Immersive versus conventional technologies in neuroanatomy teaching

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251250

Keywords:

Learning, Augmented Reality, Distance, Education, Medical, Virtual Reality

Abstract

Introduction: The study of immersive technologies in education has gained relevance due to its potential to improve learning. Objective: Compare the perceptions of two groups of students about immersive and traditional learning methods, with the intention of identifying the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Method: A prospective cross-sectional quantitative correlational investigation was carried out. The non-probabilistic sample included 56 students of the degree in Medical Surgeon of the Juárez Autonomous University of Tabasco (UJAT), enrolled in the February-August 2024 school year. Two groups of 28 students were considered: one with traditional learning and the other with immersive learning. Structured questionnaires were used to assess information retention, participation, and application of knowledge in simulated clinical scenarios. Results: The traditional group considered it more important to have a good memory to pass (46.43% vs. 39.29% in Group H) and felt that teachers paid more attention to the memorized information. The Immersive group reported less pressure on the quality of work (39.29%) but also perceived a greater workload (39.29%). Both groups mentioned teachers' lack of interest in listening to student opinions and had a mixed perception about understanding the course objectives. There were significant associations between good teaching, clear objectives, generic skills, independence, and overall course satisfaction. Conclusions: The main challenge for university teachers is to develop programs that integrate immersive technologies, which requires economic investment and greater applied research.

References

Díaz Delgado D. El aprendizaje inmersivo mediante juegos de entrenamiento en ambientes de realidad virtual en la medicina. Revista de investigación de Sistemas e Informática. 2022 Dec 30;15(2):13–8. https://doi.org/10.15381/risi.v15i2.23836

2. Prince Torres ÁC. El aprendizaje inmersivo como alternativa educativa en contextos de emergencia. PODIUM. 2022 Dec 27;(42):19–38. https://doi.org/10.31095/podium.2022.42.2

3. Sain ZH. Modern Technologies: The Use and Role of Immersive Classroom in Teaching and Learning and its Implications on Educational Management. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen, Ilmu Sosial dan Politik. 2024 Aug 7;1(3):118–27. https://doi.org/10.69623/j-emspol.v1i3.14

4. Oliech Owidi S, K. Omieno K, Nabwire Lyanda J. Exploring the Potential of Immersive Technologies to Enhance Online Learning Experiences and Engagement: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT). 2024 Oct 3;1862–71. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP1144

5. Alizadeh M. Exploring Engagement and Perceived Learning Outcomes in an Immersive Flipped Learning Context. International Journal in Information Technology in Governance, Education and Business. 2024 Sep 18;6(2):1–14. https://doi.org/10.32664/ijitgeb.v6i2.155

6. Jagatheesaperumal SK, Ahmad K, Al-Fuqaha A, Qadir J. Advancing Education Through Extended Reality and Internet of Everything Enabled Metaverses: Applications, Challenges, and Open Issues. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 2024;17:1120–39. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3358859

7. Toca Torres CE, Carrillo Rodríguez J. Los entornos de aprendizaje inmersivo y la enseñanza a ciber-generaciones. Educação e Pesquisa. 2019;45. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-4634201945187369

8. Ramsden P. A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education. 1991 Jan;16(2):129–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079112331382944

9. Jacobs C, Foote G, Joiner R, Williams M. A Narrative Review of Immersive Technology Enhanced Learning in Healthcare Education. International Medical Education. 2022 Oct 15;1(2):43–72. https://doi.org/10.3390/ime1020008

10. Frese M, Rowland J, Cregan-Evans N. Enhancing Continued Medical Education with Shared Immersive Spaces. In 2023. p. 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30566-5_10

11. Zhao G, Fan M, Yuan Y, Zhao F, Huang H. The comparison of teaching efficiency between virtual reality and traditional education in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2021 Feb;9(3):252–252. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2785

12. Liu JYW, Yin Y-H, Kor PPK, Cheung DSK, Zhao IY, Wang S, et al. The Effects of Immersive Virtual Reality Applications on Enhancing the Learning Outcomes of Undergraduate Health Care Students: Systematic Review With Meta-synthesis. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 6;25:e39989. https://doi.org/10.2196/39989

13. Răducu CM. LEARNING STRATEGIES AND SCHOOL MOTIVATION IN EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING VS. TRADITIONAL LEARNING. In 2021. p. 153–7. https://doi.org/10.36315/2021inpact032

14. Alfalah SFM, Falah JFM, Alfalah T, Elfalah M, Muhaidat N, Falah O. A comparative study between a virtual reality heart anatomy system and traditional medical teaching modalities. Virtual Real. 2019 Sep 27;23(3):229–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0359-y

15. Elfaki N, Abdulraheem I, Abdulrahim R. Impact of E-Learning vs Traditional Learning on Student’s Performance and Attitude. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences [Internet]. 2019;8:76–82.

16. Bray L, Spencer S, Pearson E, Meznikova K, Hepburn D. Assessing the Impact of Immersion on Learning in Medical Students: A Pilot Study Comparing Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Virtual Simulation. Simul Gaming. 2023 Oct 15;54(5):576–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781231189287

17. Nazim R, Raja Yaacob RAI, Che Mohd Hashim AJ, Hussain IA, Roslan A. Intensifying Experiential Learning with Dynamic Learning Styles in Traditional Classroom. jtet [Internet]. 2019 Sep. 26 [cited 2024 Dec. 5];11(4). Available from: https://penerbit.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JTET/article/view/3183.

