Cardiovascular risk control in public transport drivers: Proposal for a theoretical model of protective motivation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt2024.1295Keywords:
Heart Disease Risk Factors, Motivation, Drivers, Models, NursingAbstract
Introduction: In Mexico, the mortality rate for cardiovascular diseases is 146.3 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants; ischemic forms are prominent. Public transport drivers are a vulnerable group to develop this disease due to the working conditions to which they are exposed. The objective is to propose a theoretical model of protective motivation for the control of the risk of cardiovascular disease in public transport drivers.
Methods: A literature search was conducted in databases on the application of the protective motivation theory and the risk of cardiovascular disease, in Spanish and English.
Results: The theoretical model was formed by the variables of perceived vulnerability, perceived severity, fear, self-efficacy, perceived efficacy, threat assessment, coping assessment, protection motivation and behavior (control of cardiovascular disease risk).
Conclusions: The proposed model is an alternative to explain individual behaviors that could motivate individuals to take action in favor of their health, given the perception of threats and the coping skills that can influence the control of cardiovascular disease risk. Using the protective motivation model in nursing practice could contribute to modifying behaviors that position individuals to improve their health status.
References
1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2017). Enfermedades cardiovasculares. Enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). Organización Mundial de la Salud. https://www.who.int
2. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). (2024). Estadísticas de defunciones registradas (EDR) 2023. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/saladeprensa/boletines/2024/EDR/EDR2023_Dtivas.pdf
3. Becerra BC, Jara JM. Riesgo cardiovascular en conductores de transporte público de la empresa el Rápido S.A. [Tesis de Licenciatura]. Lima, Perú: Universidad de Ciencias y Humanidades; 2021. Disponible en: https://repositorio.uch.edu.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12872/593/Becerra_BC_Jara_JM_tesis_enfermeria_2021.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
4. Bello SA. Riesgo cardiovascular y factores ocupacionales en los conductores de transporte público en Bogotá. Rev Colomb Salud Ocup. 2017;7(2):61-67. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.18041/2322-634X/rc_salud_ocupa.2.2017.4955.
5. Chávez AE, Peña MI, Gongora JF. Factores de riesgo cardiovascular en conductores del transporte público en la ciudad de Campeche. AMMCI, Memorias de Congresos. 2023; 2(6):318-329.
6. Pérez-Villacastín J, Macaya C. Coincidiendo con la pandemia, la mortalidad cardiovascular vuelve a crecer. Sociedad Española de Cardiología; 2021.
7. Timmis A, Vardas P, Townsend N, Torbica A, Katus H, De Smedt D, et al. European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2021. Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 22;43:716-799. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab892.
8. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, Carballo D, Koskinas KC, Bäck M, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3227-3337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484
9. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association (NANDA). Diagnósticos de enfermería: Definiciones y clasificación 2021-2023. 12ª ed. Nueva York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2021.
10. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Directrices para la evaluación y el manejo del riesgo cardiovascular. Washington, D.C.: OPS; 2010.
11. Melo Barbosa OP. Enfermedad cardiovascular: creencias y prácticas en la adherencia al tratamiento. Rev Cienc Cuid. 2018;15(2):164-176.
12. Gómez Baraza MC, Pibernat-Mir L, Silva-Castro MM. Creencias de pacientes con riesgo cardiovascular sobre la efectividad de las medidas higiénico-dietéticas y los tratamientos farmacológicos. Rev Clin Med Fam [Internet]. 2021 ; 14(2) :118-119. Disponible en : https://doi.org/10.23938/ISSN2386-8201.
13. Cadena Estrada JC, Gonzáles Ortega Y. El cuidado de enfermería en pacientes con riesgo cardiovascular sustentado en la teoría de Nola J Pender. Investig Enferm Imagen Desarr. 2017;19(1):107-121. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.ie19-1.ecep.
14. Rogers R. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In: Social psychology: A sourcebook. New York: Guilford Press; 1983. p. 153-176.
15. Moorhead, S., Swanson, E., Johnson, M., & Mass, M. (2018). Clasificación de Resultados de Enfermería. 6a ed. Elsevier.
16. Arias-Meléndez C, Comte-González P, Donoso-Núñez A, Gómez-Castro G, Luengo-Martínez C, Morales-Ojeda I. Condiciones de trabajo y estado de salud en conductores de transporte público: una revisión sistemática. Med Segur Trab. 2022;67(265):278-297.
17. Ururi Y, Illanes D, Mamani Y, Abasto D. Asociación entre actividad física y riesgo cardiovascular en conductores de transporte público de Cochabamba. Rev Cient Cienc Med. 2018;22(1).
18. Camargo-Escobar F, Gómez-Herrera O, López-Hurtado M. Riesgo cardiovascular en conductores de buses de transporte público urbano en Santiago de Cali, Colombia. Rev Col Salud Ocup. 2013;3(3):18-22.
19. Ezati Rad R, Mohseni S, Kamalzadeh Takhti H, Hassani Azad M, Shahabi N, Aghamolaei T, et al. Application of the protection motivation theory for predicting COVID-19 preventive behaviors in Hormozgan, Iran: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):466. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10500-w.
