End-of-life Palliative Care: Lived Experiences and Beliefs of Healthcare Professionals with a Focused Ethnography Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251192Keywords:
Terminal Care, Palliative Care, Health Personnel, Medical Ethics, Qualitative ResearchAbstract
Introduction: This study explores the experiences and beliefs of healthcare professionals working in end-of-life palliative care in Catalonia, Spain. Recognizing the complex emotional, psychological, and ethical challenges they face, the research aims to deepen understanding of the facilitators and barriers within their clinical practices.
Objective: The aim of this research was to explore the lived experiences and beliefs of end-of-life palliative care professionals in a palliative care Unit in Catalunya, Spain.
Methods: A qualitative approach was used, focusing on focused ethnography to capture the nuanced realities of healthcare dynamics in palliative care. Seven healthcare professionals (six nurses and one physician) from a public hospital’s palliative care unit participated. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analyzed via thematic coding to identify recurring themes and subthemes.
Results: Analysis revealed two primary themes: "Beliefs associated with palliative care clinical practice" and "Lived experiences of working in palliative care." Each theme encompassed individual and interpersonal factors. Key facilitators included coping strategies and teamwork, while barriers involved emotional stress, proximity to death, and resource limitations.
Conclusion: The findings underscore the need for institutional support to address the psychological and practical challenges in palliative care. By acknowledging the multifaceted demands on these professionals, targeted interventions can enhance both professional resilience and patient care quality. Further, the study highlights the importance of comprehensive, empathetic training to improve the social visibility and understanding of the psychosocial aspects of end-of-life care
References
1. Moreno-Milan B, Cano-Vindel A, Lopez-Dóriga P, Medrano LA, Breitbart W. Meaning of work and personal protective factors among palliative care professionals. Palliat Support Care. 2019;17(4):381–7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S147895151800113X
2. Generalitat de Catalunya. Departament de Salut - DS. Pla estratègic d'atenció pal·liativa especialitzada de Catalunya: bases del model de futur [Internet]. 2023 [citado el 11 de diciembre de 2024]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11351/9183
3. Luna-Meza A, Godoy-Casasbuenas N, Calvache JA, Díaz-Amado E, Gempeler Rueda FE, Morales O, et al. Decision making in the end-of-life care of patients who are terminally ill with cancer - a qualitative descriptive study with a phenomenological approach from the experience of healthcare workers. BMC Palliat Care. 2021;20(1):76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00768-5
4. Viftrup DT, Hvidt NC, Prinds C. Dignity in end-of-life care at hospice: An Action Research Study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2021;35(2):420–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12872
5. Lind S, Bengtsson A, Alvariza A, Klarare A. Registered nurses' experiences of caring for patients in hospitals transitioning from curative to palliative care: A qualitative study. Nurs Health Sci. 2022;24(4):820–7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12982
6. Bennardi M, Diviani N, Gamondi C, Schulz PJ. Palliative care utilization in oncology and hemato-oncology: A systematic review of cognitive barriers and facilitators from the perspective of healthcare professionals, adult patients, and their families. BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19:47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00556-7
7. McPherson S, Mitchell AK, Sletten I, Kvande ME, Steindal SA. Haematological nurses' experiences about palliative care trajectories of patients with life‐threatening haematological malignancies: A qualitative study. Nurs Open. 2023;10(5):3094–103. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1558
8. Morrow SL. Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52(2):250–60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
9. Morse JM. Underlying Ethnography. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(7):875–6. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316645320
10. Morrow SL. Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology: Conceptual Foundations. Couns Psychol. 2007;35(2):209–35. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286990
11. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2008. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
12. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter; 1967.
13. Sapeta P, Centeno C, Belar A, Arantzamendi M. Adaptation and continuous learning: integrative review of coping strategies of palliative care professionals. Palliat Med. 2022;36(1):15–29. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163211047149
14. Khonsari S, O'Neill C, Mayland CR, Gilmour F, Aitken M, McKeown A, et al. Views of Care at End of Life: A Secondary Analysis of Online Feedback Using Care Opinion. J Patient Exp. 2022;9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735221103029
15. Wu YH, Hsieh HY, Kuo YL, Wu CY. The experiences and needs of nurses providing home-based palliative care: A qualitative meta-synthesis. J Palliat Care. 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597221105167
16. Pringle J, Johnston B, Buchanan D. Dignity and patient-centred care for people with palliative care needs in the acute hospital setting: A systematic review. Palliat Med. 2015;29(8):675–94. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216315575681
17. Hughes S, Lewis S, Willis K, Rogers A, Wyke S, Smith L. Participants' experiences of and perceived value regarding different support types for long-term condition self-management programmes. Chronic Illn. 2021;17(3):242–56. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395319869437
18. Mundle R. Learning from experiences of feeling heard: A qualitative study of hospice volunteers. Illn Crisis Loss. 2021;29(1):37–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1054137318764682
19. Bag B. The use of humor in palliative care services. J Psychiatr Nurs. 2021;12(2):173. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14744/phd.2021.54036
20. Nunes IR, José H, Capelas ML. Grieving with humor: a correlational study on sense of humor and professional grief in palliative care nurses. Holist Nurs Pract. 2018;32(2):98–106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000255
21. Alexe D, Bălan E, Rus M. The relationship between stress and the use of humour as a coping mechanism in nurses. The “Black Sea” Journal of Psychology. 2023;14(4):1–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.47577/bspsychology.bsjop.v14i4.260
22. Rose J, Glass N. An investigation of emotional wellbeing and its relationship to contemporary nursing practice. Collegian. 2009;16(4):185–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2009.08.001
23. Cichoń J, Płaszewska‐Żywko L, Kózka M. Emotional intelligence and coping strategies among intensive care unit nurses. Nurs Crit Care. 2023;28(2):322–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12839
24. Hui D, Hannon BL, Zimmermann C, Bruera E. Improving patient and caregiver outcomes in oncology: Team-based, timely, and targeted palliative care. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(5):356–76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21490
25. Rattner M. Navigating the Intangible: Working With Nonphysical Suffering on the Front Lines of Palliative care. Omega (Westport). 2020;81(4):670–84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222818797171
26. Koper I, Pasman HRW, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. Experiences of Dutch general practitioners and district nurses with involving care services and facilities in palliative care: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):841. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3644-2
27. Leung L. Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. J Family Med Prim Care. 2015;4(3):324–7. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Micaela Reich, Natalie Figueredo-Borda, Mirliana Ramírez-Pereira (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
