen SK, Dambatta BU, Orilonise R. Effect of mastery learning approach on senior school students’ academic performance and retention in circle geometry. Int J Instr. 2018;11(4):951–62.
60. Murwaningsih T, Fauziah M, Astuti D. Improving concept mastery through learning media with interactive conceptual instruction approach viewed from learning style. In (Vol. , No. 1). . In: AIP Conference Proceedings. 2023. p. 1–13.
61. Cimermanová I. The Effect of Learning Styles on Academic Achievement in Different Forms of Teaching. Int J Instr. 2018;11(3):219–32.
62. Azizah MNM. HUBUNGAN ANTARA MANAJEMEN WAKTU DAN REGULASI DIRIDENGAN KECANDUAN SMARTPHONE. Empati-Jurnal Bimbing dan Konseling. 2021;8(2):82–98.
63. Ningsih RS, Usman O. THE INFLUENCE OF TIME MANAGEMENT ON ACADEMIC PROCRASTINATION MEDIATED BY SELF-REGULATED LEARNING IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMI AT SMK PGRI 1 JAKARTA. J Pendidik Ekon PERKANTORAN DANAKUNTANSI. 2022;7(4):120–8.
64. Khiat H. Using automated time management enablers to improve self-regulated learning. Act Learn High Educ. 2022;23(1):3–15.
65. Ingkavara T, Panjaburee P, Srisawasdi N, Sajjapanroj S. The use of a personalized learning approach to implementing self-regulated online learning. Comput Educ Artif Intell. 2022;3:100086.
66. Omer MM, Mohd-Ezazee NM, Lee YS, Rajabi MS, Rahman RA. Constructive and destructive leadership behaviors, skills, styles and traits in BIM-based construction projects. Buildings. 2022;12(12):2068.
67. Hwang GJ, Wang SY, Lai CL. Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Comput Educ. 2021;160:104031.
68. Xu J, Du J, Wang C, Liu F, Huang B, Zhang M, et al. Intrinsic motivation, favorability, time management, and achievement: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Learn Motiv. 2020;72:101677.
69. Zimmerman BJ, Greenberg D, Weinstein CE. Self-regulating academic study time: A strategy approach. In: Self-regulation of learning and performance. 2023. p. 181–99.
70. Karabenick SA, Dembo MH. Understanding and Facilitating Self-Regulated Help Seeking. Wiley Online Libr. 2009;(126):33–43.
71. Doll CM, Michel C, Rosen M, Osman N, Schimmelmann BG, Schultze-Lutter F. Predictors of help-seeking behaviour in people with mental health problems: a 3-year prospective community study. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21:1–11.
72. McLaren T, Peter LJ, Tomczyk S, Muehlan H, Schomerus G, Schmidt S. The Seeking Mental Health Care model: prediction of help-seeking for depressive symptoms by stigma and mental illness representations. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):69.
73. Wetcho S. Fostering Pre-Service Teachers ’ Reflection in Self-Regulatory Process Through Socio-Emotional Collaborative Note-Taking in the mCSCL Environment. Contemp Educ Technol. 2021;13(4).
74. Atmojo SE, Muhtarom T, Lukitoaji BD. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia THE LEVEL OF SELF-REGULATED LEARNING AND SELF-AWARENESS IN SCIENCE LEARNING IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ERA. J Pendidik IPA Indones. 2020;9(4):512–20.
75. Itzchakov G, Latham GP. An Examination of the Moderating Efect of Core Self-Evaluations and the Mediating Efect of Self-Set Goals on the Primed Goal-Task Performance Relationship. Appl Psychol. 2020;69(4):1248–1270.
76. Gurbuz, Costigan R, Teke K. Does being positive work in a mediterranean collectivist culture? Relationship of core selfevaluations to job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and commitment. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(1):226–241.
77. Ahn J, Lee S, Yun S. Leaders’ Core Self-evaluation, Ethical Leadership, and Employees’ Job Performance: The Moderating Role of Employees’ Exchange Ideology. J Bus Ethics. 2018;148(2):457–470.
78. Chen H, Liu F, Wen Y. The influence of college students’ core self-evaluation on job search outcomes: Chain mediating effect of career exploration and career adaptability. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(18):15696–707.
79. Martínez V, Mon MA, Álvarez M, Fueyo E, Dobarro A. e‐Self‐Assessment as a Strategy to Improve the Learning Process at University. Educ Res Int. 2020;2020(1):3454783.
80. Lenski S, Elsner S, Großschedl J. Comparing construction and study of concept maps–An intervention study on learning outcome, self-evaluation and enjoyment through training and learning. In: Frontiers in Education. 2022. p. 892312.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Nur Wangid, Isti Yuni Purwanti, Sugiyanto, Chici Pratiwi, Ratna Hidayah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