20. Yan Y, Jacques-Tiura AJ, Chen X, Xie N, Chen J, Yang N, et al. Application of the protection motivation theory in predicting cigarette smoking among adolescents in China. Addict Behav. 2014;39(1):181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.027. Epub 2013 Oct 2. PMID: 24157424; PMCID: PMC3966196.
21. Jaafarzadeh Haghighifard N, Mojadam M, Ehrampoush MH, Morowatisharifabad MA, Abdullatif Khafaie M, Fallahzadeh H. Protective strategies among patients with cardiovascular diseases against dust phenomenon exposure in Ahvaz city based on the protection motivation theory. Environ Health Eng Manag. 2021;8(1):1-8. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.34172/EHEM.2021.01.
22. Chamroonsawasdi K, Chottanapund S, Pamungkas RA, Tunyasitthisundhorn P, Sornpaisarn B, Numpaisan O. Protection motivation theory to predict intention of healthy eating and sufficient physical activity to prevent Diabetes Mellitus in Thai population: A path analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021;15(1):121-127. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.12.017.
23. Fernández Silva CA, Antiñirre Mansilla B, De La Hoz Chávez VC. Autoeficacia y satisfacción de los usuarios con diabetes tipo 2 de un centro de salud chileno. Rev Cuid. 2020;11(2). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.15649/cuidarte.933.
24. Ritland R, Rodriguez L. The Influence of Antiobesity Media Content on Intention to Eat Healthily and Exercise: A Test of the Ordered Protection Motivation Theory. J Obes. 2014;2014:954784. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/954784.
25. Ruthig JC. Health Risk Perceptions and Exercise in Older Adulthood. J Appl Gerontol. 2016;35(9):939-959. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464814544214.
26. Lin H, Chen M, Yun Q, Zhang L, Chang C. Protection motivation theory and smoking quitting intention: findings based on structural equation modelling and mediation analysis. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):838. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13263-0.
27. Dulock HL, Holzemer WL. Substruction: Improving the Linkage from Theory to Method. Nurs Sci Q. 1991;4(2):83-87. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1177/089431849100400209.
28. Ferrer R, Klein W. Risk perception and health behavior. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015;5:85-89. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.012.
29. Rimer B. Models of individual health behavior. En: Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. 4a ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.
30. Dashti S, Dabaghi P, Tofangchiha S. The effectiveness of training program based on protective motivation theory on improving nutritional behaviors and physical activity in military patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2020;9(7):3328. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_70_20.
31. Rahaei Z, Eshghi S, Afkhami F, Khazir Z. Determinants of Self-care Behaviors in Diabetic Patients in Yazd: An Application of the Protection Motivation Theory. J Educ Community Health. 2022;9(2):104-110. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.34172/jech.2022.16.
32. Sabzmakan L, Ghasemi M, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Kamalikhah T, Chaleshgar Kordasiabi M. Factors Associated with Tobacco Use among Iranian Adolescents: An Application of Protection Motivation Theory. Subst Use Misuse. 2018;53(9):1511-1518. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2017.1415356.
33. Rahmwan FA, Yueniwati Y, Suharsono T. Perception of severity level and decision making of family correlation toward departing interval of patient suffering ischemic stroke. Malang Neurol J. 2020;6:63-68. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.mnj.2020.006.02.3.
34. Onu R, Babatunde S. Perceived severity of diabetes and associated factors among patients attending a referral hospital in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6(6):1856-1661. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20181964.
35. Champion V, Skinner C. The health belief model. En: Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4a ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008.
36. Mazloomy SS, Dashti S, Salehi A, Fallahzadeh H, Soltani MH. Determinants of Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) among Prehypertension Individuals: An Application of Protection Motivation Theory. Med Sci. 2019;23(96):244-249.
37. Norman P, Boer H, Seydel ER. Protection motivation theory. En: Conner M, Norman P, editores. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005.
38. Abdollahi S, Mahmoodabad SM, Lotfi M, Ardakani SY. Development and validation of a questionnaire based on the protection motivation theory to predict cigarette smoking preventive behavior in the Iranian university students. J Educ Health Promot. 2023;12(1):12. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1566_21.
39. Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: Theoretical approaches and a new model. En: Schwarzer R, editor. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1992. p. 217-243.
40. Rodríguez-Santamaría Y, Juárez-Medina LL, Zúñiga-Vargas ML, Cadena-Santos F, Mendoza-Catalán G. Hombres con diabetes mellitus tipo 2: autoeficacia y factores psicológicos que influyen en el autocuidado. Enferm Univ. 2020;17(1). Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.22201/eneo.23958421e.2020.1.707.
41. Guerrero JM, Sánchez JG, López VM. Efecto de los factores protectores sobre los estilos de vida saludable en pacientes con riesgo cardiovascular: un análisis de ruta. Av Psicol Latam. 2020;38(1):100-117.
42. Boss S, Galletta D, Lowry P, Moody G, Polak P. ¿A qué deben temer los usuarios de sistemas? Utilizar apelaciones al miedo para generar amenazas y miedos que motiven conductas protectoras de seguridad. MIS Q. 2015;39(4):837-864.
43. Floyd DL, Prentice-Dunn S, Rogers RW. A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2000;30:407-429.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Diana Cristina Navarro Rodríguez, Milton Carlos Guevara Valtier, José Francisco Góngora EK, Silvia Guadalupe Soltero Rivera, Martha Pérez Fonseca (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
