Machine learning approach to predict delay in smart infusion pump
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2022243Keywords:
Infusion Pump, SVR, Kernel, Prediction, Delay, Flow RateAbstract
Wireless smart infusion pumps are currently under development. It is critical to ensure that the patient receives the correct drug concentration. Practically, the performance of the pump has relied on the minimum startup delay. The minimization of the startup delay is prominent in open-type infusion pumps and rarely in closed types. The emphasis on reducing startup delay puts practitioners and caregivers at ease while ensuring patient safety. The startup delay of the infusion pump is based on the flow rate and the lag time. The prediction of the flow rate and lag time for an infusion pump is necessitated to ensure a safe drug dosage for the patient. Currently, machine learning methods and computational methods to predict the desired parameter are widely used in healthcare applications and medical device performance. The reduction of start-up delay can be achieved by predicting its associated parameters lag time and flow rate. The flow rate is dependent on the speed of the infusion pump, which has to be calculated based on the number of gears and revolutions. The speed of the pump has to be predicted for accurate flow delivery. Our present research attempts to predict the lag time of an infusion pump using different kernel functions of support vector regression (SVR). The performance of the SVR for each kernel function is compared with R2, RMSE, MAE, and prediction accuracy. The prediction accuracy of 99,7 % has been obtained in optimized SVM
References
1. Smith EA, Gray G. Developing a Smart Infusion Pump Dedicated to Infusion Safety. Ergonoics in Design 2022;30:4–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804620944760.
2. Brown TD, Michael M, Grady DS. Implementation of Smart Pump Technology With Home Infusion Providers: An Assessment of Clinician Workflow and Patient Satisfaction. Journal of Infusion Nursing 2018;41:344. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000302.
3. Banerjee A, Gupta SKS, Fainekos G, Varsamopoulos G. Towards modeling and analysis of cyber-physical medical systems. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies, New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2011, p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2093698.2093852.
4. Parker MJ, Lovich MA, Tsao AC, Deng H, Houle T, Peterfreund RA. Novel Pump Control Technology Accelerates Drug Delivery Onset in a Model of Pediatric Drug Infusion. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2017;124:1129. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001706.
5. Capogna G, Camorcia M, Stirparo S, Farcomeni A. Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia: The Effects on Maternal Motor Function and Labor Outcome. A Randomized Double-Blind Study in Nulliparous Women. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2011;113:826. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822827b8.
6. Snijder RA, Konings MK, Lucas P, Egberts TC, Timmerman AD. Flow variability and its physical causes in infusion technology: a systematic review of in vitro measurement and modeling studies. Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik 2015;60:277–300. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2014-0148.
7. Bequette BW. 2 - Control in Physiology and Medicine. In: Carson E, Cobelli C, editors. Modelling Methodology for Physiology and Medicine (Second Edition), Oxford: Elsevier; 2014, p. 13–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-411557-6.00002-1.
8. Kim UR, Peterfreund RA, Lovich MA. Drug Infusion Systems: Technologies, Performance, and Pitfalls. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2017;124:1493. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001707.
9. Samarah S. A Data Predication Model for Integrating Wireless Sensor Networks and Cloud Computing. Procedia Computer Science 2015;52:1141–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.148.
10. Elenkov M, Ecker P, Lukitsch B, Janeczek C, Harasek M, Gföhler M. Estimation Methods for Viscosity, Flow Rate and Pressure from Pump-Motor Assembly Parameters. Sensors 2020;20:1451. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20051451.
11. Sidey-Gibbons JAM, Sidey-Gibbons CJ. Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2019;19:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0681-4.
12. Ramírez J, Monasterio V, Mincholé A, Llamedo M, Lenis G, Cygankiewicz I, et al. Automatic SVM classification of sudden cardiac death and pump failure death from autonomic and repolarization ECG markers. Journal of Electrocardiology 2015;48:551–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.04.002.
13. Jove E, Gonzalez-Cava JM, Casteleiro-Roca J-L, Quintián H, Méndez Pérez JA, Vega Vega R, et al. Hybrid Intelligent Model to Predict the Remifentanil Infusion Rate in Patients Under General Anesthesia. Logic Journal of the IGPL 2021;29:193–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzaa046.
14. Pano-Azucena AD, Tlelo-Cuautle E, Tan SX-D. Prediction of chaotic time series by using ANNs, ANFIS and SVMs. 2018 7th International Conference on Modern Circuits and Systems Technologies (MOCAST), 2018, p. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MOCAST.2018.8376560.
15. Zhao J, Kong K, Hei X, Tu Y, Du X. A Visible Light Channel Based Access Control Scheme for Wireless Insulin Pump Systems. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2018, p. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2018.8422827.
16. Absalom AR, Mason KP. Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Target Controlled Infusions. New York: Springer Cham; 2017.
17. Snijder RA. Physical causes of dosing errors in patients receiving multi-infusion therapy. Ph.D. Thesis. Utrecht University, 2016.
18. Kovačević Ž, Gurbeta Pokvić L, Spahić L, Badnjević A. Prediction of medical device performance using machine learning techniques: infant incubator case study. Health Technol 2020;10:151–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-019-00386-5.
19. Wright K. How to calculate drug doses and infusion rates accurately. Nursing Times 2017:1–11. https://doi.org/113,10.
20. Yu D, Hsu KY, Kim JH, DeLaurentis P. Infusion pump informatics approach to quantify impact of alerts and alarms on healthcare delivery. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2017;2017-Octob:681–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601657.
21. Brindley J. Undertaking drug calculations for intravenous medicines and infusions. Nurs Stand 2018;32:55–63. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2018.e11029.
22. Snijder RA, Konings MK, van den Hoogen A, Timmerman AMDE. Impact of Physical Parameters on Dosing Errors due to a Syringe Exchange in Multi-Infusion Therapy. Pharmaceutical Technology in Hospital Pharmacy 2017;2:85–96. https://doi.org/10.1515/pthp-2017-0002.
23. Kanwal S, Khan B, Ali SM, Mehmood CA, Rauf MQ. Support vector machine and Gaussian process regression based modeling for photovoltaic power prediction. Proceedings - 2018 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology, FIT 2018 2019:117–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIT.2018.00028.
24. Guo N, Gui W, Chen W, Tian X, Qiu W, Tian Z, et al. Using improved support vector regression to predict the transmitted energy consumption data by distributed wireless sensor network. Eurasip Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking 2020;2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-020-01729-x.
25. Alamelu J V, Mythili A. Smart infusion pump control – The control system perspective . Computational Intelligence in Healthcare Springer, Cham, 2021 199-211 n.d.:1–13.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jayakumar Venkata Alamelu, Asaithambi Mythili (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
