What Are the Learning Obstacles in Students' Algebraic Thinking During the Introduction of Plane Geometry Material?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251160Keywords:
Learning obstacles, algebraic thinking, squares and rectanglesAbstract
This research addresses the challenges elementary students face in developing algebraic thinking skills, particularly during the introduction of plane geometry topics such as squares and rectangles. Algebraic thinking, essential for identifying patterns, relationships, and generalizations, is often hindered by various learning obstacles. Using a qualitative approach with Didactical Design Research (DDR), data were collected through tests, interviews, and document studies. The research involved 30 second-grade students, with six selected for detailed unstructured interviews to confirm their responses. The findings highlight five major learning obstacles: (1) difficulty understanding word problems, (2) difficulty representing problems mathematically, (3) difficulty in measurement and calculations, (4) challenges in communicating solutions, and (5) inability to generalize solutions. These results emphasize the need for improved didactic designs that address learning obstacles and foster algebraic thinking. The study offers actionable insights for enhancing mathematics education in elementary schools.
References
1. Pratiwi V, Herman T, Lidinillah DAM. Upper Elementary Grades Students’ Algebraic Thinking Ability in Indonesia. IJAEDU- Int E-Journal Adv Educ. 2018;III(9):705–15.
2. Andini W. Pengembangan Desain Didaktis Untuk Mengantisipasi Learning Obstacles Berpikir Aljabar Di Sekolah Dasar. AL-TARBIYAH J Pendidik (The Educ Journal). 2020;30(2):135–50.
3. Kaput JJ. Linking representations in the symbol systems of algebra. Res issues Learn Teach Algebr (pp 167-194) Routledge. 2018;
4. Windsor W. Algebraic Thinking: A Problem Solving Approach. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia; 2010.
5. Reys RE, Lindquist M, Lambdin D V., Smith NL, Rogers A, Cooke A, et al. Helping Children Learn Mathematics, 2nd Edition. John Wiley and Son Australia; 2017.
6. Alghtani OA, Abdulhamied NA. The effectiveness of geometric representative approach in developing algebraic thinking of fourth grade students. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2010;8(5):256–63.
7. Junarti, Sukestiyarno YL, Mulyono, Dwidayati NK. The profile of structure sense in abstract algebra instruction in an Indonesian mathematics education. Eur J Educ Res. 2019;8(4):1081–91.
8. Yildiz A, Baltaci S. Reflections from the Lesson Study for the Development of Techno-Pedagogical Competencies in Teaching Fractal Geometry. Eur J Educ Res. 2017;volume-6-2017(volume6-issue1.html):41–50.
9. Aprianti DA, Hidayat S. Desain Didaktis Pengelompokan Bangun Datar Untuk Mengembangkan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Kelas II Sekolah Dasar. PEDADIDAKTIKA J Ilm Pendidik Guru Sekol Dasar. 2016;3(1):150–8.
10. Permatasari D, Harta I. Kemampuan Berpikir Aljabar Siswa Sekolah Pendidikan Dasar Kelas V Dan Kelas Vii: Cross-Sectional Study. J Pendidik dan Kebud. 2018;3(1):99.
11. Radford L. The Emergence of Symbolic Algebraic Thinking in Primary School. Glob Evol an Emerg F Res Pract. 2018;3–25.
12. Syamsulrizal S, Juniati D. Analisis Penalaran Geometri Pada Siswa SD. J e-DuMath. 2022;8(2):58–65.
13. Zahroh SN, Lidinillah DAM, Ade R. Desain Didaktis Konsep Luas Daerah Persegi Dan Persegi Panjang Kelas III Sekolah Dasar. PEDADIDAKTIKA J Ilm Pendidik Guru Sekol Dasar. 2016;3(2):281–91.
14. Apriani IF, Turmudi T, Jupri A, Syaodih E. Profil Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. J Basicedu. 2023;7(1):509–22.
15. Pratiwi V, Herman T, Suryadi D. Algebraic thinking obstacles of elementary school students: A Hermeneutics-phenomenology study. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019.
16. Sidik GS, Suryadi Di, Turmudi. Learning Obstacle of Addition Operation Whole Number in Elementary Schools. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021;1842(1).
