Integrated Wastewater Treatment Technology: Efficiency of Lime and Eichhornia crassipes for Agricultural Irrigation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2024.1313

Keywords:

Agricultural Wastewater Treatment, Phytotechnology, Lime, Water Hyacinth, Rural Water Management, Sustainable Agriculture

Abstract


Introduction: wastewater treatment for irrigation is a pressing challenge in rural areas, especially in communities where agriculture depends on contaminated water sources. This study focused on developing a low-cost, sustainable technology tailored to the needs of vulnerable populations.
Methods: the efficiency of a combined treatment using lime and water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was evaluated in Joa, Ecuador. A completely randomized experimental design was employed to assess changes in key physicochemical parameters, including electrical conductivity, hardness, pH, nitrates, and sulfates, before and after the treatments.
Results: water hyacinth reduced water hardness significantly, from 218 mg/L to 154 mg/L of CaCO₃, while lime controlled pH, maintaining it near neutral (7,4) with precise dosing. Despite these improvements, the combination showed limitations in reducing nitrates and sulfates to meet local regulatory standards. Nevertheless, the treatments enhanced overall water quality, making it more suitable for agricultural purposes.
Conclusions: the combined use of lime and water hyacinth represents a feasible, eco-friendly solution for treating agricultural wastewater in resource-constrained settings. While effective in improving water quality, further studies are needed to optimize the system, explore scalability, and evaluate its long-term impact on soil and crop productivity

References

1. FAO. El agua y la agricultura: perspectivas globales y desafíos locales. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura; 2020. Disponible en: http://www.fao.org

2. UNESCO. Informe mundial sobre el desarrollo del agua: valorar el agua. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura; 2021. Disponible en: https://unesdoc.unesco.org

3. Silva J. Wastewater treatment and reuse for sustainable water resources management: a systematic literature review. Sustainability. 2023;15(14):10940.

4. Belhaj D, Jerbi B, Medhioub M, Zhou JL, Kallel M, Ayadi H. Impact of treated urban wastewater for reuse in agriculture on soil properties and crop productivity. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23:15877–87.

5. Banco Mundial. Gestión de recursos hídricos en América Latina y el Caribe: retos y oportunidades. 2020. Disponible en: https://www.worldbank.org

6. Singh AK. A review of wastewater irrigation: environmental implications. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021;168:105454.

7. Yadav R, Joshi H, Tripathi S. Achieving sustainable agriculture with treated municipal wastewater. Int J Biol Biomol Agric Food Biotechnol Eng. 2015;9:644–7.

8. Sarkar S, Mandal A, Das S, Banerjee S. Decentralized wastewater treatment using low-cost biochar-based filters: a sustainable approach for rural communities. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev. 2020;10(4):785–95.

9. Tetteh EK, Rathilal S, Muchatibaya G, Armah EK. Low-cost sand filters for potable water supply in sub-Saharan Africa: review and recommendations. Water Pract Technol. 2019;14(3):648–58.

10. Ahmed MT, Gad AA, Mousa RM. Low-cost wastewater treatment technologies for improving water quality and agricultural productivity in rural Egypt. Agric Water Manag. 2020;242:106392.

11. Khan S, Shahnaz M, Jehan N, Rehman S, Shah MT, Din I. Drinking water quality and human health risk in Charsadda district, Pakistan. J Clean Prod. 2019;208:1188–97.

12. Okumu SO, Mwangi SN, Njagi ENM, Wandiga SO. Environmental implications of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) proliferation and its control in Lake Victoria. Environ Monit Assess. 2018;190(6):351.

13. López-Morales CA, Sánchez-Cerón L, Romero-Fernández MG. Rural water management in Latin America: role of affordable technologies in sustainable agriculture. J Rural Stud. 2020;77:197–206.

14. López ME, Sánchez FG, Romero CJ. Evaluating the long-term effects of hybrid wastewater treatment technologies on rural agricultural soils. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(8):4864–73.

15. Rezania S, Ponraj M, Din MFM, Songip AR, Sairan FM, Chelliapan S. The diverse applications of water hyacinth with main focus on sustainable energy and production for new era: an overview. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2014;41:943–54.

16. Seguil LD, Vergara AJ, Morales ER. Application of lime in heavy metal removal from industrial wastewater: a critical review. J Environ Chem Eng. 2022;10(1):106489.

17. Zhang Z, Chen H, Zhang W, Tian X. Decentralized wastewater treatment technologies in rural China: current status and perspectives. J Clean Prod. 2021;319:128580.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Castro Landin AL, Domínguez Gálvez DL, Bernal Alavá Ángel F, Pino Tarragó JC. Integrated Wastewater Treatment Technology: Efficiency of Lime and Eichhornia crassipes for Agricultural Irrigation. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 30 [cited 2025 Jun. 22];4:.1313. Available from: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/1313