18. Ditzel LM, Hogarth K, Lesa R. Immersive learning in nursing education: Results of a study. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2017 Jan 10;7(5):120. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v7n5p120

19. Soelistya D, Julhadi J, Rahmi S, Priyatiningsih N, Siregar M, Supriatna U, et al. The Effect of Immersive Learning on Students’ Cognitive and Affective Aspects. Stud Media Commun. 2023 Apr 11;11(5):79. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v11i5.6072

20. Wu J. Application Exploration of Immersive Teaching Method in Medical Experiment Teaching. In: 2021 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Technologies in Education (CSTE). IEEE; 2021. p. 32–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSTE53634.2021.00014

21. Mystakidis S, Lympouridis V. Immersive Learning. Encyclopedia [Internet]. 2023 Mar 27;3(2):396–405. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3020026

22. Yang P, Liu Z. The Influence of Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) on Skill Transfer of Learners: The Moderating Effects of Learning Engagement. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). 2022 May 24;17(10):62–73. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i10.30923

23. Kleinert R, Heiermann N, Plum PS, Wahba R, Chang D-H, Maus M, et al. Web-Based Immersive Virtual Patient Simulators: Positive Effect on Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Nov 17;17(11):e263. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5035

24. Heirich MS, Sinjary LS, Ziadni MS, Sacks S, Buchanan AS, Mackey SC, et al. Use of Immersive Learning and Simulation Techniques to Teach and Research Opioid Prescribing Practices. Pain Medicine. 2019 Mar 1;20(3):456–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pny171

25. Ovunc SS, Yolcu MB, Emre S, Elicevik M, Celayir S. Using Immersive Technologies to Develop Medical Education Materials. Cureus. 2021 Jan 12; https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12647

26. Olivares R, Henríquez R, Simpson C, Binvignat O, González M, Conejeros L, et al. Evaluación de la Percepción del Proceso de Enseñanza y Aprendizaje de un Curso de Morfología Humana por parte de Estudiantes de un Programa para Talentos Académicos. International Journal of Morphology. 2014 Mar;32(1):141–6. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022014000100024

27. Buenfil Paredes HF. Experiencias inmersivas: herramientas de aprendizaje en educación básica basadas en realidad virtual. Revista Electrónica sobre Tecnología, Educación y Sociedad. 2022 Jul 11;9(18):1–13.

28. Bonnin C, Pejoan D, Ranvial E, Marchat M, Andrieux N, Fourcade L, et al. Immersive virtual patient simulation compared with traditional education for clinical reasoning: a pilot randomised controlled study. J Vis Commun Med. 2023 Apr 3;46(2):66–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453054.2023.2216243

29. Muntahir MI, Sukaridhoto S, Basuki DK, Putri Nourma Budiarti R, Al-Hafidz IA, Dewi Fajrianti E, et al. Implementation of Immersive Technology on Medical Education. In: 2022 International Electronics Symposium (IES). IEEE; 2022. p. 651–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/IES55876.2022.9888379

30. Graham KL, Glassman and R, Davis RB, Ayub M, Libman H, Reynolds E. Effect of an Immersive Primary Care Training Program on Educational and Clinical Outcomes in an Internal Medicine Residency Training Program: Meeting the Training Needs of a Modern-Day Physician Workforce. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Aug 8;37(11):2634–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07101-z

31. Blanchard EE, Riesenberg LA, Bergman LB, Brown MR, O’Hagan EC, Patel SJ, et al. Comparing traditional, immersive simulation with Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice in postgraduate year 2 anesthesiology residents. Advances in Simulation. 2021 Dec 26;6(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00174-0

32. González Aspera AL, Chávez Hernández G. La realidad virtual inmersiva en ambientes inteligentes de aprendizaje. Un caso en la educación superior. Revista ICONO14 Revista científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías emergentes. 2011 May 30;9(2):122. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v9i2.42

33. Sadia Choudhury Shimmi, M. Tanveer Hossain Parash, Fairrul Masnah @ Kadir. Curriculum for Undergraduate Medical Sciences: Traditional, Integrated or Both. Borneo Journal of Medical Sciences (BJMS). 2023 May 31;17(2):1–3. https://doi.org/10.51200/bjms.v17i2.4367

34. Lateef F. Blended learning in emergency medicine: implementing the e-learning component. South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education. 2014 Jun 23;8(1):60. https://doi.org/10.4038/seajme.v8i1.126

35. Hodgson HJF. Learning in Medicine. BMJ. 1994 Jun 11;308(6943):1579–1579. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1579

36. Selvakumar S, Sivakumar P. Immersive Learning: Unlocking the Future of Education. Thiagarajar College of Preceptors Edu Spectra. 2023 May;5(S1):12–20. https://doi.org/10.34293/eduspectra.v5is1-may23.003

Downloads

Published

2025-01-04

How to Cite

1.
Priego Álvarez HR, Córdova Hernández JA, Lizcano Sánchez M, Camacho Ramos RH, Cornelio Ferrer YE, Fernández Quintana Q. Immersive versus conventional technologies in neuroanatomy teaching. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología [Internet]. 2025 Jan. 4 [cited 2025 Jan. 15];5:1250. Available from: https://sct.ageditor.ar/index.php/sct/article/view/1250