17. Mazroza A. Kesulitan Belajar Matematika: Faktor dan Solusinya. Jakarta: Graha Media; 2013.
18. Anggoro S. Pengantar Pendidikan Matematika. Jakarta: Graha Ilmu; 2015.
19. Ferdiansyah F. Metodologi Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya; 2017.
20. Windsor W. Algebraic Thinking : A Problem Solving Approach. Proc 33rd Annu Conf Math Educ Res Gr Australas. 2010;33:665–72.
21. Reys RE. Helping Children Learn Mathematics: 2nd Australian Edition. Australia: Wiley; 2017.
22. Basir MA, Waluya SB, Dwijanto, Isnarto. How Students Use Cognitive Structures to Process Information in the Algebraic Reasoning? Eur J Educ Res. 2022;11(2):821–34.
23. Johar R, Sasalia P, Desy, Ramli M, Walker HCO. Preservice Teachers’ Noticing Skills in Relation to Student Misconceptions in Algebra. Eur J Educ Res. 2023;12(2):865–79.
24. Brousseau G. Theory of Didactical Situation in Mathematics. USA: Kluwer Academic Publisher; 2002.
25. Sidik GS, Maftuh A, Salimi M. Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika pada Siswa Usia 6-8 Tahun. J Obs J Pendidik Anak Usia Dini. 2021;5(2):2179–90.
26. Walle V de, J. A. K, S. K, Bay-Williams JM. Elementary and middle school mathematics: teaching developmentally (7th ed.). Allyn & Bacon; 2010.
27. Zahrah RF, Febriani WD. a Contextual Problem Based of Local Wisdom Improve the Ability To Solving a Word Problem Mathematics Students of Elementary School. PrimaryEdu - J Prim Educ. 2020;4(1):55.
28. Nurjanah D, Nurjanah E, Hasan AF, Nabila A, Ariany RL. Kontribusi sejarah aljabar Babilonia dan aljabar Arab terhadap berpikir aljabar. J Anal [Internet]. 2021;7(2):112–23. Available from: http://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/analisa/article/view/8231%0Ahttp://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/analisa/article/download/8231/6531
29. Suryadi D. Landasan Filosofis Penelitian Desain Didaktis (DDR). Bandung: Pusat Pengembangan DDR Indonesia; 2019.
30. Suryadi D, Mulyana E, Suratno T, Dewi DAK, Maudy SY. Monograf Didactical Design Research. Bandung: Rizky press; 2016.
31. Suryadi D. Penelitian Desain Didaktis (DDR) Dan Implementasinya. Bandung: Gapura Press; 2019.
32. Desmita. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosda Karya; 2008.
33. Rahardjo, B., & Waluyati T. Pembelajaran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2011.
34. Piaget J, Inhelder B. The Psychology of the Child. Basic Books; 1967.
35. Vygotsky LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.
36. Aulia Ilma Z, Turmudi T. Optimalisasi Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa Melalui Project-Based Learning Berbantuan Software Geogebra. Judika (Jurnal Pendidik Unsika). 2021;9(2):163–80.
37. Hanifah N, Koeswanti HD, Sadono T. Penerapan Model Project Based Learning guna Meningkatkan Keterampilan Representasi Matematis Peserta Didik Kelas IV. J Ilm Profesi Pendidik. 2021;6(1):54–9.
38. Gagatsis A, Elia I. The effects of different modes of representation on the solution of one-step additive problems. Learn Instr. 2007;17(6):658–72.
39. Cartwright K. Analyzing students’ communication and representation of mathematical fluency during group tasks. J Math Behav [Internet]. 2020;60(October):100821. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100821
40. Baki M. The Development of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching of Mathematics Teachers in Lesson Analysis Process. Eur J Educ Res. 2016;volume-5-2016(volume5-issue4.html):165–72.
41. Hodiyanto H. Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. AdMathEdu J Ilm Pendidik Mat Ilmu Mat dan Mat Terap. 2017;7(1):9.
42. Yuniarti Y. Pengembangan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. EduHumaniora | J Pendidik Dasar Kampus Cibiru. 2016;6(2):109–14.
43. Cahyani ND, Sritresna T. Kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita. J Inov Pembelajaran Mat PowerMathEdu. 2023;2(1):103–12.
44. Piaget J. The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International. Universities Press.; 1952.
45. Zahrah RF, Suryana Y. Pendekatan Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasae. J Tunas Bangsa. 2019;6(1):69–75.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Geri Syahril Sidik, Tria Antiya, Riza Fatimah Zahrah, Ika Fitri Apriani, Moh Salimi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
